So, is Sarah Scribbles the new Ben Garrison?

>>88745098
Anyone who speaks the truth and is based is ok in my books

>>88745112
You don't know that OP's pic is a edit, right?

Has she responded to the edits?

>>88745098
>Reddit taking credit for edits
THAT is how dead this meme is guys. Just stop it.

File: 1477256903409.png (178KB, 366x274px) Image search: [Google]

178KB, 366x274px

>>88745128
So were a lot of Ben Garrison's.
Now they don't even need to be edited.

>>88745147
She told the guys who did it to stop, which only resulted in streisand effect.

File: sarah pol.png (206KB, 503x1012px) Image search: [Google]

206KB, 503x1012px

Kek

File: cass.jpg (116KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 960x960px

Who cares about Sarah Scribbles, anyway? C.Cassandra is basically the same thing but with qter art and the artist doesn't give a fuck about politics.

File: 1482914577413.png (442KB, 503x763px) Image search: [Google]

442KB, 503x763px

>>88745158
Is this what meme magic looks like?

File: 1482914712236.png (274KB, 750x1136px) Image search: [Google]

274KB, 750x1136px

>>88745200
Their simplicity makes them easier to edit.

>>88745158
All the trolling only made Ben stronger, it's like he got a zenkai boost

Why not just make your own comics?

I feel a little bad for her but I also think these edits are pretty funny.

File: 1482920678519.jpg (307KB, 888x1024px) Image search: [Google]

307KB, 888x1024px

>>88745435
Meme magic doesn't work with original content.

Unless its GETs, in which case hold on to your butts.

>>88745435
that's not funny. Then its just some /pol/ soapbox. Editing a bland basic bitch comic into /pol/ rhetoric is what makes it funny.

>>88745173
But /pol/ supports Israel

File: 1482998221050.png (76KB, 507x447px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 507x447px

DEUTSCHLAND ÜBER ALLES

File: 1482988233802.png (252KB, 503x1012px) Image search: [Google]

252KB, 503x1012px

>>88745484
>people raiding /pol/ support the jews

Fix'd.

That and easily brainwashed idiots from r/the_donald.

File: who.png (604KB, 1038x889px) Image search: [Google]

604KB, 1038x889px

It's already spreading

>Sarah Scribbles

Literally who?

>>88745445
I used to enjoy her stuff until she made a TLDR post in facebook talking about how trump will ruin the US saying bullshit like "trump hates gays" even though right after the election he said he has no plans to ban gay marriage because the law already exists and there's no reason to change it

>>88745612
Facebook comic girls in STEM degrees share all the time.

>>88745162
>She told the guys who did it to stop
Why? Her comics are finally making people laugh.

>>88745672
Because she's a feminist liberal that thinks that flooding your country with muslims won't cause anything bad to happen

>>88745435
The people who make new comics don't overlap with the people who make edits.

There was the Dragon Ball 2016 election comic that comes to mind.

>>88745446
And then there's these weirdos.

How long until she goes full Ben Garrison?

File: hillary_and_pepe_ben_garrison.jpg (189KB, 640x502px) Image search: [Google]

189KB, 640x502px

>>88745714

Soon.

Why are the far-right so unfunny?

>>88745651
>he said he has no plans to ban gay marriage because the law already exists and there's no reason to change it
Roe v, Wade is a thing and he's said he wants access to abortion services to be a state issue, why wouldn't he listen to Pence and do the same thing for gay marriage?

File: crying-game-ben-garrison_1_orig.jpg (570KB, 1032x800px) Image search: [Google]

570KB, 1032x800px

>>88745727
> Why are the far-right so unfunny?

t. butthurt

>>88745727
>Why are the far-right so unfunny?
I don't think Sarah Scribbles is far-right.

>>88745727
Political comedy is only funny when you agree with the political spectrum of the comedian.

>>88745727
>Why are the far-right so unfunny?
Sorry, anon. Not all comedy consists of a guy repeatedly mentioning the current year and complaining about stupid people not being on the right side of history.

>>88745782
You could literally be arguing against the idea that left comedy is unfunny with that same reply.

/34/ when?

>>88745746
>making Trump handsome
Stop this shit, my new president elect is buttugly like me.

>>88745841
Does Ben even knows that Trump is 70? He always draws Trump like some kind of action movie actor in his 30's

>>88745802
Half of it, maybe.

The right isn't as obsessed with the current year because they aren't constantly moving goalposts

Sarah throwing a tantrum about the edits reminded me of the fact that Tim Buckley never said a single word about the Loss edits.

>>88745802
What? Current year and right side of history are exclusively leftist whiggish buzzwords.

>>88745878
Show me the tears, anon. I wish to bask.

>>88745768
>>88745782
>comedy

I don't think these edits even qualify as comedy, it's just /pol/ ranting in a cartoon format.

>>88745782
You can call me crazy, but I think just because John Oliver is shit doesn't mean humour consisting of "Hey, did you know THE JUDEN is responsible for everything bad? Also, muslims???" isn't also shit.

>>88745878

This. Please post.

File: boo hoo.png (24KB, 576x254px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 576x254px

>>88745904
>>88745894

>>88745098
Why is this comic of all things getting these edits?

>>88745930
Eh. Not really a freakout or anything. It's pretty polite and matter-of-fact.

>>88745684
>Dragon Ball 2016 election comic
Source?

File: wojak old.png (43KB, 542x602px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 542x602px

>>88745930

> white supremacists texts

File: 1459737093689.png (376KB, 461x450px) Image search: [Google]

376KB, 461x450px

>>88745746
That's funny, coming from the people editing shit because someone insulted your God Emperor.

File: CSfViyRU8AAQRfB.jpg (40KB, 459x650px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 459x650px

>>88745932
The girl didn't like Trump.

>>88745820
It already happened. We had a Swissbro in some of the original /pol/ threads who did some nice stuff.

Some Ruski put them up on this site.
http://no-info.no-ip.info/sarah/index.php/patreon/

>>88745965
The vast majority of comic artists don't like Trump, why was she singled out?

File: The last words of a great artist.jpg (81KB, 800x300px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 800x300px

Do you think her ego will survive to 2017? Artists have very fragile egos, regardless of skill.

>>88745971
Her art is easy to edit.

>>88745944
Some of these edits sure look like they come from white supremacists to me

>>88745978
Wouldn't it be far easier to edit xKcd?

>>88745932
>>88745971
The comics edit well into our purposes.
When all you have to do is add the word "Muslim" to a picture and make it incredibly apt and funny why not do it?

>>88745932
>>88745971
Because her stuff was easy to edit mostly.

Though I am sure some people also did it because of the anti-Trump post.

>>88745967
Thanks for sharing. The uterus was an pretty funny addition too.

>>88745983
We actually want people to look at the finished product.

>>88745983
xkcd isn't as ubiquitous

>>88745949

Wut?

Ben Garrison was edited and he hasn't a SJW. The reason people are editing her is because the art is simple to edit and make quick keks.

File: sarah die cis scum.png (55KB, 604x532px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 604x532px

>>88745930
I wasn't even mad about her until I saw these posts, now I think she deserves all the shit that /pol/ is throwing at her

>>88745932
You could ask the people who make them directly.

I suspect it has little to do with her, or her views. The faces are expressive, and manic, and it's probably easy to work with, and so the edits got memetic traction.

File: reaction295.gif (419KB, 287x216px) Image search: [Google]

419KB, 287x216px

>>88746012
>has no impact on your life

>>88745932

For the lulz

>>88746012
>>88746020
Yeah, I don't really care...

>>88745975
She will have a meltdown in 2017.

>>88745173
>Having a family sucks
Who says that?

>Being in debt is cool!
Who says that?

>>88746012
This is too tame. Did she at least make a white male bashing tweet somewhere?

>>88746012
>I was fine with her until she posted a reasonable opinion, then I lost my shit

File: racist2.png (125KB, 497x384px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 497x384px

>>88745932
Because the best way to cause leftist meltdown is to use their own strawmanning against them

File: MVXwaeK.jpg (503KB, 1478x947px) Image search: [Google]

503KB, 1478x947px

>>88745975

Maybe she will break and become redpilled.

>>88746033
Yeah, Garrison only survived the trolling because he is way mentally stronger than Sarah, who is just some random chick that wanted do draw cute stuff

>>88746047

> reasonable opinion

(you)

>>88746050
The right side should just say "nigger".

File: reaction293.jpg (68KB, 499x474px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 499x474px

>>88746047
>reasonable

/co/mblr is real

File: tiny arms.png (8KB, 255x198px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 255x198px

>>88745983
yeah but xkcd doesn't have waifu's(barring megan)or wacky facial expressions.

>>88746047
Welcome to 4chan, where any view left of center makes you a raging SJW.

>>88746064
>>88746073
What's unreasonable about it?

>>88746056
>>88746058
Maybe he's just a contrarian, or attention whore?

>>88746050
Is there an edit where both of them have big brains but still say racist/cuck?

>>88746056
Spain doesn't have problems with muslim immigrants actually. That's probably why we also don't have right-wing parties.

>>88746078
That has really only been the case for the past couple of years.

>>88746012
>has no impact on your life

Except it can when it comes to analytics and various programing around it. The inclusion of bullshit genders is an absolute nightmare when it comes to that. Especially if the government puts laws in place about forcing you to use said pronouns and what not.

And that isn't even touching on the fact that it is normalization of what is a mental health issue.

>>88746020
Yeah, I was making £50,000,000 a year until some fruitcake asked me to call him a her and now I'm on /co/, with a criminal record for arson after I burned that church down because they wouldn't let me marry Nessie from the Ballad of Nessie.

>>88746058
How is he mentally strong? Dude ended up like Winston at the end of 1984.

>>88746078
And on tumbler anything right of center makes you a nazi. Both sides are equally stupid.

>>88746080

Because people shouldn't have to use pronouns to appease special snowflakes.

File: reaction50.jpg (98KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 1280x720px

>>88746080
>why is siding with delusional crazy people unreasoable

>>88746094
Personally I'd say that the right-wing side is more troublesome because they have more influence over the real world. Left-wing politicians rarely get into power while right-wing politicians are way too common.

>>88746104
What? That is bullshit. For the last 8 or so years we had been seeing a rise in the Left's power almost completely unchecked.

It wasn't until 2016 that we have started to see a correction of that.

>>88746086

That's true, after all those years of muslim rape and occupation it's not like spaniards have anything to lose anyway. :^)

>>88746104
> Left-wing politicians rarely get into power while right-wing politicians are way too common.

Are you retarded?

In my country we almost had 13 years of leftist rule.

>>88746080
Enabling mental illness is not reasonable.

File: 55 flag.png (68KB, 429x300px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 429x300px

>>88746131
Are you a BR monkey like me?

>>88746097
That comment is really just saying "it is minimum effort from you to not be an asshole to these people".

>>88746047
>"Reasonable"
>Personal pronouns

I keep forgetting I'm on /co/mblr.

>>88746131
I was talking about America actually. As someone whose lived under actual leftist rule, do you really think Obama was a socialist left-wing radical?

I do wonder how many of the muh Jews/muh left/muh pronounces brigade are native 4channers.

>>88746141
Or else.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2016/05/17/you-can-be-fined-for-not-calling-people-ze-or-hir-if-thats-the-pronoun-they-demand-that-you-use/?utm_term=.7cdf49b50786

>>88746120
>For the last 8 or so years we had been seeing a rise in the Left's power almost completely unchecked
Obama was a moderate, and so are most of the spineless democrats. Most of the newest generation of republican politicians are right-wing nutjobs, Boehner couldn't control them so he quit, and now not even Paul Ryan can keep them in line.
Hillary Clinton wasn't left-wing, but Trump was certainly very right-wing.

>>88745484
>>88745506

I'm honestly torn on this issue. On one hand, I completely agree that Israel has been exploiting its ability of being "a western port" in return for too much American welfare. It has heavily ingrained foreign media presence as well (though to be honest, so do Muslim nations). Propaganda and cybersecurity threats are what I hear about most when it comes to Israel. So yeah, they shouldn't be considered a good trustworthy nation with no questions asked. They need to be scrutinized more.

But from the sound of it, that tells me it's Obama/Bush/Clinton's responsibility for allowing such things to fester to such an extent, keeping the tradition going. I don't blame Israel for knowing they can keep getting a little extra gravy. NATO nations have been doing it, too. Funny how when Trump made a push that they should just pay their tab (which they should), he must be awful, but it was just psychological deterrence. But when Obama does this, it's acceptable logic? Why couldn't he just renegotiate with Netanyahu before a possible UN resolution? He had 8 years to talk about his feelings directly with Israel, so why now does he stab a knife in the alliance entirely? I know he's a laugh when he tries to posture against other leaders, but I didn't think he was that afraid of Netanyahu, a man we should have pure leverage over in this situation.

Also, wouldn't it be better to hold onto them compared to an amorphous Palestinian group that consistently commits terrorist attacks and provokes the very war that media heads keep saying Israel started? How do you even try to make a truce with people who objectively want to kill every Jewish person? Hell, Obama visited the western wall and now he's saying that area counts as an occupied settlement that Israel would have to give up. It just boggles my mind what Obama's endgame would be in this situation. People are more fixated on Trump about this, but I really think Obama and Kerry need to be analyzed.

>>88746162
>Intentional or repeated refusal to use an individual’s preferred name, pronoun or title. For example, repeatedly calling a transgender woman “him” or “Mr.” after she has made clear which pronouns and title she uses

What's the problem? If you are complaining about being fined for no calling someone bunself or whatever, show me the court case.

>>88746139

Yup!

>>88746149

Obama was the most left president available. And even through he wasn't Chavéz he still did a lot of leftist mandates. The only reason there wasn't someone more radical is because of your two party system which makes just two candidates able to win.

>>88746141

> people should help others delusions otherwise they are assholes

Wow how reasonable.

>>88746171
What makes you think I was solely talking about the US?

>>88746047
haha

>>88746177
> What's the problem?

Not even american, but you have a problem if you cannot see it's wrong to force people to call others things otherwise they are fined. It's literally infringing speech.

>>88746100
Let them be delusional. As long as they're not hurting anyone it should be fine.

>>88746177
And what if I demand to be referred to as Emperor Napoleon because that is what I identify as?

>>88746214

Except it doesn't: >>88746162

>>88746180
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAT_BuJAI70

>>88746171
>but Trump was certainly very right-wing
You can argue those other points, but I have put up with sitting through almost every candidate's rallies this election. I can tell you, unequivocally, that Trump is most certainly not a right-winger. He's put on a disguise for most conservatives to be comfortable around, but the man is by nature a moderate centrist. If you don't believe that, you've been suckered in by his blatant posturing. It's a facade that he used to get the GOP to rally behind him, and for the most part it's a genuine attempt, but his methods are almost perfectly described as moderate. Like every post-election transition, the candidate backs away from some of their bolder claims and comes back to earth, but he is nowhere near the true definition of a bold GOP conservative.

If anything Hillary is closer to being a conservative, some would say neocon even, which just shows how close some people on the ends can come to agreeing. Just look at the Israel case: right now, progressives and /pol/ are practically making out over the idea.

>>88746214
Yes lets enable the slippery slope. What could possibly go wrong.

>>88746214
They'll need to learn living in the real world at some point, better to get them through early than late.

>>88746233
For a moderate, he sure seems to have packed his administration with a bunch of right-wingers and neocons.

>>88746255
He said he was going to hire the best. Which is what he seems to be doing.

>>88746223
Go for it, see how far you get.

>>88746255
Yeah, that's the administration. You know who's in the legislative branch? A lot of right-wingers and neocons. It's a disguise. Love him, hate him, he unifies people that would normally be against him in the same race. That's how he won over Democrats. Hillary barely netted a few %'s of Never Trumpers compared to his broad pull across the political spectrum.

But when you're in the house you have to appease both the voters and the politicians in charge to a degree. I'm actually impressed with his cabinet, to be honest. Would you rather him put people like Newt Gingrich, Chris Christie or Rudy Giuliani in any cabinet position?

>>88746223
Way ahead of you.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/michigan-university-his-majesty-grant-strobl-lgbtq-pronoun-gender-roster-policy-a7339866.html

>>88746270
But why would my preferred pronouns not be accepted over theirs? They both hold the an equal basis in reality. This is just bigotry you peasants.

>>88746278
I must open diplomatic relations with His Majesty immediately. He would make a most beneficial ally in the coming days.

>>88745727
Maybe he has no problems with gays marrying but sees a problem with what he believes to be the murder of unborn children? Trump isn't exactly your average Republican so it's no surprise his views on some issues differ from the mainstream.

>>88746318
Are you talking about the government de-funding of planned parenthood in Texas because they stand accused of selling fetuses for stem cell stuff creating a conflict of interest?

>>88746328
What? No. I wasn't really referring to anything specific, just how someone can be pro-life and ok with gay marriage.

File: Sarah-no.png (23KB, 587x248px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 587x248px

>>88745592
Stop it. You're hurting her feelings.

>>88745727
>state issue
>ban gay marriage

1. He's openly stated he will not pursue gay marriage rights. He thought it should be a states rights issue, but he doesn't want to put more pressure on it, "it's been decided".

2. He's had pro-LGBT beliefs, or at least non-interventionist viewpoints on them. Obama didn't even support gay marriage until after his presidential career started. There are magazines all the way back to the mid 90's where he openly admits he pays anyone for doing their job regardless of their way of life.

3. Making something a state issue does not equal a ban on it, and it does not make you pro or anti something. He's actually pro marijuana (federal medicinal, states rights for recreational), but let's say hypothetically that Obama made recreational marijuana federal, and Trump decided it was a states issue. Would he be anti-marijuana by that logic?

>>88746342
My bad. I missed the ?. Time for a feed and some sleep.

>>88746155
Man, I will never get over how Ben Garrison went from fighting against the channers to embracing them. I guess finding a common ally in Trump really was the best thing that could happen for him.

>>88746080
It is.. and it isn't.

Using those pronouns is common courtesy, and NOT obligation. She is kind of trying to make it pass as obligation when it's not.

If someone asked you to call him a bear or his feelings will be hurt, would you? probably. If you didn't, are you being an asshole? not exactly.

>>88746171
>but Trump was certainly very right-wing
Outside of his language, Trump is one of the least conservative presidential candidates in a while. Hell, it's one of the reasons a lot of the Never Trumpers within his own party despised him because they wanted another Neocon.

File: images (1).png (14KB, 355x414px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 355x414px

>>88746038

File: Donald_Trump_002.jpg (4MB, 1800x1179px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 1800x1179px

>>88745861
>>88745841
he really did not age well

File: IvqhrA9.jpg (39KB, 928x523px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 928x523px

>>88746449

>>88746449
Really? He looks like he aged pretty standard for someone as old as he is. He'd definitely look better without the ridiculous tan or haircut.

File: donald-trump.jpg (293KB, 1240x775px) Image search: [Google]

293KB, 1240x775px

>>88746472
I dunno, I've seen a lot of people around his age that look much better.

>>88746412
And even then, it does more damage to how the human brain is hardwired to create a response through logical inferences. Let's say you meet a guy with a mohawk, wearing a denim jacket, has a tattoo. Your mind immediately races to them being a fan of punk rock.

But in the world of made up pronouns, you would have to eschew every facet of logic you've used growing up in order to gauge them. But you can't gauge them. The conversation is now reduced to, "What are your pronouns? What do you identify as?" It is not natural human behavior. The barrier that these pronoun lovers create do not affect those who are beyond it. If anything, using pronouns as your only means of identifying people around you and ignoring basic sensory input and logic could be classified as a disorder, since they use it as a crutch that they then use to lord over others. Maybe it has been considered one already.

So, you have two social choices at your disposal: size a person up physically, make a guess, have charisma in case you need to rebound like 90% of humans are capable of, or stalk someone's Facebook biopic for their pronouns and gender identities and their turn-ons like they're a trading card, and hope they even have a personality left at all.

>>88746174
Does anyone have their own take on this matter? I'm trying to get different opinions on this outside of the media's take. And yes, I do realize where I'm asking for opinions.

>>88746503
Of course, never said he looked good, I just don't think he looks bad either. A fairly typical degradation of appearance for someone his age.

>>88746513
Constantly draining resources carrying Israel on our backs is a shitty situation but letting the mudslimes win would be even more of a shitty situation

>>88746449
>>88746459
>>88746503
He doesn't drink, he doesn't smoke, and he supposedly sleeps for only 6 hours a day. He looks great for 70. The problem is his tan. I've never tried a tan before, both sunbathing and spray-on. Do spray-on tans cause skin problems? Is his skin color a side effect of spray-on tans for too long a period or something, or is it just his own choosing to keep it looking that way?

I seem to agree with him on a lot of policies, but frankly, it's the most embarrassing thing about him visually. He has to know how discolored his skin looks, right?

>>88746449
>he didn't age well
He looked like a toad then, and he looks like a toad now
He aged as well as he could have possibly hoped to

>>88746412
Why should i be obligated to use your pronouns, to be respectful? Why should you have the privilege of having my respect?

File: 1483010734177.jpg (132KB, 1280x867px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 1280x867px

>Wow /co/, You don't REALLY think negros are people, do you?

What say to this qt?

>>88746038
>>Having a family sucks
>Who says that?
Hardcore anti overpopulation advocates. The voluntary human extinction movement.


>>Being in debt is cool!
>Who says that?
Payday loan centers, credit card companies, every retail store that offers it's own credit card.

>>88746084
Yes. There's several different variants of cuck edits. In several languages, from both the hard right, the hard left and the WTF are you doing. It's the nature of these edits.

>>88746086
I'm not an expert on Spain, but the videos of African immigration don't make me feel any better.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYK28f_CZ_U

What's the point of stuff like ze or hir anyway, if you're a tranny then you'd be a dude who wants to be a chick, or a chick who wants to be a dude, hence using he or she or whatever should be goal

>>88746698
>tfw no racist polish nationalist gf

;_;

>>88746788
Literally so they can be a special snowflake faggot because society's labels just don't fit them maaaaan.

File: Untitled-133.png (235KB, 526x384px) Image search: [Google]

235KB, 526x384px

>>88746084
just for u bb

>>88746012
What's her opinion on the rule 34 she got before and after /pol/ started editing her stuff?

>>88746012

> It's not a big deal and it's easy to do

But that's where she's wrong. Sure, it's easy to do for one person who you know well. But if the expectation becomes that a significant portion of the population are
1. Going to have their own pronouns
2. Become emotionally damaged when you don't use theirs

then casual conversation becomes a complete intractable mess.

>>88745965

Can we all just agree that we'd fuck that skunk?

>>88747584
#CocksOutForTrump

>>88746056
Waterfest made me lose it.

>>88745484
>/pol/
>supporting (((Jews)))

HAHAHAHAHahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahah

>>88746174
Didn't the UN basically made Israel because 'muh jews' and no other reason? like, they took land and made a country just for them. That alone shows that they are the bad guys.

>How do you even try to make a truce with people who objectively want to kill every Jewish person
it's their own damn fault. People should stay out of it.

>>88746623
It's your choice to respect people.

>>88745971

Her work made frequent reference to "girl stuff" like periods, so there was already a lot of anger against her.

>>88746020

No, it really doesn't. Maybe when you enter the working world you'll gain an understanding of what actually does and doesn't make a meaningful impact on your life.

File: He just went into the Top Secret Area AGAIN.png (31KB, 175x189px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 175x189px

>>88746120
>What? That is bullshit. For the last 8 or so years we had been seeing a rise in the Left's power almost completely unchecked.

It mystifies me that there are adults that actually believe this kind of shit.

>>88746213

If I change my name to Barry, and my boss still calls me by my old name, and I make it clear I don't want to be called that and he deliberately continues to do that, then yes, that's a hostile working environment.

>>88745727
I don't know if far-right, but /pol/ humour is one of the most unfunny things on this site, mainly because it's extremely low effort:

>Okay, lets draw our opposition:
>lets add some shit-stained pants here, let's make them overwheight and crying... yes, good.
>Now, let me just grab a smug paypay from KYM to represent us aaaaaand, perfect.
>oops, forgot to shop a maga hat

repeat ad infinitum

>>88746513
>But in the world of made up pronouns, you would have to eschew every facet of logic you've used growing up in order to gauge them. But you can't gauge them. The conversation is now reduced to, "What are your pronouns? What do you identify as?" It is not natural human behavior. The barrier that these pronoun lovers create do not affect those who are beyond it. If anything, using pronouns as your only means of identifying people around you and ignoring basic sensory input and logic could be classified as a disorder, since they use it as a crutch that they then use to lord over others. Maybe it has been considered one already.

I don't think you're communicating your point well. Are you trying to say that, when talking with someone who doesn't identify as their apparent sex, the conversation will be entirely consumed by questions of what they identify as? That it will be impossible to discern anything about that person except what pronouns they use?

>>88748202
When someone makes a demand on you, it does have an impact on your life.

>>88748290
you have to grow up.

>>88748386

When you don't have to buy your own food or pay your own rent, then sure, I suppose minor requests for basic courtesy constitute meaningful impacts on your life. But when you actually enter the real world with real responsibilities, your perspective will change.

>>88748453
When you enter the real world with real responsibilities, you start to give less of a shit about what other people call you.

>>88748453
This condescending attitude is why no one likes you powergrabbing libcucks and why your party is at the weakest it's been since the 30s.

>>88748479

Generally, yes. But if I had to deal with it day after day, I think I'd rather go through the trouble of referring to someone the way they want to be referred to (which just seems like basic courtesy to me) than have my identity invalidated by the people around me.

>>88745098
>thread is silently autosaged
I guess sarah is now sort of taboo on /co/ and all it took was a few /pol/ edits and waifuism. Bravo

>>88748578
This is as great as the purging of Kate Beaton/Hark A Vagrant from /co/ after babygate.