GOD DAMN IT CARTOON NETWORK!

You are looking at the reboot of the franchise of Cartoon Network's Ben 10.

>>89343022
CN's future, get used to it

>>89343063
Nah, it's a continuation of the original series.

A pretty decent show actually.

>>89343082
>>89343119
literally looks like something that belongs on nick jr for children under 10... Why are they making the art style so displeasing? Do they think they can pull a south park here and be something funny?

>>89343022
a dissapointment that never ends

>>89343022
You're looking at something no one wanted, no one wants, and no one will ever actually want, except the higher-ups at CN.

Because when every show on the network is shit, none of them are, and Teen Titans Go is by default the best show on CN.

>>89343285
That's really sad that TTG is the best that they can do there. That really tells you something.

Although Pokemon has changed it's Art style, it kept it's initial look I guess. Ben's head looks like it weighs almost as much as the rest of his body...

a toy commercial

>>89343022
An attempt by CN to make profits on a franchise that needed to reworked to accommodate the new viewing audience and scheduling.

>slowpoke.jpg

I wish they kept the Omniverse artstyle. It wasn't perfect by any means, but it was cartoony and unique without looking childish and generic.

>>89343425
>unique without looking generic

Wow disregard that, I need to proofread my posts.

>>89343425
I get what you mean.
Sorta on the idea of how they did Ed Edd N Eddy? It was cartoony but could get serious if they needed to right?

File: if it wasnt for him we wouldnt have this.png (752KB, 1280x800px) Image search: [Google]

752KB, 1280x800px

>>89343022
the end of an era, thats what you are looking.