Was this show good?
No. It was proto-TTG.
yes
>>88338325
fuck you
>>88338301
It was okay at best, weeaboo bait at worst.
Not really, it was ok at the best.
>>88338301
It's great, Ami is best girl tho.
>>88340130
fuck you, leatherman
>>88338301
This show was weird
The only well animated characters were the girls and their band manager, everyone else looked like they had one draft to draw a character and thats it.
Nothing else was well animated.
They also did this weird thing where we they would show the actual girls they're based off of and they looked nothing like the characters.
The music was ok I guess but I don't remember anything but the theme song.
But this show went dead silent
Like Class of 3000 silent
Just one day it vanished from CN forever and never got heard from again
I've been wanting to draw these two. Any sexy suggestions?
>>88340167
episode? why was she naked?
>>88340461
Yumi grinding on one of her stuffed animals.
>>88340461
lewd version of >>88340167
>>88340461
Ami FAPPING to Yumi.
>>88340461
some fan jacking off on them in public
>>88340461
Anything with being embarrassed nude.
Like having a wardrobe malfunction on stage, or having to do a humiliating nude concert in the first place for money
>>88340461
Ami being raped by Yumi.
>>88340490
Sorry, beat you to it. You're welcome to give it a try yourself, though.
>>88340482
Her clothes were dirty. Ami knicked them off in a finger swipe. The scene lasts 5 seconds.
>>88340520
I could go for that. Hell, I'd pay you for it
>>88338301
It was alright
>>88338301
For me it's a guilty pleasure. The show itself it's not that bad but it becomes strangely entertaining when you start to realize that it's supposed to cash-in on japanese pop culture and yet it relies on 30's-40's cartoon gags more than any other cartoon that aired back then (and even nowdays).
The fact that this was also the only show to be made 100% in the USA (yes, even the animation) makes things only more jarring
>>88340520
Thirding this, please
>>88342115
>guilty pleasure
For everyone's too.
>>88342147
well.. yeah, actually it's dificult to see it as anything else.bel nome! italiota anche tu?
They were in my first wet dream I remember
>>88340461
I have two words for youPuffy vagina
>>88340461
Those two scissoring.
>>88340167
>>88340650
Are there any other moments in the show that put either girl in a situation where they are scantily clad?
>>88342664
There's this one from Helping Hand...
>>88342708
And this one from an episode whose name escapes me...
>>88342724
I distinctly recall this one being from the very first episode.
>>88342911
For some reason, Ami showers in her swimsuit.
>>88342958
I also did three edits of this one, one private, one PG, one PG-13. This is the PG-13 one.
>two literal who even in Japan get their own show.
>Think it will do well in America.
And it was trash in general. Plus they weren't even hot enough for porn.
>>88342724
I think it's from Kaz Almighty
>>88343057
That's the one! Yeah!
>>88343057
>Dat quality
Anon, where did you found your episodes?
>>88342974
Come on anon, you can't just tease us...
>>88343039
Bear that it was 2004. at the time not only everything even remotely japanese was super-popular, but those two pop singers were pretty famous, even showing up at Macy's baloon parade.
>>88343136
Right herehttps://www.watchcartoononline.io/anime/hi-hi-puffy-amiyumi
>>88343346
thanks!
I hoped they were available for download thought.
>>88343039
>Plus they weren't even hot enough for porn.
I respectfully disagree with your opinion.
>>88342958
It would belewdnot to.
>>88343136
I hate to break it to you, but I kinda have a reputation to uphold. I'll give you your pic. Just pay me $5 on PayPal and it'll show up in your e-mail. I recommend conducting the transfer over Inkbunny, since that's my main base of operations, plus, uh, 4chan doesn't really do much private messages.
And now I expect to be bombarded with (You)s for being a cheapskate, holding out on you guys, making your dicks limp, all that stuff, well, sorry, but I gotta make money to spend money. Aside from my weekly and monthly stipend, donations and payments are all I get. Don't worry, if you do, you'll qualify for something called a Weighted Suggestion, where I'll put more thought into your idea.
>>88343848
Nudity doesn't always have to be classified as lewd if it's used for purposes other than arousal such as comedy or purity.
>>88344033
>$5
>for a couple of screencap edits
>>88344243
That's actually a better deal than selling them individually
>>88344033
To be fair I was expecting either a link to /aco/ or to be called a faggot for wanting a thing I never would have seen, so I really don't know what to say.
I think I found your Inkbunny and... sorry, but your style isn't really that appealing to me. I mean, I imagined the NSFW version to be a bit curvier but, if it's just a flat, completely on model (read, rectangular) Ami, I'l pass
...on the other hand I'm one of the few people on Earth who doesn't think porn artists are the anthichrist, and I wouldn't really mind giving you 5$ for your work.
Could you please explain to me what is a "Weighted Suggestion"? it could mke or blreak the deal.
>>88344334
Okay, here's how it works:
Normally my ideas come from a specific thread on a specific website, or from some of my associates, friends and business partners. And if none of those come to mind, I just come up with something from my head, usually a kind of role-reversal or something to reduce censorship.
I take suggestions a lot, but not every one is usable. Considering that most of the time I'm paying my own money for the art, I typically have the right to refuse or deny art based on my personal values.
Here's where a Weighted Suggestion comes into play. I've found that when people trust me money, I tend to be a lot more interested in going through with an idea. The idea is that the money is being used as leverage, something that I can place higher priority than a normal pic. Right now I have a massive project going on, but if you qualify for a Weighted Suggestion, I will work together with you for an idea and, upon coming to an agreement, drop my plans for the massive project to work on your idea instead. Basically it's a kind of two-way street: You pay something for an idea, and I send it to my people.
>>88344243
Good point. $2.
>>88344637
Whoah, I thought it was just a funny way to call a paid commission but this looks more like a contract to hire you... and I don't really need it right now, sorry
>2$
good lord! listen man, I'll buy you a coffe from that website, fine? I'll feel like a robber to pay 2$ for anything.
>>88344951
It's only one pic, a screenshot edit. An on-model screenshot edit, no less. Of course, you're welcome to pay as much or as little as you need. Just $2's the minimum for that particular one.
Of course, I really have no way to contact you unless you sent me a message over at IB. S'fine, anyway.
>>88343848
But it's the most efficient way to clean way.