Rotoscoping was a mistake

cartoons was a mistake.

File: PAY-Snow-White.jpg (47KB, 615x855px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 615x855px

Would you prefer this? Original design of Snow White.

File: boop_bamboo.gif (490KB, 328x287px) Image search: [Google]

490KB, 328x287px

>>89004906
Tell that to the Fleischer brothers. They knew what they were doing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZIoJtoxCmE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wlLHZruDCAA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B_jqqJ-77xs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdDvMaNg06s

>>89005174
Actually yeah, that's pretty damn cute.

this thread was a mistake

File: Pdvd199.jpg (554KB, 1274x965px) Image search: [Google]

554KB, 1274x965px

>>89005174
there's way worse examples you could've posted

>>89005317
>>89005174

Snow white turned out as bland as she did because she was one of the last characters in the film to be animated. Disney was already so overdue and overbudget trying to get the animation for the dwarves right that they were forced to cop out with rotoscoping for Snow White so that they could make the premiere date.

>>89005455
It's funny how it ended up working for them anyway

>>89004906

I think it made sense because she came off as otherworldly.

File: 319519_full.jpg (64KB, 1000x660px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 1000x660px

>>89005299
Fukkkk yeah, based Fleischer.

Also, without Rotoscoping we wouldn't have most of Bakshi's later filmography, including this most BASED of scenes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f-PGUQgfld0

File: cdaf707e0692018b0c0265f30ff5c872.jpg (20KB, 380x320px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 380x320px

>>89005299
The early rotoscoping in Disney looks odd because everything else is drawn traditionally, in a distinct cartoon style, which had enough time to have been practiced. Doing realistic looking humans hadn't been attempted until Goddess of Spring in 1934. Of course they wanted the heroine to be 'beautiful' (therefore, realistic), so using rotoscope made more sense

File: Kyle-Hyde-hotel-dusk-room-215-1037701_170_200.gif (165KB, 170x200px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 170x200px

>>89004906
Fuck you

File: 1939-pinocchio-model-sheet-blue-fairy_1_1d1ea66941418a1865496d215baacd4b.jpg (24KB, 500x333px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 500x333px

>>89005510
So you don't like it because one character who appears for 3 minutes was stylized from photography?

File: 46464759.jpg (107KB, 512x692px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 512x692px

>>89004906
Disney's early movie rotoscoping was only done with females characters. The Blue Fairy was the only female in Pinocchio, unless you count Cleo and the female puppets.

>>89005582
i was bitching about Walking lifebut I realized my autism was showing when bashing rotoscoping for no real reason

>>89005638
>only females
Really? Can't remember the last time I watched any of the early movies but I could have sworn I've seen males too, like the prince in Sleeping Beauty.

Rotoscoping is surprisingly exhausting.

File: Peter-Pan-Tinkerbell.jpg (35KB, 610x460px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 610x460px

>>89005825
And expensive since you have to pay for the actors and essentially make the whole thing in live action first

>>89005974
>didn't even draw over the actress

Then what's the point

>>89006095
It's called referencing. Snow White and Blue Fairy are the only rotoscoped characters

>>89004906
You are dumb

>>89004906
I read that as:
>"robocoping was a mistake

File: IMG_1276.jpg (116KB, 824x464px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 824x464px

>>89004906
I have absolutely no complaints