[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

> Sigourney Weaver Defenders Villain Is New Character

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 35
Thread images: 1

File: moot.jpg (85KB, 1024x512px)
moot.jpg
85KB, 1024x512px
>A couple of days ago saw new details revealed about Sigourney Weaver's villain role in Defenders in that she is playing a character named Alexandra.

>Now we know it's clear Sigourney Weaver is playing an original character.

>EW.com's online publication of the article states Alexandra in Defenders "has no code name and no comic-book history," but if that wasn't clear enough, the printed version also states: "Her evildoing Alexandra, whom Ramirez describes as an 'utter badass,' is not based on a comic book character."

http://www.cosmicbooknews.com/sigourney-weaver-defenders-villain-new-character
Brava Marvel TV, brava.
>>
>already resorting to OCs
lel
>>
>>89130356
>Brava
It's "bravo", you uneducated fuck. Kill yourself.
>>
Fuck. We are entering a dark road now.
>>
>>89130356
>not based on a comic book character."

Not until Bendis brings her in to the comics after the fact for brand synergy. It's inevitable
>>
Eh, could be worse. Could have been a butchered adaptation like Nuke or Diamondback.
>>
I really hope sigourney weaver reconsiders she's too good for this trash.
>>
>>89130551
They're already filming dumbass
>>
>>89130409
Why the aversion to original characters?
>>
>>89130356
>not based on a comic book character
Yeah, they all say that...
>>
>>89130551
>she's too good for this trash.

Sure

That's why she can't get cast in anything else other than Alien films. What an A-list actor
>>
We'll see, I remember last time one of the big two were producing something and they said that their antagonist wasn't a character from any comic books.
>>
>Not killing off the hand

We're going to deal with ninjas forever aren't we?
>>
>>89130415
If you want to go with the original declination, "television" is feminine in Italian so "brava" would be more correct.
Also color me disappointed about this choice, OCs are not necessarily bad but it seems to tell that they seemed to see no existing character fitting the narrative they laid out for their villain.
>>
>>89130633
Daredevil season 3?
>>
>>89130415
Brava is the feminine form.
>>
>>89130587
>I only watched her /co/-related films
>>
>>89130575
Because it is the point Marvel stops considering their books viable and make bland action movie baddies.
>>
>>89130624
The Punisher
>>
>>89130733
I was thinking more along the lines of Arkham Knight aka Jason Todd, but Frank is a far better example.
>>
>>89130694
Its not like they can't use new characters AND established characters.

Remember Max Shreck from Batman Returns?

Or Harley Quinn from BTAS?
>>
>>89130783
My biggest fear was Defenders ending up an original product and thus an 8 hour decompressed bullshit show
>>
>>89130674
Fuck no. Bullseye or Kingpin.
>>
>>89130515
I thought Nuke was pretty interesting. Felt like evil Captain America. I'm sure there'll be more to work with in the next season
>>
>>89130769
I was thinking Talia al Ghul in TDKR
>>
>>89130894
>I never read the comics
You realize they appaeared concurrently right? Stop pretending to care about these characters just enjoy your tv slop as they give it to you.
>>
>>89130944
I was a casual when that movie came out and said that Bane sucks because all he ever is is a high ranking henchmen. Then we all watched TDKR and he turned out to just be Talia's henchmen.
>>
>>89130959
Not him, but we all know Bullseye is next season.
>>
>>89130551
The lady was in Chappie, you drastically overestimate her standards.
>>
>>89130356
100% chance that she'll be the villain of Bendis' Defenders which comes out before the show does.
>>
>>89131273
God, that is gonna suck.
>>
>>89130356
My guess? Another corrupt politician/bureaucrat/crime boss with a hypercompetent right hand man who is ten times more beloved by the fanbase.
>>
>>89131717
This
>>
>>89130551

They're not trash, you contrarian fuccboi.
>>
>>89130551
She's done worse stuff

There was this vampire chickflick, forget what it's called
Thread posts: 35
Thread images: 1


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoin at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Posts and uploaded images are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that website. If you need information about a Poster - contact 4chan. This project is not affiliated in any way with 4chan.