Thread replies: 22
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3
Anonymous
Spider-Man 3 - New Cut Of Film To Be Released In Japan 2017-05-01 07:44:27 Post No. 91998046
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Spider-Man 3 - New Cut Of Film To Be Released In Japan 2017-05-01 07:44:27 Post No. 91998046
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: 81OzQpZFsqL._SL1500_.jpg (278KB, 1177x1500px) Image search:
[Google]
278KB, 1177x1500px
Spider-Man 3 - New Cut Of Film To Be Released In Japan
Anonymous
2017-05-01 07:44:27
Post No. 91998046
[Report]
https://www.amazon.co.jp/dp/B071CZGVV1?_encoding=UTF8&isInIframe=0&n=561958&ref_=dp_proddesc_0&s=dvd&showDetailProductDesc=1#product-description_feature_div
It's referenced all through the Japanese amazon page.
Looks like they're calling it "Spider-Man 3.1" 『スパイダーマンTM3.1』
Via Google Translate:
Let's prepare for the new work "Spider-Man: Homecoming" with the bonus footage of three main works and a total of about 15 hours (including "Spider-Man TM TM 3.1")!
>>
>>91998046
You mean there's some more dumbass shit we never saw in Spider-Man 3 movie?
>>
>>91998113
Yeah, they had to cut the parts with Mysterio in it because the movie ran too long.
>>
File: spider_man_3_deleted_scenes.jpg (214KB, 800x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
214KB, 800x1000px
>>91998113
>You mean there's some more dumbass shit we never saw in Spider-Man 3 movie?
Supposedly theirs between 15-20 minutes of cut content. Only something like 4 minutes of it was actually released.
>>
>>91998113
Pretty sure they had a mirror scene where Peter looks into a mirror and sees a weird Venom.
>>
>>91998214
>Flint's daughter making a big fancy sandcastle
pottery so good I would actually watch the movie again to see that
>>
>>91998046
Will we finally see the complete version of SM3?
>>
>>91998214
>>91998244
Whole movie should have been Flint's redemption story.
Then Eddie Brock turns Venom in the aftercredits.
>>
>>91998292
Fuck Flint, movie should've been venom arc with Dr. Connors turning into the Lizard at the end
>>
File: disgust.png (160KB, 254x373px) Image search:
[Google]
160KB, 254x373px
I feel...the most bizarre hype.
>>
>>91998046
I doubt it'll make the film better, but I REALLY want to see what was missing, especially if it includes "Harry hallucinating the butler's exposition" scene.
>>
>>91998046
That's pretty weird to be hearing about this 10 years later.
>>
>>92000021
Usually takes about that long to gather all the footage back and get their head around what needs to be redone and how it should be laid out.
>>
>New Spiderman 3.1
>Movie is suddenly spectacular
Thoughts?
>>
I've never actually rewatched Spider-Man 3 since seeing it in theatres, I reckon it's probably not as bad as I remember - one example is that the 'cool Peter Parker' montage bit went over my head as a kid, and that it's actually what a nerd like Peter would think would look cool, which is why it's lame.
>>
>>92000444
did they remove the Parker dance scene?
Did Peter get together with that chick with the cookies?
Did Foreman actually do anything as a villain instead of just turning up the last 5 minutes of the movie?
>>
>>92000778
>Removing the dance scene
>Not spectacular
>>
>>92000791
the original spider-man trilogy was many things. Spectacular is not one of them.
Now if you were to make a animated trilogy with the Spectacular Spider-man.. That would have been a completely different story.
>>
>>92000882
>Spectacular is not one of them.
You're right. Amazing is more appropiate.
>>
>>92001486
"so-so" more comes to mind.
I want a spidey that actually crack jokes now an then instead of 3 jokes through 3 entire movies.
>>
>>91998143
That's not it at all
>>
Was there much of a difference in quality between Spider-Man 2 and 2.1?
Thread posts: 22
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3