ITT-/co/ films that should never get sequels

>>91107600
Man of Steel :^)

>>91107600
Why would it need a sequel?

>>91107600
Finding Nemo

>>91107666
Because it had a solid ending as with all lakia films

>>91107929
I would be OK with Paranorman 2

>>91107600
Of course Coraline will never get a sequel, it is based on a book
Also Laika movies don't get sequels

>>91108146
Jurassic part was based on a book but that didn't stop it from getting 3 fucking sequels now didn't it, faggot?

I would be okay with a Coraline tv show where Coraline has to deal with family friendly Lovecraft shit every week in rural America, but they'd run out of plots quickly. Plus there's no way to do a stop motion tv show.

File: p29626_p_v8_ae.jpg (329KB, 960x1440px) Image search: [Google]

329KB, 960x1440px

>>91107600

File: The_Land_Before_Time_poster.jpg (38KB, 296x443px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 296x443px

>>91109491
I can do better.

>>91109545
>13 sequels and a shit TV show
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>91109376
The book got sequels before the moviedid.

>>91107600
The Incredibles

>>91109617
>Only a handful were even passable.
>The last one came out last fucking year.
Brilliant example of how to milk a franchise dry as a bone.

>>91109718
Agreed, that movie was too good to get a bastardized sequel, I'm afraid the new one will suck.

File: phillistine.png (357KB, 623x476px) Image search: [Google]

357KB, 623x476px

>>91107600
>Kubo

File: 1478349221798.png (149KB, 281x257px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 281x257px

>>91107600
All of them.

Animated sequels are the devil, even if there have been ones that ended up being good.

>>91108009
I miss Norman a lot, but I'd still be against it. I'll just imagine what his future would be like.