Which titles are you looking forward to? Does Marvel actually care for the X-Men again?
>>89679417
Gold, Cable, Generation X and Cable, i doubt, marvel cares more about the properties the own for movies.
>>89679417
The new Inhumans by Ewing
>>89679417
i'll try blue and weapon, but i dont have any hope really
>>89679417
What hacks are writing this crap?
>>89679417
>Which titles are you looking forward to
Black Bolt and Royals
>>89679417
>Xiceman
kek
>>89679417
Blue
Royals
Cable
And Weapon X, why not? I'll just need to use my imagination to pretend someone like Immonen is drawing instead of Land. Gold will very likely be utter shit, so I'll just read it to complain about it on the internet.
>>89679417
Are any of the old books continuing?
And really just gen X.
Fuck the solos, fuck the O5 (other than Cyke).
>>89679417
Pretty much all of them but Iceman
Any idea of rosters of blue and gold?
>>89679417
Sorta interested in Generation X.
Jean Grey is gonna be Hopeless.
>>89679417
weapon x, cable and blue, this last one only for magneto and Bunn.
Imo there is a strong lack of morally gray assholish x-men in this relaunch, to me this seems too safe and the characters too heroic and goody goody.
would like to see characters like Emma, Sunfire, Monet, magik, havok, wolfsbane etc.
>>89683398
they are both known already
blue is 05 with Magneto as professor
gold has kitty pryde as leader, with storm, colossus, old man logan, rachel and nightcrawler.
weapon x has old man logan, sabertooth, domina, warpath and lady deadstrike.
emma, old beast and magik are nowhere to be seen.
>>89679417
The character that gives me an erxtion
>>89681032
>Are any of the old books continuing?
Just X-23.
>>89679417
They all look like shit
>>89685096
I bet by summer they will have Uncanny back
>>89685006
Have we heard anything on Archangel and Psylocke? I bet they will be on Uncanny if it comes back.
>>89685241
I think they may be new Uncanny Avengers characters if that book still exists.