Choose

2008. 2012 design is too monkey-like, and the 2003 design is nothing special.

2012 > 2003 > 2008

>>92947248
2012

>>92947248
Ruffalo Hulk looks best, but Incredible Hulk is better. Maybe.

>>92947248
Can I not choose any? I like different parts from different adaptations, but overall each is lacking.

>>92947248
2008. 2003 looks too cartoony, and 2012 looks too ape like. Ruffalo is also really terrible.

eric bana was good but the movie was baaaaad

File: hqdefault.jpg (10KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 480x360px

Neither.

2012

2003 looks like a giant baby
2008 is too pretty and looks like he waxes his eyebrows

Handsome Hulk, Roids-incarnate Hulk or the one that looks like the Hulk? I'm gonna go with 2012. The face looks like the classic Hulk design from comics come to life and still recognizably like Ruffalo.

2008 >>> 2012 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2003

>>92947248
I enjoyed Ruffalo's performance the most, but I enjoyed the 2003 movie more than the other two.

>>92947248
2012 Hulk, 2003 Banner, 2008 HULK SMASH

>>92947248
2012. I love how meaty he is.

>>92947465
Kind of feels the same.
2012 is obviously much better visually, but I much prefer the facial features on 2008. He looks like a really angry animal, it can actually be somewhat scary.

>>92948521
not fair, keep best hulk out of the fight.

>>92947248
I wasn't too keen on 2012 at first, but it grew on me pretty fast, and now looking back at 2008 just looks weird still better than the bouncing green rubber hulk from 2003, even if Bana one looks more like the Hulk, so
2012>2008>2003

>>92948521
Bixby is cheating

>>92948521
this guy gets it