GOD they look Hideous

>>92198557
Tweety and Porky do. Everyone else is eh.

>>92198557
Why are they copying the opening of Dragon Maid?

>>92198557
What's this?

File: 1492987066759.png (204KB, 394x523px) Image search: [Google]

204KB, 394x523px

>>92198557
>Tweety with big anime girl eyes! How cute! Kawaii desu senpai!

File: 1494257737512.gif (81KB, 372x347px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 372x347px

>>92198557

>>92198557
It's like they tried to remake the ugly first versions of them but somehow ended making them even uglier

Aside from Tweety and Porky, these designs are fine.

File: Foghorn_Leghorn_in_Wabbit.jpg (27KB, 445x378px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 445x378px

>Foghorn was made into a small silhouette in the background
>They probably hid him on purpose

>>92198888
theres nothing wrong with this design

File: 1489892782350.png (50KB, 202x164px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 202x164px

>>92198557
I share the sentiment that most of these are just meh besides Porky and Tweety.
>>92198888
This is disgusting however.

>>92198557
bugs got an ass going on there

>>92198651
Read the filename, it's a retooled Wabbit.

>>92198919
Same thing I saw when I scrolled down.

File: SQUEEEE.png (119KB, 215x231px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 215x231px

Oh Lord, they turned Tweetie into an anime character and Porky into one of those propaganda cartoons about bourgeoise capitalist pigs, who the hell approved this low-effort shit?

File: daff.webm (2MB, 720x402px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 720x402px

>>92199007
It's old timey looking!
If Mickey can do a retro designs reboot, so can Bugs, yeah?

Just bring back Looney Tunes Show, God damn it.

>>92199058
The slapstick is weak as fuck

File: IMG_3006.jpg (187KB, 769x960px) Image search: [Google]

187KB, 769x960px

>>92198557
If people didn't vehemently hate the Looney Tunes show for being different we wouldn't have the inferior wabbit show.

Looney tunes show, for all its faults, still got most of the characters right. But wabbit was like weaponized dull. Also that stupid OC squirrel is clearly still around.

>>92199013
Is it a new reboot or something?

>>92199167
The Looney Tunes Show is still shit no matter how you put it.

File: 1397625941365.gif (1018KB, 500x700px) Image search: [Google]

1018KB, 500x700px

Why can't they just let the property die a respectable death? Why can't they just develop a brand new property?

Why does it have to be as inoffensive as possible to a mass audience? Why can't the design be funny and engaging?

Why?

>>92198557
Bugs and Daffy look closer to their 1940s selves than ever.

>>92199258
Fuck off, Benthelooney. Go fap to poorly drawn Puffy AmiYumi porn

>>92198557
Cal arts is strong on this one.

File: Mickey Mouse Shorts.png (171KB, 720x280px) Image search: [Google]

171KB, 720x280px

>>92199058

That'd be like making Goofy old

File: Dippy Dawg.jpg (128KB, 536x303px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 536x303px

>>92199334
Like his very first appearence as Dippy Dawg

File: its been one of those days.webm (3MB, 720x402px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 720x402px

>>92199244
Seems like it.
Up until now Wabbit had been a fairly minimal, using mostly new characters and Bugs, with the other Looney Tunes only occasionally showing up.

>>92199297
I don't want to watch the Looney Tunes engage in everyday mundane activities. I want to see something exciting and humorous actually happen. Fuck you.

>>92199167
The Looney Tunes show was doomed from the start. It should have been a wholly new thing, without using classic characters. If they had done that, it would have fared better.

>>92199298
Its a mixture of Calarts and Chuck Jones.

>>92199430
>jones
Clampett nigger

>>92199430

>Chuck Jones

I don't think you know what you're talking about

>>92199412
It would've crashed and burned faster without the brand recognition

File: donald-duck-screenshot.jpg (62KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 300x300px

>>92199334
>>92199343
Donald looks nothing like his original design so there's that.

File: bc1.gif (3MB, 351x197px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 351x197px

>>92199348
It wasn't all mundane. A lot of the episodes had the characters ending up in absurd situations.

>>92199412
The show did manage to get 52 episodes, that's better than some other shows get these days.

>>92199599
>some
That still doesn't make up for the majority. It can't be looney sometimes.

File: 740full-invasion-of-the-bunny-snatchers-screenshot.png (345KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

345KB, 640x480px

I'd call this episode prophetic, but it really is inevitable.

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2e82oz_bugs-bunny-invasion-of-the-bunny-snatchers-1992-1_tv

>>92199262
>Gotta hop back
>To the outback
> Kangaroo Jack

>>92199058
It feels kinda weird seeing Daffy return to his original self after so many decades. Guess that's a good indication that they have no intention of bringing Yoyo (I believe that's the name of the Dodo) back. And yeah, the slapstick isn't that great. Is Gumball the best slapstick cartoon to be released in recent years?

>>92199058
Guess I should be thankful that they didn't give the Looney Tunes the Tom and Jerry treatment and turned the show into a 2009 internet flash show. Or the Scooby Doo treatment and turned the characters into family guy rejects. Hope this flash cartoon era is over soon.

File: PLqgqvw.jpg (796KB, 608x1070px) Image search: [Google]

796KB, 608x1070px

>>92199430
>Chuck Jones.

File: Why 1.0.jpg (151KB, 606x1174px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 606x1174px

>>92198557
Bugs is passable, but Tweety is an abomination.

It did hit me till I started typing this, but is that meant to be Porky? Oh please tell me that's an OC, that being Porky is so much worse than it being an OC.

File: Porkypig12395.png (212KB, 1240x580px) Image search: [Google]

212KB, 1240x580px

>>92200748
Old Porky was fat as fug

File: 1415859727124.jpg (29KB, 500x566px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 500x566px

>>92199334
>Looks smelly
>Looks mentally stupid
>Looks unclean
>Wears clothes that don't fit him
>Has a beerbelly

So they made Goofy into an alcoholic. That's just perfect.

>>92200748
>>92200801
Also, yes that's Porky Pig

>tfw they didn't fuck up my favourite Looney Tunes character design
Feels good.

Still better than that fucking Seinfeld parody

>>92200801
Yeah, but come on, no one case about Porky from 35, or even from 39. The 1940's and 50's Porky is the one everyone knows.

Going back to the roots doesn't work when a newer version has become the one everyone thinks of. It's like DC ditching Hal and all the other Lanterns to only have books that use Alan Scott, or if Marvel decided to bring back the OG X-men team.

File: 625655.png (594KB, 1134x630px) Image search: [Google]

594KB, 1134x630px

>>92198557
as long as they get rid of this abomination I'm okay with a new new new+ looney tunes show

File: Ln3bk3h.jpg (38KB, 400x310px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 400x310px

>Looney Tunes Show died for this

File: maxresdefault (3).jpg (55KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 1920x1080px

>>92199058
Fucking awful. Daily reminder this was the ULTIMATE Daffy

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=T8FroDwIhfw

>>92200549
Gumball slapstick isn't good at all. Gumball barely is a real toon show. Most of its episodes are generic sitcom shit and car chases

>>92201123
That's not Daffy, that's Duck Dodgers

>>92199058
>Daffy is a psycho from his solo episodes, instead of a coniving arrogant asshole.
Did we ever actually see that specific iteration of him interact with Bugs in the old days?

>>92201110
Looney Tunes Show died because Cartoon Network never renews any Warner Brothers Animation series beyond 52 episodes. Not unless it's a ratings juggernaut on the level of Teen Titan Go, anyway.

>>92199412

They could have switched the lineup with their rough Tiny Toon counterparts for the most part and it would have worked about as well.

>>92201110
I'm glad

File: LooneyTunesU.png (2MB, 1593x877px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1593x877px

>>92198557

>>92198557

As long as the show is better than Wabbit, the designs with grow

Wabbit was poorly executed, it made Looney Tunes Show look better than it is

>>92198888

That expression is fine because Foghorn is smug half the time

It fits

>>92199058
Is that God of Chaos Mode Daffy? That looks great!

File: 002.jpg (32KB, 609x342px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 609x342px

at least Elmer and Bugs met each other again, which LTS failed to do, don't care just how shitty the show is

>>92201537
That sort of works, I guess. I can definitely see Buster growing up to to be an independently wealthy inventor and Plucky growing up to be a slacker mooch.

I can't really see Montana Max ever living in a suburb though.

>>92201123
Well, I never said that is was good at slapstick but since the genre is pretty much dead and everyone who tries to make slapstick fails at it, I would say Gumball is the best we have at the moment. You're free to correct me. There might be one show that I have completely glossed over.

>>92199058
Its not too bad. Definitely wish there was more weight and speed to the slapstick.

File: 1422430577594.jpg (77KB, 887x1097px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 887x1097px

>>92201038
>That face

>>92199058
LITERALLY ME

>>92200801
Original Porky was a child, not an adult

>>92201667

Yeah, but they recast Elmer from Billy West to Jeff Bergman, and Bergman's Elmer is way, WAY worse.

>>92201855
Wander Over Yonder had a lot of slapstick

>>92200611
>I know nothing about the new scooby doo aside from the character designs

>>92198557
as long as they don't fuck up Marvin
I'll be okay

>>92202003
Hmm, never watched that show. Gonna check it out! Thanks, anon!

>>92199058
>inflation
Who hired Dobson?

File: 1415045725361.jpg (265KB, 1912x1072px) Image search: [Google]

265KB, 1912x1072px

>>92202044
I have seen it. And I'm not gonna sit though a show that I find visually unpleasing more than once.

>>92199058
>daffy is back to his original self
holy shit yes! I've been waiting for this so long

>>92199058

https://youtu.be/zLkdzBvMcE4

>>92199167
why did people hate this show?
I love it

>>92202189
Not Looney enough I assume

>>92202189
It's not Looney Tunes.

File: 1482883137097s.jpg (2KB, 125x112px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 125x112px

>>92201110
Good riddance. Shit was terrible. At least the new version actually feels like Looney Tunes, and not a mediocre sitcom.

File: daffy_crazylaugh.jpg (28KB, 580x364px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 580x364px

>>92199058
>>92202170
It's pretty cool that theyve gone with old wacky daffy

File: 1222222.jpg (23KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 480x480px

>>92199058
>won't do wacky thing pls help out
>oh okay just don't do wacky thing
>JUST KIDDING LOL AM WACKY
>Y-YOU TOLD ME YOU WOULDN'T GO WACKY! YOU LIED TO ME!
yep, that's the best their team could come up with. the same basic shit tier slapstick from the previous show.

I'm tired of playing the same old waiting game I did with wabbit. step up your fucking writing at once, don't get my hopes up yet again with the conviction that it'll 'get better eventually', because I know by heart and soul it never will.

porky will probably end up growing on me but for now his design and overall execution is barely hinging on hideous. daffy's personality is a mixed bag, I like his spunk and tone in general, but if this type of humor is what can be expected out of the show then by all means just fucking hand it to someone else capable of doing not bland shit.

>>92199629
underrated post

>>92202734
>just fucking hand it to someone else capable of doing not bland shit.
that is what looney tunes are incapable of doing since the 90's

File: 1298854359770.jpg (30KB, 610x587px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 610x587px

>>92201667
>those wrinkles
why do they look so ugly?

>>92203243
stills looks better than TLS

>>92203437
That's objectively wrong

>>92201879
>>92199121

This is my main problem. It's the same with every new iteration of Tom & Jerry.

Good slapstick needs weight, needs the right amount of uumph to at least make you feel like i hurt. But today's TV standards no longer allow that level of violence.

It's why every new released from Tom & Jerry feels weak and boring. They are not allowed to do the same level of slapstick that made them famous, both because animation and because standards don't allow it anymore.

Looney Tunes Show was not traditional, but worked within the boundaries of what animation budgets they had. It's why the Roadrunner & Coyote segments were the worse: They couldn't have good slapstick in the budget and format they had.

So when someone tries to act like "We can do old fashion slapstick, we swear guys!" and then pulls this feels worse than not trying at all.

>>92201344
Psycho Daffy? Nah that was a Porky pig thing and even then he evolved into jackass Daffy in those bits as well.

File: 1448921007892.png (585KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

585KB, 960x540px

>That feel when, despite this new version, modern Mickey Mouse is more Looney than the New Looney Tunes.

>>92203805
they've deformed the characters to hell and back because they were blank slates, not hard to do.

>>92199334
I believe at this point that Disney has accepted Donald being the superior character of the brand, even his gf looks better than Mickey's gf.

File: 1486776076778.png (230KB, 718x540px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 718x540px

>>92203129
Would love if they truly went back to the wacky with Sylvester singing on the fence and stuff like that. I guess old Looney Tunes have too much violence for modern tv though. Sure, reruns are accepted but to actually recreate that magic probably wouldn't sit well with investors and shit.

>>92203830
Yet still feel more crazy and zany that this supposed new attempt at turning the Looney tunes to their zany roots.

This is not about Mickey Mouse being better, but about Looney tunes being worse when they were suppose to BE the zany answer to the Mouse.

File: IMG_1074.png (213KB, 420x359px) Image search: [Google]

213KB, 420x359px

>>92198709

>implying that tweety didnt already have kawaii eyes
>implying that the japanese didnt take it from disney and the like

>>92199167
>>92199412
>>92199505
>>92201110
>died
Their plan was to only ordered two seasons. No more, no less.

>>92203830
the world is fucking up its own ass. that's why.

>>92198919
Is that Turtle getting fucked?

>>92201344
There is a episode when screwball Daffy and Porky are trapped in a hotel because they don't have money to pay for it. At the end old Bugs appear.

>>92198616

Nah dude it's Azumanga

>>92203997
IIIIII aaaaaaaaammmmmmm cuuuuuuuummmmmmmiiiiiiiiiiiing

>>92199167
Is every version of Lola going to be bangable, because goddamn I would a LTS Lola.

File: This what they all been waitin for I guess so They been waitin for this shit for a long time didnt they Ima give it everythin I got Ayo Dougie park that X6 around the corner Ayy Im just feelin my vibe right now Im feelin myself.png (85KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 480x480px

>>92204611

File: top kek.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

that moment when you pause at the right time

>>92198557
Is the animator who did Looney Tunes show the same one for this?

File: Daffy.png (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

>that episode where Daffy was a pedophile

>>92203805
The modern Mick Mouse cartoons are actually written by cartoonists, while every Looney Tunes reboot is written by sitcom wannabes.

>>92201123
>Joe Alaskey's been dead more than a year

File: credits_3.png (191KB, 1376x900px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 1376x900px

>>92206507
Full credits:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1726839/fullcredits?ref_=tt_cl_sm#cast
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt4558858/fullcredits?ref_=tt_cl_sm#cast

Remember back in the 90s and early 2000s when tweety was on a ton of "GIRL POWER" apparel and girls products because no one knew he was a boy?

>>92200955
>if Marvel decided to bring back the OG X-men team.
But they did.

>>92199058
The kind of gags used are way better than Wabbit's, but the designs and animation style just sort of pale in comparison. The Looney Tunes Show, while a huge departure, wasn't as jarring visually since a sitcom with occasional slapstick worked with a modern style.

>>92207595
In a perfect world, we'd have the humour of this show and the designs of TLTS.

>>92201762
>I can't really see Montana Max ever living in a suburb though.

Max pumped all of his money into inflated tech stocks in the late '90s and was ruined by the bubble popping. Had to sell his mansion and buy a cheap house in the suburbs as a result but still has poor impulse control when it comes to spending money.

>>92201123
>literally me

Looney Tunes fans are nitpicky, of course.

>>92200801
39 is best Porky

File: porky_1.jpg (58KB, 655x430px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 655x430px

>>92198557
Porky my man, what the fuck did they do to you!

>>92199613
But he said a lot.

>>92200815
see>>92199343