Sigh

>>92660498
Geez, where are all of the junket-whore reviews that gave glowing marks for the film?

>>92660498
Fake but that would still make it the second best DCEU movie.

File: $ (1).png (239KB, 770x711px) Image search: [Google]

239KB, 770x711px

NOT AGAIN

>>92660498
FAKE NEWS

>>92660498
>Tomatometer Not Available...

ok buddy

It's fake, but both plausible and probable.

File: Capture.png (601KB, 765x677px) Image search: [Google]

601KB, 765x677px

>>92660498

Actual current RT page.

Honestly, I'm expecting almost exactly the same scoring as Suicide Squad ended up at. 25% critics, 60% audience.

>>92660498
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
*inhales*
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

this week just keeps getting better and better

File: the-waiting.jpg (146KB, 1135x900px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 1135x900px

>>92660498
THE WAITING IS THE HARDEST PART
EVERY DAY YOU GO ONE MORE YARD
YOU TAKE IT ON FAITH
YOU TAKE IT TO THE HEART
THE WAITING IS THE HARDEST PART

File: 2ac20b5cdade805f0a313034cfdacb77.gif (715KB, 448x252px) Image search: [Google]

715KB, 448x252px

Next week is going to be hell for anti-DCEU fans

You got your memes ready?

>>92660604
Don't do me like that.

>>92660687
>Next week is going to be hell for anti-DCEU fans

Remember when DCEU fans said the same when BvS and SS were about to come out?

You guys always die by your tongue.

>>92660687
after the amazing week this has been next week can't be anything BUT a letdown

after saw the glowing reviews, I suspect it'll end up around 80%

>>92660687
Fuck memes.
Three strikes, they're out. WW doesn't get a chance from me.

So what DC movie is next after this?

>>92660808
Justice League.

>>92660722
>>92660687

Honestly I hope it does to incredibly well, even if I do believe critics will be a bit more forgiving of this ones faults. Mainly because I'm still pissed Captain Marvel keeps getting pushed back, and I want marvel to have to be the bitches that were too chikenshit to make a female superhero movie

>>92660785
oh no, whatever will they do without you

File: C_s8up4UQAAk2fl.jpg_orig.jpg (47KB, 1080x676px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 1080x676px

>>92660782
you never saw any "glowing reviews" you saw positive twitter reactions which don't mean shit

File: commie.jpg (42KB, 413x600px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 413x600px

I have absolutely no expectations for this movie.
I want a wonder woman story in the cold war, with double double u undercover in occupied Berlin. Desperately trying to stop Ares from starting the big one, and keep some hope for humanity amidst Solzhenitsyn horror.
Make Steve Trevor a biscuit bomber who gets shot down starting the whole plot and boom, there's your WW movie.
I don't even know or care about this tripe.

File: 1442096875124.gif (52KB, 363x285px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 363x285px

>>92660898
Not him, but...
>This amount of salty that you need to comment passive agressively over people saying that they dont want to see a movie

Since the shit that was BvS, me and my friends stopped paying to whatch DCEU shit. Considering SS, it was an amazing decision.

Will this be like the new ghostbuters movie?
As in if you don't enjoy it, you are a sexist pig

>>92660782

Hopefully, it will do at least as well as Ghostbusters.

>>92660987
no 'original' to unfairly compare it to.

probably not.

>>92660867
>too chikenshit

they're actually making it, it has real people attached and everything, at this point if it failed it wouldn't be for lack of intent but something beyond everybody's control

we're not talking about the 21 Jump Street/Men in Black crossover here

Reminder that it's fucked given the competition it faces

>>92660498
I enjoyed the first Captain America a lot more

>>92661074
Well, tons of people have already compared Gadot to Lynda Carter unfavorably. Justifiably so.

>>92660782
>>92660940

yeah

not having any RT score at all is the same as not having any reviews

RT aggregates major reviewers - the people who are most-read and have been for at least several years, with millions of unique readers every month: the trend-identifiers

until there's any score at all, you can't say shit about reviews

I don't give a fuck about this "Marvel vs DC" bullshit. I just want there to be a good Wonder Woman movie.

>>92661116
Well yeah, because up until the montage where he gets his "real" suit it's Marvel's best movie.

Everything falls apart after it, though.

>>92661145
really?

fuck

Carter can't act for shit

File: 22ff9cb792ea849c1b34c2e41d97641a5b393622.jpg (23KB, 600x350px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 600x350px

>>92661156
2019

>>92661172
LC embodied classic WW though and arguably did more for Wondy than Christopher Reeves did for Superman.

Also, it's not like Gadot can act. lol Bitch is even worse, if anything. At least LC was convincing as WW.

File: MCU fans.png (8KB, 556x96px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 556x96px

>just days ago MCU fans celebrated the death of Snyder's daughter and wished death to his wife and kids
>people pointed out how they are pathetic
>other MCU fans got defensive. "They are not real MCU fans! Real MCU fans want the DCEU to succeed, too!"
>this thread

>>92661156
Just watch the animated movie

>>92661156
What are some Wonder Woman classics?
She's been so poorly written and mischaracterized by writers who amp up one part of her personality or even just her role and completely butcher her, its hard to get a bead on her anymore besides her iconic outfit and 'most willing to kill'.

File: 1452906111457.gif (851KB, 245x245px) Image search: [Google]

851KB, 245x245px

>>92661231
I did flaseflaged as DCEUfag and a Marvelfag a lot before.

Hell, it was probably you, little bitch, who wrotte that comment just so you can shitpost this.

This said, honestly fuck the DCEU, I get more enjoyment of the shitpost out of it tan from their movies.

>>92660498
FAKE NEWS.

>>92660600
Dubs falling for a fake. This is what /co/ has become.

>>92661231
>screencapping your own false flag

File: 45648827_p0.jpg (198KB, 868x611px) Image search: [Google]

198KB, 868x611px

>>92660498
DC should just meme normies like marvel does.

>>92660498
Come on, man. I haven't been a fan of the DCEU thus far, but there is no need to play that dirty. Really hoping Diana breaks the trend.

>relatives I don't get to see much
>ask if I'll go see GotG2 with them
>happy at the thought of spending time together
>couple weeks pass and complications have led to multiple reschedulings
>they call and say they still want to see a movie together but now they're waiting for Wonder Woman

Now I'm honestly wondering if I want to spend time with them all that badly.

File: suicide-squad-imax-poster.jpg (2MB, 2764x4096px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2764x4096px

>>92661850
They tried

Turns out that just like everything else they do they're terrible at it

>>92660498
>Snyder gets the boot by an act of destiny
>WW flops

DCCU fags just can't win, can they? Guess MCU will rein supreme.

The only thing saving it is the fact that all of the other releases that weekend are shit movies no one cares about.

>>92661908
That's horrible

See if you can get them to change their minds there's plenty of better movies to choose from
>>92661989
>Guess MCU will rein supreme.
As it should

>>92660766
Yes, Joss, we know you killed a kid to revive your dead career.

>>92661371
>>92661778
>I-it's a falseflag!
Always.

>>92660987

Warner is not nearly stupid enough to play that card, so no.

>>92662098
>I'm too stupid to see the obvious
No wonder you're a DC fan

I T S F A K E
T
S

F
A
K
E

I'll admit it, guys, I really, genuinely want this movie to be good. I don't care about all the company wars bullshit, I don't care what company has the better cinematic universe- I just want the characters I like to get ONE good movie.

Because really, that's all it takes. Even if a character isn't perceived favorably, or worse, is a complete unknown, it only takes one really good, universally solid movie to turn things around and get their foot in the door, culturally speaking. Get that one good movie out there, and the possibilities open up. Film sequels, TV shows, video games... Sky's the limit.

I mean, it happened for Iron Man. Who could have foreseen that in 2007? I want that for Wonder Woman. She deserves it.

>>92662209
Of course it is

the real score would never be that high

File: DC cinematic universe.jpg (145KB, 1777x935px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 1777x935px

>>92660498

>>92662418
kek

>>92662371
Well once she's in the public domain you'll get your good WW movie

>>92662601
You realize that's not how it works right?

The specific details of the character would become public domain as their respective issue releases each hit the time period. I don't know much about wondy's details but if the Lasso of Truth was only shown to do one thing in issue, say 6, and the way most people know it is completely different, which only happened in issue 100, they would have to wait until the whatever year anniversary of that specific issue's release.

unless of course the original creator retained ownership.

There's also the fact that Warners and Disney, specifically, essentially created and control trademark and copyright law. They'll find loopholes to keep the shit if they haven't already made the case that the original author of a comic is the company who contracted the books rather than the creators who made them. A lot like why many creators don't see returns even through litigation like schuster and seigal and them.

>>92660498
And yet, it will win more Oscars than guardians of the galaxy 2

>>92663198
Michael Rooker has best supporting actor in the bag.

Bait.

I mean Gal's acting aside, it should at least be a 7/10. Man of Steel is 6.2/10 and if Clark smiled more, it would easily be a 7 or higher.

With Diana it should be easy to get to 7, since people don't have some expectation of Wonder Woman being some smiling jovial beacon of hope.

Then again, RT loved the racist POS movie known as Get Out, so who knows how it will look.

>>92661926

SS' problem was that it didn't establish the chracters early enough in the movie for the climax to make much sense.

That and normies expected GotG.

>>92660785
You realize the same people don't make every movie, right?

>>92660940
The Twitter reactions this time are from actual critics and not just random industry people.

>>92660987
There isn't an overwhelming pre-release backlash like there was with that.

>>92663148

Oh, and you were doing so well until you started talking shit.

>There's also the fact that Warners and Disney

Congress created and controls (with the exception of case law decided by the courts) copyright law. Private companies can lobby - same as private citizens - and of course do, because they have businesses to run.

When US copyright law was last given a major overhaul the duration of copyright was increased *across the board* for companies and individuals, to bring it in line with international standards agreed by treaty. Those time periods represent the interests of foreign powers as much any any domestic wish. In fact, the US had one of the weakest copyright protections in the world prior to that.

Because it meant some things came back into copyright from the public domain, it's often complained about - but it doesn't increase copyright indefinitely and won't be changed again, because of those treaty obligations.

>They'll find loopholes

Selling your copyrights to a company was a thing since forever. It's absolutely normal - believe me, if you came up with the next Garfield you'd want to sell it to your own company so that other people could manage all the decisions, instead of dealing with it all as a private citizen.

Because companies obviously don't have a finite lifespan, selling rights (as assets) between them is more important. You wouldn't want your deli to have to dump all its food a week before it went bad just because you lost the right to own and sell that food, would you? Same principle applies here. Companies are still limited though - to 95 years, well within human lifespans.

>schuster and seigal

Both eventually made a lot of money from National/DC/WB. Even to begin with they were being paid very well - after they sued and settled, they got even more.

Don't confuse their families pursuing and losing cases for a company screwing the little guy. They're just not happy with the settlements that their fathers were happy with.

>>92663329
great well when the actual reviews hit you can rely on that

until then it's chatter

File: IMG_6596.jpg (21KB, 292x164px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 292x164px

Wonder Woman won't even be the best superhero film this week.

>>92660703
I won't back down

File: 1469224484415.png (187KB, 599x461px) Image search: [Google]

187KB, 599x461px

>>92663329
>>92663341
Why do you DCkeks always forget that no film gets overtly negative pre-release backlash? Green Lantern got arly positive response from critics before it was released AND LOOK WHAT HAPPEN? It also doesn't help your case that the people who gave WW positive response also gave the new Ghostbusters movie from last year positive responses AND LOOK WHAT HAPPEN?

File: Rhodey.png (233KB, 772x401px) Image search: [Google]

233KB, 772x401px

Meanwhile, Marvel yet again hits it out of the park by giving Rhodey his own movie.

WW will be fresh on RT. Most critics will be too afraid to say it sucks if it sucks. It's going to be Ghostbusters all over again.

>>92661926
This poster is pretty sick though.

>>92663664
>Electra has a 10% on RT
>Catwoman has a 9%
>Supergirl has a 7%
Doesn't matter if it has a female lead, critics won't hold back just because of that.

>>92663246
>I mean Gal's acting aside
Isn't that a rather big thing to casually brush aside?

Also did you even see Get Out? That movie as making fun of SJWs.

>>92663448

Put DC diehards on suicide watch if that happens.

Fucking being swallowing their tongues straining against straitjackets.

I'd like for this film to be a good wonder woman story.

So far we've been given near nonsensical to nonsensical elseworlds.

Like a non Self-aware Injustice.

>>92660498
JUst a reminder that Rotten Tomatoes is owned by Disney.

>>92660687
CAPTAIN UNDERPANTS BEATS WONDER WOMAN AT BOX OFFICE

LET'S PRAY

>>92663793
It's actually run by Warner Bros you retarded fuck

>>92663781
>suicide watch
Too soon

>>92663767
Those movies are back when SJWs weren't in full force. Times are different.

I think Snyder's daughter might have just saved the DCEU

I'll thank her in the afterlife

>Female led blockbuster movie
>in this day and political climate
>getting bad reviews

You guys are high. The critics favoritism towards a female superhero movie will outweigh the usual schlock that is DCEU movies.

>>92663843

Not everything is about Snyder, that does suck for the family.

>>92661251
The one where they retell her origin, the one where she beats batman, the one where she beats up the entire justice league and a dragon, and the one where they retell her origin again.

>>92660593
WW has a halo from it's feminisim. No way does it score that low from the pros.

>>92663767
Those were back before gender politics exploded. Everything put out today is analyzed under an extreme lens for gender representation. Literally the only way this movie could get bad reviews is if Wonder Woman is somehow portrayed in a sexist manner.

>>92663920
This. Good or bad, reviewers will treat it like that new Ghostbusters.

>>92662601
A porn movie?

>>92663893
>Ghost in the Shell

>>92663793
>>92663835
My sides hurt.

File: 1490572145809.png (326KB, 903x713px) Image search: [Google]

326KB, 903x713px

I'm revving up my memes already when the score ends up being below 50% again.

Also, don't forget about this:

>It was a fucking mess. There is a reason Patty Jenkins was dropped from Thor. Gal Gadot is pretty frustrated with the movie as well. Well for one, Jenkins cannot command the respect a director deserves. The director of a movie is the captain of the ship and needs to steer it. Jenkins is a total doormat and everyone walks over her. The production crew often supersedes her commands, she cant get the actors under control, and she's easily frustrated. Fucking Chris Pine on the days he was on set pretty much had to play Dad while she was Mom.

File: 847169841228430465.jpg (26KB, 367x500px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 367x500px

>>92660687
>You got your memes ready?

If WW gets bad reviews it would harm Ms Marvel movie and any other attempt at female superheroes like Widow. Disney, numales and journos cant afford to have another Catwoman movie around, so they will give a good review to further their own interests.

Im a Dchad and WW looks like a turd. But it will get decent reviews because female characters and female director. I dont know what their previous works of Patty were but the 7 minutes I watched from WW looked like an episode of Legends of Tomorrow with a blue filter.

The angles, the blocking, the cinematography, how the characters are placed, the acting, the edition, its all tv tier.

>>92663246
>Get Out
>Racist

What did he mean by this?

>It gets a good score
"CRITICS JUST DON'T WANT TO BE CALLED SEXIST REEEEEEEEE"
>It gets a bad score
"DCKEKS ON SUICIDE WATCH 0/4"

Embargo preponed.

Now opens on Monday.

/co/ and /tv/ btfo

https://twitter.com/rejects/status/867405966291161089

File: June 2nd.jpg (69KB, 919x612px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 919x612px

>>92664436
oh wow a whole 2 days earlier

>>92664436
Embargo means shit when the movie itself is mediocre anon.

Why can't a movie just be mediocre? Why does it have to be "award winning" "BEST OF X" bullshit?

>>92664436
>2 days earlier
>4 days before release like Man of Steel

now I'm confident

>>92661926
SS problem is that it sold itself as a Batman v. Joker spinoff and they werent even on screen that long

>>92664436
>>92664529
Wasn't Pirates also 4 days before? And it was panned

Of course, Disney does not have the same policies as Warner about that. But Kong didn't do that great with critics and they still lifted the embargo 8 days earlier.

I'm expecting a 60-70%

>>92663793
Warner Bros you stupid faggot

>>92664756
It might be an X-men Apocalypse situation where the reviews were really bad and Fox mistakenly opens the embargo way too early and harms the box office.

>>92663246
>I mean Gal's acting aside, it should at least be a 7/10. Man of Steel is 6.2/10 and if Clark smiled more, it would easily be a 7 or higher.
This is a gross oversimplification of MoS' problems.

>Then again, RT loved the racist POS movie known as Get Out, so who knows how it will look.
Oh, so its a retarded /tv/ poster. Carry on.

>>92664137
I remember writing that! I was an intern bitchboi during the production of this movie. What a fucking mess.

>>92661543
They are shills, what do you expect?

>>92660498
>fake news

>>92665209
Naw, shills start up "DCEU/MCU support threads" what you're dealing with here is a classic case of shitposting.

>>92664484
https://desuarchive.org/co/search/filename/June%202nd.jpg/

So, what scene can they add to the DvD which they will claim somehow fixes the movie and brings it all together? Gotta love the directors cut extended universe!

>>92663546
No, it didn't, not from actual mainstream critics.

This was a full screening of the movie where all the major critics were invited.

It'd be one thing if most of them just clammed up after the screening, but so many went on social media to start praising it that it significantly raised its estimated opening box office. The exact same major critics that trashed all of the previous movies.

The positive buzz for stuff like Green Lantern, BvS and SS came from people invited from fan sites, random industry people, family of the crew, and even fucking Mexican TV hosts.

>>92664137
Yeah the word months ago from an anonymous "intern" is totally more legit than all the people who just saw the fucking movie.

>>92664137
Whedon ghost directed this so it will be passable

File: 1494366874223.jpg (14KB, 480x371px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 480x371px

I really want this movie to be good because I'm not a companywar fag and I just want to see enjoyable filmsm...but at the same time I hope this movie gets panned because the meltdown that happens after is always funny. Does anyone remember "ONE MORE FRESH REVIEW THE PRAYER CIRCLE IS WORKING" for BvS?

File: standing ovation every actor and actress praised being called the next dark knight literally EVERYONE loved it.jpg (113KB, 1552x979px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 1552x979px

>>92665731
yeah that was what happened

I hope it's good because it's the first comic book movie my mom is excited for, and she's been nice enough to sit through all of the other comic book movies my dad and I went to.

File: 1469224701190.jpg (19KB, 472x409px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 472x409px

>>92665731
>No, it didn't, not from actual mainstream critics.
http://www.slashfilm.com/early-buzz-screening-green-lantern-earns-positive-praise/
And to add more insult to injury
https://www.comicbookmovie.com/fantastic_four/twitter-reactions-from-early-fantastic-four-screening-major-a123570

Seriously STOP TAKING EARLY BUZZ SERIOUSLY and fags want to to be good that you're blantantly lying to yourself. There are no reviews out and there were no major critics who praised it.

>>92660498
These threads exactly like Nintendo vs Sony threads on /v/

>>92661926
They 'tried' as in the completely mangled up SS in post to try and turn it into a normie-friendly meme movie after the fact

>>92660722
>DCEU fans said the same when BvS
Lies. BvS was shit that everyone saw coming, DC fans included, except contrarians. There was no possible way that movie was going to be anything but terrible.

>>92666384
and like Sony no one here wants DC and loves to laugh at it's failure

>>92660498
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

DSHIT BTFO

>>92665776
How many times do we have to tell you that early twitter reactions are literally nothing.

>>92665838
I want this movie to be good because Wonder Woman is the only member of the trinity without a good movie and one at all.

>>92666910
This is the biggest lie i've ever heard.

>>92663546
I'm baffled that people still give a shit about reviews in the first place. The vast majority of internet critics would suck your dick for a sandwich

File: 1494302377236.png (464KB, 1324x992px) Image search: [Google]

464KB, 1324x992px

>>92665878
>Ben returned to alcoholism because of BvS

>>92660498
It's too early for Disney to be shaping and forcing the narrative

>>92663893
>What is Ghostbusters

>>92668342
ignored by the masses and loved by critics
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/ghostbusters_2016/

>>92668302
DC has lost control of the narrative ever since Green Lantern

>>92660498
You fucking wish. It's gonna be huge, ya bitch hater

>>92666928
Darkstalkers is great, faggot.

>>92660498
I wouldn't doubt it does terribly. This year has been horrible for film so far. It's pretty bad when the best mainstream, hell, even spanning indie, films were capeshit. Get it together Hollywood. Even Disney isn't immune this year after the reviews for Pirates 5 came in.

>>92668034
I think probably more because of his marriage and having small children who can't see daddy as Batman for like a decade and the whole affair with Terrio thing but the movie won't have helped.

>>92660513
Seriously.. are you mentally challenged?

Review embargo moved to Monday from Wednesday

>>92668302
>Disney having influence over a website owned by WB

I love you Dkeks!