Raimi Spiderman trilogy: The movies that Disney and WB are unable

>>91161877
Yeah and then you get web erectile dysfunction in SM2 and the magic butler in SM3.

Think about the things in your life that lead you to this moment.

Think hard.

What could you have changed?

Perhaps it's not too late.

Oh good, another movie thread. Exactly what I was missing.

When will that faggot Hiro ban live-action shit from /co/?

>>91161877
Thats all just your opinion. And to be fair alot of people share it. I just find it hard to get past how creepy Peter comes across. He seems more like a school shooter than a super hero.
But most people disagree so there is probably sonething im missing when I watch them.

It's a well directed movie but the writing and in some cases the acting is awful.

>>91161900
is there a better topic of discussion you'd like to see in the catalog? make a thread anon. maybe it will do really well.

>>91161900
Never, fuckwad.

File: Cute peter.jpg (29KB, 802x358px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 802x358px

>>91161886
And how are these bad things? They were interesting character development moments. I mean, this has a lot of heart:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nL8hVXSDmNM

>>91162010
Inexplicably losing your super powers without cause and then regaining them when its convenient to the plot is not an interesting character development moment.

>>91161877
BvS is better.

>>91162030
>Inexplicably losing your super powers
His emotions fucked up his powers

Theoretically could Spider-Man do this in the comics /co/?

>>91162277
What

>>91162030
>convenient to the plot

>I am incapable of understanding simple themes in my childish super hero flicks

Toby was a fucking awful choice, he just comes off as some sad, dreary, dweeb as Peter and Spiderman. I've never seen the Andrew Garfield films but he also seemed shit from the trailers, he cracked jokes which was nice but his comic delivery was fucking garbage also he has stupid hair.

>>91161877
Spider-Man 2 is more of a character piece than a superhero movie, but it's a damn fine character piece.

1 and 3 are just plain fun.

>>91161877

imagine this scene happening in the MCU

>spidey loses his mask
>saves all the people
>faints and almost falls
>they catch him
>carry him through the wagen
>a couple of teenagers start taking videos of him without the mask on and put the videos on youtube

>>91162572
Also quips

>>91162277
Spider-Man in the comics is frighteningly strong. Like, so strong that when he decides to cut loose his villains literally run and hide because when Spidey ain't joking it's time to run. This is the time when faces get torn clean off.

>remember when andrew fags said he was the definitive spiderman?

>>91161877
They sucked balls except for the first one

>>91163018
he was

File: fresh-costanza.jpg (60KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 500x375px

>>91163055
Not even andrew garfield remembers he was spiderman in a shitty teenage drama movie

I remember feeling a bit disappointed when I finished watching the first one. It wasn't bad but it wasn't that good either. And eveything felt fake, like it was obvious they were on a set and not in a real city.

I like the second one a lot more. It's funny because every times people are talking of Raimi's Spiderman movies, it's always with that video from SM2.
It's truly iconic but the rest of the trilogy is not on par with that scene level.

> nostalgia

>>91163140
>And eveything felt fake, like it was obvious they were on a set and not in a real city.
Are you talking about the MCU?

>>91163018
>definitive spiderman
Yeah, and it's still true. Maybe not best Peter, but his Spidey was the best of anyone's.

>>91163140
>eveything felt fake
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfSz0bQzZuM

>>91161877
Sympathetic Doc Ock, weepy peter and Haggy Jane run it for me, anon.

>>91161877
>anymore bright ideas?
What a cunt.

>>91163272
Man I saw that movie in theaters opening night, and not since have I heard an audience cheer as loud as when Green Goblin got the wall pulled down on him.
Raimi Spider-man is the only capekino in existence.

https://youtu.be/cbq5r03Duj0

Raindrops keep fallin' on my DICK

>>91161877
Only SM2 is kino

i could never understand the appeal of raimi's work, but i'm not gonna shit on anyone who does enjoy it. if evil dead is your thing, go you, i'm happy for you. that being said i just don't like his take on spiderman.

It seems like for every /superhero/ movie since 2000, only Raimi's films have really felt like /comic book/ movies. Not just the melodramatic dialogue and plots, but the cinematography, color, action, and conspicuous SFX (you can almost see "thwip!" appear in text on-screen) really feel like a comic book page brought to screen. Snyder tried desperately to recreate Watchmen basically panel for panel, but Raimi's better sense for inventive, dynamic cinematography and love of "meaningful slapstick" just fit the films more than sheer mimicry could have. I'll never be over how good of a choice Raimi was for those movies, I can't imagine them any other way.

>>91163272
>that part where Spidey just keeps punching him in the face against the wall, picking Goblin up and punching him down again
kino

>>91161877
They are kind of awkward in a lot of ways MCU movies aren't but they benefit from feeling like real movies in retrospect and not just the latest installments of a product line like all the MCU movies do now

>>91163040
Kind of agreed, I don't know how it was decided that the second one was the stand-out one, ditto for the X-men movies

>>91163594
Hulk 2003 was kino too

>>91161877
>Their soulless movies


MoS and BvS are hardly soulless

>>91164458
>this is what DCfags actually believe

>>91163219
MCU's cities look like set to you?

This looks like a real place to you?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcs_dIIO_Fg&ab_channel=CoolestClips4K

>>91163272
That didn't age well... And I'm not talking about the moving wall.
The fight choreography is... meh?

>>91161900
As opposed to the 4 Star vs. and SU threads. Fuck off.

>>91162030
That's stupid have you ever got depressed and were unable to get an erection
It happens then you gotta get your mojo back

>>91161936
I thought the point of Peter's character was that he WAS a nerd/borderline school shooter type prior to his powers?

>>91164955
What choreography do you want? Some SW prequel shit? It was a normal fight.

File: 1490793199847.jpg (149KB, 1140x670px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 1140x670px

>>91164926
Since phase 2? Yes.

>>91164900
How are the movies soulless?
Everyone on board was extremely passionated about it

File: fuckingdisney_0.jpg (234KB, 949x851px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 949x851px

>Marvelfags will defend this

>>91165378
No, idiots will defend that.

>>91162030

This plotline was taken straight from first The Amazing Spider-Man Annual. He lost his powers due to the immense guilt he felt and all the problems he was facing at the time, which was purely psychological thing. Just like in the comic, he regains it when his loved one is in danger and his determination fully returns.

>>91165378
Disney already wins just by merit of not having Tom Holland lose the mask every five fucking seconds
As a bonus that also means we don't need to see Tobey shitting out bricks or Andrew's stupid hair every other scene

>>91165734
>Using shitty CGI models and shitty CGI environment instead of real actors and practical effects is a merit
Really?

>>91161936
>>91165084
I always thought he came off like a closeted cat molester

>>91161877
Say what you want, but Raimi Spider Man might have been nice but it was also 'soulless' in that it completely ignored the core of the character. The fact that they have Spider Man take off his mask constantly, when comics Spider Man protects his identity on an insane level shows how much of a disconnect there was.

Also they constantly had things going back to Uncle Ben, like they thought Spider Man was Batman levels of obsessed about Uncle Ben. The whole "With great power comes great responsibility" saying is what underlines his character because of Uncle Ben's death, but he doesn't sit in the dark brooding over it and he doesn't have his entire life revolving around it.

>>91165378
Is it wrong that I like the bottom a lot more than the top because Spider Man has his mask on and he used a crap load of web to help secure the boat instead of just a few lines and then this body?

I just realized that both pictures have the statue of liberty in them. Cool detail.

File: 1466510634096.png (140KB, 363x332px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 363x332px

>>91165734
>>91166081
>I don't want a movie, I want a cheap PS3 videogame

>>91166305
>CGI is videogames
Are you a mom from 2005?

File: 1490787851770.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>91166486
>CGI with the quality of an old videogame
>It's f-fine. The model has a mask.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qtx18tPNda4

>>91161877
Spiderman 2 is in my top three comic movies. Next to Iron Man and Sin City.

>>91161877
>The movies that Disney and WB are unable to top
I'd say Iron-Man did a decent job all things considered, so did the first two X-men movies (I know they're Fox) and Chris Nolan with The Dark Knight. And I'm a huge fan of Raimi and probably the only person who defends Spider-man 3, but let's not blow things out of proportion.

>>91165140
That looks like the rooftop scenes in The Room, probably because of the shitty green screen.

>>91161877
These movies are childish as fuck.

>>91168244

you mean campy.

i loved this cheese. sure it's dated now but i still love certain scenes.

>>91168429
I find Maguire's Peter to be the hardest to take seriously because he's like a small, awkward child in an adult's body. The way he acts, the way he talks, the way he thinks, and his bizarre attempts at being dramatic.

>>91168429
No, childish.

>>91168633
>>91168244

>be /tv/
>go to /co/ to trash capeshit
>profit???

>>91166081
Actually watch the scene. Only a few lines of webbing were left after the others snapped.

>>91162888
Checked for truth.

Proportional strength of a spider, baby. On top of that there's the Marvel explanation of 'regular people have been known to lift cars to save a baby from burning after an accident', meaning that in times of extreme duress Spidey gets a couple of magnitudes stronger, or as strong as the writer needs him to be within reason. Strength and toughness is to Spidey almost what prep time is to Bats.

>>91161900
It's comic related so... never.

File: 1467778280309.png (110KB, 212x302px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 212x302px

>>91165378
>That horrendous CGI suit
>MCUcks are literally defending it in the replies

File: IDAW1fCQR1o3u.gif (406KB, 300x173px) Image search: [Google]

406KB, 300x173px

>>91170549
>MCU suit looks nothing like the one in the comics.

>"OMG! So comic accurate"

File: 1490709256833.jpg (341KB, 1427x608px) Image search: [Google]

341KB, 1427x608px

>>91171092
That has nothing to do with the CGI, retard.

>>91168509
That's literally who Peter Parker is. He doesn't know how to handle relationships or responsibilities, to disastrous results. Spiderman acts like a class clown to cover up his insecurities. Toby was perfect for this.

>>91171326
Raimi's still looks better unironically

>>91171326
Your point? Still something that's annoying about MCU fags.

>>91161936
>>91165084
>how creepy Peter comes across

raimi spiderman is a sensitive kid who happened to get superpowers

ditko / asm spiderman is the nerdy prick who could have gone full supervillain if not for the death of his uncle ben.

the best part is, most of spiderman's classic villains are twisted versions of himself, either being smarter or dumber or more or less successful or egotistical. classic spiderman is great stuff.

>>91161877
These movies are corny as shit

>>91173777
>spiderman

That out of the way, I do agree with you.
Just try and remember the hyphen so that you don't look silly.

>>91163272
Anyone else feel like the early 2000's comic book movies had the perfect amount of violence? They was no gore or anything (which was good) but they had some really great beat downs.

>>91173059
>no webbing on the proto suit
>light blue instead of navy blue or black
>custom footwear despite everything else looking cobbled together from off the shelf

baka senpai. on the bright side, the solid red does feel remniscent of the scarlet spider outfit.

>>91174165
Early 2000's comic book movies have something current movies don't: real villains. The Goblin was a real threat. You can feel how he wanted to kill Peter for good. We have nothing but jokes like Ultron and Loki now.

>>91164955
>Two people without any knowledge of martial arts are fighting like two people without any knowledge of martial arts.

Wow.

>>91161877

These movies were shit

>>91174893
Fuck off, child.

File: screenshot.jpg (68KB, 824x464px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 824x464px

How can the MCU even compete? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KCB-balUBu8

>>91161877
It feels remarkably non-corporate, which considering how fucking stupid Sony is is pretty impressive. Not being tied down to a "cinematic universe" helps in that you are able to enjoy the film without being pushed by the movie itself or the 3 mid/post-credits scenes to be excited for whatever bullshit comes next.

More importantly it fully embraces its comic book roots far more than any other Marvel or DC film has or probably ever will. It's cheesy but feels honest with the story it's trying to tell and the themes it is trying to portray.

>>91174837
I like the MCU but yeah you are right. The only MCU movie villian that I thought was actually done well was Zemo which was because he wasn't a generic villain with a giant suit or some shit.

>>91161877
theyre okay generic super hero movies but not really spiderman films

File: why.jpg (23KB, 288x499px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 288x499px

>>91165140
>taking vigilante advice from Tony

>>91175722
You didn't like Wilson Fisk or Cottonmouth?

>>91175728
>spiderman

>>91176075
>>91175722
Sorry, missed the "movie" part of "movie villain".
Disregard me, I suck cocks.

File: IMG_6822.jpg (82KB, 630x423px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 630x423px

>>91174893
t. Marvel shill

>>91164926
I don't remember the movie being this bad as a kid.
I didn't expect the special FX to age well but I never recalled them looking this cheesy.

>>91174803
>Custom footwear
It's just red shoes and socks. How is that "custom"?

>>91177556

Im trying to build a cosplay of this, and let me tell you, those shoes or something even remotely similar to them is about impossible to find. They're like some kind of rubbder slip on running clog.

File: spiderman.jpg (64KB, 720x480px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 720x480px

>>91173059
Everything about that "suit" is awful.

>>91165671
wasn't it a cold?

>>91175579
J. K. Simmons as Jameson was one of the most comic accurate portrayals in any cape movie.

>>91173122
read a spidey comic. spidey is the everyman not the autist. he's a generally likeable down on his luck guy who had plenty of girls and friends interested in him. i feel like people who watched the raimi movies before seeing spidey in any other media just now has that image of him and projects it into everything else, when really he was never portrayed as such a loser in any media as he was in the raimi movies where he's portrayed as a soft-spoken wimp most of the time. and I'm saying this as someone that GENERALLY LOVE THE RAIMI MOVIES. (it was a fine enough interpretation of peter that worked for the story they were telling, but when people say tobey portrayed peter parker from the comics well, that to me proves that person is a movie-fag)

File: Ninja_Brian.jpg (36KB, 263x360px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 263x360px

>>91179401
Every time I see that, I still think of Ninja Brian.

>>91161887
ZzZzZ..

>>91179828

More like Raimi and Tobey went way back to the original Peter Parker from the comics. He was a nerd who got shit from most people.

>>91163594
It's because Raimi is ultimately the better director. He did turn horror on its head thrice with the Evil Dead trilogy. Snyder didn't understand the metanarrative behind Watchmen and just saw it as a "dark superhero story" that ended up dictating his adaptation of every DC property he's touched since. Raimi wouldn't have done it "panel by panel" but instead shift it into more of a spiritual successor that adapts the comics' radical deconstruction into a cinematic environment where it would have better synergy.

File: 1487416128776.png (177KB, 367x321px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 367x321px

>>91161877
Rami is a fucking legend and god-tier director. Nobody can deny that.

Tfw he will never direct another capekino ever again

Also Tobey Maguire is fucking cute as hell

File: Daredevil-tired-then-spin-kick.gif (3MB, 320x180px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 320x180px

>No endless cuts
>No shaky camera or blur effects

God, I miss this. I loathe the modern trend of making every fight scene a mess of rapid jumpcuts and schizophrenic camera shaking. Why include a fight scene if you aren't going to let us see what's actually going on? What's the point of even having one?

That's part of what drew me to Daredevil, actually, it mostly stays away from the shakycam nonsense.

>>91161877

God how I miss Raimi's insane vertigo-inducing massive camera swoops

No seizure camera, no stupid pointless fast cuts

Nobody else has come close to capturing the insanity of Spiderman's web swinging antics

>>91165351
No they weren't. Both were birth off trends. MOS was birthed because execs wanted Nolan style Superman and BvS was for the Avengers money.

>>91180618
From what? The first 28 issues? Even there, he wasn't that awkward. In fact, he was more like Andrew's take than Tobey's.

>>91161900
Bitch shut the fuck up

>>91163018
best spider-man and best costume

>>91173122
>>91180618
Quit pretending you know about Classic Spider-Man.
Peter wasn't an awkward boy, he was an outcast who wasn't afraid of engaging with banters against Flash.

>>91180913
That looks pretty good

>>91180618
yeah, peter was talking back to flash calling him an idiot every time he got called puny, and even ended up winning over liz allen when everyone realized being smart was actually better than being a jock (i know the two aren't mutually exclusive but the way peter and flash was portrayed, it was).

>>91181777
The greatest mystery in Marvel for me is the question of what happened to Peter Parker's balls.
Can anyone who's read through the run pinpoint when and who exactly made him a dopey idiot?

>>91183052
Some could argue it happened after Ditko left, and I could kinda see that (given how he's more mopey and self-pitying during the post-Ditko Lee run) but even looking through Lee's or Conway's or Stern's Spider-Man he's far more capable than the Spider-Man we've seen from OMD onwards.

I think a part of it is that a lot of people have a pretty bad interpretation of classic Spider-Man that they focus on the worst cliched aspects and ramp them up because they think that's what Spider-Man's all about.

>>91183166
Thank you. Discussions about the differing impressions from Peter's personality have come up and I've always had the gist a significant shift happened but never a firm chronology to work with.

>>91175687
>More importantly it fully embraces its comic book roots far more than any other Marvel or DC film has or probably ever will.

Someone has never seen Superman: The Movie

>>91162030
>Inexplicably
>autists who need a comicbooky explanation

>>91183837
here's a story about the amazing adventures of a flying cup of tea who likes to rape fire hydrants and hates all jews, and the whole story is just stuff like this happening. what the fuck is this? why do you ask that? do you need a comicbooky explanation you fucking sperg? go read some more awesome nonsensical garbage

>>91165140
I can't tell you how happy I am that Tony's wearing a suit with the Ultimate armor colors

>>91162611
Spiderman has a right to quip. Spiderman should quip.

>>91161877

I honestly kind of agree, though I'm against the whole 'old shit automatically > new shit' ideas on 4chan, but I agree about Spiderman. But I'll admit it must be nostalgia.

However something about those movies really stick in my mind. Even the third one, which I only saw once, really feels good to me. I don't know why but every time I think about that scene with the Green Goblin, MJ, and the school bus on the bridge it gives me chills.

I've never touched a comic in my life but Spiderman will always be my favorite super hero.

File: 1_bruce-campbell-sam-raimi-evil-dead.jpg (106KB, 840x562px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 840x562px

>Peter Jackson (Dead Alive) makes LotR while Sam Raimi (Evil Dead) makes Spiderman

It was a weird time

>>91181051
Sam Raimi always uses crazy cameraplay.

I like how people are posting deliberately desaturated and photoshopped screen caps from the trailer to make the cgi look worse.

This is Damage Control's new tactic: They don't like their movies, they just hate yours.

>>91161877
I unironically think Spider-Man 2 is the best Spider-Man movie to ever come out. Not sure what /co/ thinks

Are people really complaining about the CGI in this after the Justice League trailer?

>>91165140
>>91165378
>>91167074
>>91171326
All the SM Homecoming shots in these have been altered to look worse.

>>91184747
Most would agree, the first one was okay, the third one was one of the worst things ever to happen to comic book movies.

Nostalgia is simply just the pretense being used here to troll the new Spider-Man movie and those looking forward to it because the movie makes anti-MCU folks insecure.

>>91184732
>>91184768
They did the same thing with shots from the Civil War trailers. It's their new FUDD technique.

>>91184747
>>91184777
I disagree. I think Spider-Man just tops Spider-Man 2 a bit more. If there's anything I didn't think I'd enjoy in rewatching a decade after, it was Aunt May's character in both movies.

File: smuggoku.jpg (28KB, 419x400px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 419x400px

>>91184732
>>91184768
>this delusion

>>91184813
I like the first two very closely. I just enjoyed Peter's internal struggle in SM2 a lot more. Also the action scenes were pretty great. The train scene is still one of my favorites.

File: images.jpg (16KB, 182x276px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 182x276px

>>91179828
You read the comics. Science nerds arent everymans. He's likable, sure, but in a "nice guy but would never date you" sort of way.

>>91161877
>thinking Raimi's Spider-Man movies were good
Typical moviefags. Read a fucking comic. They were fucking terrible. Peter's characterization was so off from the source material, might as well have been an entirely different character.

>>91180913
I miss the days where not every superhero knew Jason Bourne level martial arts. Fuck it's boring to watch now. It's fine for Daredevil and Batman, but now everybody's doing it.

What defines a true hero?

Also makes for the best YTPs.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tT55pvSe9R4

>>91185264
One who'll save us, not gonna stand here and wait

>>91173122
>That's literally who Peter Parker is.
You can just admit you've never actually read a Spider-Man comic in your life. You might actually gain a little bit of respect for being honest.

>>91183166
>from OMD onwards
Mostly because of Slott. That guy misunderstands the character (and actively hates him, even going so far as to call Peter "anti-Marvel") on a foundational level.

>>91185071
Well that's good, comics are gay. I only use this board for cartoons.

File: Damage_Control_1.png (281KB, 300x464px) Image search: [Google]

281KB, 300x464px

>>91184732
>>91184782
>It i-is p-photoshopped guys... the movie looks good

>>91161877
Honestly? I'd say it's just nostalgia and luck. It wasn't really that good of a movie series, anon. It just came out at a good time.

>>91161877

WB topped it with Nolan Batman trilogy though

>>91186898
Coincidentally, both had a third finale that was a bit lackluster and the second ones were deemed the peak of each series.

>>91161877
I am sure Disney is weeping in their Scrooge McDuck size vaults as they drown in all the money they made for not being able to do what Sony did

File: imagem23_16_39_8.png (1MB, 700x774px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 700x774px

The stupid people over Disney say Tom Holland version of Spiderman is the best one yet even through he can even land a hit to his opponents.
This seriously makes me want to puke. I don't have anything against Tom but the people in charge of this movie should gas themselves. Even the other faggots who played Spiderman would do better than the Disney one

File: spider-man-homecoming-damage-control.png (240KB, 670x284px) Image search: [Google]

240KB, 670x284px

>>91185861
Ironically, Damage Control is a literal company in Homecoming.

>>91187026
>SAVE ME, TONY!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRgdA9_FsXM

>>91185693
I must have watched this every day for a good 2 months at one point in my life

>>91185906
Watched it again. You're full of shit. It still holds up.

>>91188015
>It still holds up.
That's some shit taste, anon. You and I both know it didn't. The movie aged like milk.

>>91161877
Raimi is just the perfect director for a comic book movie. He has a fun directing style and understands the importance of the suspense and release of horror while also having great comic timing that all works great for the flashy moments and rescues of a superhero film.He also knows to keep the camera on the action rather than obscuring it.

I watched that dumb pizza delivery scene from 2 recently, and it fits exactly how I'd picture a comic about that going. You feel his worry, his rescue of the kids in the street is fun and uplifting, and the end is crushing while still being funny. He's the best!

Too bad the trend now is studios fucking with their directors to please focus groups or whatever (also something that hurt Spider-Man 3). We'll never get a good director delivering his vision again.

And yeah, there were writing issues and stuff in spots, but I still think the visual language holds up really well all over the place in that trilogy.

>>91188040
>The movie aged like milk.
We aren't talking about Civil War

>>91189845
I know. Civil War was pretty dope. Raimi's trilogy on the other hand? Was good when it came out... because that's all we had. Looking at it now, its a campy shitfest.

Anyone who thinks those movies are actually good needs to take off the nostalgia goggles and actually watch the movie.

File: Screen Shot 2017-03-31 at 1.15.20 PM.png (2MB, 1402x696px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1402x696px

>>91184995
lol posting panel from literally the first appearance before the character has any room to actually take shape.

File: Screen Shot 2017-03-31 at 1.24.37 PM.png (1MB, 628x908px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 628x908px

>>91184995

File: Screen Shot 2017-03-31 at 1.16.24 PM.png (305KB, 388x378px) Image search: [Google]

305KB, 388x378px

>>91184995
>girls didn't want to date him in highschool

File: 20.jpg (212KB, 895x440px) Image search: [Google]

212KB, 895x440px

>>91190256

>>91161900
IT'S /CO/ RELEATED YOU

File: Screen Shot 2017-03-31 at 1.32.20 PM.png (772KB, 536x774px) Image search: [Google]

772KB, 536x774px

>>91184995
he could even be pretty smooth sometimes

>>91161877
I love the first two raimi spidey movies
the third one it terrible.
I love the first two Nolan Bats movies
the third one was terrible.

"Top" them... maybe maybe not. But lets not act like Nolan Bats doesn't atleast tie spidey. Begins is the best of the six and tdk is top three.

Arguably:
Begins
SM1
TDK
SM2
SM3
TDKR

File: 22.jpg (345KB, 898x1333px) Image search: [Google]

345KB, 898x1333px

>>91190306
He and Betty Brandt hook up in Amazing Spider-Man #7.

>b-b-but Peter is a neeeerd! He doesn't have any friends!
>Moviefags actually believe this

>>91190441
>I love the first two raimi spidey movies
So you don't actually like Spider-Man?

>But lets not act like Nolan Bats doesn't atleast tie spidey
Oh, you're a turbo casual. Got it.

File: 2.jpg (424KB, 891x901px) Image search: [Google]

424KB, 891x901px

>>91190345

>>91190488
Oh you touch children? got it.

>>91187026
That costume looks so shit, no texture at all,
and the front logo is fucked up.

How did they get away with this?

>>91190345
Peter BTFO Flash in the movie too

>>91190543
>F-fuck he figured out I'm a moviefag!
>B-better try to insult the anon. T-that'll show 'em!

>>91190345
this is proving my point. peter is obviously pissed off in this scene because it's gotten to a boiling point, but he was standing up for himself here and not in a "REEEEEEEE" way. he always called out flash on how he was a dumb chad the same way flash teased peter about how he was a nerd. oh, and you posted this out of context. liz actually asked pete out, but pete was doing spidey stuff or something so he couldn't go. the adventure was resolved early so he was letting her know he actually could go out with her in the first panel. she was obviously pissed by then. parker luck, but that also proves that liz liked him. also, betty brant fancied him as well and there was a bit of a love triangle going. after the first 10 issues or so (you know, when the character actually got to develop to who he canonically was) it wasn't because pete was an autistic nerd that got in the way of his social life, it was because he was spider-man. socially he was fine and people liked him (of course, there were people that didn't, but that's true for everyone). raimi's version of peter was portrayed as pretty socially weird. that worked for the movie, i liked the series (except 3), but it wasn't comics-accurate peter.

to take it one step further, all you have to do is look at any other spider-man media not relating to the raimi trilogy. literally any other one. not a one portrays peter the same way as raimi's peter. he was a normal guy that happened to like science, not a character from the big bang theory.

>>91190608
Yeah, unintentionally. He was a complete pansy (socially speaking) throughout the whole movie.

>>91190627
>Anon makes unverifiable assumption about another anon
>Anon responds with another unverifiable assumption to point out the absurdity of making assumption on the internet
>Another anon is a faggot and decides to side with original anon because "LOLFUCKNOLAN amiright"

>>91190699
>LOLFUCKNOLAN amiright
To be fair, his movies are pretty terrible.

Just look at how poorly they're edited: https://vimeo.com/28792404

>>91189992
>its a campy shitfest.
This is why these movies were so good.

>>91191235
>implying its less campy than a fucking Sam Raimi movie
Anon, the hell is wrong with you?

>>91189992
Thanks for confirming once again that you have terrible taste.

>>91190699
Anon, just report this autist. He shits up every single Raimi Spider-Man thread with his autistic "IF YOU DON'T SHARE MY TASTE YOU DON'T READ COMICS" screeching. Or tell him that Eddie Brock is a garbage character that only exists to pander to 13-year olds and edgy manchildren.

>>91190664
The problem was we didn't get as much inner monologue to convey his feelings. He had a breath catharsis upon beating Flash.

File: Spiderman.jpg (71KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 960x540px

>>91191301
I'm talking about Raimi. His movies were campy shitfest and it was amazing. Like a silly old comic

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mk9_340xqeU

File: The Birth Of A Hero.jpg (139KB, 696x423px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 696x423px

If you don't enjoy this, you don't like superheroes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9-fhQvYMwo

>>91191423
charming as all hell

>>91191806
This.

>>91190488
Kys

>>91188040
You are milk

>>91191806
she was a good aunt may but what was wrong with toby's mouth in this scene
>fuck you toby who told you how to face

>>91195474
Toby is cute tho