[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

What the hell is this?

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 216
Thread images: 27

File: C-DFsY5XoAYhHMX.jpg (122KB, 626x960px) Image search: [Google]
C-DFsY5XoAYhHMX.jpg
122KB, 626x960px
What the hell is this?
>>
cant you read? It's called The Unstoppablw Wasp you retard
>>
It's cringe but also probably a commissioned cover
>>
>>91790824
A reference to an old rap song .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oU19mwjHiRs
>>
It's what the kids call a "big bootay"
>>
>>91790824
A Sketch cover someone paid Cho to draw.
>>
>>91790824
Cho being based by bother delivering fap material and pissing Tumblr off
>>
>OUTRAGE.png
>>
Frank doing his thing.
>>
>>91790824
You pretending to be offended to make a shit thread on /co/ even though you actually support it.
>>
File: Cho.jpg (101KB, 480x747px) Image search: [Google]
Cho.jpg
101KB, 480x747px
>>91790824
How is it possible for just one man to be so goddamn based?
>>
>>91791863
Yeah, he should of just made another samurai jack thread.
>>
>>91790824

isn't she like 14?
>>
Cho trying to stay relevant.
>>
>>91791866

No lie, I'd read the shit out of that.
>>
>>91791902
Your point?
>>
>>91791866
>Why is Willem Dafoe yelling at us?
>>
File: i cant see shit captain.jpg (27KB, 700x535px) Image search: [Google]
i cant see shit captain.jpg
27KB, 700x535px
Why are white chicks so obsessed with no wanting a big butt?

I had a chick talk to me one time and make fun of another girl.

>"God, like she needs to be eating that. Her ass is already huge."
>responded with shrugging and going "Nothing wrong with a huge ass."
>get disgusted look back in return
>>
>>91791954

you;re a paedophile
>>
>>91792017
Might be so but those young girls can really fuck once youteach em how
>>
>>91792017
Hebephile, technically.
>>
>>91792012
to them it just means theyre fat

i know, its strange
>>
>>91792012
I usually experience the opposite problem, people who know I'm an assman think I only care about size when shape and proportionality are more important to an ass than being big.
>>
File: Batman-S01E27.png (111KB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]
Batman-S01E27.png
111KB, 320x240px
>>91791866
That's it. Marvel, just hire Cho again. Put him in a comedy book.
>>
>>91791902
There are some 14 year old girls who have big butts anon.
>>
>>91793192
Pics or gtfo
>>
>>91793230
That stupid Cashme Ousside girl probably does
>>
>>91793230
You think I walk on the streets taking pics of every girl with a big butt anon?
>>
>>91793250
Can confirm.
>>
>>91793267
Then what the fuck are you doing here?
>>
>>91793267
So you're gay.
>>
>>91790886
anyone who didn't recognize the reference is too young to appreciate it anyway
>>
>>91793298
I read comics.
>>
>>91791918
Stay mad fag.
>>
>>91792017
Unless it's a real 14 year old girl, your full of shit.
>>
>>91790824
That, friendo, is pure stupidity. Applying the "thicc" meme to a character who's defining power is SHRINKING.
>>
>>91793036
Please don't.
>>
>>91793459
Nigger the original Wasp was a hot as fuck daddy's girl.
>>
>>91793397

thats not how the law works paedo
>>
>>91790824
Wow I can't wait for this to become a controversy.
>>
>>91793543
yes it is
>>
>>91793732
Wasp's writer is definitely the kind of guy to flip out over sexy depictions of women/teenagers.
>>
>>91794013
And oh hey what do you know
>>
>>91790824
I like Cho's art, but the only dialogue that was funny was "Chest out, Danvers. Not that far out."
>>
>>91794111
>REEEEE
>>
>>91794111
Color me surprised, more delicate snowflake millennials getting chapped about harmless cheesecake.
>>
>>91794111
>Oh no
>The Pinup artist drew pinup art!
>>
>>91793192
Hormones in our meat are turning girls into cows and it is great.
>>
>>91794111
>evolving
Ironically all this sex-negative stuff is actually pretty regressive. It's just a drawing. If Cho says it's Janet then it's probably Janet, because Cho likes Janet.
>>
>>91790824
Can't Slow the Cho.
>>
>>91794454
Looks like Janet to me.
>>
>>91794454
Yeah. They are railing against a liberal status quo by demanding censorship.
>>
>>91794111
Well he handled it better than Robbie.
>>
>>91791866
Gwen and Eddie deserve each other.
>>
>>91790886
>this comes on the radio at work
>turns it up a bit so everyone can hear

>boss walks in
>>
>>91794111
>implying Frank Cho doesn't love comics
he'd probably make a lot more money as a straight commission artist than continuing to work for Marvel
>>
>>91792012
It's about the way different races put on fat
>>
File: morality-28.jpg (209KB, 750x1000px) Image search: [Google]
morality-28.jpg
209KB, 750x1000px
>>91794454
>It's just a drawing.

But anon, the implications.
>>
>>91794454
SJWs are the new Victorians. The reasoning behind it is different, but the end result is the same.
>>
>>91790824
>no "outrage" though balloon
obviously just a cho ripoff.
>>
>>91791902
17
>>
File: WaspCho.jpg (138KB, 651x916px) Image search: [Google]
WaspCho.jpg
138KB, 651x916px
>>91794111
>>91794454
It IS possible he isn't aware Nadia isn't Janet.
He just passed through and didn't care to read the new shit but saw there's a new costume.
>>91794454
There's no regression with evolution though.
You just change, so if Cho isn't changing he isn't evolving even if he's not evolving into a prude like the rest of the times.
>>
>>91790824
BASED CHO XDD
>>
>>91794745
>But in real life, that's not titillating or sexy - it's violent and horrible and totally, utterly, deeply wrong.
>what is bdsm
>>
>>91794916
>There's no regression with evolution though.
>You just change, so if Cho isn't changing he isn't evolving even if he's not evolving into a prude like the rest of the times.

Well if we're trying to apply the actual meaning of evolution here then the whole argument goes out the window, because changing behavior through shame and outrage isn't evolution it's just censorship.
>>
>>91794994
Change is change
>>
>>91794987
>against their will

Non-rape bdsm requires consent anon.

That page is still ham-fisted preaching but please understand that.
>>
>>91795030
Think of it like this, if we start lobotomizing gorillas because reasons, did they evolve to have half a brain?

Change != Evolution
>>
>>91793324
>this is actually coming true
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wlfE_IplWAU
>>
>>91795038
I know it requires consent, but rape fantasies are common in BDSM, aren't they? That's what I've seen from porn. That's why you have the set safe words, so that people can scream no and stop and all that but with them knowing you don't actually want them to stop.
>>
>>91795073
No because that's not actually a physical evolutionary change on part of the Gorillas whereas self censorship is still social evolution
>>
>>91795131
>porn
>an accurate depiction of real-life sexuality
pick one
>>
>>91795131
>That's what I've seen from porn
Protip: the real world is not a porn website.
>>
>>91795149
That's cool and all, but then we're back to the point that we're talking about social issues and not real evolution, meaning there is in fact such thing as regression and this SJW shit is about as regressive as it gets.
>>
>>91795162
>>91795172
So are rape fantasies not a thing in the "domination" part of BDSM? Am I wrong about the usage of safe words? Enlighten me, anons.
>>
>>91795228
Nah, just use your Internet abilities and get a escort who will explain it to you. Just make sure mom doesn't see her going into her basement, OK?
>>
File: 227687_1.jpg (88KB, 630x630px) Image search: [Google]
227687_1.jpg
88KB, 630x630px
>>91795030
CHANGE! YOU GOT CHANGE? C'MON HELP A GUY OUT!
>>
>>91795228

rape fantasies do exist, and can be a part of BDSM.
but they're a small subset.

and safe words are safe words, if you get uncomfortable you use it, regardless of fetish involved.
>>
>>91795228
It explicitly says in the panel that he's drawing women having things done to them "against their will" not engaging in bdsm activities in which they pretend it's happening against their will.

Again, not agreeing with Mr. Mouthpiece about fictitious rape/assault being morally wrong because it somehow makes it happen in the real world, but here >>91794987 you are arguing that real life non-consensual sexual abuse is comparable to consensual bdsm activities.
>>
>>91795228
Nono, rape fantasies are very, very common.
But the catch is that it all builds on mutual trust and prior agreement with BDSM.
It's roleplay with safe words and rules.
Which makes rape fantasies a bit hard to act out because, well, it's hard to build up an illusion of threat in an absolutely safe environment.
The idea of getting swept away by a forceful-overwhelming stranger is alluring, but in reality it just does not happen.
Unless you actually get raped which isn't sexy and alluring at all.
No matter what talentless hack writers imagine.
>>
>>91795162
>>91795172
Rape fantasies are so prevalent in romance fiction that it's an ordeal to find one that doesn't have it. Women like the idea of a guy they want to have sex with removing the choice from them.
>>
>>91795276
i'm homeless and find this offensive please delete this and check your privilege
>>
>>91795416
>fiction
>an accurate description of real-life sexuality
pick
one
>>
>>91795416
Then what's the problem? Besides you being a pathetic prude, that is.
>>
>>91795406
>>Which makes rape fantasies a bit hard to act out because, well, it's hard to build up an illusion of threat in an absolutely safe environment.

Drugs help
>>
>>91794553
Remember, it's cannon that Eddy can instantly spot lesbians thanks to how hot he is.
>>
>>91794745
What happened to people being able to differentiate between reality and fiction?
>>
File: 5ca.jpg (260KB, 570x558px) Image search: [Google]
5ca.jpg
260KB, 570x558px
>>91795541
>>
>>91795577
SJWs are generally somewhere on the autistic spectrum and have trouble differentiating the two, so they assume that's how everyone is.
>>
>>91794745
Is all of this book a big dumb meta-wank "fiction is reality" preachfest like this page
>>
>>91795577
A lot of it is just moralizing browbeating towards others that you eventually end up tricking yourself into believing.
>>
>>91795378
No anon, I'm saying that people find rape fantasies hot in real life too, and some even enjoy acting them out. It's not against their will, but they can enjoy the illusion that it isn't.

Don't put words in my mouth.
>>
>>91795447
There's a demand for it, and some of them will admit that yes that's what they want.
>>
>>91795635
The author tries to maintain a neutral stance on things, but its pretty obvious how they feel about everything.
>>
File: 1211947661554.png (336KB, 527x566px) Image search: [Google]
1211947661554.png
336KB, 527x566px
>>91795420
>i'm homeless and find this offensive please delete this and check your privilege

It's time for you to get a job.
>>
>>91791866
Most babies are born based. The fact that people other than them exist is something they have to learn.
>>
>>91795669
Wait, "is". They can enjoy the illusion that it is against their will. My bad.
>>
>>91795694
romance fiction is probably the absolute worst place to get a primer on human sexuality
>>
>>91795577
Nothing, but a lot of ess-jay-dubbya arguments revolve around pretending that it's impossible and that even if you're aware it doesn't protect you from being influenced.
>>
>>91795669
I'm not putting words in your mouth, but you are misunderstanding what you are arguing against. By quoting that particular line, you are arguing against that author's stance that "in real life, that's not titillating or sexy - it's violent and horrible and totally, utterly, deeply wrong". You're arguing that fantasies are fine, and you are correct. But that is not what the author was talking about. He was equating fiction to real life situations of assault and rape. He's wrong, but not for the reasons you're putting out there.
>>
>>91795577
People are perfectly aware of the difference between reality and fiction.

Some people, however, are aware that fiction actually exists and that it is written and read by real people. Others are trained to doublethink that anything that could possibly make them wrong is inconsequential to the point of being nonexistant, except when that same thing offends them personally, in which case it's an act of vile censorship invented by pure evil monsters for no reason but to be evil.
>>
>>91795767
A lot of facts revolve around the connection between art forms and the thoughts/feelings of their creators and consumers.

A lot of lies revolve around pretending these facts are evil and wrong because any sort of criticism gets in the way of artistic freedom and facts aren't valid if they get in the way of moral dogma.
>>
>>91795807
>I'm not putting words in your mouth
Yes, you are. You just did it again.

Let me spell it out for you. By saying "what is bdsm" I was implying that all of those fantasies are not only carried out in fiction, but also in real life, and that women (and men) can totally enjoy being bound, tortured, and ravished, and some even enjoy it being done under the illusion of a rape situation. I'm not equating BDSM to actual rape and torture, you just took it that way.

But please continue telling me what I meant.
>>
>>91795845
I can't even tell who you're siding with here, are you trying to say people who are sick of shit like >>91794111 would be equally as retarded presented with something they don't like? Because some would for sure, but that's an unfair generalization. Many people are just legitimately fed up with the growing trend to demand that all things that might offend anyone be removed from public view.
>>
>>91795943
>>91795845
Your argument falls apart since the same could easily be applied to "sjw" works, but the moment someone tries they also get met with "You're just overthinking it, gawd!".
>>
>>91796042
>"You're just overthinking it, gawd!"
That isn't false tho
>>
>>91795945
You quoted a thing, then argued against it with examples that are not comparable in the context of the quote you were arguing against. I'm pointing out that your argument is not relevant to the particular point you're arguing against, that is not putting words in your mouth. I never once said you argued something that you hadn't, I just pointed out that your argument was irrelevant to the discussion.
>>
>>91795845
>Some people, however, are aware that fiction actually exists and that it is written and read by real people
What point are you trying to make here?
>>
>>91796042
No, the usual excuse is either "that's not a bad message" or "you're making up a message that's not actually there". Rarely do they try to shout down the entire concept of art having a political message, or the idea that people are allowed to interpret and judge said messages.
>>
>>91794745

Is this from Strong Female Protagonist? It seems like its flavor of bullshit.
>>
Can we stop arguing about wether or not if it's wrong to draw women on provocative situations and post more of Cho's work?
>>
People only ever want their message in art.
People only ever say they don't want messages in their art when it's a message they disagree with.
Nobody actually wants to extend the right of free expression to ideas they personally find objectionable, much less defend said right.
>>
>>91796313
>Nobody actually wants to extend the right of free expression to ideas they personally find objectionable, much less defend said right.
I do?
>>
File: BatChoChair.jpg (85KB, 736x1113px) Image search: [Google]
BatChoChair.jpg
85KB, 736x1113px
>>91794111
I mean technically he's right in that Cho has been doing this since the 90s. Down to the shitty butt jokes.
However the lack of Outrage Gwen causes one to question if it's specifically to troll or if he just wanted to draw Waspbutt.
>>
>>91796354
>shitty butt jokes
heh
>>
>>91794858
I'm convinced that the modern SJW is exactly the kind of person who would have been railing against unwed mothers or gin consumption a century ago. People don't change, just their motivations for doing things. And the concept of raising the mob against the sinner is a powerful one.
>>
>>91796313
What is the CBLDF
>>
>>91796130
>or "you're making up a message that's not actually there"

While conveniently forgetting they do the same exact thing. We're in a thread about a guy whom others called sexist, racist, homophobic, and transphobic, all because he drew cheesecake and told people who complained to fuck off.
>>
File: Phantom.jpg (82KB, 960x603px) Image search: [Google]
Phantom.jpg
82KB, 960x603px
>>
>>91794111

Why do they fucking care? Its not a published cover?

SJWs seriously want to prevent people from saying/drawing/etc. anything they don't like
>>
>>91795845
Take a deep breath and try again because I have no idea what point you're trying to make here.
>>
>>91792164
Fucking THIS. The fattest ass in the world doesn't mean jack shit to me if it looks like someone shot a bag of cottage cheese with a potato gun. Tightness is rightness.
>>
>>91797012
Considering there are legal issues about in some countries it's worth clarifying that he doesn't think Cho is a pedophile drawing sexy pictures of a child and he just fucked up thinking it was simply a Janet costume.

Now he is still a bitch for saying that Cho is unevolved, BUT being mean about someone doesn't mean he's saying the guy should be locked up. People are allowed to talk shit if they want. It's not that bad to me.
>>
>>91797179
The long and short of it:

>SJWs_are_bad_but_don't_you_think_anti-SJWs_are_just_as_bad.webm
>>
>>91796775
I'm not sure what your point even is now. At the start, people were raging at the thought that art can have any connection to people's thoughts and feelings by using the old "THEY CAN'T EVEN TELL FICTION FROM REALITY" strawman. Now you're just using the "well some of them do something vaguely similar sometimes" stock response.
>>
>>91797422
which is not wrong... I just find the SJWs slightely more annoying (with all the High horse mentality and what not)
>>
>>91793520
But not "thicc."
>>
>>91798655
All Cho Girls are Thicc
>>
>>91790824

Cho doing the one thing he knows how to do and thinking he's clever for it, and /co/ eating it up because it sorta-kinda attacks the SJWs they lie awake at night fearing.
>>
>>91797012

Are we looking at the same screenshot, Anon? There's no calls for censorship anywhere in that image.
>>
>>91790824
I can't fap to her ass when Luke and Danny are right there.
>>
>>91799020
You're overthinking this, Cho draws thicc chicks with great asses and /co/ likes that.

The fact that he infuriates SJWs while giving zero fucks is just a bonus.
>>
>>91799283
Don't bother replying to the salt posters.
>>
File: Frank_Cho_Sketchbook_6.jpg (89KB, 829x1182px) Image search: [Google]
Frank_Cho_Sketchbook_6.jpg
89KB, 829x1182px
>>91799020
Well he's not doing anything wrong, you guys just need to thicken up that skin and get on with your life.
Cho isn't going to stop now, he was doing it before you kids were even born.
>>
File: ifjTRDO.jpg (153KB, 427x630px) Image search: [Google]
ifjTRDO.jpg
153KB, 427x630px
>>91794745
>>
>>91799163
It's "implied."
>>
>>91790886
This reminds me of that time will smith fish did a can't touch this reference, and it feels like it's on the same level as that.
>>
>>91799279
Open new windows/folders and drag them over the two.

You're fucked if you're on a phone.
>>
File: 1066606-wasp2.jpg (788KB, 1999x1402px) Image search: [Google]
1066606-wasp2.jpg
788KB, 1999x1402px
>All New All Different Wasp
Nah, Cho. Nah.
>>
>>91799626
Cho said he was drawing Janet so it's entirely possible he thinks it's just a new costume and hasn't actually read the comic
>>
>>91791866
Why does it feel lik this guy makes dumb political cartoons?
>>
>>91790824
This feels like its on the same level as that one time that one woman said the nazi frogs were getting triggered.
>>
>>91794111
How boring must the existence of an SJW be? Just waking up in the morning knowing that you'll do nothing but make things less fun all day long.
>>
>>91799670

Cho can draw, but he can't write.
>>
File: Oh that Cho.png (377KB, 1161x403px) Image search: [Google]
Oh that Cho.png
377KB, 1161x403px
>>91799670
Nah he makes stupid comic sunday comic strips
This is about as political as he gets.
>>91799997
Recently they've taken to rioting in the streets, that should liven things up. Y'know if you don't get clocked by a manlet for throwing bottles at people.
>>
>>91800024
I kinda don't like is style honestly. Something sorta off putting about it to me honestly, though I'm not sure exactly what.
>>
File: 2014-04-11-magicpen_126.jpg (309KB, 800x1142px) Image search: [Google]
2014-04-11-magicpen_126.jpg
309KB, 800x1142px
>>91794745
>>
>>91800098
The only big turn off for me is the same face.
>>
>>91790886
>Stuffy old song about the buttocks.
>>
>>91800256
That might be it actually.
>>
>>91791926
If the content is anything like the cover, sign me the fuck up!
>>
>>91799645
>he thinks it's just a new costume and hasn't actually read the comic
I want to live on that earth
>>
>>91793269
You saw her twerk on Snapchat too, huh?
>>
>>91793459
It's a valid use of Irony. Look it up!
>>
What exactly is Frank Cho doing nowadays? Just living off commission?
>>
>>91793269
>>91800473
so is there a weebum or
>>
>>91800511
how much does it cost to comm him?
>>
>>91800473
I need a sauce fampai
>>
>>91800511
he does a lot of variants, I think
>>
>>91800511
He did Totally Awesome Hulk, then signed to DC to do covers for them.
>>
>>91800560
Then Rucka got all pissy about a Wondy variant and /co/ called him Cucka for a while.
>>
>>91800695
>Rucka identifies as a lesbian
>>
>>91799556
I love this.
>>
>>91790824
Chong can only draw collosal, curdled, fat assed pigs. Next question.
>>
>>91800885
>Next question.

At what point did you realize your tastes were shit?
>>
>>91800519
>>91800550

https://youtu.be/LANQuagKS-Q
>>
File: x-butt.png (853KB, 900x684px) Image search: [Google]
x-butt.png
853KB, 900x684px
>>91800934
Thanks
>>
>>91800979
Anytime.
>>
File: 1444097996961.png (213KB, 343x432px) Image search: [Google]
1444097996961.png
213KB, 343x432px
>>91800885
>collosal, curdled, fat assed pigs

You have my attention.
>>
Post more thicc girls anons
>>
>>91800916
Have you seen Mrs. Chong?
>>
>>91790824
Looks like someone handed Frank Cho a blank cover of that new Wasp book and asked him to draw Janet in the costume as a commission and Bleeding Cool decided to try to make another story out of it because Nick Spencer hadn't tweeted anything new in 5 minutes.
>>
She's like 14

why isn't it jan

>>91794111

nvm it's jan. chill response
>>
>>91794111
the fact people like this exist really makes me feel I'm not putting enough effort on being evil and ruin the fun of everyone around me.
>>
File: 1490583841941-pol.png (493KB, 500x517px) Image search: [Google]
1490583841941-pol.png
493KB, 500x517px
>>91792017
>>
>>91793036

Put him on Hulk again, I fucking loved Totally Awesome Hulk. You got your dinos, you got your thick warrior women, you got your Pak writing charming and interesting characters. Literally one of the best comics out of ANAD that /co/ never read.
>>
>>91802558
>10
You are a fucking sick person.
Hebopophilia it's when sexual attraction is for people who has achieved hormonal maturity and secondary sexual traits like wider hips and body hair start to be present.
>>
>>91802669
>what is early development
>>
File: What a stumper.jpg (167KB, 448x608px) Image search: [Google]
What a stumper.jpg
167KB, 448x608px
>>91802669

So if you're attracted to a fictional underage character you're a pedophile

Does that mean that if you write them dying you're a murderer?
>>
>>91790824
Funny.
>>
>>91802817
I don't buy into the whole pedophile thing, but I do think killing off a character is indeed killing them. But fictionals don't have rights, so it's fine.
>>
>>91790824
>>91796354

>ass expansion jokes

Cho is either a weight gain fetishist or a dormant Dobson and no one can convince me otherwise
>>
>>91802817
>This anon will slip on the shower and break its neck at sometime next week.

I just killed you, what you are going to do about it?
>>
>>91802941

>This anon's mom will die from a brain aneurism sometime next week

If I'm going down I'm taking all of you with me
>>
>>91803018
>every anon in this thread will die from a heart attack in the next week
you're thinking too small
>>
>>91794745
>Comics will make your children violent misogynists.

This argument has never, and will never work. Just because a medium depicts unsavory or morally distasteful content does not mean that it will influence the reader to perform those acts.

Even with children, given that they have been raised properly and are not mentally unsound, depictions of unwholesome acts in media will not influence their personality or interactions with the world because they realize that the media is fictitious and not to be emulated.

I hate, hate, HATE when moral busy bodies like this condescend and patronize comic book readers by saying they have no control over their actions and that their interactions with other humans is influences heavily by what they read. Like, nigga seriously, we aren't fucking retards.
>>
>>91803133
>and so a unknown virus infected everyone in this thread and then dispersed through all the world killing everyone, thanks to a fast response and preparation for these kind of situations the only humans that survive where the people of Madagascar.
>>
>>91790824
Frank Chedo's latest cry for attention
>>
>>91803133
Thanks m8
>>
>>91790824
Well of course you would Danny
>>
>>91803018
its ok, if she dies i get $1.5 mil
>>
>>91803248
>Cry for attention
>Doing what he's done since forever
>>
>>91803598

shh anon, don't feed the trolls.
>>
Imagine an All-Female Marvel vs DC 2D Fighter with Cho's art... Hot damn.
>>
File: 14 KARAT GOLD.gif (171KB, 375x375px) Image search: [Google]
14 KARAT GOLD.gif
171KB, 375x375px
>>91794111
The sensitivity of some people nowadays is astounding.
>>
File: OUTRAGE.png (49KB, 216x116px) Image search: [Google]
OUTRAGE.png
49KB, 216x116px
>>
>>91796571
>the kind of person who would have been railing against gin consumption a century ago.

Not to get all teetotaler over it or anything, but pre-prohibition alcoholism rates never really came back and gin tastes tastes like liquefied pine needles, so the prohibitionists at least had some valid points.
>>
>>91797422
It's a matter of Voldemort versus Umbridge.
>>
File: 132942885117.jpg (63KB, 554x439px) Image search: [Google]
132942885117.jpg
63KB, 554x439px
>>91804064

Well, it would certainly save on development costs for every character to be a palette swap of each other...
>>
>>91803226

If it makes you feel any better, this >>91794745 is followed up with this >>91800221 which implies "Wait a minute, why should you care what they think of your fantasies when this isn't real anyway?"
>>
>>91790824
Why is Slur on that cover?
http://pbfcomics.com/275/
>>
>>91799556
Too bad Colbert is nothing more than a Jew puppet now.
>>
>>91806140
>now
>>
>>91806140
>Implying he was ever anything else

Comedy Central Colbert was a character, a parody, not real
>>
>>91806146
>>91806149
Go listen to his interview on Howard Stern before he got his late nite gig. He was never this much of a goy. He just realized he was getting shitty ratings and sold his soul to the cabal.
>>
>>91791866
the only good thing to come out of Sins Past.
>>
>>91798953
That's not thicc at all. Stop deluding the term by using it for any girl with a slightly big butt or tits.
>>
>>91806140
>>91806149
lol are conservahicks STILL mad about how long it took you tardos to realize the Colbert Report was making fun of you?
>>
>>91806346
>deluding
Diluting, anon. Though you clearly think he was deluding himself.
>>
>>91795276
Go back to your shed Douge
>>
>>91806355
lol you mad that you didn't realize it sooner?
>>
>>91806346
Anything to keep it from meaning fat girls
>>
>>91807158
...yes
>>
File: frank cho.gif (77KB, 1000x307px) Image search: [Google]
frank cho.gif
77KB, 1000x307px
>>
File: waspbutt.gif (44KB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]
waspbutt.gif
44KB, 320x240px
>>91790824
Rule 63 Waspinator in human form.

>>91792012
OH MY GOD BECKY
>>
>>91799556
I wonder why feminists didn't accused Colbert with rape charges for that moment.
She got rekt on national tv.
Thread posts: 216
Thread images: 27


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.