How do you feel about MCU Stan Lee beinga Watcheras oppose tothe OAA?
I don't care.
>implying they will not make him OAA in Infinity Wars
What's more important to me is that the reveal is funny, whichever it is
>>91844853
What if Stan Lee was playing a Skrull the entire time?
>>91844853
The watcher makes 100x more sense than if he were to be the OAA, the one above all is just the head of the celestials and isn't omniscient like a watcher afaik. Celestials are glorified scientists. I think it's a cool detail and the watchers are a great concept so the fact that they have the balls to utilize something like them is a good thing to me. I hope his head is huge
>>91844941
I think OP meant TOAA as in the actual deity that created everything including the first firmament and etc.
>>91844941
And the Watchers are glorified peeking toms.
>>91844941
Different OAA, anon.
There's OAA, head of the Celestials, and there's OAA, Marvel-God.
I assume OP meant the latter (supreme maker of the Marvel Multiverse or whatever his official title is), the former really would be a WTF role.
>>91844941
A celestial would murder a watcher, because watchers can't do dick
Jack is OAA. Now and forever.
>>91845067
Nick Fury murdered a Watcher, they ain't shit.
>>91844969
>>91845033
They would never show that in the MCU though
>>91844986
Read this as "Peking Tom"
>>91845067
This is a really random impertinent thing to say
If it means they got the FF back, great.
>>91844853
>Avengers 4 ends
>No post credits scene
>"For Stan"
>>91845261
>>91844853
I'm fine with it, the one above all is canonically Jack Kirby.
However, Stan was shown to be his collaborator.
>>91844910
>implying he will live long enough to be in infinity wars
>>91844969
But TOAA will forever be Jack Kirby.
>>91845393
You know he's filmed lots of cameos for future films right?
Also,
>Stan Lee
>Dying
You new here?
>>91844925
that would make so much more sense, too bad the skrulls are hanging at FOX