[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

So true

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 142
Thread images: 13

File: C08lw08UkAAL16_.jpg (303KB, 2048x1348px) Image search: [Google]
C08lw08UkAAL16_.jpg
303KB, 2048x1348px
So true
>>
porn when?
>>
>>88823793
That's a nice B^U right there
>>
Is that the final comic? If so, that's a good finale.
>>
File: furfag of wisdom.jpg (233KB, 1280x828px) Image search: [Google]
furfag of wisdom.jpg
233KB, 1280x828px
>>88823793
>>
Remember when /co/ used to circlejerk over this awful garbage like it was funny? Fuck you /co/.
>>
>>88826798
Oh holy shit SJW's in a nutshell
>>
>>88826798
This is a completely reasonable thing to say. Why is the author trying to portray this person as some kind of demented retard?
>>
>>88823793
>>88826798

Is this the teen equivalent of Kelly?
>>
>>88826846
They're not. That's you projecting.
>>
>>88827827
I don't think you know what that word means.
>>
>>88827838
I don't think YOU know what that word means.
>>
>>88827827
it's generally the point of the comic, though, that it depicts the dumb things that people say in their shops, so you can't really blame someone if they think showing someone saying that, drawn in the same unflattering style as every other characters who's said something stupid, is intended to take the piss out of them
>>
>>88827996
If you've ever read the tags of his comics, you'd know this is fucking wrong. His #Jus Folks and #It's True tags are for normal people who he isn't making fun of. For fucks sake, he even does ones of little kids excited about Spider-Man, Star Wars and other shit.
>>
>>88826846
He just draws everyone in the same B^U style and the quotes are just random shit he heard in his shop, not necessarily stuff he agrees or disagrees with.
>>
>>88828079
ah, my mistake. I'd mostly seen the OVF comics posted on other sites, where they usually were mocking people for stupid comments.
When I checked the site itself toay, I found the non-mocking comics are more common than I thought
>>
>>88827902
That's exactly what that word means.

>>88827996
The point of the comic is to literally depict things said in the dude's comic book shop, including verbatim quotes and a representation drawn to the best of the artist's ability. Any other meaning you extract is from your own biases.
>>
Daily reminder that he was forced to delete one of his strips and post an apology because it offended people.

Keep in mind, what he posted was a true statement said by an actual person presented in as neutral a fashion as possible.
>>
>>88830875
Well if you don't have it to share then you are a huge faggot for bringing it up.
>>
File: 553.jpg (69KB, 640x434px) Image search: [Google]
553.jpg
69KB, 640x434px
my fav one
>>
>>88823793
>Having husband who loves comics and works in comic book store

This is a pure fantasy. No women would want to marry someone like that
>>
File: OVC-nerdgirls.jpg (487KB, 749x1317px) Image search: [Google]
OVC-nerdgirls.jpg
487KB, 749x1317px
>>88830875
>he was forced to delete one of his strips and post an apology because it offended people

He posted an apology, but didn't delete it. I think a lot of the anger came from people who, like the anons above, don't understand that these are things he's overheard in his comic shop.

>>88831052
>Well if you don't have it to share then you are a huge faggot for bringing it up.

Yes, that anon is an enormous bundle of sticks. And while I did screen cap it just in case, it's still up on his site.

http://ourvaluedcustomers.blogspot.com/2013/08/to-her-friend.html
>>
Everyone in these comics are drawn to be idiots in the wrong. I don't give a shit if he claims that he doesn't do it on purpose. He draws every single one of them as ugly, slackdrawed, and even sometimes just spitting. The dude is drawing strawmen.
>>
>>88831469
>like the anons above, don't understand that these are things he's overheard in his comic shop.
has anyone indicated that they didn't think that these were things that people had actually said?
>>
File: 1476494803575.png (307KB, 322x591px) Image search: [Google]
1476494803575.png
307KB, 322x591px
>>88831496
>Everyone in these comics are drawn to be idiots in the wrong.

Well, look at this wrong idiot.
>>
>>88831081
>>88823793
This style is reminiscent of smuggies
>>
>>88831559
Considering he got threats and hate over it, yeah it's safe to say someone doesn't understand they are things said by other people.
>>
>>88831496
And what's wrong about it?
>>
>>88831568
That anon specifically says he does care if the artist claims it's unintentional, he plainly and clearly does it, which is a massive artistic failure.
>>
>>88823793
That's what the blog is about.
>>
>Comic lovers
>only discusses about mainstream tv crap and capeshit
>>
>>88826846
He draws all of them like that, whether they're making good points or bad.
>>
File: 511.jpg (70KB, 640x395px) Image search: [Google]
511.jpg
70KB, 640x395px
>He then proceeded to tell us about all of the other animals that had “presented” themselves to him, because his pheromones were that amazing. However, he is still holding out for his panther. He had the whole plan scarily thought out, and even had a plan if the ASPCA tried to take his “mate “ away from him. Needless to say, no one wanted to ever go to the zoo with him.
>>
>>88831825
I should add the headline was

>While buying the new issue of GOLD DIGGERS
>>
>it's getting canceled

Damn shame.
>>
File: 1551.jpg (84KB, 640x415px) Image search: [Google]
1551.jpg
84KB, 640x415px
>>88831860
I think he's just tired of doing it. Who knows.
>>
>>88826846
the author consider it wrong, since he's been doing the whole "I hate my customers I will draw the m ugly and take their words out of context for y personaly pleasure" for years.
>>
>>88831871
>Z bags

what did he mean by this?
>>
>>88831568
prove him wrong, post someone who hasn't been drawn in an unlattering manner
>>
>>88831584
not random assholes, I mean what makes you think anons in this thread didn't get that they were things people had said
>>
File: 1468724913961.png (605KB, 690x611px) Image search: [Google]
1468724913961.png
605KB, 690x611px
OVC is my favorite webcomic, its a very visionary type of humor
>>
>>88826798

Well he's right.
>>
>>88831469
>"we never wanted to offend anyone thats why i draw everyone ugly haha just as a joke lol"

Really fires up your neurons
>>
>>88832913
Too bad he just ended it, then.
>>
>>88826846
While he does draw everyone as a caricature, it's not always to mock them. Often he's actually agreeing with what that person said.

http://ourvaluedcustomers.blogspot.com/search/label/it%27s%20true
>>
>>88831898

2 Bags.
>>
>>88830815
Not OP, but his early years is mostly making fun of the stupid shit people say.

Its been a few years but he was mostly known for that.

Its a common mistake, don't sweat it.
>>
>>88833173
yeah, he should draw everyone as sexy anime girls instead
>>
>>88826825
/co/ never thought this comic was funny though. that's literally something that never happened. the single nicest thing i ever heard anybody anywhere say about it was "these images are way higher resolution than they really need to be today but i guess a decade from now when we all have 7680*4800 monitors they will appear more reasonably sized".
>>
>>88832274
>What makes you think anons in this thread didn't get that they were things people had said?
Experience
>>
>>88835923
/co/ did use to like it at one point though, mainly because most of these agreed to their comfirmation bias regarding "fake nerds" and "casuals".

Mind you, this was way before SJWs were a real thing.
>>
>>88833173
he could draw them way more hideous you know, they just look like awkward sub-par looking young people
>>
>>88831469
>only fake nerd girls get mad about being called fake nerd girls
>cue harassment by a bunch of fake nerd girls mad that they were called fake nerd girls
>>
>>88831081
I like this because I've heard people unironically say that on here and /v/
>>
>>88833173
Most nerds aren't supermodels. Also I'm pretty sure that's just how he draws.
>>
>>88826798
I feel like we should have a sticky with this image on it.
>>
>>88831825
>>88831831

>Literal zoophile talking about his fetish in public.

why tho
>>
>>88838148
why is every single post on /qa/ posted by this guy?
>>
>>88826798
>SJW takes break from complaining to actually have fun
>>
>>88838045
>>88831081
It is true though
>>
>>88838148
I like how people will readily admit that the american two-party system is fucked but fly into a triggered rage at centrists because they refuse loyalty to either party
>>
>>88838533
If you don't vote, you're unamerican and may as well be an isis sympathizer, or a trump supporter.
>>
>>88838547
I voted, but out of recognizing that we were going to live under one of two presidencies no matter what I did and protest was pointless, so I voted for the one that sounded less bad. I have no love for either party.
>>
>>88838547
>continuing the "Isis" meme
That's not what they're called.
>>
>>88838619
I miss when people referred to living in "Obama's Republic of Hitlerstan".
>>
>>88838619
>no matter what I did and protest was pointless, so I voted for the one that sounded less bad.
Congratulations, you're a part of the problem.
>>
>>88838533
The image is making fun of centrists who aren't really centrist, they're just leftists that call themselves centrists so they aren't made fun of.
>>
>>88838794
I'm normally all for voting who you actually want to vote for, but I don't think our current voting system nor this current election allowed for that.
>>
>>88838148
Is there any one of these for people who like both kinds of extremists simply because I like seeing them fighting?
>>
File: smug_disney_face.png (89KB, 326x383px) Image search: [Google]
smug_disney_face.png
89KB, 326x383px
>>88826828

apparently you've been off /co/ for a while now, because all I ever hear is the incessant whining of /pol/tards getting triggered and clutching their pearls in a pants pissing panic about any number of meaningless things like non-whites continuing to exist, or someone not liking a politician they want to fellate.
>>
>>88839410
You're a bit of a whiner, too. You're not exactly better.
>>
>>88839493
Not him, but it's stating the truth.

All I ever see are right-leaning people throwing shitfits about how this board has become /co/mblr. I almost never see people pushing left-leaning ideas, but I see people throwing tantrums at liberal comics every other day.
>>
>>88831081
He's right
>>
I like the one about Tesla. Because it sums up just about every conversation I've ever had on the man.
>>
>>88838533
>don't want to be forced to vote for the lesser evil because they're still bad, and if you do you're supporting the crooked system
>but voting for third parties or abstaining in protest would just mean the greater evil has a weaker opponent, and people will accuse you of just letting them win

I hate elections
>>
>>88831081
>>88838045
>>88838364
It's worse actually, because it's portrayal of nerds is often pretty spot on. Problem is, the audience isn't supposed to relate with those characters, they're supposed to relate with the normal girl character who's there to essentially be a walking reaction face.
It's similar to if you had a show about a lower class black family just going about their daily lives, but there's also a white guy in a suit just standing around, and any time a character does something he wouldn't do, he smirks to the camera and goes "Psh, Black people".
>>
>>88838148
What is the problem with horseshoe theory?
The idea isn't that all groups are exactly the same in their beliefs but rather that the further you go to the left or right of the politician spectrum the more similar the end result is which is to say they are both ultimately advocating for statist fascist societies.
>>
>>88839886
>It's similar to if you had a show about a lower class black family just going about their daily lives, but there's also a white guy in a suit just standing around, and any time a character does something he wouldn't do, he smirks to the camera and goes "Psh, Black people".
I would love to see a show like that.
>>
>>88839607
>All I ever see are right-leaning people throwing shitfits about how this board has become /co/mblr.

Speaking as someone that has had /co/ as their home board almost since its creation, there hasn't been a shift to /co/mblr.

These people have come from other places and expected /co/ to be just as much a shitshow as /tv/ or /v/ (though /v/ isn't nearly as bad as people say). But /co/ was never like that. We're generally civil with each other. And this comparative civility is taken as evidence that we're a bunch of left-leaning sissy SJW's. When in reality we're just not calling each other nigger-faggot-kikes every other post.

/co/ is love.
>>
File: 1482287164954.gif (834KB, 267x225px) Image search: [Google]
1482287164954.gif
834KB, 267x225px
>>88839607
Really? I think the "All you every see" is people being "right-leaning" is because /co/mblr is now the normal and it's an attack to your normal. Moreover, you cross everyone who doesn't go with the flow as "boo hoo evil racist right leaning people", even though the reason I think Marvel is shit is because of the pandering, not the things they are pandering to.
There's a bizillion fetish threads, gay threads, shipping threads, yuri threads, THIQUE threads and whatever fucking shit general of whatever shitshow is on right now, how come you don't complain about that unconstructive self-fellating garbage? No, it's people expressing different opinions the ones who are the problem.
If someone doesn't agree with you, deal with it you fucking pussy.
>>
>>88840037
>/co/ is love.

Man, that takes me back. Livestreams, playing greek chorus to Storytimes, no image expand so you had to make a new tab to look at an image.

And Reaction images, used to be a lot more of those.
>>
>>88839885

off topic, but go watch Oliver Stone's untold history of the US, its focus on presidential politics and policies from FDR on really make our current political situation a lot clearer, and also at lot less upsetting, in the sense that the choice between "the lesser of two evils" is not even a thing, you just have the status quo vs shit that is different but equally stupid and evil.
>>
>>88840111

did you get triggered? do you need a safe space?
>>
>>88840008
politics isn't a spectrum. the left and right do not actually exist. Horseshoe theory is just propaganda pushed by the two identical parties in nations with two party systems to keep the public from seeking alternatives
>>
>>88840111
>that unconstructive self-fellating garbage

Gay threads became significantly worse after the newfags ran out people that actually contributed by harrassing them ("hur durr why are you posting here"). Old gay threads succesfully made a rec chart and discussed the few gay characters around - now we have stuff like Midnighter and Marvel (regardless of quality) that are relevant to them, but most of the people who didn't get fed up and leave are 3dpd and annoying shippers.
>>
>>88840197
>by the two identical parties in nations

so... like the two ends of a horshoe...?
>>
>>88840111
>/co/mblr is now the norm
It's not. This is the entire point. The actual negative shit about tumblr- the organized attacks, the obnoxious hugbox, the shutdown of free speech doesn't go down here, yet I constantly people attacking the site for being tumblresque.

The only shit I could see being construed as /co/ being "tumblr" is shipping threads, /sug/, and /hsg/, all of which keep to themselves so they're easy as fuck to ignore.

Meanwhile, every thread with with a spunky female lead has people whispering "is this SJW? should I hate this? Hello?" I'm not saying they're not allowed to do it, just that it's fucking hypocritical to complain about social justice warriors ruining the board when /pol/fags are literally doing what they do- inserting politics into everything and actively seeking out things to be offended by.

No amount of strawman comics can change the fact that SJWs and /pol/tards are two different sides of the same coin.
>>
>>88831469
cuck mode engaged
>>
>>88840253
>Meanwhile, every thread with with a spunky female lead has people whispering "is this SJW? should I hate this? Hello?"

lmao, the last Saga thread was hilarious because of this. The OP was really faggy and instead of asking whether the comic was any good (people quickly pointed out that it had done downhill) the first thing he did was ask whether it was "sjw" and if he should skip it because of that.
>>
>>88840253
A major reason for this is that Trump won so /pol/ doesn't know what to do anymore. Nowhere to go but down for them now, and they hate that.
>>
>>88840171
>everyone who calls me a retard on 4chan is exactly as histrionic as the people who temporarily shut down multiple suicide hotlines by flooding them with calls because Hillary lost the election
When will this meme die?
>>
>>88840253
>No amount of strawman comics can change the fact that SJWs and /pol/tards are two different sides of the same coin.
Well, yes. Basically what I am saying is that you should talk about comics and cartoons, don't be lead into politic or social shitflinging.
Now when someone expresses a "right-leaning" point of view, some retard comes out of the woodwork and says something stupid like "you /pol/tard get out". It's not different from the "IS THIS SJW" example you posted. It's really annoying, I just want to talk about Comics and Cartoons without being branded either a Nazi or a cuck simply because I have individual opinions that don't conform to either extreme
It's really annoying and just makes me browse less. This used to be a chill board, but now is a battlefront for both kinds of retards.
>>
>>88840510
That's fair enough.
>>
File: 1483231322309.jpg (457KB, 1280x2730px) Image search: [Google]
1483231322309.jpg
457KB, 1280x2730px
>>88831825
Wait, what was his plan to Thwart the ASPCA? I seriously need to know, was he going to run to Mexico? Marry the panther? Was he planning to drive off a cliff like thelma and louise, well I hope his pet monkey can drive because there is no way this fruitcake has a permit.
>>
>>88840443
>as histrionic as the people who temporarily shut down multiple suicide hotlines by flooding them with calls because Hillary lost the election
Did... did that really happened?
>>
>>88840579
You only want to know so you can have all the sexy panthers to yourself.
>>
>>88838647
Well, we don't all speak Arabic, do we?
>>
>>88841338
What's wrong with "Islamic State?" Beside the fact it calls out islam for its bullshit?
>>
>>88831469
>He posted an apology
It's not even an apology.
>>
>>88838148
What's funny about it?
>>
>>88841403

because a)they're barely a state b)that gives them claim to all of islam instead of their podunk desert territory which isn't accurate.

ISIS or Daesh is better because it contextualizes them, and also drives them mad to be refered to with a political acronym.
>>
>>88838800
Or maybe they actually find SJW as insane as /pol/ and are calling a cat a cat.
>>
>>88841494
>because a)they're barely a state

This. For god's sake, don't call them Islamic State - that's giving them way more legitimacy than they deserve.
>>
>>88840008
>What is the problem with horseshoe theory?
It was memed so hard, it became a buzzword that nobody can take seriously anymore.
>>
>>88838148
Ah, another ad hominem. Playing identity politics. Satirizing your opponent's argument, by using a white, middle age man, and straw-manning them.

Tell me Horseshoe theory isn't true.
>>
>>88841611
You mean it made /pol/ so assmad they're scrambling to try to get people to stop calling them out on their bullshit?
>>
>>88841611
I kinda disagree. It became popular and people who can't find argument against it decided that it was a stupid meme they didn't need to argue about.

Like "LOL HORSHOE THEORY MEME, ROFLMAO3REICH" as if it was an argument to dismiss the point.

I mean, people haven't waited for the term" Horseshoe theory" to call out SJW as as bad as Racist extremists.

"Horseshoe Theory" just became popular because it managed to express that feeling in just two words.
>>
>>88841638
>and straw-manning them.
Damn, you were so clase, with calling it Ad Hominem, which is effectively what it is. But it's not an strawman fallacy. Strawman fallacy consist of putting flawed argument in the mouth of your opponent he actually didn't say and then attack those flawed argument. which is not what this peicture is doing.

It is indeed ad Hominem. Or genetic falacy. I'll be honest, I have never been sure of the difference between Ad hominem and Genetic fallacy.
>>
File: 9c0.jpg (29KB, 426x341px) Image search: [Google]
9c0.jpg
29KB, 426x341px
>>88841237
noooo of course not friend, that woulld be silly. I do not have a lust for panther puss, I do not.
>>
>>88841703
>Like "LOL HORSHOE THEORY MEME, ROFLMAO3REICH" as if it was an argument to dismiss the point.
Anon, 2016 should've taught you already that such ordinary little things as facts or logic don't win arguments; memes are more powerful and influential than any of those.
>>
>>88840220

two on the same end.

>>88841611

it's just a fallacy that prevents any discourse from reaching a bottom or distill ideas into pure forms because "you'd be just the same" is insidious rethoric, making disingenuous comparisons that take forever to clear up and poison the well and good will.

It's meant to keep issues from reaching a concrete resolution in order to always leave the possibility for a losing side to keep contesting eternally and thus prevent anything built upon a debate.
>>
>>88841834
But dismissing something just because it is a meme isn't valid either.
>>
>>88841424

He might not be apologizing for the comic itself. And it's bordering a really polite way of saying "I'm sorry you feel that way." But it's still an apology.

>I'm really sorry that I bummed you out with todays comic, it was never my intention to do so.

I'm glad he didn't take the comic down. Too many people immediately delete things instead of posting a rational explanation when they've pissed off extremists. This way any social media click-throughs will see the explanation and then question the person who linked them to the "horrible, misogynist, hateful nerd-girl comic."

At least that's what I hope.
>>
>>88841846
>it's just a fallacy that prevents any discourse from reaching a bottom or distill ideas into pure forms because "you'd be just the same" is insidious rethoric, making disingenuous comparisons that take forever to clear up and poison the well and good will.
It's not a fallacy when it is true.

Mentionning the horseshoe theory is actually valid when some try to impose the rhetoric that only two side exist and somehow, one have to choose either on or the other.

And when tow opposite sides start to use similar weapons, while still condemning the ohter for using it, the hypocrisy need to be pointed out.
>>
>>88841916
>And it's bordering a really polite way of saying "I'm sorry you feel that way."
There is nothing wrong with being polite. It's usually the best approach. And whil I can like an artist who don't gave tow fuck and throw it back in the face of the whiners, I won't blame one either for trying to deal with the critic softly.
>But it's still an apology.
It's really not. he didn't apology about the comic then it's not an apology.

In the same way than when an politician say "I am sorry I offended someone, or was misunderstood, but I 100% still think the awful thing I said earlier and I am not taking back anything" it's not an apology either.
>>
>>88841942
>And when tow opposite sides start to use similar weapons, while still condemning the ohter for using it, the hypocrisy need to be pointed out.

that still makes them two sides with their own goals being awful in similar meassure, but it doesn't address ideological differences in the least, which is the only thing that actually warrants discussion and not just the validity of the methods.

bringing out horseshoe theory is just pulling the focus away from the actual substance of a disagreement to remind people they should be butthurt about something someone did once.
>>
>>88842256
>that still makes them two sides with their own goals being awful in similar meassure,
And this is what the Horseshoe theory point out.
>but it doesn't address ideological differences in the least
It's not "full circle theory, it's Horseshoe theory. the tow sides don't touch either. It doesn't deny the difference, but point out that there is similarities that need t be showcased.
> which is the only thing that actually warrants discussion
"Only thing" is where I strongly disagree with you. especially as similarity can be found at the core of each theory.

Example, anti-sexy women and anti-gay, while looking differnet "and, will, as it currently is, often be found at opposite, sides), will, if you scratch the surface, be found to have a common cor, a common root: an incomfort toward sexual display and the need to prevent those who enjoy those kind of contents to have access to it and to make them ashamed of it.
Both rely on bigotrry and it's actually trying to present them as opposite sides you need to pick one from that will turn moot any kind of constructive discussion.
>>
>>88842256
>bringing out horseshoe theory is just pulling the focus away from the actual substance of a disagreement to remind people they should be butthurt about something someone did once.
Not when the similarity also lie at the core of the presented "disagreement".
>>
>>88842358

the claim that the foundations of two extremist point of views in opposition must stem from the same needs, insecurities and ambitions is still nothing but simplifying them to the point it's impossible to tell who's in the right or at least has the deeper concern in a particular case, address it and thus end discord, it's always going for the third option of saying "i'm above actually risking taking a side and having to choose what rings true to me and defend it".

an advocate of religious censorship and an activist in favor of less objectification of women end up having similar means and taking similar action but they still have different levels and approaches to their reasoning.
>>
>>88840171
Why didn't you ask the other guy that?
>>
>>88842256
The horseshoe theory, is mostly used in repsonse to /pol/ coming into non-/pol/ boards, and bringing their ideaology with them. USually making an excuse, for why they should stay, by equating others to SJWs, or saying, if they aren't allowed here, the SJWs would take over.

So, the counter argument is, they don't want either, and they're equally annoying.
>>
>>88842613

yeah yeah, but what actually happens is that /pol/ is always called a foreign threat, and then said /pol/ posters bitch about SJW taking over.

in turn, SJW posts are not called a foreign threat, and if called out, those who called out are accused of being /pol/ and told to leave themselves.
>>
>>88842546
>the claim that the foundations of two extremist point of views in opposition must stem from the same needs, insecurities and ambitions is still nothing but simplifying them to the point it's impossible to tell who's in the right
Pointing out similarities is not simplifying. And again, when neither sides are right and have fundamental flaws at their core that need to be pointed out, then it has to be done, in what is dissimilar AND similar.

>it's always going for the third option of saying "i'm above actually risking taking a side and having to choose what rings true to me and defend it".
When both side are wrong, it is essential to be aware that you don't have to pick either and can have your own view.

Picking a side that ha glaring flaws doesn't end anything. all it result is switching from a one side to the other that focus on useless point while nothing is done to address what actually matter. Then the other side call the first one incompetent to get going and end up being as useless. that's the whole issue of bi polarisation.

>an advocate of religious censorship and an activist in favor of less objectification of women end up having similar means and taking similar action but they still have different levels and approaches to their reasoning.
Disagreeing, both have a core of bigotry and inconmfort toward sexuality.
>>
>>88842676
>in turn, SJW posts are not called a foreign threat,
Okay, you just outed yourself as never having been there. Tumblr get called out on a daily basis, here.
>>
>>88842676
>in turn, SJW posts are not called a foreign threat,
They are.

But we have far less people complaining about big boobies and "objectification" and far more people complaining about diversity.
>>
>>88840008
The problem is that it lets you disagree with /pol/ without giving them enough material to make epic boogeyman caricatures of you and that's unacceptable.
>>
>>88842764
>Pointing out similarities is not simplifying. And again, when neither sides are right and have fundamental flaws at their core that need to be pointed out, then it has to be done, in what is dissimilar AND similar.

it is, though, because you can argue against them individually instead of building your position on a comparison between them that ignores their own internal logic or context. In fact, criticizing them while drawing comparisons only entrenches people into their lines of thinking further.

>When both side are wrong, it is essential to be aware that you don't have to pick either and can have your own view.

you don't have to pick a side and stick to it but you can't expect to solve anything if you don't meassure each argument and decide which one you agree with and which one you don't to make your position.

>Picking a side that ha glaring flaws doesn't end anything. all it result is switching from a one side to the other that focus on useless point while nothing is done to address what actually matter. Then the other side call the first one incompetent to get going and end up being as useless. that's the whole issue of bi polarisation.

telling each side they're not working towards anything is how you make them not listen to you because you aren't addressing anything they actually contest, it's whining about form over substance.

you're conflagrating "third position" with "complaining about the first two" which is what horseshoe is used for in internet arguments.
>>
>>88840008

i think bc it's just about tactics and extremism and not actual beliefs.

anyway SJW > /pol/ because they don't have nazis.
>>
>>88843094
I find it kind of funny that /pol/'s ironic jew posting eventually attracted actual nazis to the site. Like full on Stormfront users.
>>
>>88843094
>anyway SJW > /pol/ because they don't have nazis.

that's what you'd think
>>
>>88843163
Apparently it was stormfront themselves that turned /pol/ into what it is today. They actually raided us and we got fucked.

There's a capture floating around out there that shows what happened.
>>
>>88840019
Hence why normal white girls love Big Bang Theory.
>>
>>88843163

Which is why ironic shitposting is such cancer.
>>
>>88843567

and it's a stupid fake narrative.

there's also a huge and growing communist community in /pol/(as well as the other debate boards) too, there's anarchists, traditionalists and all sorts of weird fringes and bugs that, while may share some things they hate, still have clear divisions in all other topics, stormfront is merely another faction in the cesspool. Not every anti-semitist, anti-islamist, xenophobe or mysoginst is a neonazi, in fact, if you find an open anti-semite, chances are he's a muslim, if you find a xenophobe, chances are he's axian, if you find a mysognist, chances are he's black. People don't need to be told to fucking hate eachother, or to disagree with the mainstream progressive think-tank, while at it.

there's never been an us-vs-them thing going with an external group except in ridiculously one sided raids in the far past, 4chan doesn't have a minimum bar to be considered "part of" the site, if you go to Reddit but still spend all day in 4chan you're still an anon, same with tumblr, same with any other shitty site. 4chan just naturally gathers very angry and resentful people, people really want to pretend the whole "internet hate machine" is a thing of the past to feel cozy and to neglect having to think about the time they spend here.
>>
File: 1435765046159.jpg (30KB, 352x344px) Image search: [Google]
1435765046159.jpg
30KB, 352x344px
>>88838148

Funny how /pol/ had to put the "delete /pol/" and the hillary logo there, because what he's saying is not that exagerated and strawman-y enough.
>>
>>88831081
People always bitch about what an overreaction this is but the show is basically Autist 'n' Andy
>>
>>88838800
They are really centrist, the problem is that "centrist" doesn't really mean some sort of platonic ideal-neutral strictly rational position as self-described centrists (both them and yourself presumably) like to imagine but a specific set of politics that in American is mostly right-Democrat (I'm going to guess you're a wishy-washy "libertarian" instead - the other main group that likes to call itself centrist for basically the same reason)
>>
>>88839886
>Big Bang Theory is more offensive than blackface
>>
>>88831469

I've only met and dated a real "nerd" girl in my life that was also the only real "nerd" person I've personally met and she hated comics, anime and all the "geek" garbage she thought those things were children's stuff. She liked old British literature and biology, she was way smarter than me.

I miss her ;_;
>>
>>88845354
Nice blog, where do I subscribe?
>>
>>88840037
>We're generally civil with each other

I was shocked by that, after being told how horrible 4chan was. It inspired me to be less of a dick.
>>
>>88848843
Most of the "4chan is horrible and evil" talk comes from people who come here and see us slinging insults, calling each other faggots, and telling people to kill themselves and then conclude that we act like that because we're bitter, mean, and petty assholes. Since obviously normal well-adjusted people wouldn't just act like assholes on the internet simply because they can, so clearly something must be wrong with us to make us behave this way. These people assume that talking shit on an anonymous Malaysian finger painting board is the same thing as acting like an asshole in real life because they don't understand how anonymity works. They miss the entire point of 4chan.
Thread posts: 142
Thread images: 13


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.