>Good first movie
>Awesome second movie
>Dog shit third movie
How did this happen?
Asians
>>91040396
A bit too much of a heavy focus on comedy, specifically Po's comedy, making all the Pandas exactly like Po with a lot of focus on lazy, food and fat jokes wasnt really a great move
>>91040396
That's Dreamworks MO.
If first movie is good, then 2nd movie is great! 3rd is shit and they get progressively worse.
>Shrek Good
> Shrek 2 Great
>Shrek the 3rd Shit
>How to Train your Dragon Good
>How to Train your Dragon 2 Great
>How to Train your Dragon 3 shit
>>91041607
Was Despicable Me 2 better than the first?
>>91042237
Despicable me isn't Dreamworks, it's Illumination. Rule only applies to Dreamworks.
>>91041607
What about Madagascar?
>>91042478
third movie was weird as hell but best
>>91040396
Villain was boring
Plot was boring
Scenery was boring
Jokes weren't funny.
I fell asleep on my first viewing of it.
>>91041607
How to train your dragon 1 is better IMO
>>91042737
A villain voiced by J.K Simmons should never be boring
They dropped the ball hard
>>91041607
Wait there was a How to train your dragon 3?
>>91041607
How to Train your Dragon 2 was fucking terrible though
>>91042737
Kai's theme was fine as hell though
>>91042478
I've never actually seen a Madagascar movie. Forgot that was Dreamworks, the animation is so primitive.
>>91040396
Not enough Furious 5 character building.
>>91041607
>>How to Train your Dragon 2 Great