You know it's true

>>88777269
I do know

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WI0mSEzttx8

File: 11184495_455560277932652_410070766_n.jpg (16KB, 320x320px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 320x320px

>>88777269
Shrek one was also fun, even if 2 was better.

3 and 4 are bad, but 4 is better than 3.

Puss in Boots movie by Del Toro is fantastic,

>>88777269
Shrek 1=Shrek 2

>>88777269
Shrek 1 is better faggot

are you comparing movies or soundtracks?

movie 1 > movie 2
soundtrack 2 > soundtrack 1

Shrek 2 is a comedic marvel.

I don't know if I genuinely hate the first one or of I'm just fucking sick of it after seeing it on Cartoon Network every other day.

Shrek 2 has better music prove me wrong
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irebRU5t80A

>Shrek 1 was good.
>Shrek 2 was better.
>Shrek 3 was worse.

The original Shrek trilogy = The original Star Wars trilogy.

>>88777269
2 IS Kino though

>people shitting on 3
2 is tied with Emperor's New Groove for best animated comedy of all time
3 is lame at parts but is clever enough and a fitting conclusion that could never have matched 2
1 is kind of fun but also doesn't hold up at all, especially after watching 2

>>88777967
>>88778483

>Jennifer "Eat Shit, Bonnie" Saunders' cover of Holdin' Out for a Hero
>that weird Drum n' Bass remix of Livin' La Vida Loca
>Tom Waits sinking a drunken pirate tune

Best soundtrack of 2004, of all years.