Heathcliff wears a powdered wig.

>>89197840
You're a little early today.

File: squeak.gif (119KB, 640x738px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 640x738px

gocomics switched to a shitty "modern" format so no more saving the comics easily or viewing the old people comments

File: 1479442402756.gif (3MB, 264x240px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 264x240px

>this garbage clings to the sunday funnies like a parasite while thousands of talented cartoonists beg for donations to support their failing webcomics

Why?

>>89198465
If they were truly talented, they wouldn't rely on being lowly webcomic artists.

>>89197840
Excellent, I think this is a repost of Heatchliff from 1772?

>>89199016
Why is Donald Trump naked? I really hoping what he's grabbing isn't what he said he'd grab.

File: 1451974508325s.jpg (7KB, 180x215px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 180x215px

>>89197840
Wouldn't it make more sense for the mustachio old guy to be the one saying that? After all, there's a toupee gag based around it right?

>>89199626
It makes a lot of sense for the wig store owner to say it too.

>>89199626
Does it make sense that birds, racoons and mice can talk in the Heathcliff universe but not dogs or cats?

It's Heathcliffe we stopped making sense a few Garbage-apes ago.

I don't click any other thread so fast as I do Heathcliff

File: 1483961367169.png (176KB, 800x592px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 800x592px

>>89198465
>implying Heathcliff doesn't blow 99% of webcomics out of the water
>implying Gallagher doesn't blow 99% of webcomic artist's work ethics out of the water
>implying Heathcliff isn't better than 100% of other sunday funnies

File: heathcliff.png (111KB, 450x522px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 450x522px

>>89199816
There's a place between mice and humans that need others to drive the plot forward. Heathcliff is propelled by bystander dialogue. Makes sense to me.

File: It's been one of those days.jpg (18KB, 454x345px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 454x345px

>>89198465
>webcomics
Aha! Here's the problem. Too many webcomics!

>>89199003
>political commentary in my Heathcliff
Has it gone too far?

>>89198465
Because the best way to guarantee newspapers will never remove you from their pages is by being as inoffensive as possible.

Which usually translates to unfunny.

>>89197840
>>89198418
>>89199003
>>89199016
>>89199038
>>89199038
>>89199594
>>89199714
>>89199781
>>89200781
THESE ARE BAD AND YOU SHOULD FEEL BAD TOO

Where is the joke

>>89204006
Heathcliff is not a joke. It's a key to understand duality of man, forever torn between his divine and bestial natures.

>>89198418
I think GoComics also fucked up their RSS feeds in the transition.

>>89202573
No. They are good. You should feel good. Heathcliff is good. I like Heathcliff.

>>89202492
Hey, it worked for Obama.

File: contraception.gif (114KB, 600x693px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 600x693px

>>89202451
It happens from time to time.

File: mcmansion.gif (84KB, 450x524px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 450x524px

>>89205305

File: occupy heathcliff.gif (120KB, 600x724px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 600x724px

>>89205385

>>89201134
i hope we can get rid of them!
get the hint?

File: 1456207798523.gif (88KB, 450x521px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 450x521px

>>89197840
What, again?

>>89205305
Oh, boy.

>>89202573
What's the matter, anon? Is this perhaps TOO DEEP for you?

File: 1461954149475.jpg (87KB, 640x418px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 640x418px

>>89206909