Bland

>>90587546
Is bland necessarily a bad thing? Growing (6-9) up during premier episodes of Doug was the closest thing I'll have to life lessons on how to be Canadian.

Someone post the Tree of Doug image.

File: ARTHUR_READ.png (34KB, 563x1128px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 563x1128px

I think Arthur comes pretty close if not equal.

>>90589146
Not bad at all. In fact, I really like Doug.
But I also realize that he isn't the most...interesting character out there.

>>90590411
They are pretty close in blandness, huh?

>>90590536
Yeah, sometimes its even used as a gag; especially by D.W. and Francine.

>>90587546
his imagination isnt so bland. that's what made him stand out

>>90590411
Arthur was at least willing to smack a bitch when she touches something she shouldn't.

he doug deep in my butt and he was a skeeter.

>>90587546
Hi Mr. Walker.

File: unified_doug_theory.jpg (106KB, 480x1051px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 480x1051px

>>90589557

>>90592556
Nah all those characters had more personality except Lloyd, Ginger, and the AGU cast, charlie as proto-doug is alright but even then Charlie is smarter than Doug. Fillmore was bitter but had a past as a delinquent and sought redemption. TJ was smart and sassy, Pepper Ann was more of a loser but actually had good friends who weren't one off jokes, Arthur is just a regular kid who makes mistakes but actually emotes a lot more. Arnold is exhausted and is embedded in reality with an optimistic lens.

>>90594836
What about Pelswick?

>>90594836
>the AGU cast

It's amazing how much personality was lost in the 10 years between the original show and AGU

>>90592556
How the fuck can you compare TJ or Fillmore to Doug?

Tintin. Capable hero but bland. Snowy helped him a bit but the series took over when the secondary characters came.

>>90587546
Miles Morales