ITT: When posters and DVD covers look deceptively better than

File: image.jpg (3MB, 1974x2306px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1974x2306px

>>93073494
It's not an animation, but this thread topic is too niche to pass up the opportunity to post this

>>93073543
this seemed like a fun idea, what was bad about it?

File: allegro.jpg (124KB, 590x892px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 590x892px

This movie was great and all, but I had kind of a different idea of what the animation and art style would be like than how it turned out.

>>93073558
It's just like the box says, it looked like a generic family movie because it was a generic family movie. I didn't go see it because I'm not under the age of 12/ have children, but man what a good cover art that was wasted on this.

File: the neverending story cover.jpg (172KB, 736x1018px)

172KB, 736x1018px

>>93073543
>>93073807
It looks like it's just trying really hard to imitate a classic 80s movie and the hand drawn vhs covers that typically went with them. Which, yeah, I do wish more films would do because those covers and posters were great, just saying they seem to be doing it for a very specific reason.

Oh and before anyone gets the wrong idea, pic not related to the OP. Just illustrating a point. This movie is just about as good as its cover, in this case.

>>93073998
I wish the newer star wars posters better copied the previous ones

>>93074351
>implying Disney cares about SW beyond whoring out for money

>>93074388
Hence the wishing