>>92702050
Fuck off with skeletons, it's not Halloween yet.
>using kino non ironicaly
>Implying that Steve Trevor didn't save capekino.
Steve is best boy.
I wonder what kind of meltdowns we'll see if RLM does a positive review of it.
>>92703532
It's got the same defense as Ghostbusters, only doubly so because """critics""" specifically asked (whined) for a wonder woman movie for almost a decade now.
>>92703589
So you've already got an excuse lined up to conveniently discount any positive reviews.
>>92703617
Yes. And any negative reviews are a result of the Disney funded anti DCEU bias.
>>92703710
I didn't say that was any less hilariously delusional.
Just that the desperation for a movie to be bad is even more pathetic.
>>92703710
That's not what that anon said but whatever.
>>92703812
>>92704079
I've got no stake in this fight man. I've just been on /co/ long enough that I can tell what both sides are going to use to ignore the reality that this is going to at best be average and generic. Anti DCEU fags will claim any positive buzz is because muh strong female character. Pro-DCEU fags will claim it's because the movie is kino while any negative comments are shills and mousketeers. The arguments and excuses were decided upon before this movie was even announced let alone released. Repeat that for the next five years or so.
If I had my way, these movies wouldn't even be allowed to be discussed here.
>>92702136
if only he were Green-Lantern.
>>92704321
You don't have to discuss them m8