I truly do not understand. Why were all the feather-dusters birds?

Lets try to work through this logically. Do feather dusters and birds have in common?

>>90841302

A bird in the hand

>>90841551
BIRD BIRD BIRD BIRD BIRD BBIRD BIRD BIRD

>>90841497
I dunno, somebody ask /an/.

>>90841497
Dust

File: 1232376787046.gif~c200.gif (675KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

675KB, 200x200px

>>90841586

>>90841302
FEATHER dusters
Get it?
Get it?
Get it?
Get it?
Get it?

>>90841641
/an/ here, both feel good when you gently caress your dick with them

>>90841812

Okay, but it's not like any of the other objects were animal-hybrids or whatever.

>>90842301
BUT

It's a FEATHER duster

Do you get it?

A writer was paid a lot of money for this anon, it can't be that stupid.

They weren't real birds. They're stylized feather dusters for a fancy castle.

File: OP1.jpg (337KB, 1312x954px) Image search: [Google]

337KB, 1312x954px

>>90841302
Feathers = birds

You = faggot

>>90841302
The original design was too sexy for the young audiences of today

>>90841497
They both shit on me.

>>90842427
Would people in that era really design feather dusters like that though? I'm not sure they would see much of a point in dressing up something only the servants are going to use anyway.

File: 32c9e9a25afb92b8edc27d0c7d8aea03.jpg (37KB, 500x589px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 500x589px

>>90843048
I don't know that there's any extant examples, but I've seen similar "everyday" items given fancy looks when they're designed to be shown off. Kind of like how Marie Antoinette had servants pour milk made at her dairy in expensive, pretty porcelain pails before pouring it into glasses for her guests, rather than having the servants be seen pouring it from plain pails.

>>90842364
Ohhh