Heathcliff and the mice wear jeans.

>>89593424
So did the cartoonist only discover that kids wore jeans yesterday or something?

>>89593424
is heathcliff intentionally unfunny or is the humor supposed to be in sort of a transcendent way

>>89593424

>Enough with the jeans

To be continued

>>89593457
At this point he has to be intentionally making comics without jokes. Pushing the crap boundary until he finally gets fired.

File: 1480969293554.png (343KB, 748x710px) Image search: [Google]

343KB, 748x710px

What if this is extremely high brow comedy and we're all just too dim to understand it?

>>89594285
>An actual joke

What is this

>>89594488
Above these apparent hieroglyphics was a figure of evidently pictorial intent, though its impressionistic execution forbade a very clear idea of its nature. It seemed to be a sort of monster, or symbol representing a monster, of a form which only a diseased fancy could conceive. If I say that my somewhat extravagant imagination yielded simultaneous pictures of a cat and a human caricature, I shall not be unfaithful to the spirit of the thing. A round, furred head wearing a helmet emblazoned with "ham" on it, surmounted a pudgy body with a shirt that read "I'm Bad News"; but it was the general outline of the whole which made it most shockingly frightful. Behind the figure was a vague suggestion of a Cyclopean architectural background.

>>89593424
What is wrong with wearing jeans? I thought they had them even back in the miner 49er days when Healthcliff was considered funny

>>89594075
Bullshit, a glove that oversized is impractical ind impossible to close with human fingers, let a lone a small cat's paw. It is entirely the glove's fault. Fuck you, kid.

>>89594088
>"Thats not good"

Honestly works for every single Heathcliff comic.

>>89593457

I think when you have to come up with a joke every day you just stop trying at some point. I mean, why make an effort to be funny? They're just gonna print it anyway.

>>89594488
Speak for yourself, I understand it perfectly.