What could it be?
>>92207943
>For comic news
>Not even specifying if it's Marvel or DC or Image comics or indie only.
Unless it's some sort of special partnership between companies for some comic-book stream/buying site, or a big crossover that surprises people, it's gonna suck, and you know it.
>>92208066
I would kill for a DC unlimited comic app.
>>92207943
It's probably just his own store
Where is his store anyway? I kinda want to visit
>>92208183
California somehwere
>>92208066
Obviously it is Marvel or DC. Nothing else would be big news for a retailer.
>>92208132
DC already announced an online platform like a week ago. They mentioned that comics would be involved, but I don't think it would be more than just the free issues they already provide. Their trades sell too well to cut into that with another service.
>>92207943
Stan Lee dies.
>>92208295
>>92208269
It's not the same audience, anon. Unlimited is no substitute for a hard copy, any more than floppies are a substitute for the trade.
>>92208529
I really think Unlimited is a large part of why Marvel's trade sales are so horrible (in addition to the awful price point and paper quality of course). If you can just get a free month and marathon through any run why do you need to buy anything?
>>92208295
>Implying you can outlast Stan "The Soul Eater" Lee
>>92207943
Isn't that Marvel solicits day?
>>92208657
I think they might be the 23rd, not positive though
>>92208657
Maybe Legacy creative teams
>>92208726
Higgins hates Marvel, so I doubt it.
Could see Spider-marraige confirmation I guess, but I'm not really convinced that should be big news given the fact that it seems like they're rehashing what DC already did with Clark and Lois AND it's been telegraphed with the MJ variant month.
>>92208183
His store is a mid level store. It's older than it is big. Whatever he's referring is likely to not just be centered on his store . In addition, his opinions on comics are sometimes pretty dumb but his commentary on the business end of the industry is spot on 9 times out of 10
>>92208887
He doesn't hate Marvel, he just has a massive DC bias. He also loves money and is on record saying that Marvel being in a better position than they currently are is much better for his bottom line because when a big 2 fan drops their books, they don't switch to buying the other company or an indie, they just leave.
Flash 22 spoilers I'm assuming
>>92209657
I think he would just post the release date if that was the case not a Tuesday. And even then they've already used Watchmen. What could be enough to be "big" at this point? Marvel crossover?
>>92207943
Did he delete it?
Can't see the tweet on his feed
>>92207943
Geoff Johns rehired Alan Moore to write the Watchmen characters' arrival to the DCU
You heard it here first
Give me a quick rundown on this guy.
>>92210075
Guy with a comic shop, he is a semi-famous person on comic twitter
>>92208295
every comic fan would celebrate
>>92207943
Rich says it's about Secret Empire 2
>>92210075
Comic shop owner that became internet famous for regularly talking shit on Marvel on twitter.
>>92211681
Why would he say Tuesday then?
>>92212000
I guess they'll have a big media announcement with Entertainment Weekly or somesuch to spoil it?
It happened before
It's some stupid video game announcements.
>>92212581
Why would a LCS owner care about video games?
>>92211681
Rich already ran something spoiling a few details from SE 2 and 3 yesterday.
>>92212632
Maybe they sell video games too, since comic sales are worth shit these days.
>>92212743
They would have to increase security a lot too. Doesn't seem feasible.
They make money off tabletop shit.
>>92207943
Shilling is against the rules
Also if this guy shit on DC exclusively I guarantee you would never be posting his bullshit
Sage
>>92213142
How am I shilling? I was just posting what the guy said.
>>92213142
Did you follow him during the DCYOU days? He shit on them constantly
>>92213142
He's a comic retailer. I think he would be happier if Marvel and DC were doing great.
>>92207943
Isn't that the day the last Button issue drops? Might be Manhattan
>>92213142
>Being this defensive over a corporation
Look at yourself, anon