Gargoyles, or no gargoyles? Explain

>>89050025
They were real.

No gargoyles. They detract from the dramatic and dark themes of the movie.

https://mega.nz/#!KEsS0D4K!P89Ph7a4dW3OycLmI6-fy6HSuzSbr7AlxvkpBd8Y5FU

who fucking cares

this movie sucked, with or without them

>>89050025
I think the Gargoyles would work much much better if they just stayed stone during the final battle. After they give Quasimodo that pep talk they just fade out of the film and don't detract from the atmosphere by making catapults and wacky jokes during the siege of Notre Dame. Or if they were just made more ambiguous in the entire film outright, though I don't think anyone would disagree there.

>>89050025
Not real.

I would have really preferred them to all in Quasimodo's head. When he introduces them to Esmarelda as still statues she should be weirded out but feel sympathy for his loneliness.

It would've been cool if it were the Gargoyles from the Gargoyles cartoon.

>>89050305
>Keith David giving awkward dating advice to Quasimodo

I didn't know I wanted this

I always thought of them as isolation induced hallucinations.

>>89050025
I liked them. They pushed Quasimodo through the movie, whenever he was doubting himself.

If there were no gargoyles Frollo wouldn't have died.

>>89050725
But it wasn't any of those three fuckers who killed Frollo.

File: 400px-Goliath.png (127KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 400x300px

Gargoyles.