Will it be good?
>>92108191
Yes for you and no for everyone else.
>>92108191
I thought the previous two Those were okay nothing bad, so not the highest bar.
But when was the last time the 3rd installment was the best of them? Revenge of the Sith??
It can't be any worse than the last two. Thor's sadly set a really fucking low bar for this sorta thing.
It will be the best Thor film but still be another basic MCU film
>>92108440
>But when was the last time the 3rd installment was the best of them?
Logan?
Well it's got a good director so I'm hopeful.
>>92108508
So did the first Thor and Ironman 3
>>92108191
I hope so.
It seems the only media thats making use of Kirby's creations outside of Kamandi Challenge (and hopefully Bug) willing to actually go full 'Kirby' for lack of a better descriptor.
>>92108524
And they were both good.
No, just because you're a comicfag that went full "NOT MUH MANDARIN" doesn't mean Iron Man 3 was bad. It's actually one of the more unique movies in the MCU that doesn't feel like it was made by a commitee.
>>92108508
>let's hire a comedy director
>to direct a movieloosely basedon the Ragnarok storyline
>>92108440
>>92108497
Toy Story 3. I hope all the work they've put into the fourth one accidentally gets deleted and they have to quit making it.
>>92108563
They hired comedy directors for Winter Soldier too and that didn't turn out very comedic.
>>92108546
* in his Centenary.
>>92108191
Marvel Studios has yet to make a -bad- film. Thor 2 came really close because of the Scooby-Doo gang.
>lol Selvig is naked
>mewmew!
Ragnarok has no sign of those guys or a sappy romance novel plot. It might actually be the best Thor film yet. For what that's worth.
>>92108553
>No, just because you're a comicfag that went full "NOT MUH MANDARIN" doesn't mean Iron Man 3 was bad
>You spend 2 movies building up to the ten rings
>the first trailer you see for iron man 3 being the serious, "shit is hitting the fan," movie
>the movie comes out
>all that build up was a for a shitty joke.
>>92108191
>Iron Man 1 a best
>CapAm 2 a best
>Thor 3 a best
It has meme magic on its side, brother.
>>92108620
>Marvel Studios has yet to make a bad film
this at worst it will be AMAZING
>>92108620
>Marvel Studios has yet to make a -bad- film. Thor 2 came really close because of the Scooby-Doo gang.
Thor 2 is fucking garbage, what the hell makes it a passable movie?
>>92108583
I could be argued that Toy Story 3 is the best but there are also arguments for the other 2. Toy story is in a different argument of "is this the only trilogy with nothing but good movies?"
>>92108553
Dude my whole family doesn't read comics and they even hated it for being boring as shit.
Not to mention how the trailers felt like giant lies after the movie was released
>>92108897
this
But why not give Ragnarok its own movie before doing a crossover?
>>92108620
>Marvel Studios has yet to make a -bad- film
Thor, Thor 2: The sequel, Ironman 2, Ironman 3, Avengers: Weekend at Ultrons are all shit
>>92108831
>You spend 2 movies building up to the ten rings
Not really
>Trailers
wew
>>92108191
>guys our last two movies are the weakest in the MCU
>let's finish strong by copying the quirky space opera that sold billions of tickets
Nothing says twilight of the gods quite like dadrock
>>92109102
Most of those are mundane and boring at worst, AOU gets unfairly shat on. It holds up better to multiple viewings than Avengers.
>>92108897
Loki.
2nd act was ok, too.
Makes it at least watchable.
>>92109102
Thor's films a best tho
I'll give you Iron Man 2 at least. And AoU was certainly wonky in several placesSpader not being one of them.
>>92108897
Long.
Boat.
Star.
Fighters.