New Yorker crap

>No meat touching ma'am.

>Bourgeoise feminism

Somebody forgot to tell this guy that the New Yorker's comics are meant to be charming and quaint.

>>93011122
Yeah, plus it fails the New Yorker universal caption test, wherein all New Yorker cartoons must be able to use the caption, "Christ, what an asshole!"

>>93010464
What nu-male is responsible for this?

>>93010464

T H I C C

File: meatwad gets it.jpg (37KB, 500x360px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 500x360px

>>93010464

>>93010464
>catwoman
>fighting supervillains

>>93011262
nah, i say it works here. They're clearly walking away from someone or at least 3 monster looking things

>>93011289

he signed his name right there on the art, you ass

TOM

or maybe it says FOIL, I can't tell

>>93011030

How kafkaesque

>>93010464
How did I know this was going to be Wonder Woman-related. Can't have an actual New Yorker thread, has to be company wars bs.

>>93011289
If it's not a jew I'll be shocked

File: Zchristwhatanasshole_011.jpg (31KB, 640x261px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 640x261px

>>93011316
The asshole should to be the center of attention, like in pic related.

>>93010464
Sexism is ingrained in Usa. Removing it, is removing America.

>>93011315
>catwoman
>not an anti-hero
Nigger, do you even read comics?

>>93011347
>How did I know this was going to be Wonder Woman-related

the thumbnail?

>>93011703
That's not what he said at all.

>A paper nobody reads anymore on the verge of death hires progressive millennials that work on the cheap.

Somebody make a cartoon about that.

>>93010464
There needs to be an edit where Captain underpants is in the background and the caption reads "Christ, what an asshole. "

File: on-my-way-home-today-on-the-bus-george-booth.jpg (148KB, 900x826px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 900x826px

Booth is the only good New Yorker cartoonist left alive, and when he goes there will be only god awful hacks like Roz Chast left

>>93011703
i'm pretty sure she has been a full blown mob boss since nu52

>>93012010
explain

File: ww.jpg (37KB, 633x337px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 633x337px

>>93010464

>>93010464
Why are their boobs all flopping out.

File: athineos016zq.jpg (539KB, 1064x1297px) Image search: [Google]

539KB, 1064x1297px

>>93012071

With Booth there's nothing to explain, his comics are only occasionally possessed of a punchline, the "joke" is that the guy's life is shit and hes telling this banal nonsense to a dog that doesnt understand or give a fuck. Like Charles Addams before him he usually crafts a weird, offputting situation to poke fun at daily life rather than trying to be ha-ha funny.

File: Addams+sad+movie[1].jpg (451KB, 1600x1469px) Image search: [Google]

451KB, 1600x1469px

This is the only New Yorker artist I'm acquainted with, because I'm a philistine who doesn't read newspapers.

>>93012184
>>93012199
>Charles Addams Hivemind

File: tumblr_ln11lakKzA1qzxelgo1_500[1].jpg (85KB, 500x476px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 500x476px

>>93012225
Forgot the image.

File: booth-tub052-992x1024.jpg (328KB, 992x1024px) Image search: [Google]

328KB, 992x1024px

>>93012184

Like, Booth has this whole series of comics, spanning literal decades, about his loser who sits in a bathtub pontificating loudly while his wife ignores him to do chores and an ever increasing number of cats lay about the house.

File: 2dee16f2cf2fd3066ceb8a5767bdb3c7.png (87KB, 235x220px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 235x220px

>>93012199

>>93011703
Didn't she murder a bunch of people?

>>93010464
Please tell me this is an edit.

>>93012434
I'm sure they were all misogynists, so it's fine.

>>93012363
>I wanna

>>93011262

I think that works better the actual caption they chose.

>>93012266
>ever increasing number of cats

That sounds amazing. Is there somewhere with the comics compiled?

>>93010464
This is actually funny to me. I view the caption as being ironic. It's like a shit-covered grin to feminists.

>>93012434
If you're talking about recently in Batman where she was accused of killing 200 something people, no, it was revealed she just took the blame for Holly.

>>93012434
No, she wanted to take the fall for her adoptive daughter/protege and they were terrorists.

>>93012021
Lasted like 10 issues, it wasn't like Black Cat, she was doing it as a Matches Malone style "keep your enemies close" schitck.

>>93010464
>Christ, what an asshole

>>93012107
That's because the man is telling the truth and, rather than accept that truth has no gender bias and that women don't have a monopoly on it, you label it mansplaining.

Mansplaining is just code for "you have a Y-chromosome-argument invalid".

>>93012958
he has a few collections out there, check libgen

>(((New Yorker)))
What do you expect? That city is the end result of the cultural marxist game. Soulless, dirty, crime infested, liberal, and devoid of culture.

>>93011100
this

>>93012363
>Sickos

I don't know dude. This thread seems to be making their case for them.

I remember my dad had an enormous book with literally every New Yorker cartoon ever made up until the early 2000s. I would spend entire days reading the whole thing cover to cover. It was interesting seeing how the comics changed over the course of almost a century.

>>93014127
Oh really

>>93012107

Is that the actual dialogue?

>>93010464
You sound triggered.

>>93014678
yes

>>93011289

Aren't you just adorable.

>>93012010
>>93012184
Does he also write Heathcliff?

File: torbjorn.png (1009KB, 1125x1100px) Image search: [Google]

1009KB, 1125x1100px

>>93011332
that clearly says "Torb"

>>93012107
"Mansplaining," "manspreading," anymore quirky non-issues I should know about?

>>93015025
Mansplaining is a real issue with a retarded quirky name that hopelessly dooms any argument it's used in.
If you're talked down and undermined, the constructive reaction isn't to try to do the same to your interlocutor. You just end up creating an endless cycle where the argument centers on itself without seeking a solution.

>>93012199
Based Uncle Fester

>>93010464
>and Catwoman too!
This is the type of comic that occurs when you have to make one every day.

>>93010464
All that power and you're still hurt by words.

>>93015130
>All that power and you're still hurt by words.

that would unironically be a better and more poignant caption

>>93015098
It's disingenuous to say that only men do this.

>>93015130
The wind doesn't carry away words. They linger forever. It's impossible to oppose them for they don't have a physical body you can attack. In a balanced community they are the deadliest weapon.

>>93015177
...they say as they weaponize language

>>93015171
Yes, but it's a problem when there's significant nepotism and tradition placing men in higher positions of power and then denying women the ability to climb up by unconciously treating them as inferior.
It's a very specific issue that doesn't really apply to "stop mansplaining to me how superpowers work", but it might be good to even argue about it at the level since it sets a precedent.

Ideally, it'd be nice if nobody was an asshole, of course. But that's the one thing that trascends all barriers.

>>93010464
>"YOU DIDN'T PROTECT A GOD DAMNED THING!"

>>93015171
no one here is saying that.
the core complaint, when you chop away all the shitposting for reblogs and self-aggrandization is that putting men in charge of women's health issues is like putting someone who has never had a job in their life in charge of worker's rights.

we're also saying that putting a 'quippy' label on it and letting than be applied to crap like internet arguments over if getting kicked in the cunt hurts more than being kicked in the nuts or not has completely undermined the capacity to talk about the actual legislative issues that can effect a woman's ability to be a healthy and fully contributive member of the workforce

>>93015130
As they say, "The pen is mightier than the sword". Words can influence how large groups of people think, feel, and behave, and in that sense, they're extremely powerful.

>>93014678
Yes, but they quickly realised it was stupid and didn't continue with that sort of garbage in mainline Wondie comics.

>>93015500
>crap like internet arguments over if getting kicked in the cunt hurts more than being kicked in the nuts or not
One of those is objectively more painful, though.

>>93015551
Sensation Comics was an anthology book. So it never affected Azzarello's Wonder Womanin the first place. Also, depending on when that issue was published, the next writer may have used that sort of preachy dialogue anyway. DC was pretty open about the title being an opportunity for people to use Diana as a mouthpiece.

>>93012263
>anon goes to watch a animeted movie alone

>>93012434
Only the first black mask that I know of

>>93010464
Feminist always need to inject their agenda.

>>93010464
>fighting misogyny

I don't get it, do publishing companies now just hire literally anyone, including those who don't know the definitions of the words they use?

I don't like crazy people hijacking Wonder Woman but at least she's a success.

>>93015546
The sword can remove those same people from existence
There's a reason no great conflicts are solved with rap battles or poetry contests

>>93016773
That's why America and the USSR nuked each other.

>>93011301
The New Yorker in a shellnut

File: Internet_dog.jpg (32KB, 300x335px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 300x335px

>>93010464
Reminder

>>93012107
Sensations Comics were a mistake.

>>93016773
A lone guy with a sword can't do much. If he wants whatever cause he's fighting for to succeed, he's going to have to convince other people to join him. Violent coercion is one way of controlling people, but it's not the only way, and often not the best way even from a self-interested standpoint.

And anyway, in Western society, interpersonal violence is almost never accepted. That makes ideas the main means of influencing people.

>>93015546
Pretty much. Amusingly, Donald Trump in a way is living proof of the power of words.

>>93010464
What the fuck.

>>93012184
Kinda spooky

File: spongebob batman.png (268KB, 594x515px) Image search: [Google]

268KB, 594x515px

>>93010464
Because they're mostly done by out of touch old guys.

>>93010464
Is this a meta joke because the artist drew Wonder Woman with massive tits and Catwoman with plunging cleavage, revealing it is in fact impossible to fight misogyny in the realm of fiction because the artist/writer will always be in control of their characters thereby depriving them of the agency needed to tackle real world problems?

Or is it just bland uninspired unfunny shit? Either way, those are some nice tits on Wondy.

>>93017604
This is a "lol fags" type of joke, isn't it.

>>93017744
Yes, yes it is. Batman and Robin gay jokes will never die.

>>93011703
>reading comics

>>93017756

This is why Damian is necessary. No one would joke about Batman fucking Robin if Robin is his actual son.

>>93017782
Most people don't know who Damian is, and they probably never will.

>>93015025
> needs it's own word to explain exactly what's going on
> non issue
Kek

>>93017782
>No one would joke about Batman fucking Robin if Robin is his actual son
No, they'd probably just find it hot.

>>93017816
I know this is probably bait, but those things don't need specialised descriptions. "mansplaining" is the same as "talking down to someone" and "manspreading" is the same as "sitting down when you have a cock and balls between your legs"

>>93015025
there another comic where some guy hero calls an alien baby a he and some female hero gets triggered about how assumed its gender. think it was marvel

>>93012263
"Look who has come out of his cave!"

>>93017782
Man, hold on to that innocence.

>>93013574
Congratulations, you've managed to interpret it exactly opposite to how it was intended.

>>93017782
Most people don't even know that there is more than one robin.

>>93017855
believe it was spiderman

File: 1461028201522.jpg (97KB, 1024x569px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 1024x569px

>>93010464
CATWOMAN IS A SUPERVILLAIN!!!

>>93018735
No, she's chaotic neutral. So she plays by her own rules.

>>93012184
damn....... This is deep.

>>93019513
>she plays by her own rules
sounds like villain talk to me

>>93012199
>4chan goes to see Requiem for a Dream

File: Political_chart.svg.png (41KB, 941x1024px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 941x1024px

>>93019513
>chaotic neutral
Are you so seriously retarded that you think that somehow precludes a character from being a hero, a villain, or anywhere in between? Even "lawful good" people can be villains. The entire lawful/chaotic good/evil two-axis characterization is reductionist and stupid. People are not RPG characters with stat bars, and fictional characters shouldn't be, either.

>>93010464
Meanwhile the artist also drew them half naked and extra-thicc.

I'm getting mixed messages here.

>>93011262
That would actually be a decent punchline to this cartoon.

>misogyny is a pathological hatred of women
>use it as a catch all term for any and all inconveniences women face

powerful, & really makes you think

The New Yorker is a publication for boomers, by boomers. Is there any wonder it's so boring and up its own ass?

File: roz-chast-dream-parents-new-yorker-cartoon.jpg (65KB, 473x473px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 473x473px

>>93012010
Roz Chast is not a hack. She's much funnier than any of the Booth comics you've posted in this thread

File: CwK59aXWIAA-zxX.jpg (148KB, 692x1000px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 692x1000px

>>93019838
>you can't draw sexy women and be a feminist

>>93012199
/tv/_goes_to_the_movies.jpg

File: 974837c0b56a60a356ba3322a8fe48e0.jpg (53KB, 500x732px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 500x732px

Post feminism

>>93019838
I dont know shit about feminist demographics but i'm pretty sure a lot of them are sex-positive (I think that's the term?)
I'm more worried that Catwoman kind of looks like boomhauer

>>93019828
which characters do you think best embody the four areas of the chart?

>>93019969
Sex-negativity has come back in a big way thanks to SJWs. uWu

Because like /pol/, no one at the New Yorker actually watched the movie before forming opinions of it that they needed to share with the world.

>>93020033
yeah, i know the thing about objectifying and all that
I don't really have anything else to add to this conversation though

>>93020033
Extremists of any stripe don't like people who choose to own their sexuality? In other news, water is wet.

>>93016773
But what drives the man to pick up the sword?

>>93010464
Catwoman is a supervillain. Or at least an antihero

>>93012263
This image is perfect for one banner of 4chan

Cuz you're too dumb to get it? Fucking love New Yorker comics.

>>93020262
Enlighten us oh wise one.

>>93020262
Boco more like Baka(Japanese for idiot) lmao

>>93020285

About what, the OP one?

>>93020354
Sure, go for it.

File: 10606236_797320943645087_8564765919343637768_n.jpg (37KB, 519x466px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 519x466px

>>93012363
I love uncle Fester.

>characters dressed like bodosomo complaining about misogyny

death to the west tbqh

>>93020385

Its another "lol, feminism" joke.

Not that funny, really.

>>93011301

>>93020551
So you're saying it's mocking feminist whining instead of celebrating it?

>>93020590

Kinda.

>>93019969
>which characters do you think best embody the four areas of the chart?
My point was that dividing characters up through two factors (good/evil and lawful/chaotic, or alternatively authoritarian/libertarian socialist/capitalist) is a false premise since people and fictional characters are more nuanced than that.

People don't have a "good/evil" slider in their head which is set at 0%, 100% or anywhere in the middle. Good and evil are abstract concepts. Same for lawful and chaotic, there's no slider, there may be patterns or averages. For example a murderer might be "less lawful" than a bank robber, but the distinction is arbitrary and reductionist. Maybe the murder was a crime of passion, while the bank robber is a career criminal. When you reduce complex behavior to a linear axis you're making things too simple, and you ignore all the nuances of characterization and behavior.

>>93012199
>4chan watches Schindlers List

>>93020821
>tfw I just wanted to read comics about libertarian/authoritarian capes
I semi-agree with you, but I don't know enough about morals to argue

>>93020975
Surely you have a moral code you live by?

Even if it's just "sit in the basement and surf 4chan".

>>93012266
>>93012010
>>93012184
So what you're telling us is that Booth is the best because there's nothing political in his comics? Even though The New Yorker comics are often throwbacks to our modern society.

>>93021145
I've never really had to make any effort to uphold it but i guess it would be something like "don't fuck with people"
goddamnit, i cant phrase my problems with your previous statements but it goes something along the lines of there being some value to simple categorizations of people

>mfw my anti-feminist post got deleted...

for real 4chan?

>>93020260
Very true

>>93020262
Fuck off Boco

>>93021476
>I've never really had to make any effort to uphold it but i guess it would be something like "don't fuck with people"

That's a pretty good moral code desu

>i cant phrase my problems with your previous statements but it goes something along the lines of there being some value to simple categorizations of people

Fair enough. I think there's some value, especially when you're having short discussions on image boards.

>>93012010
>disliking Roz Chast

It must be terrible to have such shit taste. I bet you don't even read the New Yorker.

>>93024131
>Fair enough. I think there's some value, especially when you're having short discussions on image boards.
i think that was my point, I just wanted some recommendations, not some ultimate, final decree of a character's moral alignment by some anon. I can probably decide that on my own after reading. I'm new to comics so that's why I'm asking btw

>>93014920
Well then the nu-male part was certainly correct.

Activision interns pls go

File: Captain America 333-009.jpg (451KB, 988x1500px) Image search: [Google]

451KB, 988x1500px

>>93024274
Oh.

In that case, I'd recommend Greunwald's 80's Captain America run, specifically the part where he introduces Super-Patriot/U.S.Agent, the right-wing superhero who replaces Steve for a while.

>>93025742
thanks mate

>>93019969
>I dont know shit about feminist demographics but i'm pretty sure a lot of them are sex-positive
Not the loud obnoxious ones who dominate all debates.

File: 1496714162318.jpg (599KB, 2048x2024px) Image search: [Google]

599KB, 2048x2024px

>>93011262

File: Injustice- Gods Among Us (2013)-084.jpg (2MB, 1988x3056px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1988x3056px

>>93025933
Also, the Injustice comic.
Related, also check out the Justice Lords episode of DCAU Justice League.

>>93027926
Legit funnier this way.

>>93025742
that page made me mis the smell of paper printed comics for some reason

>>93027926
That is legit better

>>93028932
Childhood memories?

Plain printed paper, the glossy paper they use these days smells different.

>>93028802
Who thought this exchange wouldn't be cringy?

File: fusilli-you-crazy-bastard-how-are-you-charles-barsott.jpg (129KB, 900x701px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 900x701px

I dunno why, but this is easily my favorite New Yorker comic.

File: 379787929.jpg (171KB, 1398x1048px) Image search: [Google]

171KB, 1398x1048px

>>93014827
Thank you, I try.
But this guy is clearly lacking in testosterone as many of these male feminists seem to do just look up a video of the guy.
The lack of muscle, the skinny frame, the relatively narrow shoulders, his very feminine soft way of speaking, his slumped shoulders, the lack of presence, he doesn't have the beard and balding features of the typical nu-male but his complete lack of masculinity is apparent to all.

>>93019969
>>93020033
You guys don't have the full picture, they are sex positive for women but simply sex negative for men.
Sexuality that women express? Good.
Sexuality that men express? Bad.
That's pretty much it, which is why the can seem to be hypocritical sometimes but really have one clear underlying double standard.

>>93013622
>This is what Red State Red Necks really believe.

>>93011100
Is there any other kind?
All the hard working women on oil platforms, in labs and on production floors have no time for such nonsense.

>>93013622
The fuck are you on about? The actual explanation is very in-line with what /pol/ would think and you still pull garbage out of your ass.

What actually happened is that the city sold itself to the banks.

The liberal nonsense that flows out of new york is just collective virtue signaling by the rich fucks who live there so they don't have to stare the fact that they're pricing everybody else out of the city in the face and come to terms with it.

>>93016796
Diplomacy didn't save the world either, idiot. Mutually assured destruction did. Even if you're a master swordsman you won't willingly fight another to the death without armor.

>>93017484
He's also proof that words will only get you so far.

>>93031014

if you're a pussy maybe

>>93012107
>People like the Wonder Woman movie
>We going to get dialogue like this for the next decade.
Kill me

File: autism released.jpg (172KB, 522x680px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 522x680px

>>93010464

Welp, my autism levels has gone through the roof.

I absolutely hate that this comic thinks that Wonder woman and Catwoman would ever get along.

Like, I get that they're one of the two most known DC women, but one is a literal cat burglar, and the other is a pure hearted heroine. They wouldn't be taking a stroll and talking with each other.

Secondly, Catwoman doesn't fight supervillains. She MAY help but fighting supervillains aren't her thing. She goes around stealing jewelry all the time. She wants to avoid fighting supervillains as much as she can.

Thirdly, why would Catwoman even care about fighting "misogyny" when all she'd care about is stealing gems and other priceless items? Why does Wonder Woman care about misogyny when her country is full of misandrists who have a strict no-men rule? They are literally the only country to have EVER existed to ban a gender. No man owned country has EVER done that. So Wonder Woman caring about misogyny is a load of bullshit.

>women earn 75% as much as men
>somehow misogyny isn't real

>>93032379
Do you unironically think that the wage gap is real?

>>93030274
What caused this epidemic lack of testosterone? Soy milk?

>>93011100
So feminism in general

>>93032468
If it wasn't, feminism wouldn't exist.

File: 1496563698250.png (63KB, 209x201px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 209x201px

>>93032545
Read a book, you fucking retard.

>>93032566
>a book written by men say men do no evil
meditating and learning from mother earth will teach you the truth of feminism

>>93032379
Women just don't take as many high paying jobs. There's no magical woman-hating minotaur taking money out of women's paychecks.

>>93016773
No, but good rhetorics and arguments and media campaigns have probably prevented a lot of shit from ever evolving into a great conflict

>>93012010
This makes me feel a little bit sad

>>93028802
>the chess pieces haven't even moved

Why even make this a comic if you're just going to copy and paste?

>>93030395
>Sexuality that women express? Good.
No, actually not always no. On tumblr for example there's a big movement against any kind of "toxic" or non-wholesome sexuality, where for example any ships where the other partner is over 18 and the other under are labeled pedophilia and people creating or even reblogging content SEXUALIZING MINORS (including fictional characters in their late teens who act quite sexual in canon) are labeled as glorifying and normalizing abuse and hurting survivors and generally being disgusting pedophiles etc. I've seen people get really intense over Reylo (19-29) or Otayuri (16-19) insisting that if you ship those your'e fucked in the head and essentially a pedo, for example

There's this weird sentiment that "normal" girls under 21 or whatever are sweet and pure inncocent babies who should be protected from icky sexual content and if you create content sexualizing young people (I don't mean kids, I mean 16-21) that's freaky and if you're interested in non-wholesome sexual content, you're sick.

So even if it's women drawing or writing sexual content it's horrible and should be blocked, reported and banned if it depicts characters under 18 or situations that are in any way whatsoever questionable. It's kinda puritanical.

>>93029861
Everyone but you, gungrabber.

>>93032589
Meanwhile
>books and articles written by women say men do all evil
Science is dead and widespread partisanism is pissing on its corpse. Whoop-fuckin'-doo.

Maybe EVERYBODY is at fault, not just Them...?

>>93012363
Interestingly enough the Adams Family started off as a New Yorker comic series

>>93032986
I'll never not find it funny how the Left are the puritans now.

File: Man-a-taur.png (146KB, 800x1600px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 800x1600px

>>93032591
>There's no magical woman-hating minotaur taking money out of women's paychecks.
And now there is

>>93035476
Bravo

I like how this is very relevant. Just above this post is Starfire spreading her legs and showing her asshole

>>93032986
Amazing how little difference there is between that and religious fundies bullying teenage girls for liking gay fanfic.

>>93035476
Gasp, we need a hero to save her!

>>93015025
manexisting

>>93035476
What a despicable scoundrel, some brave womyn needs to put an end to his rampage.

>>93032545
If the wage gap was real then nobody would hire men because you could get the same exact work for 25% less by hiring women.

>>93035476
good on you

>>93035476
WHO WILL STOP THE MAGICAL WOMAN-HATING MINOTAUR RAMPAGE?
WHO?

File: Sensible Chuckle.gif (995KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

995KB, 250x250px

>>93010464
>anti-misogyny cartoon
>lets draw these srs bsns women thicc, curvy, and with giant tits
I think I found the real joke. Sometimes you really have to think in order to understand the real jokes in these upper class comics. They're like onions, they have layers.

because it's the New yorker, can't get more up your ass than that