Thread replies: 7
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
tim the tool man taylor
uhhh. lucky god 2017-06-15 09:32:36 Post No. 93230626
[Report] Image search: [Google]
uhhh. lucky god 2017-06-15 09:32:36 Post No. 93230626
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: maxresdefault[3].jpg (49KB, 1280x720px) Image search:
[Google]
![maxresdefault[3].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/NcOBxX0.jpg "maxresdefault[3]")
49KB, 1280x720px
how did Disney get away with this?
>>
They outsourced the animation to a completely different studio, going so far as to have that studio produce and distribute the film outside of the Disney banner.
>>
>>93230626
>people are mistaking Dreamworks for Disney now
>>
>>93230626
By being Dreamworks.
>>
>>93230626
It wasn't Disney, but instead Dreamworks, and it was in the early 90s. Dreamworks at the time was aiming for slightly more serious animated films, after coming off the heels of the 1980s which had been darker and a bit more grim. Dreamworks had already done The Prince of Egypt which was not a kid film, despite not being overly adult in its content.
The 90s was also much more permissive of jokes and innuendo, especially from a studio that had close ties to Warner Brothers.
>>
>>93230626
>disney
off yourself thanks
>>
File: IMG_1696.gif (303KB, 765x551px) Image search:
[Google]
303KB, 765x551px
>>93230626
Nice bait fag
Thread posts: 7
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2