Is it simply too dated to be enjoyable today?

>>93110672
No.

>>93110672
Absolutely not. Looney tunes is timeless.

No, Time Warner is just run by morons who can't keep a property that most of the other faceless media conglomerates would KILL to own in people's faces anymore

>>93110689
That's wrong. The outdated vernacular and references to actors would fly over anyone's head today.

>>93111173
Son, I say, son, you're about as sharp as a bag of wet mice.

>>93111173
And yet it remains enjoyable.

>>93110672

Just watched through a 4disc set. Aside from references to actors and politics of the time, Looney Tunes remains gut-busting.

>>93110672
Fuck no.

>>93110672
I would go so far as to say it's still the greatest cartoon series of all time.

>>93111173
Then you go online and look the reference up, lazy shit. I didn't know who Ned Sparks was until Warner Brothers cartoons. See, they're educational.

>>93110672
Loney tunes? no.
Tiny toons? yes.

>>93112377
Who's gonna take the time and do that? Kids won't give a shit. How many kids or even teenagers are gonna sit through these and find them funny? The last generation who probably enjoyed them was back in the 80's and early 90's.

>>93112377
I wouldn't even know their names. They rarely say who they are.

>>93112447
Shittiest opinion I've seen the past few days. Get b8