anyone excited?

no lol

>>92200146
Cars wasn't bad. Cars 2 was terrible, but it wasn't really a sequel to Cars. Cars 3 could be pretty good.

>>92200146
This is a 18+ website, at least pretend you're not 10.

>>92200459
it's a board about cartoons.

>>92200459
pls, if the anons here were excited for the pony show or the lesbian rocks show or even for fucking frozen, how is this any different?

the autism of this board hsve no limits.

>>92200146
I'm actually looking forward to seeing this. The premise of the movie and improved graphics make me think there is potential for it.

>>92201068
>>92201209
SU and even Small Horses that I Own are family shows compare to the kiddy shit that is fucking Cars. No adult can be possibly interested in Cars 3.

>>92200146
Not really, but I might still end up seeing it if there's nothing else going on opening weekend.

>>92202426
>going to see shit is better than not going to the cinema at all
You sound stupid.

File: IMG_0113.jpg (49KB, 574x380px)

49KB, 574x380px

>>92200281
>>92200146
>>92202426
I hyped you guys!

File: M1P5QVz.png (906KB, 800x1354px) Image search: [Google]

906KB, 800x1354px

:)

File: 1489727637802.png (204KB, 540x480px)

204KB, 540x480px

>>92202786
Even if this is pure autism, I'll admit how fascinating it is that a person has thought this through and was able to document this onto paper.

I feel like I'm the only adult who likes Cars. I think both movies are really fun.

>>92203015
>fun
For kids. Cars is the only time when Pixar went full kids movie rather than making a family movie like they usually do. And it paid off because kids buy millions worth of the dumb Cars merch.

Still not as bad as Up though.

>>92200146
Honestly, no.

>>92200146
Depends on how the plot goes. If 3 subverts expectations it might be worth talking about. The trailers spoiled a fuckton though.

1 was cliche and 2 was a Larry the Cable Guy vehicle. I'm not holding up high hopes.