dogbert is best dog

The creator's a nutjob, though.

File: milou.gif (9KB, 201x255px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 201x255px

snowy iz da king

>>91400124
Has Dilbert ever been funny, ever?

File: 2017-04-09-213917.jpg (77KB, 960x544px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 960x544px

herge was such a rascal...
he named tintin's dog after his girlfriend
maybe she was always in heat?

>>91400201

Ever watch the cartoon?

>>91400134
>cant separate creator from creation

>>91400231
Not really. I do remember laughing at the comic once or twice but for the life of me I can't find those.

File: b7d1de34d155eadd050352817742f4d0._SX1280_QL80_TTD_-600x923.jpg (155KB, 600x923px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 600x923px

bad dog ace!!!

then again batman did smell of catwoman...
after he had been patting her pussy, cat.

>>91400134
What kind of stuff has he said that you disagreed with? I've read some of his writings, and I don't see why people have a problem with him.

File: image.jpg (159KB, 750x485px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 750x485px

badass...

File: Josh-Lynch-Dog-Dr-Strange.jpg (215KB, 750x500px) Image search: [Google]

215KB, 750x500px

a magical mutt !

>>91400556
perfect

File: Josh-Lynch-Dog-Ghost-Rider.jpg (161KB, 750x500px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 750x500px

a combustible canine ?

File: Josh-Lynch-Dog-Hulk.jpg (192KB, 750x485px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 750x485px

a green growler ?

File: Josh-Lynch-Dog-Iron-Man.jpg (175KB, 750x485px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 750x485px

a charley snorting k9 ?

File: Josh-Lynch-Dog-Octopus.jpg (200KB, 750x485px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 750x485px

doc ock doggo

File: Josh-Lynch-Dog-Silver-Surfer.jpg (343KB, 750x485px) Image search: [Google]

343KB, 750x485px

a herald hound ?

You've a pun for them all but >>91400633 there's no way you didn't consider M.O.D.O.G, stop slacking.

File: Josh-Lynch-Dog-Spidey.jpg (253KB, 750x750px) Image search: [Google]

253KB, 750x750px

spider pooch senses tingling ?

>>91400623
>Iron Doglet
This is too perfect.

>>91400684
>>91400650
>>91400633
>>91400525
Lots of pugs getting into the cape business apparently. I would kinda want to see more breed variety, but other than that, I'm enjoying these doggies.

File: Josh-Lynch-Dog-Thor.jpg (234KB, 750x500px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 750x500px

>>91400675
drat !
drat !
and double drat !

i wish
i wish
i had thought of that !

(well played anon!)

a hammering howler ?

File: 73f002cade6cbaaa2e2be806417dee8e.jpg (26KB, 400x530px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 400x530px

>>91400124
>>91400158
i feel differently about all this

File: Josh-Lynch-Dog-Wolverine.jpg (184KB, 750x485px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 750x485px

a snikt sniffer ?

all done

you ain't nothing but a hound dog
superheroing all the time...

>>91400201
I also remember being 16

File: dick_dastardly_and_muttley_pup_by_animationfanatic-d2lezuj.png (189KB, 600x714px) Image search: [Google]

189KB, 600x714px

>>91400768
mischievous muttley !

File: Sam_and_Ralph_clock.png (484KB, 622x474px) Image search: [Google]

484KB, 622x474px

sam sheepdog security sleuth

File: how-to-draw-ren_1_000000002939_5.jpg (63KB, 900x1339px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 900x1339px

irrepressible ren !!!

File: scooby-doo-scared.jpg (22KB, 540x540px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 540x540px

a scared spliff smoking scooby !

>>91400134
he isnt tho, you just dont like what he has to say

>>91400491
probably
The reality is that women are treated differently by society for exactly the same reason that children and the mentally handicapped are treated differently. It’s just easier this way for everyone. You don’t argue with a four-year old about why he shouldn’t eat candy for dinner. You don’t punch a mentally handicapped guy even if he punches you first. And you don’t argue when a women tells you she’s only making 80 cents to your dollar. It’s the path of least resistance. You save your energy for more important battles.

>>91400664
>The Silver Pointer

Your not even trying.

>>91400124
Dogbert is a cunt though? Dogs should be nice and loyal and helpful.

>>91400124
Dogbert is Brian Griffin tier, Jake is best dog

>>91401708
dogbert is loyal and helpful

>>91401693
I looked up the blog post to see the full text. If that's what made the other anon declare Adams as a nutjob, I feel a little disappointed. I wish people would get angry over things that actually deserve anger.

>>91402030
he is right and he got fucked over by the same principle he bashes
the only reason he ever got into making cartoons was he worked his ass off at the bank and his supervisor told him the company was only promoting women and minorities so he either looked for a job somewhere else or would keep overworking himself for nothing, his supervisor did this because she was scotts friend and had respect for him
then he got into another company and it happenned all over again
according to him it was either spending 20 years there to make it halfway into the possittion he deserved while being bossed by a girl half his age with 1/4 his qualifications or fuck off from the corporate world forever

>>91402246
I know. He has discussed the problems of positive discrimination, but I don't think that means he's a misogynist, a racist, a nutjob, or any other label I've seen people cast on him. Judging by his writings, he seems to care a lot about his fellow humans, and IMO he appears more compassionate than most people who vocally take pride on being "tolerant". Still, he sees the world very differently than the average person, and his opinions can apparently be hard to understand unless if you've got an open mind for alternate POVs.

>>91402437
>positive discrimination
isnt discrimination always positive to one side and negative for the other?

>>91402437
>he appears more compassionate than most people who vocally take pride on being "tolerant"
thats a can of worms
generally speaking people who get into the lets yell into peoples faces, harrass everyone, get people fired, bully people and get away with targeting a sector of the population arent out for compassion and helping their fellow men
it wasnt with nazis
it wasnt with klan members
it wasnt with skin heads
it isnt with the sjw

>>91400556
Reed can't be this cute.

>>91401708
He does help Dilbert out of jams.

>>91400491
>>91401680
He actively denies Syria has and uses chemical weapons. And that's just last week.

>>91403848
...wouldn't it make more sense if he was a wolverine?

>>91403887
in all fairness the footage was fake, its a political move that makes no sense for anyone involved provided what we know as of now, its following a fake attack pattern we know very well and the bombing was publicly supported by some very shady people
also we find two new conspiracys every month nowdays

>>91404010
How much time per day do you spend on /pol/? That stuff's rotting your brain.

>>91404052
0 minutes
please point everything thats wrong in my post, locking yourself inside acho chambers os rotting your brain

>>91404105
It's your job to prove everything you just said is true, not mine to disprove it. And that's gonna be hard considering you made like six entirely different claims.

>>91404142
I wasn't in this conversation before, but you should prove Syria was the one that used chemical weapons. It's pretty obvious that they didn't.

File: 1384871769438.jpg (663KB, 688x1044px) Image search: [Google]

663KB, 688x1044px

>>91403909
Nah.

>>91404182
I'm not gonna spoonfeed you on something that's been in every major news source for years, anon. This isn't even the first time they've used them. Stop going "no u" and back up your own points.

>>91404142
ok
the footage was fake because the soldiers on it were helping chemical attack victims without gloves, as in direct touch with the same harmful chemicals and not recoiling in pain inmediately wich is imposible even for a trained soldier
also its been noted than they werent following any standar procedures and some of the people being helped are also featured in footage of other attacks
also two months ago i dont remember wich news channel faked footage of a crime zone by attaching police tape to a fence utside the studio and filming there

its a political move that makes no sense for either russia or russias allies since they dont want war with the us since the us is strogner than the second and third military militar powers put together

its pretty much a move that could start the war the clinton fundation wanted and got dontations from saudi arabia and the big media empires for

i think thats enough

>>91404243
Anon, I'm just a third party in this conversation. You need to back up your own point here. In your debate you argued someone is insane because he thinks Syria didn't really use chemical weapons. With that, you need to show that they did so.

>>91400201
Get a job. Then Dilbert becomes a religious experience.

>>91404243
translation im retarded, i dont know what im talking about, i get paid 5 cents for every post like this i make and there is not enough time for me to search anything if i want to make it to the end of the month

>>91404281
>the footage was fake because the soldiers on it were helping chemical attack victims without gloves, as in direct touch with the same harmful chemicals and not recoiling in pain inmediately wich is imposible even for a trained soldier

I'm not even going to explain this one. Let's just let desuarchive give you the answer.

>https://desuarchive.org/r9k/thread/36079257/#36081038

>>91404292
It's been confirmed by the United States on multiple occasions, not to mention other sources. Literally just google "syria chemical weapons".

>>91403887
When I saw those pictures of children in the bare hands of those brave rebels and the respectable doctor proclaimed it to be a sarin gas attack, I just knew that sending in the Navy was the right thing to do. When liberals and conservatives have unanimous support for someone they called orange Hitler the day before, I knew I made the right choice.

>>91404417
It's not a matter of whether it was right or wrong, it's outright denying the existence of chemical weapons.

>>91404412
Why are you so hesitant to back up your assertions yourself?

File: shrug.jpg (23KB, 337x417px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 337x417px

Man, this isn't even the first time they've been trying to fake or pin chemical attacks on the syrian government. Surprised it worked this time.

>>91404412
ok, how about every single other thing in my post thats still higly relevant tho?

>>91404436
Because it's not some obscure source, it's a known fact that the US among other nations and IOs have confirmed on multiple occasions.

But fine, since you'd get mad if I cited even a single major news source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Use_of_chemical_weapons_in_the_Syrian_civil_war

>>91404496
You didn't give a single cite to any of those. None were relevant.

>>91404508
Are you trying to cite wikipedia as a source? You can't get away with that even in grade school.

>>91404436
its a psichological thing
they are trained in college or equivalent that their word or logic holds no merit and they should always point to a higer source of information, basically anything they can link holds more merith than their testimony
also because that way you arent arguing with them, you are arguing with the person they link, how many of these arguments do you think happen in real life without a computer? didnt you see hillary pull the i cant answer your point, visit my website card during the debates?

>>91404524
>appeal to atuhority
i can link you to a two hour stream where all of those get explained if you want, i dobut that if you listen to all of it and then come back here with an answer there will be anyone here to read your post

File: is this nigga serious.png (15KB, 235x147px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 235x147px

>>91404540
Jesus, man, I'm fucking done. This isn't 2008, you can cite wikipedia, you moron.

>>91404598
Not in any serious or academic setting you can't. Did you even go to a real college?

>>91404614
>Not in any serious or academic setting you can't.

We're on /co/. Or I should say /pol/, but that would be too on the nose.

>>91404672
And? You still have yet to cite a reliable source yourself, despite all this time.
Perhaps you should step away from the computer for a while and think a bit more objectively going forward.

>>91404598
there is a link to an r9k post as a reliable source in this very thread

File: 2564278e9d223aba2b353356ce562799.406x406x1.jpg (37KB, 406x406px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 406x406px

>>91400231
>decide to watch the first episode of the dilbert cartoon
>they thought anthrax was an herbal supplement
>at one point it cuts to a street full of dying people
>"My throat feels great."
Okay this show is actually pretty good.

File: dogbert.jpg (35KB, 707x526px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 707x526px

I think you should kill yourself Dilbert.

File: 3036-1468-3274-1-adventures-of-rex-th.jpg (46KB, 400x588px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 400x588px

>>91405043
I'm not sure if the cover art on that dog's comics was ridiculous or awesome. Probably both.

File: 1948-1468-2106-1-adventures-of-rex-th.jpg (55KB, 400x576px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 400x576px

>>91405271

>>91400718
Pugs are the current meme dogs

File: 286-1468-308-1-adventures-of-rex-th.jpg (48KB, 400x588px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 400x588px

>>91405298

File: Rex_the_Wonder_Dog_38.jpg (66KB, 400x563px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 400x563px

>>91405334
What's Bambi doing here?

>>91405479
Dilbert is always relevant

>>91400134
>creator constantly predicts political shit and substantiates it with good explanation
>HUURRR he mean man, he did not agree with buzzfeed article, I need an adult here

this is how you sound.

>>91400158
I remember seeing one 20-30 year old french comedy magazine where at one point milou gets gigantified and ejaculates all over a woman.

wtf man.

>>91400124
he was originally supposed to be named Dildog

>>91400134
>Hating on based Dilbertman
Delet yourself

>>91400134
Do you feel... persuaded?

>>91400158
>iz da king
back2reddit

>>91401693
That is 100% accurate

>>91402030
I remember when Comics Alliance, HuffPo, and a bunch of other sites got pissed off at Adams over that article.

Based on what's happened since then, in retrospect I think that turned out to be a warning sign more about news sites than about Adams.

>>91402494
>isnt discrimination always positive to one side and negative for the other?
Not necessarily. If the police beat down a random black person every day, that doesn't inherently provide any positives for white (or Asian, Latino, or other not-black) people, and may well provide negatives instead.

>>91402030
>I wish people would get angry over things that actually deserve anger.
People get more enjoyment out of anger when there's a comparable set of rage coming back at them.
http://slatestarcodex.com/2014/12/17/the-toxoplasma-of-rage/

File: Protect+your+computers.jpg (10KB, 235x240px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 235x240px

>>91400124
Public service announcement to protect your computers.

>>91402494
Yes. But what is meant by that is "discrimination intended to advance society by correcting for past wrongs or current inequities". Any argument on exactly whether it's a good idea or not should be followed up in /pol/ of course.

>>91403848
Shadowcat wants a piece of that pussy.

>>91403887
So, you suck at reading comprenension, and possibly past and present tense.

He makes the claim that he doesn't believe it, outlines specific reasons why, and also includes cases that he believes the most likely conditions under which he could be wrong, and in the followup also considers scenarios in which the attack was real.

>>91403909
It seems like the obvious choice.

>>91404243
>>91404142
It's nobody's job to do anything. This isn't fucking /pol/.

>>91410527
>discrimination intended to advance society by correcting for past wrongs or current inequities
nazism?

File: 640[1].jpg (63KB, 640x405px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 640x405px

>>91405321
I thought it was corgis and shibuya inus.

>>91409490
i imagine it would be a positive for police maybe?
i mean it doesnt make sense to beat up black people for no reason to begin with
thats something a crazy person would do

File: qkld5a0b8six.jpg (48KB, 669x669px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 669x669px

>>91400134

>>91410650
It's at most a positive for the sadists within the police force and police union bosses. To a certain extent, the current police situation in the U.S. is as follows (though it's not nearly as based on race as some claim):

>small minority of police repeatedly commit use of force infractions
>Police unions + thin blue line brotherhood exert massive pressure on other cops to cover for police abuses
>cops who attempt to expose or fight this situation get forced into retirement or fired

People who enter the police with good intentions aren't helped by such a policy, the public at large aren't helped by such a policy, only the psychopaths who make it into the police force are "helped" in that they get to act on their urges, but it's not clear that doing so is best for them in the long run either.

>>91410890
dont sadist join the military instead?
anyways i cant make sense out of what crazy people do, thats why they are crazy afterall

>>91404614
Not giving a shit about who wins this. But you can cite wiki if you track down where they pulled their info from. Smart writers just use it as a jumping off point.

Research papers in the long run don't have much of a standing themselves since anyone can get their paper published if they polish it up and make it look researched.

>>91410650
That is kind of the point anon. The minority that do that are fucking crazy and produce no positives for anyone. As >>91410890 pointed out, they just get to stay because of the union, lack of knowledge into the problem, employee shortage, and other reasons.

The police problem in particular has been around for decades and not just limited to blacks. However the media generally did not give a shit when minorities or the lower income people get abused until the advent of cell phone cameras.

>>91400491
At one point during election season he "switched" from supporting Trump to Hillary, and insinuated that he would be assassinated if he didn't pretend to like Hillary.

>>91413241
Technically, he hadn't ever endorsed Trump at the time he endorsed Hillary. He merely wrote about his persuasion abilities.

File: Dil art.webm (2MB, 716x540px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 716x540px

>>91404944
yeah its pretty great