Thread replies: 8
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
Jumpman (ID: !!wPhlyh8seG+)
Wonder Woman Soars On Saturday; Mummy Still Crummy 2017-06-11 12:30:30 Post No.
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Wonder Woman Soars On Saturday; Mummy Still Crummy 2017-06-11 12:30:30 Post No.
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: landscape-1489502614-wonder-woman-new-poster.jpg (71KB, 980x490px) Image search:
[Google]
71KB, 980x490px
Wonder Woman Soars On Saturday; Mummy Still Crummy
Jumpman (ID: !!wPhlyh8seG+)
2017-06-11 12:30:30
Post No.
[Report]
>Warner Bros./DC’s Wonder Woman continues to be the popular ticket with her second Saturday of $23.8M +51% over Friday. This now puts the Patty Jenkins-directed movie on course for a second weekend of $57.2M, which by the way is more than what Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice and Suicide Squad both made in their second weekends (respectively $51.3M and $43.5M). That’s remarkable when you consider that both titles posted bigger opening weekends ($166M, $133.6M) than Wonder Woman ($103.2M).
>Should these figures maintain their pace into tomorrow, Wonder Woman‘s second weekend will be down 45%, which is an amazing hold for a superhero movie beating the 50%-60% average decline we typically see for Marvel fare in its sophomore session. The Gal Gadot movie should stand at $205M by EOD Sunday. Among all WB/DC superhero features’ second weekends at the B.O., Wonder Woman will file behind Dark Knight ($75.1M) and Dark Knight Rises ($62.1M).
>In updated ComScore/Screen Engine PostTrak audience polls this weekend, women continue to lead the charge into Wonder Woman screenings at 55% with women over 25 numbering 32%, and women under 25 repping 23% of all moviegoers. Thirty-two percent of those under 25 are watching Wonder Woman in a group — with two to four friends. The DC female superhero movie still has an awesome 75% definite recommend.
http://deadline.com/2017/06/wonder-woman-whipping-tom-cruise-mummy-weekend-box-office-1202111169/
>>
but muh dc drop
>>
I've heard that The Mummy is doing very well in China.
>>
>>93137631
It's doing very well outside US.
http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=mummy2016.htm
>>
>>93137642
Not well enough. From the same article.
>Because of the date-and-date opening, number of territories, and number of screens, of course, it will be Cruise’s largest worldwide opening. But what does that mean? It’s not the result of the picture’s strength or Cruise’s drawing power, rather it is driven by the new opening paradigm in the marketplace. And it certainly has nothing to do with profitability, which is what matters.”
>>
>>93138126
Because Deadline's writer has a hardon for hating Tom Cruise specifically. Probably for his "religious" connections if you could call it that besides all the sexist headlines they keep writing for WW in general.
More telling is that WW is having trouble keeping up with The Hunger Games:
Mockingjay - Part 2 which ended just above $281 in the States
>>
>>93138235
WW has a lesser budget. It should balance things out in terms of profitability.
>>
see Universal? this is the power of great movie, no one cares about your lame setup of dark universe if you didn't make a good movie first
Thread posts: 8
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1