/co/nstructive criticism

They'd probably get fired.

Don't quote me on this but I heard from somewhere they can't really do that because the person who had the idea could easily sue the company for stealing the idea or some shit. Not sure if entirely BS or not.

>>88333496
Social commentary mysteriously dissappears outside of the occasional tract on new conservative values.

Stories either focus on the same general set of characters as before or create an entirely new cast. There is no midway.

More action, lore, and depression.

Probably better aesthetics.

So a net gain, though it isn't all good. The world of fiction becomes a smaller place as all works seek to cater to one narrow base.

>>88333496
why would anyone listen and implement advice and criticism from /co/?

its nuts

Alex Hirsch does (or did). I mean, he gave us NWMM as a token scrap of meat to the Padipper autists on here...and then insta-reconned it.

Things would become alot more like /a/'s subject matter.

...No. Really.

Manga magazines in particular can have popularity polls tied to the bigger series which editors can use as a basis to influence the writer with; Naruto's first tournament arc's outcome, aside from those absolutely strictly necessary for the plot, were determined by what character was more popular than the next. Akira Toriyama has mentioned numerous times in his DB/DBZ books how his editors got him to do more stuff based on their suggestions.

Basically if say the Big Two actually plumbed the depths of /co/ for criticism, it could turn into that. Whether in a 'good' way (these guys are talking about THIS character, so let's use them alot more to bring in the readers,) or a "bad way" (they're furious about this Character, or what This Character Did. KEEP doing that--they obviously are buying and ranting about it so they want to be angry.")

And even if it didn't, there are consistently threads on here about the morality of every character under the sun, complaints of this book or that character that contradict what the next person says about what went right/wrong with this comic, "characters who did nothing wrong" threads etc., etc. /co/'s a huge clusterfuck even when people seem united on hating Lisa Simpson or summat.

For every person who defends their points or makes a legit criticism, there's some guy who rants about SJWs or Jewish people or some shit, so to draw forth any helpful advice that are still based ultimately on opinons on a message board, you'd need and Infinity Gauntlet Powered filter.

The show would resemble a porno movie.

Even more sexualization of characters.

>>88333496
everything would turn to shit

Oh god no, it would just be underage characters fucking for 30 minutes every episode.

>>88333496
If cartoon writers listened to fans in general, not just /co/, then it would be a horrible idea and they'd all get rightfully fired

File: 1471571048986.png (330KB, 450x750px) Image search: [Google]

330KB, 450x750px

What if cartoon writers didn't make anything until they came up with a good fully fleshed idea, instead of trying to get potential fans to make up some fanfiction level garbage for them to try and make a quick profit off of?

If anyone on /co/ actually had good ideas they'd be in the industry, not in the audience

File: Oh dear God no.jpg (16KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 480x360px

>The Loud House written by /co/

>>88333496
Adventure time is long gone, Anon.

>>88334481
BTW, back in 2012 before Gravity Falls was a thing, Alex came to /co/ saying he was developing this new cartoon about a boy and his sister having wacky adventures over summer vacation. Pretty damn lame until we gave him advice for all the mystery plots and whatnot.

>>88336278
Incest, oversexulization of little girls, orgies, it'd be great tbqh

>>88336424
Pics or it didn't happen

>>88336424
And then he turned around and shit on the very people who helped him.

>>88336278
Clyde would be killed off in 1-2 episodes tops.