Frank Cho's Latest Art

Nadia's butt is cute! CUTE!

>>91837329
So he's just trolling the shit out of the industry with these? I need more examples of this.

By "this" I of course mean defiance of industry trends, not these covers.

Though more covers would be nice too.

>>91837415
That's Janet.

>Cho isn't aware that Nadia isn't Janet
>because Cho doesn't read comics
>/co/ defends this because he's "fighting" "against" our favorite boogeypersons
Wew.

File: jw1.png (113KB, 640x739px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 640x739px

>>91837329
>Jeremy Whitley is a virtue signalling faggot who says Cho is 'behind the times'
who'd have fucking guessed

>>91837742
>guy who works in comics doesn't care about comics
wut

File: jw2.png (136KB, 557x981px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 557x981px

>>91837742
>muh Eisner nomination
Cho's effect as an artist on the comic book community will be felt generations after this nobody has faded into obscurity.

>>91837742
Bash cho for being old stuff, then bashes cho for not knowing comics.

Weird.

File: jw3.png (62KB, 627x513px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 627x513px

Maybe he and Rob can gang up Cho in a dark alley one day for exploitating their daughter-fus

>>91837763
Theyre all wrong.

>>91837763
Wait, how is it Marvel's fault Cho drew what Cho draws?

>>91837733
Cho may have intended it be Jan, but with Nadia's suit and her hair it's effectively Nadia. Especially when my dick would rather it be Nadia.

>because Cho doesn't read comics
>implying not knowing one year old legacy character who exists simultaneously with the original is a big deal
Would you say Priest doesn't read comics because he had to clarify that Deathstroke hadn't been replaced with a black guy before he accepted the job writing him?

File: jw4.png (41KB, 623x321px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 623x321px

last one for now but damn

>>91837733
I don't care who he thinks it is. It pissed off virtue signaling faggots, and its an incredible piece of art. If you catch my drift.

>>91837733
Nadia might as well be Janet's clone. Not like anyone can tell them apart anyway.

File: image.gif (93KB, 2000x2059px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 2000x2059px

>>91837329

>>91837824
Priest actually doesn't read comics.

File: tumblr_inline_ntsq98fA9f1qldhit_500[1].png (445KB, 500x559px) Image search: [Google]

445KB, 500x559px

>>91837329
your husbando a shilord

>>91837477
He's been doing the same sort of combination of ass and snark for the past 30 some years.

>>91837733
Perhaps the comissioner wanted Jan in Nadia's costume? Perhaps Cho balked a little at drawing 14 year old ass?

>>91837763
Modern eisner nomination means squirrel girl to me. Pic related is the comic he's crowing about. I actually sort of like it, but there's no fucking way I would consider it for multiple nominations the way it got.

>>91837821
Marvel isn't blacklisting him the way some of the bitches and whiners would like.

>>91837858
Credit where credit's due. At least he didn't go full navy seals copypasta like the spider gwen guy.

>>91837858
>he's playing to a diminishing base
Funnily enough I imagine Cho will still be getting commissions and published work long after whoever that is gets his book canceled.

>>91838180
I don't know if that comic is satire or what, but fair also means "beautiful". Literally.

File: 20170425_125902.png (174KB, 1073x606px) Image search: [Google]

174KB, 1073x606px

HOLY SHIT, Mark Waid just almost redeemed himself in my eyes, I expected he would be hardcore against cheesecake.

>>91839144
What libel is this?

>>91837733
>Reading Unbeatable Wasp.

If you non ironically like that garbage you should consider offing yourself.

>>91837824
>and her hair

Which isn't that much different from Jan's.

>>91837858
Is that why Marvel's progressiveness is losing readers?

File: 1436684572173.jpg (105KB, 640x800px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 640x800px

>>91839722
Last I saw Jan still had the pixie. When did she get a bob?

>>91837329
He's fucking shit and needs to stop, or at least try to do something a bit different. But I suppose that's too risky and he'll just keep on shitting out cheesecake and taking that T & A money. Good Girl art without any of the charm or sense of fun. I can't think of a comic artist with less self-awareness.

>>91839776
Isn't that Ultimate Janet?

>>91837329
BRAAAAAAAAAAAAP

>>91837742
>>91837763
>>91837799
>>91837858
>hey guys look at these cucks, amirite?
>based cho XD

Jesus Christ you're a faggot

>>91837329
I know Whitley, he is a good guy. That being said all the new writer/artists in comic industry need to relax and learn to take a joke and not be so uptight about making every little thing a PC issue.

>Whitley is basically whatever about it. Frank Cho gonna Cho
>People keep trying to prod him into anger

what the hell

Does anyone even get offended by Cho's art anymore save for Rucka?

File: sweet christmas.jpg (43KB, 310x549px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 310x549px

>>91837988

>>91837757
You could sum up all of Marvel and DC editorial with that phrase.

>>91839343
see
>>91837858
>>91837799
>>91837763

>>91840119
I assume they're doing it because he's being condescending, implying artists like Cho and their fans are outdated boors possessed of an inferior mindset.

>>91840258
That seems too tame to be actual libel.

>>91840351
It mentions BC. Maybe they called him a pedo when they were clickbaiting over this?

>>91840532
>>91840351
He's talking about Jude Terror and BC not Whitley:

https://www.bleedingcool.com/2017/04/24/jeremy-whitley-responds-frank-chos-unstoppable-wasp-blank-sketch-variant/

>>91840583
What is "bleah"?

>>91840583
What does it say?

Why is this Jeremy guy even mad it's not even his character.

He literally created IP for Disney and his only job is writing a few stories before he's replaced. Where is all this pride for his waifu even coming from?

>>91840681
Practically nothing, just screenshots of Whitley's twitter comments and the author adding in some self-fellating captions.

>>91840796
Post the captions.

>>91840757
He didn't even create her, that was Waid.

>It's Mark Waid's character to begin with
>He's not even mad and is totally bro with Cho about it
kek

>>91837742
>who could give two shits about comics
Why do Americans do this and think this is a sentence that makes sense? He COULDN'T give a shit, c'mon.

>>91840051
>I know Whitley, he is a good guy
No, he's a nu-male.

>>91840806
Only because you asked so nicely.

>On Saturday, Bleeding Cool published a report telling you about Frank Cho’s latest blank sketch variant, apparently depicting The Unstoppable Wasp, otherwise known as teenage superhero Nadia Pym, with Luke Cage and Iron Fist ogling her butt. After Bleeding Cool published the article, Cho updated his Facebook post to say that the character was meant to be Janet Van Dyne, the original Wasp.

[Screens of Cho's fb post]

>Nevertheless, Unstoppable Wasp writer Jeremy Whitley commented on Twitter:

[Screens of Whitley's twitter]

>Well, that’s putting it bluntly. A helpful and reportedly very handsome person pointed out that it wasn’t technically in the *original* post that Cho labeled it as Janet, to which he replied:

[Screens of author's twitter exchange with Whitley]

>In the end…

[Superfluous twitter screens]

>Just Luke Cage talking about butts…

If you ask me to post the screens you can go fuck yourself, I don't even know why I did this much.

>yfw he draws an adult Moon Girl variant

>>91839693
Calm your autism you unpleasent prick.

File: heavy sees you.jpg (87KB, 1680x1050px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 1680x1050px

>>91837329
Okay, just going to ask. Does Cho do spanking pics? His fixation on the booty would support the notion he'd be into it and my dick can barely process the imagery of him drawing one out

>>91839144
I like Rich The Leech is so good at triggering the manbabies of the comic book industry,

File: STL007717-600x9101.jpg (142KB, 600x910px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 600x910px

couldn't give two shits about comics eh?

>>91841321
To be fair I imagine he doesn't actually care about Janet's replacement.

File: 1487705980216.png (330KB, 600x666px) Image search: [Google]

330KB, 600x666px

>>91841071

>>91839955
This, whenever I see posts with twitter screencaps I can't help but think the anon who posted it is either a teenage girl or just a bitchboy.

>>91839955

t. cuck

>>91841186
It wasn't Rich who wrote the article, though, it was Jude

It is getting kinda tiring with the Cho crap. Can't he just get back to drawing hot ass bitches without trying to deliberately piss people off at the same time. The first 10 times was kinda funny, but now we're on the 15th drawing telling the same joke?

>>91841024
>I don't even know why I did this much
Because you're a bitch, now post the screens.

>>91841571
He wasn't even trying to piss anybody off. It was just a bit of cheesecake with a little joke, no Outrage Gwen or backhanded dialogue or anything.

>>91841576
Sorry, I might be a bitch but I'm a lazy bitch. That's way too much work.

>>91841564
I'm pretty sure that's just a made up persona.

I'm not sure which salt is tastier, the stuff coming from the people Cho is pissing off on twitter on the people he's pissing off on /co/.

>>91841691
Yeah, sure there was no Outrage Qwen because there doesn't need to be one now. All his work has become boringly uniform. There's usually some character in the bottom corner of the page, saying something snooty, the female being drawn has the brain size of a peanut, and then he pretends that he hasn't already purposefully done this to irk people.

If that's what he wants to be known for then that's his business. It's just really hurting his appeal to be able to draw in other books. I'd rather he ramp down his innocent act and just embrace what he's doing or shut up about it.

Plus, I'd really like to see him work on other stuff rather than just drawing dumbed down cheesecake ALL the time.

>>91841861
Well, /co/ can make long autistic rants about how triggered they are: >>91841908. Whereas Twitter only allows a given number of characters.

File: 1458539844499.jpg (119KB, 627x960px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 627x960px

>>91841908
>the female being drawn has the brain size of a peanut

How can you tell? There is no change within the size or cranium nor any convenient transparency.

>>91841908
>the female being drawn has the brain size of a peanut
Because stupid women don't exist, right?

>>91842393
I like Cho's art, but these jokes are terrible. Nobody says "Damn my wide child bearing hips."

>>91842393
To be fair, this is just cheesecake. I still like the guy, yet Artist like Adam Hughs at least change up the themes of their sexy art. It's not just the same scenario rinse and repeated.

>>91842393

her hips are through the vent though.
her thighs are what are stuck

File: starfire_statue_by_adamhughes-d39tbnx.jpg (709KB, 690x1228px) Image search: [Google]

709KB, 690x1228px

>>91842585
Cho has one big advantage over Adam Hughes, which is that Hughes cannot draw hips for shit.

>>91842656
He prefers a different body type. I think Ryan Ottley and Cho draw the best babes.

Cho should draw a aged up version of that princess charcther that guy drew as a coked out whore

>>91842710
Ok, commission the drawing. I'd love to see it.

>>91837742

Jeremy Whitley's art isn't as good as Cho's.

Whitley knows this in his heart of hearts and the only thing he chooses to do about it is rage.

Envy is a terrible thing.

>>91842990
>Jeremy Whitley's art isn't as good as Cho's.

I don't know about that. It depends on what you're looking for. I mean, Cho's art just doesn't lend itself well to serious storytelling. It would be a hilarious thing to see him draw "The Boys" by Garth Ennis. Cause suddenly all the impact of the emotional scenes would be taken away because of how distracting his art can be when it comes to telling grimdark stories, his art just doesn't lend itself well to certain types of storytelling.

If you wanna have a wank, then Cho's your man.

File: b583ed48fd9227f4f3fbe68ba5888a03.jpg (88KB, 736x516px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 736x516px

hoo boy

>>91841114
I think I hear your wife's son calling, better get on that.

File: 1423188445056.png (57KB, 306x421px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 306x421px

>>91843323
Those ladies are looking kinda Frank.

>>91842990
I was under the impression Whitley was just a writer.

>>91843291
Damn that fantastic four chic is thicc as fucc

File: Quantum and Woody v3-040.jpg (14KB, 187x236px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 187x236px

>>91843410
>check his bibliography
>he wrote My Little Pony books

>>91841908
There's no Outrage Gwen because that phase is over and he's gone back to making his sketches the way he's done since forever. He's not pretending that he isn't doing this to irk people, he just isn't doing it to irk people. It's just another variant cover that he does on the side for fun, complete with cheesecake and a little joke. If Cho was trying to irk people, you would know, because the cover would be taking shots at those people. Like with the Harley Quinn cover or the Power Girl one.

It's also funny that you think that these little side bits are what Cho is largely known for in the industry. The guy has won multiple awards and is the creator and owner of multiple published award winning works. Trust me, he doesn't have to worry about his appeal.

YOU only know him as this guy who draws silly little cheesecake sketches because your investment in comics and art begins and ends with whatever social media you follow, like the threads on /co/. You probably spend more time bitching about comics than you do actually reading them.

If you actually knew anything more about his work, then you would know that he doesn't just do "dumbed down cheesecake ALL the time". Fuck if you even followed comics or bothered to read the storytimes on this board you would have seen his art in Totally Awesome Hulk, which wasn't all cheesecake and had impressive depictions of monsters.

File: dlZ2ZNpS9yYmY.gif (1010KB, 450x248px) Image search: [Google]

1010KB, 450x248px

>>91837329
In another, better, universe Frank Cho uses his skills to draw full porn.

>>91837742
>evolving

If "evolving" means giving up liking fat asses then I don't wanna evolve

>>91843767
Is he saying that blacks are less evolved than whites? I feel like we can use this.

>>91838180

What a horrible lines and art

>>91843649
I'm here on 4chan, so I know who Frank Cho is in all his glory and flaws. I even have some work of his signed by him. If you can't criticize an artist just because you like their work, then that's your issue not mine. I'm certainly not losing any sleep over it. He trolls people. That's pretty much what he's been doing since he found out that it's lucrative to piss people off.

Not only does making people mad increase your sales but it also makes your work more known to others. Being that he's so well rounded, he's at that point in his career where he can take chances like this.

>If you actually knew anything more about his work, then you would know that he doesn't just do "dumbed down cheesecake ALL the time". Fuck if you even followed comics or bothered to read the storytimes on this board you would have seen his art in Totally Awesome Hulk, which wasn't all cheesecake and had impressive depictions of monsters.

I liked Lady Hellbender as I thought it was a very cool design. Had you been listening to what I said in whatever retort I gave. I basically said, that his art doesn't lend itself to certain kinds of stories. At least when he's hired to do a book you'll notice that it's usually to draw a story that speaks to his strengths as an artist.

Take Totally Awesome Hulk for instance... he draw anatomy pretty well. Hulk half-naked half the time. He draws monster pretty good, that story is full of monsters.

If you're trying to checkmate me, it's not going to work because I ain't even mad at your passion.

>>91840191

thanks

>>91843795
That's not at all what he said in fact it's literally impossible to even come to that conclusion unless you already had the thought in your head or were (obviously) trying to frame him, but feel free to use it, I'm sure it won't make you look like you're projecting.

>>91842656
Hughes can't draw hips and ASS

>>91841908
>he pretends that he hasn't already purposefully done this to irk people.

Really?
Citation needed

>>91837742
I think jealous or envy for me

>>91843527
>fantasthicc.

File: 1473461852665.png (56KB, 401x372px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 401x372px

>>91843585
Not good ones either. He shoved fucking racial oppression undertones into the MLP books he wrote.

It's insane.

>>91843970
I think it's ok that his holiness Frank Cho is a bit of trollish prick sometimes. That's pretty much it, as it doesn't really take away from what point he's trying to make.

Lastly, it's ok for people to be assholes every once in a while. There's just no way he's not kicking the hive just to stir the shit sometimes. I'll leave it at that.

>>91843872
I'm not saying that you can't criticize Cho, just that you were wrong.

Does he troll people? Yes? Is this particular sketch trolling? No. The female isn't even acting dumb and the corner characters aren't being snooty. Does he draw silly cheesecake? Yes. Does he draw silly cheesecake all the time? No. Is he known for cheesecake? Yes. Is that all he is known for? No.

And you didn't say anything about his art not lending itself to certain kinds of stories, doofus.

It's true, but you didn't say anything about it until just now.

File: 1531267453.jpg (92KB, 1507x1058px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 1507x1058px

>>91841321

>>91837733
>post avengers disassembled marvel is canon.

why would you bother to read modern sjwcomics?

>>91844111
>And you didn't say anything about his art not lending itself to certain kinds of stories, doofus.

I must have lost track of whom I was responding to at the time. I said it to someone else on this thread, oh well my bad!

I think we'll just disagree on certain points, but overall you got the jist of what I was saying. I feel we converge enough on some points to where I don't feel the need to get overly nuanced if we understand each other's points.

File: cho harley.jpg (132KB, 564x877px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 564x877px

>>91844108
This is Cho trying to kick the hive. The Wasp sketch, and many others, are not.

File: Skybourne_002_PRESS3.jpg (197KB, 994x1528px) Image search: [Google]

197KB, 994x1528px

>>91843164
>The story with tons of ridiculous sex and titties wouldn't be a good fit for Cho
I'm sure you could trust Cho to not just wiggle in Asses and tits when he had to draw some dead dogs. Or do you simply mean you don't buy that Cho's style in general just can't lead to emotional moments ignoring the sex. Which I could somewhat agree on. Cho is good at being big and flashy. Y'know hyper detailed, understands his anatomy, bomb ass and titties but emotionally lacking. If you appreciate it for those aspects he's great but I wouldn't really recall any Frank Cho art ever emotionally moving me, apart from envy for my own lack of skill. However I feel I could say the same for Darick Robertson, I like the boys but the emotional hits aren't particularly from Darick's art. Though he IS a better fit in that his shit does feel grimy whereas Frank's stuff is super sterile most the time.
That said from what I've seen of NuWasp's art it's not like you could drop her in The Boys and accomplish Darick's dirtiness. Also a lot of his fill ins just weren't very good.
>>91841908
Does Skybourne fall into dumb cheesecake? The first issue has a hot girl with big titties but relatively conservatively dressed and spends the whole issue literally punching holes through dudes. But the story was pretty weak.

>/co/mblr siding with faggot Jeremy Whitley

Nothing new under the sun.

>>91837858
Is there a single Marvlel writer out there that isnt a cancerous liberal?

>>91843795
>>91843916
>That's not at all what he said in fact it's literally impossible to even come to that conclusion unless you already had the thought in your head or were (obviously) trying to frame him, but feel free to use it, I'm sure it won't make you look like you're projecting.

Hold up. White dude insults a POC, calling him unevolved. That's more than enough to start an outrage train that has gotten people fired before. And in this case He triples down by calling him prehistoric and saying that his kind is going to die out.

Now the outrage train goes to fucking retarded places, so it's not healthy to push this, and even the clickbait fuckers didn't run with this angle, but calling it unthinkable means you aren't aware of things going on around you right now.

>>91844225
>This is Cho trying to kick the hive. The Wasp sketch, and many others, are not.

Granted but once you open that door, it can't be closed once you've pissed off tons of people. It's a stink he's got on him now, it's not going away anytime soon and I don't think he minds at all. He just kinda beat people over the head with it and no some people remember. That's what happens when you just don't let shit go.

>>91844270
>Does Skybourne fall into dumb cheesecake?

I stopped reading after the first issue, when he kills off the character. I was reading it and I was liking the blood and the gore, I was imagining this fully capable female in some cheesecake poses in later issues, but then she dies. So, I'll wait until it comes out on paperback. Or just pick it up when it's all done. From what I can tell it's reading kinda like kick ass beat-em "No you killed my Sister!" revenge story. Which will be cool to read I imagine.

On the Frank Cho stuff, he's just not my go-to guy when it comes to emotional beats. Ryan Ottley of Invincible (MurderMan) fame can really draw the expression of someone who is royally pissed off. His facial expressions are top notch. and his bodies of women while still hot can still not be too distracting.

But yeah that's about it.

>>91844531
Please someone tweet Whitley. Call him a racist.

>>91844531

You're allowed to insult PoCs that don't believe in the victim narrative, anon.

>>91837329
>character's defining power is shrinking
>Cho makes her "thicc"
For fuck's sake.

>>91844034
>He shoved fucking racial oppression undertones into the MLP books he wrote
kek

Western comics are fucking trash.

Is "Outrage Gwen" just Frank's version of Kelly's crying statue of liberty?

>>91844702
Tall women should be slim.
Midgets are meant to be thicc.

>>91837858
>muh right side of history
>muh eventual progressive takeover

this grinds my gears

>>91844604
>He just kinda beat people over the head with it
Yeah, with the Outrage Gwen sketches.

Not this one.

File: kek.png (785KB, 735x529px) Image search: [Google]

785KB, 735x529px

>>91841114
>He likes Unbeatable Wasp.

>>91844789

yes and no.
yes in that its a recurring "character"
no in that Kelly is satirical and Cho doesn't understand humor

File: IMG_1129.jpg (36KB, 480x640px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 480x640px

>>91837799
Teenage girls are never sexy. I keep forgetting that.

I meam, I seem to recall them being sexy when I was in high school... But maybe I'm mistaken.

>>91841844
Jude's from the Outhousers, the Gawker of comics journalism and the only site I'm aware of that's openly hated by multiple pros.

File: Cho.png (377KB, 1161x403px) Image search: [Google]

377KB, 1161x403px

>>91844604
>He's got the stink
Well I guess there's nothing that can be done, Frank has literally been doing this shit since the 90s.
So I guess Whitley isn't wrong in that Frank hasn't evolved, but he's like a Crocodile in that sense. He doesn't have much reason to.
>>91844794
I believe in a world where all bodytypes are loved. Be it cute short skinny girls or bombshell amazons.
Except landwhales. Ew.

>>91843323
Since when can the Invisible Woman shoot bullets out of her eyes?

>>91845074
I don't see doing whatever Whitley is doing as an evolution.

>>91845097
she can do some crazy shit with her powers.
it's not just invisibility now

File: 1455801201965.jpg (34KB, 460x397px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 460x397px

>>91837329
wow it's the same cover with the same joke how exciting
it's really appropriate that it's a cover for wasp because zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

File: c7b4df1fac0553aca19268bc9abdf124[1].jpg (123KB, 622x960px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 622x960px

The fumiest thing about all of this to me is that Cho is great comes to women of varying physiques, and possibly the definitive brand name when it comes to a look that has physical power without sacrificing femininity.

Pic not related. I wanted to see how far down I'd have to go to find a cover with zero cheesecake. Which wasn't nearly as far as I though.

>>91844451
Typically they put their most right wing person available on Punisher. Which would probably mean a mainstream democrat, given how crazy shit is right now. Who's doing the new one?

>>91844606
Do it your damm self. No good will come from it.

And in any case, pretending to support the position and slowly ramping it up to maximum retardation is the better troll play


>>91844677

And the opinion of the POC in question doesn't matter when fighting for social justice.

>>91844789
>>91845045
It makes more sense if you know the cartoons Kelly is satirizing. But it's close enough.

>>91845097
Her head is just blocking the view of Black Widow's guns.

>>91845323
What other cover has he done that references a rap song and makes a joke about butts and Pym Particles?

>>91845074
True enough. I just wish he'd add in more comedy to his work and some kind of variation. His past drawings on this subject provided nuance, humor, and some tongue in cheek commentary. Now it's just tits, snark, and a lack of imagination. Not that cheesecake needs imagination, but I do miss old school Cho cause back then he had something to say.

His pinups just seem kinda heavy handed all the time. Like he's hitting his viewers with a mallet time and again. It's as though, he found the metric and just keeps doing the same thing.

I liken it to a person who just continues to make the same youtube video repeatedly. But hey, if it works I suppose it ain't all that bad, I just wish people would stop making him out to be this innocent participant. He's clearly not and it would matter more if folks understood that instead of protecting him all the time.

>>91845325
>The fumiest thing about all of this to me is that Cho is great comes to women of varying physiques, and possibly the definitive brand name when it comes to a look that has physical power without sacrificing femininity.
>Pic not related. I wanted to see how far down I'd have to go to find a cover with zero cheesecake. Which wasn't nearly as far as I though.
jesus christ cho i know you need this website for free advertisement but calm down

>>91845325
>Who's doing the new one?
Cloonan. According to some weirdo who trawled every Marvel writer's twitter accounts, she's liberal but one of their most apolitical.

File: 6d0fd247dd36d76673ae9fe7402a525a[1].jpg (99KB, 520x800px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 520x800px

>>91845364
This is the best I could do in looking. Not part of the Outrage series either.

>>91845407
Wait, I thought cloonan was doing the current one? The terrible "frank as a horror movie serial killer" one.

>>91841908
Isn't this stuff he's getting paid to draw? I mean these all look like blank sketch commissions which if that's what people want then what's the problem with doing it. Not everyone is gonna want the animals from Liberty Meadows. I'm just glad someone from here got famous in a industry I like. Fuck yeah frank

>>91845445
Cloonan's run is continuing past the first arc beyond 12 issues. He's going back to New York.

File: Totally-Awesome-Hulk-1-Raekwon-Only-Built-4-Cuban-Linx[1].jpg (400KB, 1940x960px) Image search: [Google]

400KB, 1940x960px

>>91845364
Second closest.

Does this count as cultural appropriation? Or does it get a pass with the Racial Draft trade involving the Wu Tang clan?

>>91845452
A lot of people seem to confuse Cho's work that a publisher hires him for and the blank covers/commissions. Like they are all the same.

Cho fans like women with big tits and nice asses. Cho likes to draw this. So Cho draws some for his fans to buy. Seems like a good idea to me.

File: LeiaCho.jpg (148KB, 1493x956px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 1493x956px

>>91845396
I think you're expecting a lot from pin up sketches.
I don't think those in particular were ever a part of Cho's nuanced commentary or whatever you want to call it. He says he does a good chunk of these as war,mups.

>>91845416
>It's Hammer Time
......is the hammer her penis?

File: Screen Shot 2017-04-25 at 6.09.31 PM.png (203KB, 619x914px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 619x914px

Who are these people that think they can dictate what people draw, look at, talk about and think? Jesus.

File: 16655[1].jpg (175KB, 600x922px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 600x922px

>>91845528
>That depends if you're Worthy.

>>91845570

>I dont like seeing thing you should stop posting it
>I dont like you doing thing you should stop

lmao

>>91845570
>Who are these people that think they can dictate what people draw, look at, talk about and think?
Literally no one in that screenshot.

Are you just engaging them so you can screencap their reactions and post them here?

>>91845652

I didnt engage them at all, this is a conversation of two other people and the girl? literally says she has a problem that he posts it for people to see and doesn't care about any negative reaction you shitstain.

>>91845452
It's not like an artist has to draw what you want them to, especially if it's a commission. And yeah, he'll continue to be one of my favorite artists he just pisses me off sometimes which his antics.

>>91845526
>I think you're expecting a lot from pin up sketches.

Naw, I'm not really. I'm just so often confused at what he's trying to say these days. First, he wants to draw whatever he wants, then gets some flack for it, then complains about it as if he's being crucified. Then waits a few months and does the same thing again.

I mean, at what point do you just relax and accept not everyone is going to like what you're doing. It's not some conspiracy, art is by its very nature complex people are just gonna have opinions about this kinda shit.

Comic books fans both young and old are gonna have some pretty conflicting opinions.

>>91844289
>search thread to find one person with stupid opinion
>claim that they, and not the rest of the thread disagreeing with him, represent the entire board

I don't have an enemy website to accuse you of being from, but you sure are a faggot.

>>91845706
She also literally says that she didn't say that she thinks he shouldn't be allowed to do it, you retard.

>>91845834

Just follow her arbitrary rules, not get any recognition for it, not draw for anyone else, and stop when literally ANYONE has a problem with it. How nice of her!

File: BatChoChair.jpg (85KB, 736x1113px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 736x1113px

>>91845734
What Frank is doing in these sketches was what he always did. Drawing cheesecake. Then when people started giving him shit for it he went on a prolonged "fuck you I can do what I want" it helps that people were funding it, now he's just back into normal cheesecake mode on these sketches. There was originally no real commentary the commentary only comes about when people try to shit on him and then he goes back. It only repeats because people just don't let the sketches be.
>>91845834
I don't think she's doing that she doesn't say he's not allowed to do it just that him doing it is trolling. However what he did was post it to his own private shit. It's hard to call that trolling. It's not as though he went and put it up on the writer's tumblr or tweeted it at him.

Though I think reading it as full on saying "this can't be done" is a problem. If only because it just escalates the debate to a level it never needed to be at. This isn't really about censorship yet

>>91846028
What rules? There's nothing about rules or what people should or shouldn't do in that entire screenshot.

She just calls Cho a troll, then some guy tries to btfo her and fails because he's putting words in her mouth. After he took the weak shot at Marvel, of course.

>>91846198
The logic of the person you're arguing with is that any negative comment inherently suggests the target shouldn't exist. Which, of course, is fucking stupid but that's the internet for you.

File: 1472003751446.gif (2MB, 356x400px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 356x400px

>>91842682

>Ottley

>>91845329
Anon was being facetious

>>91842563
Thats the joke.

>>91838180

Whitley sucks and is envious of Cho's talent.

>>91846573
I actually just thought she was just firing tiny force fields really powerfully.

>>91847429
He knows that, hence why he's saying the joke is terrible.

>>91842656
Those are actually realistic hips, though.

Not drawing the hips you like =/= not being able to draw hips

>>91843291
Thats a buff ass Hellcat compared to that rejected webcomic version

>>91839144
How would that in any way be libel since it is just some assholes arguing on twitter? Or does the fact he's attacking him as a professional and his professional identity suddenly make it that?

>>91844034
>Not good ones either. He shoved fucking racial oppression undertones into the MLP books he wrote.

#Earth Pony lives matter

>>91848091
No he's complaining about the unnatural syntax but the joke IS that the lines are stilted the way a porn actress would say it.
"Oh no, I've spilled coffee on my huge tits. Maybe I should take my shirt off..."

>>91839144
>Waid bitches about people bullying, harassing and namecalling him online
>does the same to Rich
#WOKE

>>91837742
>Jeremy Whitley
Who? and ..... seriously, who???

>>91837763
>muh Eisner nomination
Not even Eisner winner, WTF Waid is a winner and you dont see him bringing that every single time

>>91837860
>and its an incredible piece of art
duh! and water is wet.

>>91844111
>Does he troll people? Yes? Is this particular sketch trolling? No. The female isn't even acting dumb and the corner characters aren't being snooty. Does he draw silly cheesecake? Yes. Does he draw silly cheesecake all the time? No. Is he known for cheesecake? Yes. Is that all he is known for? No.
Whatever you say, Donald Rumsfeld.

>>91852009
>Donald Rumsfeld
Does this guy talk like that or something?

>>91839144
How would Mark Waid be against Cheesecake?

>>91852252
I'm guessing an allusion to unknown unknowns and known unknowns.
However he doesn't actually have an argument so he's just deflecting.

>>91840864

He could stand to give a shit or two. Because he doesn't presently.

>>91839834
No. Ultimate Jan was Asian.

File: arrested development michael.jpg (15KB, 612x528px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 612x528px

Some people seem to think:

draw something I don't like = trolling

Maybe stop disliking so many random things?

>>91845493
>Does this count as cultural appropriation?
Tribute Marvel cover series were almost all Rap albums

File: 17499081_10155866265929688_6699466165989805692_n.jpg?oh=6fe2eaddc0041d694f75ac8e0bc56ec4&oe=59841C88.jpg (91KB, 636x960px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 636x960px

>>91853802
I mean to be fair Frank was trolling for a good while and occasionally falls back into it. Also most of these people only link Frank with trolling. In fact his form of trolling being what he always did but with a Spider-Gwen drawn in the background.
So it's understandable that they'd be ignorant that Frank just does this and think it's some kind of snipe at them.

File: Bullied!.jpg (59KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 1280x720px

>>91854122
>PG's sweaty, smelly, onion-y armpits

>all this butthurt over fucking variants and commissions
worst timeline

File: character_170_f.jpg (137KB, 400x393px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 400x393px

>>91839776

This is how Cho drew her in Mighty Avengers.

>>91854122
Would armpit windows be even more fetishy than a boob window?

File: rare ennis.jpg (31KB, 599x443px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 599x443px

>>91844451
Still waiting on The Platoon, though.

File: ArtgemMarvel.jpg (219KB, 659x1000px) Image search: [Google]

219KB, 659x1000px

>>91855179
Isn't that basically a tank top with gloves?

>>91855542
I think it's more like how girls tear the sleeves off of their t-shirts so you get their armpits and the side of their boobs peeking out through the holes. But if she wears said sleeves, then yes.

File: PBF275-The_Offenders.png (1MB, 800x3278px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 800x3278px

>>91837329
is that slur

>>91837329
These are funny but is he doing any real work right now? All I ever see is this shit anymore. I mean, how long has he been running this gag now? A whole year?

>>91837990
It seems that there are a lot of writers at Marvel who don't read each other's work except for Ewing.

>>91857336

I mean people keep paying him to draw them, so why would he stop? He's also doing Harley Quinn covers.

>>91857336
Variant covers for Trinity and his Boom book as far as I know. Supposedly he's got some Marvel project he's working on, but I don't think it's been announced

>>91855203
If only more Marvel writers had Ennis' working-class liberalism ideologies.

>>91838920
Quoted for truth.

24 Archaic a person or thing that is beautiful or valuable, esp. a woman

>>91842563
I said it twice this morning.

>>91857740
Somewhat amusing the number of people who confuse ennis with an ultra right wing trog.

>>91845325
I am highly offended that someone feels that it is okay to tell Deathlok to smile. That's sexual harassment, yo.

>>91845528
Either way, you're gonna be thor in the morning.

File: 3066938190_eddb4c2486.jpg (195KB, 500x372px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 500x372px

>>91843291
>>91843323
>>91843358
Buff Hellcat is something I never knew I wanted until now. Marvel, please put Cho on a Hellcat book with Patsy having this physique.

>>91837757
anon this is way more common than you think.

>>91845734
>#
>It's not like an artist has to draw what you want them to, especially if it's a commission.

Due to there being zero inflection with typed words I'm not sure if this is sarcasm or not.

All's I know is if I'm paying frank cho to draw something I want him to draw me sexy super women

>>91837329
Honestly, I've seen Cho make this joke so many times, all I'm wondering is why he used Luke and Danny this time. Did Spider-Gwen get too old?

File: biggrin.png (572KB, 600x580px) Image search: [Google]

572KB, 600x580px

>>91837742
>>91837763
>>91837799
>>91837858

kek look at this dude

>LOOK GUYS I GOT NOMINATED OK!!!!???? DO THINGS MY WAY!!! IM RIGHT YOU'RE WRONGG

mysides

gotta live twitter for bringing autism to the masses

File: 17835141_10155912292994688_7773332170738604577_o.jpg?oh=211b6f9db3551125b0fb701cc723c7ab&oe=597DE21E.jpg (84KB, 480x728px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 480x728px

>>91862311
Because the guy didn't commision Spider-Gwen probably.

File: DSCN0662.jpg (2MB, 2816x2112px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2816x2112px

>>91839955
>>91841478
you don't think they're overreacting? cuck is overused and a normie meme at this point, but these dudes are just being ridiculous because someone likes something they don't like.

The New Puritans™

>>91864381
>cuck is a normie meme
Is that why they're trying to spin it as a good thing now?

>>91864300
I just looked up some stuff and apparently he has a daughter who he basically character inserted into his OC, PC, Stronkwomen comic?

>>91843710
i wanna go there too :(

File: edgyBitch.jpg (9KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 300x300px

>>91864408
they are? i dont know any normies who think being a cuck is a good thing lol

>>91864458
desu i think he can write shit comics if he wants to. i don't mind writers and artists inserting their politics into games/comics/movies/tv shows. just gotta know how to do it subtly and not shove it at other people's faces.

>>91857948
Fucking how, his Punisher run was constantly talking shit about Bush and the military industry complex.

>>91837329
He draws good arousing art but I could never get behind his sense of humour.

He has a hard time letting go of jokes.

I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of it comes from commissions, though.

>>91865151

Not just his Punisher, either.

Dude shat on Bush at every available opportunity, and always depicted him as being either corrupt, a retard, or a corrupt retard.

File: frank the patriarch.jpg (581KB, 1280x1955px) Image search: [Google]

581KB, 1280x1955px

>>91865151
Ennis is extremely crude and un-PC which makes him a nazi as far as easily distressed twitter/tumblrites are concerned. That's how you know he's from the working class and not some pampered middle class+ like all the other liberal writers.

>>91853433
Oh man, you stopped reading the Ultimate Universe at the right time.

File: bw.jpg (10KB, 267x400px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 267x400px

>>91866487
I say! He is some bloody Irish scum? Probably a Roman Catholic?

>>91856467
Okay, the picture is great, right down to the file name.

File: The Punisher v5 09 - Kitchen Irish 03 - 13.jpg (327KB, 1024x1625px) Image search: [Google]

327KB, 1024x1625px

>>91867163
Irish, yes, Catholic, no. A fedora tipper as demonstrated in Preacher and other works.
>I'm an atheist, really. But everyone seems to think I'm some terrible lapsed Catholic who suffered the worst of a Catholic upbringing and had the crap kicked out of him by nuns and monks. In actual fact, I'm not Catholic, and I never had any kind of direct religious upbringing at all, although I was exposed to the inevitable religious influence that growing up in Ireland will give you. And slightly more directly, my school had what was known as the Scripture Union or Christian Union, which young people were very strongly encouraged to join. They weren't too overt about it, but the kind of insidious propaganda that they employed used to, quite frankly, annoy the piss out of me. But I've always been interested in the history of Christianity and its effect on the world, and more generally speaking, in the idea of faith and of someone giving control over his destiny to what he sees as a higher power. These things have always just fascinated me and they're bound to show up in my work again and again. Negatively.

>>91867336
>fedora tipper
Yer not the chuffin' full shillin'?