Bandai had no issue coming with a Miraculous Ladybug toyline.

>>88341286
>I want a Ruby and Sapphire figure that can combine in a Garnet...
How the hell would that work in a toy?

Well it probably helps that Bandai is primarily a toy company.

>>88341505
Basically turning them inside out and making Garnet really tall compared to the other two.

>>88341505
Like a transformer?

>>88341286
because Ladybug is apparently more successful worldwide, while only the USA cares about LGBT universe.

>>88341552
And? It's not Bandai who produce Miraculous Lady Bug, isn't it? It's a French production.

Nothing to stop any toy company, (like Hasbro, for example), to make toy like Giant Garnet Glove, like they did with the Hulk or the Thing.

>>88341715
I think SU is getting quite the audience intentionally.

>>88341286
Surely it's because they don't want to deal with SU fans.

No kids want toys of a fat kid and his ensemble cast of ugly women

These characters look like standard doll fare

File: miraculous-tales-of-ladybug-02.jpg (2MB, 3150x1755px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3150x1755px

>>88341286
>Bandai had no issue coming with
Fetish wear line, when then?