Why does the MCU mess up all it's villains?

it doesn't

next

>>92743665
Why are you implying most of these villains were worth a damn in the first place?

Mandarin and arguably Ronan were the only times that I'd consider missed opportunities.

>>92743665
Why do people hate this pic of Thanos? He looks fine.

>>92743665
they did a really good job with Ego imo famalama

good design

>>92743665
>Obidiah Stane
>Whiplash
>Justin Hammer
>Red Skull
>Loki
>Abomination
>winter soldier
>Kaecilius
>Ego the living planet

The majority of marvel villains have been better than their comic counter parts in the case of most of their appearances.

Mandarin, Ronan, Malekith and one or two others were forgettable and underwhelming, but let's not discount the rest for the mishandling of a few.

>>92744521
This. Are you serious?

>>92745569
>Loki
debatable

>>92744553
Oh boy, it's one of those phantom Mandarin fans who suddenly appeared once the movie 'ruined' him.

>>92743665
Well it keeps killing them off for a start. What villains have survived their respective movies?
>Loki
>Justin Hammer (as a side villain)
>Red Skull (maybe)
Every other movie has the antagonist dealt with, either killed indirectly or kept due to fan outcry (see Loki). Every movie becomes a glorified villain-of-the-week scenario and we have to see how our scrappy heroes deal with them. Lacking a consistent villain, they don't have time to develop as a persistent threat and thus fall short.

>>92745569
I think comic and mcu Red Skull are equal, but that still is definitely a credit towards the mcu considering how generally entertaining the comic version is.

>>92745569
Says more about the source material than the movies desu

>>92747049
>Red Skull (maybe)
Nah dude, he's dead.