What happened with seeing women's panties on cartoon shows?

File: ohno.jpg (56KB, 481x448px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 481x448px

You really can't post Totally Spies as an example of this.

They had everything. Cat Clover best Colver

>>93349478
I think you meant fat Clover

File: hnnggg.jpg (30KB, 423x317px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 423x317px

>>93349459
Feminism something something cultural marxism

>>93349459
Because when are panty shots not creepy?

>>93349612
Japan maybe?

>>93349459
because Americans are repressed Puritans

They just end of sexualizing things like women's underwear by making it taboo to show/see it

>>93349697
America is the global center of pornography on Earth

>>93349612
When you're a man

>>93349697
>>93349737
Both of these things are true. In fact, one is related to the other.

>>93349737
yeah and Osama Bin Laden was found with a massive porn stash

repressed people love shit like porn, they just can't bare to express anything sexual publicly and they also tend to see even the tiniest things as sexual

>>93349800
>>93349794
>>93349737
This.
The more a person represses something that comes naturally, the more their urges for whats being repressed will be.

>>93349737
I wanna argue this but I can't-
We absolutely DOMINATE this field.

>>93351190
A shame 99% of real porn is absolute trash.

>>93349459
That's some chastity belt.

File: Typical_Morning_Loud_House.png (3MB, 1920x1090px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1090px

>>93349459
>What happened with seeing women's panties on cartoon shows?


We traded in that wretched degeneracy for pic related.

File: Screen_Shot_2012-07-18_at_6.19.46_PM.png (217KB, 398x360px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 398x360px

>>93353590
Funny, since Loud House is the cartoon of recent memory to plenty of girl undies.

That's what having a show about 10 girls will do for ya

>>93353590
Do you think he peeks at his older sisters?

>>93349459
three letters: S J W

File: jXY30I0.gif (2MB, 452x358px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 452x358px

>>93354069
SJWs wouldn't care. Feminists though...

>>93349459
I have a much more thought provoking question for you to contemplate,
Why the hell would you want to see women's panties in cartoons in the first place?

>>93354189

Aren't they the same thing these days? SJWs have co-opted the feminist movement IIRC.

>>93354240
It's the principle. If leotards and swimsuits are acceptable, underwear shouldn't have a problem.

>>93349612
>when are panty shots not creepy?

why are they creepy?

>>93349612
creepy...in which universe?

>>93353804
Incest is wincest

>>93354069
When do you think this trend started? I think you have a bad concept of time, this is an old issue bud.

>>93353804
>just his older sisters