>....Lulu....Take care of....Lulu.

This series has some god-tier dogs

File: images[1].jpg (8KB, 188x269px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 188x269px

Oh, I'll take care of Lu', brudda! IF YA KNOW WHAT I'M BLITZIN', YA!

Why was the sword able to cut X9?

>>91079346
Barneyfag Jr, your tears only add to the fire

Also X9 is a good bot, he deserved better

>>91079373
Don't get me wrong, I love SJ, but...really? About 20 at once?

>>91079373

>If I call anons Barneyfag, my dozen threads will be less annoying.

>>91079357
He was just a robot with emotions chip.

>>91079357
He doesn't have the qi of a living thing, and so the sword can't tell.

>>91079389
It's been years and SJ is now on its way to the finale we've all been waiting for, of course /co/ will explode about it

>>91079401
There's been some wacko autist spewing READ THE FUCKING CATALOG around, I was a bit too harsh to that anon though

>>91079406
Doesn't that technicality count as real emotions?

>>91079476
Nope, AI isn't the same thing imo.

>>91079357
Firstly the sword is not nonfunctional against good by default, it's only if evil tries to use it against good specifically.
Secondly regardless of X9's reasons or moral affinity he was trying to kill Jack, so like the Lava Monster that's about the end of the matter.

>>91079715
>Firstly the sword is not nonfunctional against good by default, it's only if evil tries to use it against good specifically

Just checked Jack and the Zombies and it looks like this checks out. If the user is a good guy it can be used as they see fit I suppose.

>>91079715
X9 very soon understood what he(they) were doing "was very bad". He did it to the end.

Every evil except Aku has an excuse or justification.

>>91079326
WHY DID YOU SAY THAT NAME?!

>>91079357
The way it was phrased, an innocent could kill other innocents.

X-9 wasn't wholly innocent, either.

>>91079354
AHHH
HA
HA
HA!

...sweet thing.

File: 1490502623670.png (595KB, 1280x709px) Image search: [Google]

595KB, 1280x709px

Did she dieded?