Good superhero films are back

>>92786404
They probably meant to say "knocked out", as she shows abou as much emotion.

>>92786404
Is it actually good or did people just "upboat because gril"?

>>92786438
its good unless you're a misogynist pig :^)

>>92786438
It's good but marvel shills will spin it the other way

>>92786404
>black

>>92786404
It's funny because there are stars in her costume

File: 04420b18-6e27-4257-a4b6-7587186011a4.jpg (369KB, 760x776px) Image search: [Google]

369KB, 760x776px

>>92786620
Am I allowed ONLY to like this shit?

File: Screenshot_2017-04-25-01-06-06.png (291KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

291KB, 960x540px

>>92786404
>Marvel has nothing but amazing reviews
>i-it doesn't matter! Their movies are shit!

>Warner has nothing but shit reviews
>i-it doesn't matter!
>suddenly they have a questionable movie, with good reviews
>l-look! Reviews matter! This mean that it is good!

I don't really understand you guys.

Almost got as good reviews as Ghostbusters.

>>92787040
Your lavish use of the s-stuttering meme indicates a full objective understanding of every side of the issue though. Can I support you on patreon?

>>92786620
They already tried
The other day some fag posted only the negative reviews while saying something like "it's bvs all over againg"

>>92786404
>worst DC hero gets best movie

It's not fair

>>92786404
Warner paid so much for these reviews. Gonna be funny when this movie flops like it deserves.

File: June 2nd.jpg (69KB, 919x612px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 919x612px

>>92786404
A WHOLE 6 REVIEWS!!

>>92787114
What is your issue with patreon to bring it up out of nowhere?

File: dc-josh.jpg (4MB, 2316x2886px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2316x2886px

>>92786404
He sure knows how to read the changing winds, doesn't he.

>>92787135
You left out that it was negative user reviews on fucking IMDB, most of which conveniently didn't mention anything about the plot.

>>92787175
>>92787161
Cringe, you're only upset because you lonely faggots don't have anyone to go with.

Sort you lives out

>>92787184
The IMDB forums had even more retarded company wars than here.

>>92787161
>marveldrones talking about bought reviews

Jesus christ

Guy>>92787143
>worst dc hero
Harley and the hot topics had a shit movie though, and yes she's essentially a hero nowadays, at least in the eyes of her fanbase

File: FJcGTlv.jpg (22KB, 484x461px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 484x461px

>>92786404
>overpowered hero sites with the bad guy in WW1

>>92786404
>Den of Geek
>those other literally who places
how long till the commercials use twitter posts as postive reviews

>>92787040
>Marvel has nothing but amazing reviews
>reviews are all that matter!

>Warner has nothing but shit reviews
>reviews are all that matter!

>suddenly they have a questionable movie, with good reviews
>i-it doesn't matter! Their movies are still shit!

goes both ways, faggot

>>92787923
I don't usually get involved in these, but Empire, Radio Times, Time Out, Total Film, literally who's? Are you literally retarded?

>>92786404
>Good superhero films are back

Well, yeah. Guardians already came out.

>>92786404

>Den of Geek
>Radio Times
>Empire
>Time Out
>Total Film
>some other shit I can't read

Yeah, totally amazing reviews.

File: 1458218054312.jpg (93KB, 299x343px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 299x343px

>>92787914
>Entente
>the bad guy
There has to be a good guy for there to be a bad guy.

>>92787982
It absolutely goes both ways but it is fucking hilarious how the use of Ghostbusters as a tool to invalidate reviews is now biting the defense of Wonder Woman in the ass.

File: 1486950840294.png (50KB, 754x724px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 754x724px

>>92786404
FUCK YOU THEY'RE ONLY PRETENDING TO LIKE IT BECAUSE IT HAS A WOMAN

B-B-BUT I'M NOT SEXIST THOUGH...

File: geoff-johns-rings.jpg (89KB, 300x325px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 300x325px

APOLOGISE

>>92787040
Reminds me of;

>Trailer is released
>"That looks like shit"
>"WAIT AND SEE! IT'S TOO EARLY TO JUDGE!"

>Trailer is released
>"That looks pretty good"
>"I AM SO GLAD YOU AGREE!"

>>92787713

To be fair, that doesn't even explain it. I've sabotaged every chance at a relationship int he last decade, and I'm still going to see the film alone with a spring in my step, because I'm loving the DCEU. And there is some awesome fast food right next door to the cinema. But mostly the DCEU. Wonder Woman will be my date for the evening, and best of all, at the end of the night she puts out.

File: CwMdBE5KXRoIBEBLAAoaDB0aBlwdABddFREMBwURWwxdQVVSREoaBgAaW0VTQkFXWl0NEQ0FEFkXBAQaCQ9fB1lbR1laHhUV.jpg (133KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 800x600px

Why are Marvel shills so petty and insecure? I thought RT scores were super reliable and the word of God considering how hard you were spamming them just a few weeks back.

>>92787143
No one cares about WW enough to read the source material and shit on this movie for it

Not being particularly partial to Marvel or DC, DC fans are easily the most pathetic when it comes to movie shit. Like it's really sad how desperate you guys are for these shitty movies to be less shitty.

Not being particularly partial to Marvel or DC, Marvel fans are easily the most pathetic when it comes to movie shit. Like it's really sad how desperate you guys are for these shitty movies to be less shitty.

>>92787914
>WW1
>Having good guys and bad guys
The whole war was nothing but a massive clusterfuck of treaties and generals yelling that their dick was bigger across no mans land, most the soldiers just wanted to go home to their wives and turnips but couldn't otherwise some fat dude who spent half an hour every morning waxing his mustache would shoot them.

>>92789619
that's treason, Darling!

>>92789494
I've always read The Big Three at DC just for continuity's sake. There have been great runs. George Perez's WW was fantastic. So was Gail Simone's. She has suffered from mediocrity in between classics, though.

My point: I'll be sure to shit on this movie if it's a turd.

So all memery aside how is the movie?

Gal Gabot seemed like a fucking abhorrent actor in all the previews I saw but if it's getting good reviews maybe it did something right.

>>92786404
>4 stars
is that supposed to be good?

>>92789866
Yeah. That's what 4 stars usually means.