What are your opinions on Ctrl+Alt Delete?
Has it improved over time?
(Also post some edits, but please no loss)
>>88767735
>no loss
Why would you want to lose out on that?
Wouldn't that be a loss?
>>88767735
>no loss
I'm at a loss for discussion now.
>>88767735
>but please no loss
>please no loss
But why?
Pic unrelated
>>88767749
>>88767763
>>88767774
>>88767735
He is a terrible writer, very much so with comedy. The fact is that some people just aren't very funny, I don't think it's something that he will ever get good at.
As an artist, he has improved a ton, but even back in the day his art outside of the comic wasn't bad, he was just very lazy and used stock assets and terribly flat faces.
He basically only got popular because he was so early and rode the penny arcade train, if his comic started today, even in its current form, it would never gain any traction.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5t4xS2PqFFA
I still can't believe that Buckley never said a single word about the Loss edits after all these years.
>>88767735
>>88767800
I only read it when I was laughing at all the webcomic gossip surrounding CAD. I remember Scott Kurtz did a podcast in 2012 eviscerating the "finale" of CAD and he made a great point. You have a ten year webcomic called "Control Alt Delete" and in the final panel someone pushes a button to delete the comic, but they don't push "Control Alt Delete."
That said, Scott Kurtz complained about how the third post-finale comic was a direct rip-off of a Penny Arcade comic. Sadly, not too long after that Scott ripped off the "growing a mustache in two panels" joke from Penny Arcade.
All in all, it was good to waste time on petty squabbling a few years ago, but the comic was always shit.
>>88768014
Kek
>>88767797