[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

If they did this the other way around, Black Lives Matter and

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 536
Thread images: 59

File: JNL-Batgirl.jpg (31KB, 230x280px) Image search: [Google]
JNL-Batgirl.jpg
31KB, 230x280px
If they did this the other way around, Black Lives Matter and such would go berserk.
>>
>>
Of course. Get white Storm and watch fireworks.
>>
>>88213530
k
>>
>>88213530
Okay.
Why should we care again?
>>
>>88213583
Honestly Barbara being a cop seems a bigger change than being Black.
>>
why did they make babs a darkie?

Also is she going to fuck batman in this?
>>
Cool story, OP
>>
>>88213672
How? She is commissioner in Beyond
>>
>>88213686
I mean being both Batgirl and a Cop at the same time.
>>
File: lego batman.jpg (202KB, 500x741px)
lego batman.jpg
202KB, 500x741px
>>88213530
You're right. To be fair and balanced, they should really have changed some of the characters who aren't white in the comics to be white. Let's go with - hmm. Well, we could make - no, that doesn't work. Oh, there's Two-Face - oh, but he is white in the comics.

What a shame. Seems that there just aren't any black characters that we can turn white to be balanced. Maybe in the next movie, then!
>>
>>88213709
Dick did that.
>>
>>88213672
how is that a bigger change? anybody can change careers, you can't just become black.
>>
>>88213753

Dick was Batgirl?
>>
>>88213766
Michael Jackson became white.
>>
>>88213766
>how is that a bigger change?
Because being white isn't as integral to a character that has appeared in throughout history as a character's career
It's like saying James Bond being an ice cream man and having to do nothing with any sort of spy work or secret service isn't as big of a deal as him being played by a black character
>>
>>88213803
His nose also fell off when he sneezed so I don't think he's good choice.
>>
>>88213672
Nah. It's a change, sure, but not a huge one, and it makes sense for an adult Barbara.
>>
File: 2466b.jpg (77KB, 425x644px) Image search: [Google]
2466b.jpg
77KB, 425x644px
>>88213729

Make new characters instead of changing the race of existing ones?

See what people like you don't seem to realize, is that diversity is not just adding more black people.

Barbara Gordon is a light skinned redhead. Just because her skin happens to be white, does not mean that she doesn't represent diversity.
O right, but discrimination only is about black people, right?
People with red hair should just suck it up, because they're not diverse enough, and also... they have no souls, right?
>>
>>88213853
I'm pretty sure I read a comic where Barbara wants to be a cop like her dad, but can't because she doesn't meet height and weight requirements. Not being able to help people as a cop is part of her motivation for becoming Batgirl.
>>
>>88213880
>Make new characters instead of changing the race of existing ones?
People do that, they fill roles with new characters, but people still get upset
Ms. Marvel, The Hulk, Spider-man, etc etc
New black/minority characters appear all the time to fit various roles, but people get super upset when non-whites take mantles that white characters held.
People are super okay with there being 5+ robins, but there can't be a black batgirl named barbara gordon

>People with red hair should just suck it up
The barbara gordon in this has red hair, what is your point?
>>
You know I'm ok with a black Gordon fanily retcon. It doesn't seem as blatantly pandering as a lot of recent race change trash
>>
>>88213530
I wouldn't mind if Batgirl #4 is black. It looks pretty good with that shade of purple. Maybe have a Batgirls title with Babs as Oracle supervising Steph as Spoiler, Cass as Orphan or Black Bat, and the rookie Blackgirl
>>
File: tvJvFfX.jpg (48KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]
tvJvFfX.jpg
48KB, 800x800px
>>88213978
That's just it though. It's not Barbara. You can have 47 non-white robins for all I care, they just better not be named Dick Grayson, Carrie Kelly, etc
>>
>>88213672
Yeah but that doesn't trigger /co/'s victim complex
>>
>>88213978

Point me to a black woman with natural flowing red hair.
Also, watching the trailer, this version of Barbara has a total "I'm Joining the club, Ya'll!" vibe like Ghostbusters 2016.

The point is natural redheads get plenty shit coming their way on a daily basis.

Sure there can be a black Batgirl. There was an asian Batgirl too, but they didn't turn Barbara Gordon into an asian to get there.
>>
>>88214065
>It's not Barbara
It's fine if you think of it as not being Barbara
It's just a different Barbara Gordon who is a cop and black
>the better not be named Dick Grayson, Carrie Kelly, etc
why?
>>
>>88213880
Oh my god, who cares? They changed her skin color because they got Rosario Dawson to play her. Why do you people get so upset over stupid shit like this?
>>
>>88214107

>"I'm Joining the club, Ya'll!" vibe

pretty sure that's there from the start in the 60s
>>
>>88214112

>why?

Because those are existing characters. How is this difficult to understand?
>>
File: 1436767198082.gif (2MB, 256x192px) Image search: [Google]
1436767198082.gif
2MB, 256x192px
>>88213583
>that
>Black
They already had a black lady voice her in the arkham games funny enough
>>
>>88214122

>you people
>>
>>88214132
Who are you?
>>
It doesn't matter if a character is race changed in adaptations.
>>
The only Batgirl that matters is the Asian one so I don't give a shit.
>>
>>88213771
no but he dicked her
>>
>>88214127

Not like this. She talks... typical.
>>
>>88214122
>she's black so she can only play black characters
That's racist.
>>
>>88214107
>Point me to a black woman with natural flowing red hair.
pic related

>Also, watching the trailer, this version of Barbara has a total "I'm Joining the club, Ya'll!" vibe like Ghostbusters 2016.
The origins of batgirl have that sort of vibe, she just made her costume and essentially took up the mantle without Batman's permission
But she had promise (and a banging body) so he let her in

>The point is natural redheads get plenty shit coming their way on a daily basis.
Don't natural redheads of other races with different skin tones get shit from redheads with lighter skin because they just assume they aren't natural/don't exist?

>but they didn't turn Barbara Gordon into an asian to get there
If your point is that they didn't do it before so why would they do it now, then why not do it now so if they need to do it again in the future they can do it again?
"It's never been done before" isn't a good reason to not do something
>>
File: tumblr_mk5gjsFmFG1rom810o9_540.jpg (63KB, 531x780px) Image search: [Google]
tumblr_mk5gjsFmFG1rom810o9_540.jpg
63KB, 531x780px
>>88214211

Yeah? Where is that Batgirl now?
>>
But she isn't black...?
>>
File: dulcedereyes_1358734018_23.jpg (152KB, 1008x649px) Image search: [Google]
dulcedereyes_1358734018_23.jpg
152KB, 1008x649px
>>88213880
>Barbara Gordon is a light skinned redhead. Just because her skin happens to be white, does not mean that she doesn't represent diversity.
>>
>Afro-Cuban, Puerto Rican, Irish and Native American
>lel black
Can someone explain this to me? The character here looks more latina than black too.
>>
>>88214280
Because this is a shitty bait thread.
>>
>>88214247

>rosario dawson
>black
>>
Ehh, I don't mind race swapping in general so long as we have a talented actor playing the part, for instance the Hugo Strange we had in Gotham, Nick Mother Fucking Fury in MCU, hell Two Face in Lego Batman, but if you get some black bitch with no presence to play a white character I do reee a little
>>
>>88214280
Race is determined by the one drop rule in order to preserve the elite exclusivity of whites.
>>
File: 0D7A6106,large.1441276421.jpg (74KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]
0D7A6106,large.1441276421.jpg
74KB, 1024x683px
>>88214257

That's not flowing red hair, dumbass.

And the point was that Cassandra Cain was a new character created for a new Batgirl. That's how this should be done.
>>
>>88214141
>Because those are existing characters
So superboy-prime shouldn't have been written because clark kent already existed?
Didn't Superman die and get replaced by a different version of himself? And hasn't that happened many times throughout history?

It's a different universe, Batman isn't also a master builder who can shape the very environment into other things to suit his needs. Why can't Barbara be a different race?
It's not the exact same Barbara.
>>
>>88214279
I think it's pretty funny that redheads are such a small number of actual people, but they're everywhere in comics because comic artists want to bang them.
>>
>>88214150
Arkham Asylum/City Babs voice >>>>> Arkham Knight Babs voice

Fact

Also her Arkham Asylum/City VA did voice work for the BTAS Animated Movies in Mystery of the Batwoman as the daughter of one of the Mob Boss
>>
anyone else really want the mutant leader figure
>>
>>88214279
i WANT TO DROWN IN THAT RED SEA
>>
File: Sabina_Karlsson[1].jpg (25KB, 400x291px) Image search: [Google]
Sabina_Karlsson[1].jpg
25KB, 400x291px
>>88214357
>That's not flowing red hair, dumbass.
I guess I don't really understand what flowing means
Like this?

>And the point was that Cassandra Cain was a new character created for a new Batgirl.
And now, in the lego Universe, Barbara Gordon is black
That's how this was done
>>
>>88213530
So is Commissioner Gordon now black?

Why not make Alfred Black then?
>>
>>88214257
that girl's cute anon
>>
One thing I find ironic about this is that for decades, legos deliberately went with primary color yellow for all characters. No exceptions, because they wanted to be post racial.

At some point, they added black legos. I"m no /toy/man but I think it was with a licenced movie or something.

And now, it's sort of simpsons race rules, I guess. I wonder how legos will do asian characters. Since hollywood gives no fucks about asians, It may be a while before we find out.
>>88213766
Rachel Dolezal. Shaun King.

Race rules are moving away from genetics and parentage and towards 100 percent self identification.

>>88214003
In this case, they're making the races match the voice actor races. Billy Dee Williams, and Dawson. The voice actors are also well established, well loved, and fitting for the characters. They're also keeping important parts of the look of batgirl, by giving her a massive henna addiction for the red hair. Most importantly, they aren't claiming that it's some sort of civil rights revolution.
>>
>>88214503
>Half white
>Still has Nappy hair

Bad luck.
>>
>>88213729
White Bane?
European Ras Al Guhl?(as opossed to Persian)
White Doodlebug?

Who would watch a movie with that?
>>
>>88214503
He means not curly or wavy.
>>
>>88214542
Guess by that voice actor idea we need to change Samurai jack into a Black guy.

Oh wait, good voice actors don't just sound like their stereotypes.
>>
>>88214564
>Nappy
that's not what that means
>>
>>88214521
Because he's not played by a black guy.
>>88214542
>At some point, they added black legos. I"m no /toy/man but I think it was with a licenced movie or something.
It was for Lando, yes, because he didn't look right in yellow. It's why they moved to fleshtones for licenced characters, so they could keep the idea that yellow didn't necessarily mean white.
>>
>>88214542
>I wonder how legos will do asian characters.
I think they do them like Simpsons actually, make them paler.
>>
>>88214595
So how does that work then?

Maybe the shitty voice actors should stop sounding like stereotypes.

Look at Clancy Brown. He can play any race.
>>
>>88214580
she can just straighten it if it's that big of a deal
or is hair care and maintenance not a part of the batgirl identity?
>>
>>88214566
Bane was Half English though, so him being a dark skinned beaner was always stupid.

>>88214637
Not being black was part of her Identity quite a bit.
>>
>>88214633
>Maybe the shitty voice actors should stop sounding like stereotypes.
Honestly, if Shaolin Showdown weren't such a decent show, I would have never watched it after hearing Tara Strong
>>
>>88214667
>Not being black was part of her Identity quite a bit.
So why is batgirl black in the lego movie sequel?
>>
>>88214566
>White Doodlebug?

What?

He only showed up in Beware the Batman, and he was black then, too. I think they even made Junkyard Dog a Latino.
>>
>>88214690
Because the voice actor can't sound like a white person?
>>
>>88213729

>Two Face is black
>Commishoner Gordon is Black
>Babs is Black
>Catwoman is black

Yeah, but why?
>>
File: giphy[1].gif (1MB, 480x287px) Image search: [Google]
giphy[1].gif
1MB, 480x287px
>>88214710
>Because the voice actor can't sound like a white person?
>>
>>88214721
DC wants those SJWbux.
>>
File: Cass 8.jpg (121KB, 730x1095px) Image search: [Google]
Cass 8.jpg
121KB, 730x1095px
>>88214733

Why not just use Cass? Or have Batwing in it?
>>
>>88214581
No. We don't HAVE to. But we COULD, and in Samurai Jack's case the show would still work.

The show isn't even particularly japanese to begin with.

And you're right. Voice actors don't have to match the race of the voices they play.

>>88214633
The rules are more based on what triggers the audience into protests, and what execs think sells tickets than anything consistent or rational.
>>
>>88214726
Except that's true, she sounds like a 30 year old Black Woman.

Ergo, they need to make Batgirl black so her voice fits.
>>
>>88214755
Asians aren't colored enough. Not marketable.
>>
>>88214721
Because Billy Dee Williams
Because Babs is
Because her voice actor is
Because Frank Miller version, maybe?
>>
....She's not black you mongs. she's latina or tanned.

Bunch of whiny faggots.
>>
File: photo[1].png (295KB, 473x472px) Image search: [Google]
photo[1].png
295KB, 473x472px
>>88214763
>implying the show would still work without a japanese main character
I seriously hope you guys don't do that
>>
>>88214763
>No. We don't HAVE to. But we COULD, and in Samurai Jack's case the show would still work.
>
>The show isn't even particularly japanese to begin with.

Except of course... Jack being a Samurai, with his dad being a Shogun.

>>88214781
So because of excuses to add black people.
>>
File: KittCat.jpg (104KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]
KittCat.jpg
104KB, 1024x768px
>>88214721
>>Catwoman is black

Anon pls
>>
>>88214776
>Except that's true, she sounds like a 30 year old Black Woman.
*Afro-Latina Woman
>>
>>88214781

Isn't Rosario half-black? Couldn't Gordon have been white and his wife black?

The Dark Knight Returns Catwoman isn't black though
>>
>>88214809
>So because of excuses to add black people.
Yeah
Just because you call them excuses doesn't mean they aren't reasons to do that thing
>>
>>88214803
The show becomes more afro samurai.

>>88214781
Frank Miller was a big Batman TV show fan. I think it goes back to Eartha Kitt for this one.
>>
>>88214834
Wow, so she's half beaner, how interesting and totally not conradictory to Batgirl's Identity.
>>
At least some of the sets are pretty cool.
>>
>>88214542
Lego speed racer did asians iirc
>>
>>88214854
Well here is a question.

Why Those characters?

Why no Black Riddler or Black penguin?

Why no Black Alfred? Why no Black robin?
>>
>>88214858
>totally not conradictory to Batgirl's Identity
I agree anon
so why are we fighting?
>>
>>88214809
They only added one so far as I can tell and he already had the role over 20 years ago so it's nearly a reprisal.
>>
>>88214908
>Why no Black robin?
But Duke is already a thing, and he's better than Robin.
>>
I don't particularly mind it, there are so many interpretations of these characters these days, it's not some blatant jarring difference to me anymore. At least the voice actor idea is better than, say, making Johnny Storm black because he's friends with the director.

Though in fairness, what OP said is true. If it's any other race but white, it's celebrated and defended, but if a character is made white, there's outrage and cries of whitewash.
>>
>>88214908
Because historical precedence and Lego stuff tends to be a celebration of the entire franchise across history.

If there were a black Alfred ever, then they'd conceivably have done a black Alfred. And you'd piss and moan about that too like a bitch.
>>
>>88214952
Could you imagine a White Cyborg or Static shock?

>>88214960
When where Batgirl or Gordon ever Brown?
>>
>>88214721
>Catwoman is black
Well, who else would be stealing that much shit?
>>
>>88214952
>If it's any other race but white, it's celebrated and defended
I don't get this logic that says that no one complains about black/diversity washing in a thread that's complaining about it.

BOTH cases have their defenders and critics and whiny pissants that blow this shit out of proportion. Change is resisted by autists, regardless of what direction that change is in.

Sonic's arms are blue once and idiots lose their goddamn minds.
>>
>>88214990
She's stealing diamonds, not bicycles.
>>
>>88214908
>Why Those characters?
Why not those characters?
Would you rather have a black robin named Dick Grayson or a black butler named Alfred Pennyworth?
I'm sure those things could and might happen in the future, very easily now. Wally West has been black a couple times, same with Aqualad. I'm willing to bet that black Robin might happen soon.
There's a black twoface and a black catwoman, so obviously Black riddler and black penguin could exist.

The answer is,
There's literally no reason to not have it, so why not?
Just because there's no reason to have something doesn't mean there's a reason you shouldn't have it.
>>
>>88214293
Where gonna go through this whole thread calling her "black batgirl" regardless of how inaccurate that is. Does op think he'll get more replies than calling her latina?
>>
Are we supposed to care?
>>
>>88214721
>Not knowing about Billy Dee Williams' Harvey Dent
>Not knowing about Eartha Kitt's Catwoman
Anon, please, the adults are talking.
>>
File: fred perry.jpg (108KB, 783x960px) Image search: [Google]
fred perry.jpg
108KB, 783x960px
>>88213530
As long as Gordon, his wife, or both are black I'm good with it.

Because fuck random adoption plots.
>>
>>88214991
Oh people will complain about it - here on anonymous 4chan - but doing so anywhere else and you'll get accused of being a racist.

Hell, the Mall of America has a black Santa right now and that's what's happening to anybody who dares suggest that's out of the norm.
>>
>>88213766
Rachel Dolzel?
>>
The important thing is that they chose the best Robin
>>
>>88215034
Just like Miles is latino, amirite?
>>88215103
Genderflipped Carrie?
>>
>>88215087
>abloo bloo bloo someone called me a name
And?
>>
>>88215001
Let me explain why.

Because Batgirl, Gordon, Catwoman and Two-face are "Important, but expendable"

They're characters that are big, but mostly able to be reformatted and changed around as needed to suit any agenda they needed.

However, Black Robins disrupt the characters, Black Alfred's would be seen as racist and no black person would accept a Black Riddler or Black penguin as they're not cool.

It's basically babystepping around black people#s feelings to blackwash a few characters they can blackwash to the detriment of the characters.

Because fuck you people, Billy Dee Williams is a shit actor. He ALWAYS sounds like a 70ies black comedy character,
>>
>>88215103
>>88215121
It's Dick.
They just made him look more like Cera because that's who voices him.
>>
>>88215121
>genderflipped
Wait, what? I thought she was still a girl.
>>
>>88213530
No one complained about Shades being whte afaik.
>>
>>88215125
You're a moron.
>>
>>88215121
More so than Miles and she looks it. She's at least less black than Miles. Anon already posted her background
>>
>>88215132
>Because Batgirl, Gordon, Catwoman and Two-face are "Important, but expendable"
>It's basically babystepping around black people#s feelings to blackwash a few characters they can blackwash to the detriment of the characters.
pick one anon, either changing the race of the causes ruin or they are expendable to where it doesn't matter
Nobody says, "you ruined this newspaper from 3 months ago" if nobody cares about using a newspaper from 3 months ago
making those characters black doesn't ruin those characters nor does it add anything

>and no black person would accept a Black Riddler or Black penguin as they're not cool
I know of at least one black person who would
And he's the only black person I know that's actually into comics
>>
I thought you guys hated Barbara Gordon for being the ultimate feminist.
>>
>>88214881
Same color as Akira from the simpsons.

>>88214974
Cyborg, yes. Both animated and comic version.

Static is tougher because more of his core stories are about race.

>>88214952
>If it's any other race but white, it's celebrated and defended,
An exception. You can change from asian to any other race, including white and frequently, nobody gives a fuck in hollywood. Big hero 6, ect.

>>88215043
It's far better for your mental health if you give zero fucks.


>>88215132
They COULD have used the butler from the fresh prince, and it would have worked, but that's probably an unacceptable level of risk for hollywood.
>>
I'm okay with it because if anything more black qts in capeshit are welcome

Too often Big 2 treat "diversity" as just turning another white guy black with either a "hood past" or a "racism is bad m'kay" subtext, and having him date a blonde
>>
>>88215132
Being a bad actor is actually the inablity to play the role you've been typecast as, not just versatility.
>>
>>88215173
And?
Someone calls you a racist. Who gives a shit? Why does that make you so butthurt? Just be a racist.
>>
>>88215241
>pick one anon, either changing the race of the causes ruin or they are expendable to where it doesn't matter
I think it's more nuanced than that. The look and the emotional tone of the character is critical. And hollywood fucks both of those up all the fucking time.

And race actually does make a difference in the look of characters.

Now it's not the ONLY thing about the character, but it's an oversimplification to make it all one or the other.

For example:
Michael Clarke Duncan isn't white, but he matches the physicallity, the strongfat, the imposing presense of the Kingpin.

>I know of at least one black person who would
The easily triggered crowd who protest at the drop of a hat is the opinion that matters. They give ZERO fucks of what actual black comic fans want.

>>88215255
are you fresh off the upvote boat?

>>88215412
Quit being a racist anon.
>>
>black person is wearing purple and orange
Wow, so progressive.
>>
>>88215458
>Quit being a racist anon.
I'm actually sexist instead. It's more fun because I get to look at tits.
>>
>>88215412
It might cost you your job and rep, but I don't understand the problem in the first place, Santa's been played by so many different people it's ridiculous. I mean, Tim Allen?
>>
>>88213672
That doesn't change the alt-right victim complex.
>>
File: batgirl 2014.png (77KB, 240x320px) Image search: [Google]
batgirl 2014.png
77KB, 240x320px
>>88213530
You can always make her race whatever you want, as long as you have the parts.
>>
Why not make a new black Batgirl?
Why do they have to raceswap existing characters?

Comics are a visual medium, it's the same as if they made Babs Gordon a blonde
>>
>>88215458
>The easily triggered crowd who protest at the drop of a hat is the opinion that matters. They give ZERO fucks of what actual black comic fans want.
my point was that you can't honestly say you understand what black people want or how they'll react because you, and nobody, can speak for a large amount of people that haven't told you that you could speak for them

>And race actually does make a difference in the look of characters.
>The look and the emotional tone of the character is critical
But not so much that you couldn't have a new character that was black, that fulfilled the same roles as barbara gordon and had a similar backstory to barbara gordon, but not "barbara gordon"?
>>
>>88215653
They already made her eyes green.
>>
>>88213978
>People do that, they fill roles with new characters, but people still get upset
>New black/minority characters appear all the time to fit various roles, but people get super upset
>but people still get upset
I hear that excuse all the time, and it's bullshit.
Get it through your thick skull: it's different people who get upset.

/pol/ and the like get upset at any non-white character ever taking a main role, even if it's a completely new character. Actual comic fans are of course okay with it because why not! But we don't like when characters' look and background gets changed for corporate reasons ("we need to up our representation quota").

If you add a new character, only /pol/ will get upset.
If you change an existing character for a bullshit corporate/political reason, both /pol/ and regular comic fans would get upset.

>People are super okay with there being 5+ robins, but there can't be a black batgirl named barbara gordon
No, because Barbara Gordon is a white redhead. I'm okay with Asian Cass Cain because she's a fucking different character. I'd be okay with 5 new black Batgirls, whatever.
>>
>>88215711
>But not so much that you couldn't have a new character that was black, that fulfilled the same roles as barbara gordon and had a similar backstory to barbara gordon, but not "barbara gordon"?
Why do you need a black character to fulfill a role of a preexisting white character and assume their identity?
Why not create a new black character with their own identity, like they did with minority characters like Batwoman, Cass Cain, Renee Montoya?
>>
>>88215827
It doesn't matter if it's different people bitching, it's still people bitching, it's still twenty threads a day, there's no way to stop the whining so there's no point in paying attention to it unless sales drop.
>>
>>88214952
My biggest problem with Johnny Storm being black is that they made the BOLD! BRAVE! PROGRESSIVE! decision to raceswap Johnny... but didn't have the balls to make his sister Sue black too, because you see, old Hollywood producers think white guys kissing black girls is icky.
>>
>>88214004
They played with this idea at the end of BQM's batgirl run, with Nell Little (the little black girl that Steph meets occasionally in the series) becoming batgirl during Steph's Black Mercy hallucination. But of course flashpoint happened.
>>
>>88215827
>Actual comic fans
I'm not concerned with actual comic fans and neither are corporations
Actual comic fans are simply just that, fanatic.
It means no matter how much you bitch and moan about what should happen in comic related media, you are still going to consume comic related media
I know it, you know it, comic creators know it, comic CEOs know it.

This isn't the first thread about changing the race of a character and it won't be the last.


>we don't like when characters' look and background gets changed for corporate reasons
I'm sure we includes you and a bunch of other like-minded individuals, but certainly not all "Actual comic fans" and certainly not me
Because honestly, as long as the story is good, who cares?
Comics are a visual medium, but if the story isn't good, if the subject matter is bullshit, nobody would care
The Fantastic 4 movie, the newer one, was complete garbage
After it aired, nobody was truly upset that the storms were black and adopted susan because the entire movie was so poor
>>
>>88215874
see
>>88215001
but if you need a reason
representation, diversity, etc etc
it literally doesn't matter
>>
>>88215894
So you're saying you don't see a difference between the opinion of a racist who hates seeing minority characters period, and a comic fan who don't see a reason to change a preexisting character's entire background and appearance for a purely corporate reason? Lovely.

Also great how you admitted that sales are the only thing that matters, not integrity or quality
>>
>>88215983
That post doesn't give a reason, it just says "why not? lel"
>>
>>88215986
>not integrity or quality
what do those have to do with a race change?
would the integrity and quality of the movie go up if barbara was white?
Is there some sort of Bplot that has to do with race in this brightly colored movie about superheroes made out of toys?
If you're that concerned with integrity and quality, why not wait until the movie comes out and then judge it?
>>
>>88216029
>That post doesn't give a reason
That's my point
There shouldn't have to be a reason to change someone's race
If there is, great
But if there isn't, that doesn't mean it shouldn't happen
>>
the only actual race swap is hispanic Babs and retroactive hispanic Gordon

or whatever the fuck Rosario is
>>
File: 1463067910156.jpg (199KB, 911x685px)
1463067910156.jpg
199KB, 911x685px
>>88214721
>>
>>88215954
What if a next installment makes Batman a short blonde Russian one-eyed oil magnate with a handlebar moustache... but the story would be good! And no, not an Elseworlds either, he's supposed to be the Batman.
>>
>>88216119
If you think the story is good, what is your problem?
>>
>>88216034
Changing characters' canonical appearance in a visual medium for zero reason except "minority quota" is a sign of poor integrity.
>>
>>88215921
>>88214952
>>88215954
Ironically enough, the movie was so shit, that black Johnny storm turned out to be the best casting there.
>>
>>88216148
Changing to meet a growing demand of minority representation in a forward thinking community a sign of high integrity
>>
File: earthpantherwhite1.jpg (68KB, 499x395px) Image search: [Google]
earthpantherwhite1.jpg
68KB, 499x395px
Do white people even want to be black heroes tho?
>>
>>88216139
Because it's a good story, but not a story about Batman. It's a good story about some other character who has a "Batman" label slapped onto him.
>>
>>88213530
I find the black police chief trope quite pleasing. I can forgive any skin swapping as long as Rosario is involved. She a cute CUTE!
>>
>>88216119
I'm already supposed to suck it up when he's a stupid, rageaholic, murdering asshole.

So yeah, they could do that. Who gives a shit anymore.
>>
>>88216119
so basically KGBeast takes up the mantle of the bat? i would read the fuck outta that
>>
>>88215986
>>88215986
>So you're saying you don't see a difference between the opinion of a racist who hates seeing minority characters period, and a comic fan who don't see a reason to change a preexisting character's entire background and appearance for a purely corporate reason? Lovely.
Yes. I'm saying it's all noise at this point.
Especially when the "comic fans" are going LOL NIGGERS too.
>>
>>88213766
>>
>>88216081
One half of that list isn't even black and the other half are reprisals/references
>>
>>88216185
If you want to represent people, represent them. Create characters who come from their backgrounds and walks of life, and give them bigger roles than "background token minority #57".

Don't just unperson some white dude/gal, and then smuggle their identity on a minority person forcing them to live out their assumed identity's life, like some sort of creepy urban legend shit.
>>
>>88216195
>It's a good story about some other character who has a "Batman" label slapped onto him
And this is a story about not barbara gordon black batgirl who happens to be named barbara gordon
That doesn't retroactively make literally every incarnation of batman a blonde russian cyclops
And this lego movie doesn't retroactively make literally every incarnation of barbara gordon not white

How is "batman" not as much of an identity as "barbara gordon" is?
>>
>>88213880
>make a new character
>LITERALLY WHO? Need more of muh legacies
>racebend a character
>NOT MUH LEGACY. Ummm reverse racism much?
>>
>>88216185
If a community becomes diverse, it means that people of different races and ethnicities move in, and are welcome and accepted. It doesn't mean that the Jones family who live next door suddenly turn black overnight.
>>
>>88216192
I used to love Cloak (from Marvel) as a kid. Kid me would probably love to be Cloak. He had cool powers.
>>
>>88215874
Catwoman and Two Face are both adaptions of previous characters that were originally black, but were also race swaps. The only new swap is babs to latina and Gordon.
>>
>>88216254
>Create characters who come from their backgrounds and walks of life, and give them bigger roles than "background token minority #57"
How are you going to decide what characters represent them if they are literally begging and pleading for the specific type of representation that exists in this movie?

>Create characters who come from their backgrounds and walks of life
So it'd be fine if Bruce Wayne was black?
Obviously most white people aren't rich orphans with tons of kung fu training, so it couldn't be a problem of representation.

Or are you really saying that it'd be impossible for a black girl to have a dad who worked in law enforcement and was maybe even the commissioner?

It seems like this is boiling down to you having a problem with something and assuming that other people should have the exact same problem
>>
>>88216231
No, no, no. No one "takes the mantle".

It's the same old Bruce Wayne. He's always been a short one-eyed Russian cyclops, didn't you know?

>>88216274
I should correct my phrasing.

The blonde Russian cyclops isn't just Batman, he's Bruce Wayne.
I'm okay with someone else assuming the mantle of Batman or Batgirl (as long as it's well executed, of course). But not raceswapping/whateverswapping preexisting persons.
>>
>>88215874
Why do you assume that they set out to make a black Barbara rather than setting out to make Barbara Gordon, and changing her to be black after casting the voice actress?
>>
>>88216277
>make a new character
>LITERALLY WHO? Need more of muh legacies
Yeeeah... because that's EXACTLY how /co/ feels about Cassandra Cain or Batwoman. Stop strawmanning to prove your flawed point.
>>
>>88216372
>The blonde Russian cyclops isn't just Batman, he's Bruce Wayne.
Yes, okay, that was kinda the assumption
Your argument is essentially trying to elicit some sort of reaction out of me and then you'd use that reaction to justify your own
But that's not a good argument and I'm honestly fine with blonde russian cyclops batman
There was a russian superman and that was pretty neat
>>
>>88216158
That wasn't surprising, man. MBJ is a great actor.
>>
>>88216312
Batman '66 was a show that got everything wrong, and did it partially on purpose. So a Catwoman who was black and dressed like Emma Peel from the Avengers gets a pass.

Where is black Two-Face from? I remember a black Harvey Dent in Burton's 80s Batman, but he didn't become Two-Face and was essentially a different character.
>>
>>88216453
Billy Dee Williams was set up to be Two-Face in a future movie, but Burton pitched a fit because he didn't want a black guy in the role and the studio let him recast him for Batman Forever.
So they got Billy Dee Williams back for this one.
>>
>>88216372
so bruce wayne takes the mantle of the beast? i would also read the fuck outta that
>>
>>88216349
>they are literally begging and pleading for the specific type of representation that exists in this movie
Black people are specifically begging and pleading to be represented by a black Babs Gordon?

>So it'd be fine if Bruce Wayne was black?
It'd be fine if a new character was black.

>Or are you really saying that it'd be impossible for a black girl to have a dad who worked in law enforcement and was maybe even the commissioner?
It is possible. So they should go and create a new character like that.

>It seems like this is boiling down to you having a problem with something and assuming that other people should have the exact same problem
You might say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one
>>
>>88216398
>Ms. Marvel
>New Inhumans guy
>Every single legacy hero
>>
>>88216374
Why change her to be black after casting the voice actress?
>>
>>88216236
The bigger question here is why Superman owns a Blackifier machine to begin with
>>
File: young_jim_gordon.png (138KB, 350x350px) Image search: [Google]
young_jim_gordon.png
138KB, 350x350px
>>88215034
Seems like it. I guess I know why /co/ doesn't read comics, because they can't see
>>
File: killer_croc_by_jprart-d9t2z46.jpg (276KB, 1642x1116px) Image search: [Google]
killer_croc_by_jprart-d9t2z46.jpg
276KB, 1642x1116px
>>88216374
>and changing her to be black after casting the voice actress?

Because she's a fucking cartoon and that would be retarded.

It's like saying you can't play Killer Croc unless you're a mutant crocodile man

>Croc lives matter
>>
>>88216491
Burton didn't direct Batman Forever.
>>
>>88216559
The only people who complained about Ms.Marvel were /pol/acks
Literally, the only complaint about her was "oh no, a Muslim!"

And people (mostly X-fags) hate Inhumans in general.

>Every single legacy hero
Jaime Reyes
Cassandra Cain
Renee Montoya aka The Question
I could go on. /co/ (not resident /pol/acks) only complains about legacy heroes when they feel forced.
>>
>>88216536
>specifically
yes, why else would this character exist in this specific way?

>It'd be fine if a new character was black.
Why can't Bruce be black?
There aren't nearly as many rich orphans with kung fu training as there are white girls with passions for justice, so obviously if there was a character that could be race bent, it would be the one that less resembles a character with a background similar to those who read the story, like Bruce Wayne

>So they should go and create a new character like that
>they should
>should
That's a reason they could, but not a reason they should

>I'm not the only one
I'm sure you're not the only one with a problem with this, but you shouldn't assume that other people should have a problem with this simply because of the way you think about things
>>
>>88216536
>by a black Babs Gordon?
And they really pulled through with an hispanic Babs Gordon
>>
>>88213530

Wrong board.

>>>/pol/ is that way.
>>
>>88216408
Russian Superman was an Elseworlds tale about if the exact same Kal-El landed in Russia. It wasn't Superman suddenly and inexplicably being a short blonde Russian cyclops for no reason.

>>88216530
No, Bruce Wayne is still Batman. It's just that Bruce Wayne is now a short blonde Russian cyclops.
>>
>>88216374
Primarily because it's fucking hollywood, and that's the way that casting works for them.

This case might be an exception.

>>88216427
I hadn't seen his shit before, and thought it was nepotisim. I also wasn't expecting every single other actor to blow it that badly.

>>88216574
I guess that explains Jimmy Olsen in the new supergirl series.

>>88216622
Given the writer's previous comics track record, it really isn't that out of line to be suspicious that Ms marvel is shitty pandering. I was expecting something like The Movement, or the new Champions. That the character is actually appealing, and the book is well executed pandering is a pleasant surprise.
>>
>>88216491
Hmm, did not know that. Interesting.
>>
>>88216675
is KGBeast robin then?
>>
>>88216675
But if somehow superman lost an eye when his ship crashed, turned out to not be as tall as he was in other incarnations, or happened to be blonde
I seriously doubt it would have affected the story much
>>
>>88214218
He stayed in her holiday inn express last night? Yowza!
>>
>>88216574
>>
File: download (8).jpg (8KB, 313x161px) Image search: [Google]
download (8).jpg
8KB, 313x161px
Hey guys, member how Brick who is one of GA's biggest enemies and the only notable black villain in his rogues gallery was turned into a white chav for the only live-action adaptation he's ever had? Remember how upset black people on the internet got? Oh wait, no one gave a single shit or made a bunch of threads about it like white people did about this or black Human Torch. You like to believe minorities are so much more triggered than you but you're all actually full of shit.
>>
>>88216639
>yes, why else would this character exist in this specific way?
Because corporate suits told them to up their minority quota.

>Why can't Bruce be black?
Because he's already white.

>That's a reason they could, but not a reason they should
They should if they want to have a black Batgirl with a cop dad.

>you shouldn't assume that other people should have a problem with this simply because of the way you think about things
Wut
>>
>>88216764

Literally who?
>>
>>88216764
Then they ended up making the same character for season five of Arrow.

The only GA villains that weren't shat on were Merlyn, Cupid, and Clock King, and they even wasted the last one when they killed off the Suicide Squad.
>>
>>88216664
and Tumblr is the other way.
>>
>>88216764
nothing wrong with vinnie jones anon, arrow just brings out the shit in everyone
>>
>>88216720
So you'd be okay for Superman to be like that in a next installation? Oh, and also, his costume is now green and orange.
>>
>>88216698
>I guess that explains Jimmy Olsen in the new supergirl series.
It really doesn't, unless a Blackifier machine includes a complete change of personality.
>>
>>88216810
>Because corporate suits told them to up their minority quota.
Because they wanted money from the people who said "man it sure would be nice if there were more characters like me"

>Because he's already white.
And he could be black if someone decided to make him black
That doesn't mean he wasn't previously white

>They should if they want to have a black Batgirl with a cop dad.
Obviously that's not the only way to have a black batgirl with a cop dad, because there's a black batgirl with a cop dad whose name is barbara gordon
So no, they "shouldn't"

You shouldn't assume that others should have the same problem, just because you think you're justified in thinking that it's a problem for everyone, just because you're thinking about it in a way that makes sense for you
>>
>>88216764
I was mad, and I'm a white guy.
Not enough black people care about GA, I bet.
>>
>>88216862
>So you'd be okay for Superman to be like that in a next installation?
Like I said, as long as it's a good story

>Oh, and also, his costume is now green and orange.
Like I said, your argument is essentially trying to elicit some sort of reaction out of me and then you'd use that reaction to justify your own
But that's STILL not a good argument
>>
>>88216914
>I was mad, and I'm a white guy.
Maybe you're just mad for no significant reason?
But probably not, right?

>Not enough black people care about GA, I bet.
Or maybe black people care more about the representation of black heroes moreso than the representation simply for race's sake
>>
>>88216893
>Because they wanted money from the people who said "man it sure would be nice if there were more characters like me"
Why change pre-existing characters for that?

>And he could be black if someone decided to make him black
Why make a pre-existing character black? Why not make him redheaded? Why is it even an option people consider?
In a visual medium, characters' look is iconic. Why mess with that?

>there's a black batgirl with a cop dad whose name is barbara gordon
What happened to the other Barbara Gordon? The redhead one? Was she killed? Did her black namesake assume her mantle?

There's literally no reason for messing up a preexisting character's appearance and background, instead of just creating a new character, and having them assume the mantle.
>>
>>88216917
I was just asking a question.
>>
>>88217076
I answered the question multiple times
I even showed you where I answered the question previously
>>
File: 992_races.jpg (188KB, 800x600px)
992_races.jpg
188KB, 800x600px
A better question is, why is "representation" and "diversity" always about raceswapping white characters to black? Where are the Asians? The Indians? The Native Americans? Hell, I liked Moana, where are my Pacific Islanders?
>>
>>88216828
>Then they ended up making the same character for season five of Arrow.
He really was essentially Brick and a better Brick at that. S3 really didn't know what the fuck it was doing.

>Or maybe black people care more about the representation of black heroes moreso than the representation simply for race's sake

It's not like there's an overabundance of black villains relative to heroes though. Villains can be cool characters too.
>>
The thing that's strangest to me about this thread is the people who'd rather they invent an entirely new black Batgirl for a Lego movie than change the tone of Barbara Gordon's Lego-skin
>>88216612
>>88216563
Have you people literally never encountered the concept of "make the animated character resemble their voice actor" in your life? "Why make Barbara black because Rosario Dawson is" is exactly the same as "why make Wreck-It Ralph look like an animated John C. Reilly"... or, hell, "why make Lord Business look like an animated Will Ferrel." In all three cases the answer boils down to "why not".
>>
>>88217019
>Why change pre-existing characters for that?
Because it's easy and doesn't sacrifice quality

>Why not make him redheaded?
People change their hair color all of the time
If you're talking about natural redheads, then fine, I'm sure it wouldn't be a huge deal if they were changed so that they were a natural redhead

>In a visual medium, characters' look is iconic
Not really
It's why comic characters have various costumes that may even look wildly different
Consider current batman's tacticool versus the campy adam west batman
They have a bunch of similarities and a bunch of differences
The iconic things are not changing
Batgirl still wears purple

>What happened to the other Barbara Gordon?
It's a different universe, so the other barbara gordon is the same as she ever was

>There's literally no reason for messing up a preexisting character's appearance and background, instead of just creating a new character, and having them assume the mantle.
There's no reason to do one and not the other
notice that I'm saying and, not but
They can do both because both are fine
>>
>>88217126
I'm glad there are at least a decent amount of Latino characters in the Arrowverse. I'm looking forward to Cisco going full Vibe. I also want him to cut his fucking hair. Ryan Choi would be an easy character for them to pull of if Atom makes a new suit.
>>
>>88217126
>why is "representation" and "diversity" always about raceswapping white characters to black?
If you feel that passionately about diversity to that regard, please feel free to ask for those things
But if you're only bringing that up so you can say "we shouldn't change characters to all races equally, so we shouldn't change them at all", then that's a poor argument
There's an asian hulk and an arab ms. marvel, and there will potentially be more
Rosario Dawson is an afro-latina, so it'd be safe to assume that barbara gordon is maybe an afro-latina
>>
File: diversityincapes.png (2MB, 966x1128px) Image search: [Google]
diversityincapes.png
2MB, 966x1128px
>>88217126
>Where are the Asians? The Indians? The Native Americans?
They're there
>>
>>88217019
>There's literally no reason for messing up a preexisting character's appearance and background, instead of just creating a new character, and having them assume the mantle.

>"After going through a series of actresses, we've decided to cast Rosario Dawson to play Barbara Gordon! Since we've done that, maybe, to increase the diversity of the characters and match the actress better, we should make Batgirl's skin darker."
>"No, it's absolutely intolerable for you to do that. Rewrite the plot to use an entirely different character as Batgirl AND explain what happened to Barbara and why she isn't Batgirl."
Alright, buddy.
>>
>>88217126
You have Aquaman. If raceswapping characters isn't a good thing, why would you want more of it for more people? They didn't make babs black so far as I can tell, so even going outside black swaps doesn't seem to help the general acknowledgement any.
>>
File: EarthTwo29c.jpg (54KB, 360x507px) Image search: [Google]
EarthTwo29c.jpg
54KB, 360x507px
Does /co/ even remember this?. I guess not seeing as this is from one of the most depised title of DC
>>
>>88213530
so like

what is this exactly?


desu making the same thing another ethnicity is pointless in my opinion, why not make something new instead of just rehashing it to fit someone else's standards?

but I'm a white cis male so my opinion doesn't matter
>>
>>88217339
This post triggers me.
Not because you are a white male, but because you added so much spacing and used desu like an autist would.
>>
>>88213530
Actually, a bat wearing a girlsuit has kinky potential...
>>
>>88217371
you found me out, I'm an autist
>>
>>88217226
I'd like to see Ryan Choi featured in more media.

>>88217271
I'm sure there are people of all races wanting more representation. Or do you think only black people want that?
>But if you're only bringing that up so you can say "we shouldn't change characters to all races equally, so we shouldn't change them at all"
Not what I was saying, don't assume okay?

>>88217285
I was talking about race-swapping specifically though, as this thread is about race-swapping. Most characters in your pic aren't race swaps.

>>88217298
Fair point about Aquaman.
>>
>>88217464
>I'm sure there are people of all races wanting more representation. Or do you think only black people want that?
Which is fine, I did say that you should campaign and ask for more representation from other races if you really felt that way.

>Not what I was saying, don't assume okay?
I wasn't assuming anything. Or rather, I was assuming that you either felt that way or you didn't. And if you really do feel like there should be more representation of other races, then ask for it.
>>
>>88217221
>I'm sure it wouldn't be a huge deal if they were changed so that they were a natural redhead
Why? Why should it be done at all?

>It's why comic characters have various costumes that may even look wildly different
And you know as well as me, there are some costumes that work as decent redesigns of a character's original design, and there are ones that just look different and don't fit the iconic look.
You're saying as if a character could wear absolutely anything, and it wouldn't sacrifice the quality.

>They can do both because both are fine
Yes, completely changing the look and background of a preexisting character for no reason is the same as creating a new original character that has that look and background organically.
>>
>>88217292
If they cast a white actor to voice a black or Asian character, should they make the character white as well?
>>
>>88217319
Steel's daughter becomes Harley?
>>
>>88217578
>Why? Why should it be done at all?
There's no reason to do it just as there's no reason not to do it

>You're saying as if a character could wear absolutely anything, and it wouldn't sacrifice the quality.
I'm saying that comic fans got mad when superman didn't wear his red briefs that were "so iconic"
I'm saying that costumes are fine as long as they resemble what we can recognize
And I'm also saying that someone's race really shouldn't matter if they are putting on a mask and covering nearly every inch of their body

>for no reason
you have a reason, you just won't accept it because you prefer alternatives
>>
>>88217339
Because SJWs don't care about new interesting characters. They want to repurpose established popular brands to fit their vision of a perfect diversity percentage.
>>
File: Image1.png (951KB, 748x709px) Image search: [Google]
Image1.png
951KB, 748x709px
>>88217622
Yep

Actually no. Earth 2 writers tried to create their own version of Harley.
>>
>>88217599
Are we talking about a series which is predominantly cast with black/Asian characters but their race isn't particularly relevant? If so, sure.
>>
>>88217498
I shouldn't ask anything. There are already people asking for representation.

My point was, if companies did actually do their race-swapping because they care about their audience, and they want different demographics be more represented – then they wouldn't only raceswap whites into blacks. If they truly wanted to better represent a multiracial society via raceswaps – then they'd already be doing white -> East Asian, white -> Indian, etc raceswaps.

Why aren't they already doing that?
>>
>>88217710
So... an anime, for example? Like... Ghost in the Shell?
>>
>>88217695
Oh, I see. The hammer reminded me of Steel. Would've been cool, I love when they do cheeky mashups like that in different universes.
>>
>>88217655
Removing Superman's briefs is like changing Barbara Gordon's eye color. Changing her whole race is like making Superman's costume all red.

>you have a reason, you just won't accept it because you prefer alternatives
You seem to do the same, refusing to consider my reasoning why it shouldn't be done. The only reason you gave me is "why not", which is not a reason to mess up a character's look.
>>
>>88217772
Nah, GITS is set in Japan and is, fundamentally about Japanese culture in the era of the post-WWII industrial boom, so that's not really a series where race isn't relevant.
>>
>>88216878
At least Jimmy has some semblance of his personality.

The fuck is Rip and Snappers?
>>
>>88217750
>I shouldn't ask anything. There are already people asking for representation.
That's retarded
How could one more person asking for more representation not help people actually get representation?
You don't have to ask for it, but other people asking for something isn't really an excuse to not ask for it yourself.

>Why aren't they already doing that?
They are trying to, but whenever someone gets race swapped, such as Barbara Gordon to an afro-latina, people always get upset and have huge arguments about whether or not they should
There are several minority characters "taking up the mantle" of other characters, far more than there are of characters getting "race swapped"
In the future, hopefully there will be, but saying that raceswaps shouldn't happen because companies haven't raceswapped all races yet doesn't make much sense
>>
>>88217855
>Changing her whole race is like making Superman's costume all red
That happened before
There was also an all blue superman

>You seem to do the same, refusing to consider my reasoning why it shouldn't be done
I've been arguing against that, proving examples as to things that have happened in the past that more resemble my argument than yours
The only "reasoning" you have is that it hasn't been done before
>>
>>88216878
Of course not. It would be silly for a blackifier machine to do that.

Superman obviously has a completely different machine for that.

>>88216764
What has brick done that's memborable?
>>
>>88217863
I'm sure there were enough gaijin living in Japan at that time. Besides, that's just thematically. It's a story set in the future, why should race matter?

Also, Marvel's Asgard is thematically based on Dark Ages mythology of the Scandinavian nations. Didn't stop them from casting a rather non-Scandinavian Heimdall, did it?
>>
>>88217887
Me not asking for it is also not a valid reason for why it's not happening. I hope you understand that.
>people always get upset and have huge arguments about whether or not they should
So you're saying that stops them from making white -> Asian etc. raceswaps. Why doesn't it stop them when they make white -> black raceswaps then?
>saying that raceswaps shouldn't happen because companies haven't raceswapped all races yet doesn't make much sense
Again, not my point.
My point is, if companies actually made raceswaps because they wanted to "represent a diverse society", they'd do diverse raceswaps, instead of just white -> black.
>>
>>88214566
We already had Irish Ras with Liam Neeson.
>>
>>88218091
thats_the_joke.jpg
>>
>>88218076
>Me not asking for it is also not a valid reason for why it's not happening
It's also proof that you're only bringing up the notion so that raceswaps stop completely

>they'd do diverse raceswaps, instead of just white -> black.
I'm sure in the future they will, as long as people keep fighting for more diverse societies
>>
>>88217927
>That happened before
>There was also an all blue superman
And it was shit. Or do you want to say that it was a good, quality move on DC's part? I wouldn't be surprised, actually.

>The only "reasoning" you have is that it hasn't been done before
No. Of course race-swapping preexisting characters has been done before. What are you even talking about?
My reasoning is that a character has a certain iconic look and background, which includes their costume, face, bodytype, important biographical points and personality traits.
When DC ignored that with Amanda Waller and made her thin in Nu52, and then in some other media as well, it was a travesty because her bodytype was iconic for her character. But of course you'd probably defend that bullshit too.
>>
It's just an elseworld chill.
If Superman can be a commie in one world, black in another, and a whole bunch of things everywhere else why can't Barbara be a brown lego person?
>>
>>88218091
White Ra's was a stupid thing to happen. The movie itself was okay, but I didn't like that portrayal, especially since Ra's Al Ghul is one of my favorite villains.
>>
>>88218076
They do other swaps tho, yes even white to asian
>>
>>88218140
Again you're assuming things. I'm only saying that the companies are dishonest.

>I'm sure in the future they will
I'm sure they won't. I have no reason to believe otherwise.
>>
>>88213637
Someone post the Boondocks strip
>>
>>88218195
>And it was shit.
And there have been superman stories that were completely retarded
That doesn't mean they should stop writing superman
That just means that they should just get better

>My reasoning is that a character has a certain iconic look and background
raceswapping a character doesn't change that background in a fantastic or sci fi setting where literally anything can happen
>face, body type, important biographical points and personality traits
all things that change based on who is reading it

>it was a travesty because her bodytype was iconic for her character
But it really didn't change the role of the character or how she acted, which is far more important to the quality of the story than where she grew up or whether or not she has a specific hair style
>>
>>88214107
>Point me to a black woman with natural flowing red hair

No need. 1966 Babs, which I consider a definitve version of Batgirl when it comes to looks, canonically wore a long flowing red wig to hide her adorable raven pixie cut.
>>
>>88213729

Harvey was played by Billy Dee Williams in batman 89. There were plans to have him as Two Face, this is a homage to that.

Selina was played by Eartha Kitt in the 60s batman and was black in Batman Year one.

So besides baiting, there's no reason to get mad about the casting for these two.
>>
>>88218545
>That doesn't mean they should stop writing superman
Of course not. But they should stop making changes that mess up what makes Superman iconic.

>raceswapping a character doesn't change that background in a fantastic or sci fi setting where literally anything can happen
It's a visual and character-driven medium, it changes enough.

>But it really didn't change the role of the character or how she acted, which is far more important to the quality of the story than where she grew up or whether or not she has a specific hair style
So what, you're defending what they did to Waller? Seriously?
>>
>>88214952

You weren't around for Last Airbender obviously.
>>
File: flat,800x800,075,f[1].jpg (116KB, 761x800px) Image search: [Google]
flat,800x800,075,f[1].jpg
116KB, 761x800px
>>88218825
And what's iconic to superman, and all heroes, isn't their race
Unless their backstory has to do with some sort of racial anything

>It's a visual and character-driven medium, it changes enough.
it being a visual medium is an even greater reason that there can easily be raceswapping
In both harry potter and james bond, as well as any other literature with a visual adaptation, people get upset when other want literally race for a character
It being a visual medium just means that the only canon that exists for race is precedent, which just means that it's never explicitly been stated that Superman has to be white, that's just what's happened before
Something happening before doesn't mean it has to happen in that exact same way again

>So what, you're defending what they did to Waller? Seriously?
pic related is you
no I'm not calling you a cuck, a loser, a numale, etc etc, because I don't have an argument
I'm saying you resemble this image macro because "SERIOUSLY?" isn't an argument
What happened to amanda waller happened, it's honestly not a huge deal
It was only iconic to her character because people could subtly make the whole pun about her being fat and being named Waller
Yeah, it would be nice to have more representation of overweight people, but changing a character's look isn't exactly the end of a character
Viola Davis, the actress who played her in Suicide Squad, isn't exactly the biggest chick either, nobody was upset when she was cast
>>
File: maxresdefault.jpg (71KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]
maxresdefault.jpg
71KB, 1280x720px
>>88214690

Because of pressure from a growing SJW mentality that every movie, TV show, or cartoon needs to represent diversity.
...and by diversity, SJW's mean one or more black people.

Doesn't matter to these fuckers that the Gordon family has been stated to be from Irish descent in the comics.

Also, Barbara Gordon has been voiced by a black actress before. It never caused them to model the character after the voice actress before, so that really can't be the excuse for something that is blatantly done to pander to SJWs and Black lives Matter.
>>
>>88219322
*Latina
Babs needs to go back.
>>
>>88219322
>Doesn't matter to these fuckers that the Gordon family has been stated to be from Irish descent in the comics.
See that's where you're going astray. This isn't comics Batman, this is the Lego Batman continuity. After the Crisis on Infinity Bricks Barbara and her father were reconstituted as Black Irish. And Lego Joker has shark teeth.
>>
File: What Does That Mean.jpg (74KB, 558x683px) Image search: [Google]
What Does That Mean.jpg
74KB, 558x683px
>>88213530
What the fuck is the other way around!?
>>
>>88214781
>Because Babs is
>Because her voice actor is

Bullshit. The voice actress from the Injustice game is also black, and the character is white.
>>
>>88213530
I don't see anything particularly wrong in changing the race or any other characteristic of a character, as long as:
1- it makes sense in the setting and makes things interesting
2- they could not cast anyone that resembles the original character.

Shimalangdong had the same issue in the Last airbender movie, people shitted on the choice and called it whitewashing, but there is just NO good inuit actor. Sometimes the only way for a movie to even exist is to change the race of a character... and sometimes the movie should not exist.

Notice that sometimes the behavior or acting of an actor resembles the original character to the point the other traits can be ignored.
>>
>>88219214
>And what's iconic to superman, and all heroes, isn't their race
It's their personality, their major bio elements, their looks (incl.race), and their costume

>It being a visual medium just means that the only canon that exists for race is precedent, which just means that it's never explicitly been stated that Superman has to be white, that's just what's happened before
That's backwards logic.
In a visual medium, a character's look and design is iconic, while in a non-visual medium, it doesn't play as much of a role. A book might never describe a character's hair color at all, but in a comic book it's part of a character's design (unless they wear a mask that covers it).
If Superman was designed white with dark hair and a blue-red caped costume, that means that Superman as a character is white with dark hair and a blue-red caped costume. In a visual medium, a character's visual design is as important as the writing, and should be as consistent. A buff dark-haired white guy with a red-gold caped costume is Captain Marvel, not Superman.

>Something happening before doesn't mean it has to happen in that exact same way again
That's like saying Superman might be retooled into crash landing in a city and growing up there instead of a Kansas farm.
Inconsistencies like that just water down a character and their iconic concept. If someone wants to have a city-born super alien, why not create a new character for that idea.

>I'm saying you resemble this image macro because "SERIOUSLY?" isn't an argument
It wasn't an argument, you idiot, it was a question.

>It was only iconic to her character because people could subtly make the whole pun about her being fat and being named Waller
Speak for yourself. It was something that made her unique, and in a way, look iconic. They took it away and made her look much more bland.

>Yeah, it would be nice to have more representation of overweight people
I'm not exactly thin, and I couldn't care less for "representation".
>>
>>88216192
when i was a kid girls of every color wanted to be storm
>>
Did they cast Jim yet? I have some suggestions
>>
>>88213978
>New black/minority characters appear all the time to fit various roles, but people get super upset when non-whites take mantles that white characters held.

I personally hate legacy characters. There's rarely any real canon reason for names to be passed on It's usually just to profit on a name. There could very fucking well be a black Robin for this reason. Bruce adopts a black kid. Now little Jaquan is Robin. See. It's easy if you take the time instead of just changing an existing character for reasons.

I also hate that Marvel took up making more and more of them to fill a diversity quota. DC sucks for diversity as far as I can tell, but Marvel has a lot of characters that aren't legacies that are great and diverse but they books don't sell as well and we're stuck with them making legacies now and then changing them back when people get bored of them. Ms. Marvel is the only character that doesn't suck and I'm slowly getting tired of her being spread thin.
>>
File: 1addgW3.jpg (185KB, 1080x1080px)
1addgW3.jpg
185KB, 1080x1080px
>>88213530
Bavk in april I remember seeing Rosario Dawson when I was at a bernie sanders rally in Manhattan. Feels good man.
>>
>>88220111
Minus the orphan and claustrophobia parts. Hell yeah.
>>
Will there ever be a redhead in /co/ adaptations again?
>>
>>88219322
>in the comics
This is the lego batman movie
>>
What is it with DC turning redheads and gingers black?
>>
>>88220359
>DC
Mera's gonna be redhead
They swapped Lois Lane for redhead
The character here at least still has read hair and isn't actually black.
>>
>>88214279
We can do one with black characters too if your implying theres too many redheads
>>
File: 5bc.png (35KB, 625x626px) Image search: [Google]
5bc.png
35KB, 625x626px
>>88213530

It might have something to do with the fact that nonwhite heroes also sell well, creators want to appeal to these profitable audiences, but because copyright law has changed they will no longer get the same level of control and profitability from new IPs unless the creators give them some very special privilages that are almost unheard of today, therefore they take the abundance of white characters they have and make some of them nonwhite
>>
Why does raceswapping need to be done in the first place?
It's just a cheap gimmick that pisses off long term fans to try and bring in a short term boost.

It also is pretty much the same as admitting that they can't make these diverse characters without latching them onto a pre-established white identity and character that is already well established and successful.
Then on top of that, when they do have diverse characters that were already established and successful they fuck them up entirely and drive it into the ground.
Remember what New52 did with Static and Milestone?

Milestone should be a beacon for anyone who wants to make comics. If you want to tell stories that relate to you, your situation, your view. Make new characters, make them well written and people will be drawn to them.

But comics don't want to take risks either, making a whole new character and putting a push behind it is too much of a risk that may upset the normal balance.
Might as well just throw a dart at a board and turn whatever character it hits into a transgender queer black muslim.
Because that's good writing, appearantly!
>>
>>88220072
>It's their personality
Not at all
Campy Adam West batman and 50s batman beg to differ
>bio elements
what?
>their looks/race
again, no
>their costume
again, no

>In a visual medium, a character's look and design is iconic
cape comics change character's basic designs and looks far too often for anything except a basic color pallet and insignia to be iconic
If a black guy can wear a superman costume and still be recognized as superman, then race obviously isn't a huge part of who a character is
>in a non-visual medium, it doesn't play as much of a role
Because the scar on harry potter isn't just as iconic
In a non-visual medium, things like character descriptions are key. But in a visual-medium, you can change whatever you want and as long as people can still recognize it, it's valid
Art in comics doesn't matter nearly as much as the story
Art is nice, but people choose good stories over good art nearly 100% of the time

>That's like saying Superman might be retooled into crash landing in a city and growing up there instead of a Kansas farm.
Where superman grows up changes in many different stories and they are all superman
It doesn't water down the character, it just introduces a difference to tell a different story
Not necessarily better, not necessarily worse

>It wasn't an argument, you idiot, it was a question.
One that I subsequently answered
This is why I called you out on it, it has nothing to do with your argument and yet you found it relevant enough to bring it up again

>It was something that made her unique, and in a way, look iconic. They took it away and made her look much more bland.
If we're speaking for ourselves, I could easily say that there's no problem because batgirl's race has nothing to do with the manner in which she is iconic

>I'm not exactly thin, and I couldn't care less for "representation".
Not my point, but if you didn't care about representation, then why shit on people who do and tell them how they should be represented?
>>
>>88214122
The same reason there's a war on Christmas.

Because up until now mainstream comics have almost exclusively catered to them. The other guys getting a piece of the pie feels like their rights are being taken away
>>
>>88220547
baka at entertaining OP
>>
I am more upset about her being comissioner than her being Puerto Rican. Or is she Dominican?
>>
>>88214280
It's Ind- I mean Guatemala Flash Thompson all over again.
>>
I like Ginger Jim Gordon.

Barbara could be a googly eye alien and i still wouldn't give a fuck.
>>
>>88220568
>It's just a cheap gimmick that pisses off long term fans to try and bring in a short term boost.
Because those short term boosts are worth several hundreds of millions and the "long term fans" are only worth hundreds of thousands

So why not bring in short term boosts every couple of years?

>It also is pretty much the same as admitting that they can't make these diverse characters without latching them onto a pre-established white identity and character that is already well established and successful.
If they did admit that, would you be more okay with it happening, or is that just you insulting them and the practice?

>But comics don't want to take risks either
This has little to do with comics, we're talking about a lego movie anon
we might reference comics, but that's only to support our arguments about the lego movie

Making a whole new character and putting a push behind it is a really dumb idea in a business that has made the majority of it's money writing about the same characters for the past 50+ years
There aren't any other ways to successfully promote diverse characters and maintain the same amount of profit without making them adopt the personas of other characters

Because if people honestly wanted to read about other characters, they would
There's a reason they keep rebooting the same characters over and over and there's also a reason all the other, different or newer, characters that simultaneously get rebooted don't receive future reboots
>>
>>88220605
Horseshit, that excuse doesn't fly when you're changing current characters without a good reason.
>>
>>88220188
Legacy characters can be annoying if written poorly so they feel forced, but at least they're better than changing existing ones.

The reason they do legacies is at least kind of understandable from a medium standpoint. It's the same reason death isn't final in comics. Companies need to keep their trademarks, and they have to do it by publishing comics featuring those trademarks from time to time.
>>
>>88214279
5 of these 8 are from Marvel, which is not surprising because either Stan or Jack had a boner for redheads. Starfire is an alien with Donald Trump skin so she doesn't really count. Leaves 2 true redheads from DC, Batgirl and Ivy.
>>
>>88220751
>So why not bring in short term boosts every couple of years?
Why cut off your hand to buy a new pair of gloves?
Long Term Fans are established, these are the people they want to create. They have large pull lists of books they like and will spend money regularly, keeping the company in business when one of the gimmick pushes isn't in effect.
However, if they get tired of gimmicks or the direction the company is taking, they move on and drop the company entirely, meaning that established regular cash flow dries up.

This is a big part of why the current comic industry is drying up, people are leaving Marvel and DC when they pull bullshit like this because they're getting tired of it.
DC Rebirth was a push to try and get those readers back by reintroducing things that drew those established fans in the first place.

>If they did admit that, would you be more okay with it happening
They already did admit it, and it'll never be okay.
Make new characters, write them well, draw in new readers.

>Because if people honestly wanted to read about other characters, they would
But they do. People are abandoning Marvel in droves, to the point Marvel has to send thousands of free comics to stores to artificially inflate their numbers.
They're going to IDW and Image and other companies.
DC only recently starting bringing those people back with Rebirth.
>>
>>88220605
So make more new non-white characters to cater to non-whites. Like DC already did with Blue Beetle, Cass Cain, John Stewart, Ryan Choi, Simon Baz, Jessica Cruz, etc etc.

But sorry, of course it's just evil racists hating blacks, or some shit like that, carry on.
>>
>>88217695
Man, sometimes it floors me how bad cape artists are at drawing kids
>>
>>88214542
Shaun King is Black.
his mother is white, is biological father is a black guy.
his step dad is listed on his birth certificate because he was married to his mom
>>
>>88220568
>Remember what New52 did with Static and Milestone?

>Milestone should be a beacon for anyone who wants to make comics. If you want to tell stories that relate to you, your situation, your view. Make new characters, make them well written and people will be drawn to them.
THIS.
>>
>>88221140
Should take a look at Champions sometime, the first issue or two is about a slave ring and they keep going on about children slaves and child trafficking, but all the girls in the issue look around 18.
>>
>>88220595
>Campy Adam West batman and 50s batman beg to differ
>again, no
>again, no
So did I get you right? You can write and draw whatever you want, and then slap an existing name on it, and it's good writing. Right?

>If a black guy can wear a superman costume and still be recognized as superman
He can be a Superman, but he's not the same OG Kal-El Superman

>Because the scar on harry potter isn't just as iconic
I didn't say it plays zero role, I said it doesn't in general play as much of a role.

>Art in comics doesn't matter nearly as much as the story
Bullshit.
It's a visual medium. Try changing the color scheme of Goku's outfit or Asterix' hair color. It breaks the iconicity of the characters.

>I could easily say that there's no problem because batgirl's race has nothing to do with the manner in which she is iconic
What makes Barbara Gordon iconic? Her backstory, her making the costume out of scratch, her wearing purple, and her being white with red hair.

>why shit on people who do
I don't shit on these people. I shit on the companies who mess with established characters to pretend they care about these people.

>and tell them how they should be represented?
Wut
>>
>>88220568
>Remember what New52 did with Static and Milestone?
Yeah. If DC actually cared about black readers, Static would've already been their Miles Morales. And would probably featured in this movie, instead of awkwardly blackfaced Babs.
>>
>>88213530
whats the point, whats the fucking point, just get the mexican question she literally serves the exact same fucking goddamn purpose in this movie.
>>
>>88221475
>or asterix's hair color
lol what
>>
>>88221605
Renee Montoya. That's a valid question, anon
>>
>>88221725
he's blonde
>>
>>88221605
Because it doesn't get the short term shock value and let the company call anyone who dislikes it racist.
>>
>>88217170

If the actor can't voice their character properly because of the skin color in a goddamn cartoon about lego then they're a shit actress to start with.
>>
>>88213530

But black characters are a tiny minority and the vast majority of the depictions of this character have been white.

What's the issue? It's not like we're not going to have a white version of the character again, not that it particularly matters. I'm sure there are plenty of other caucasian minifigures for young white girls to model themselves on.
>>
It should also be said, Black people make up 12% of america where White people make up over 63%
i think Hispanic is now near 19%, but even with that 31% is half of the white population, thats why all our media is mainly white, because the fucking country is statistically mainly white.

the race mixing shit is retarded. objectively.
>>
>>88221752
yeah, thats the name. shes also way more kick ass than barbara ever was.
>>
>>88221986
Even then, the characters here are mostly white.
>>
>>88221192
>Shaun King is Black.

Back to tumblr
>>
>>88221752
Hey Carlos
>>
>>88222054
im not saying keep the cast all white, but dont change a white character to another race, get renee montoya or cass or something, subtracting the white is so stupid.
>>
>>88214542
>Race rules are moving away from genetics and parentage and towards 100 percent self identification.

Only in shitty places like California
>>
>>88214542
>>88215089
Did you niggers just seriously bring up Rachel Dolezal?
>>
>>88221887

Look, if they where making a live action version of the character and the best actor for the role was a black actress who could really sell it?

Cool. Even Catwoman was played by a black woman back in the 60s for no reason beyond Ertha Kitt being awesome.

This is a cartoon though. There's no reason to race swap for any reason than "You want the attention" there's zero reason any decent actor should have a hard time playing a character who's not the same race as they are.
>>
>>88221036
There's a decent number of dude red heads too if this is a "representation" argument.

The real stupid shit is if they wanted a minority batgirl then Cassandra already exists. This weird shit where you have to have Barbara but also have to have a minority is such cognitive dissonance.
>>
>>88221079
>Why cut off your hand to buy a new pair of gloves?
Why give up on some of the most lucrative deals of literally any century?
The revenue from movie sales alone is enough to buy an island
factor in merch and stuff and you're a billionaire
Joss Whedon's net worth more than quadrupled thanks to his work

>This is a big part of why the current comic industry is drying up, people are leaving Marvel and DC when they pull bullshit like this because they're getting tired of it.
Yeah, comic sales have never been that great
The biggest reason the current comic industry is dying is because other media that's cheaper and easier to consume exists
Same with radio and newspapers

>They already did admit it, and it'll never be okay.
So why bring it up?
You being right about how desperate they are to get new people doesn't mean you're right about whether or not it's working

>But they do. People are abandoning Marvel in droves, to the point Marvel has to send thousands of free comics to stores to artificially inflate their numbers.
Like I said, print comics are a dying industry in America
It's why a lot of people are going digital
>>
File: batgold06.jpg (149KB, 578x800px) Image search: [Google]
batgold06.jpg
149KB, 578x800px
>>88222284
There's also no reason not to change it if they decide to. There was no reason to make Robin look like Carrie Kelley but they did that too. Or give Joker shark teeth. It's bizarre watching people getting upset as if the change somehow significantly alters the very nature of the characters. Superman flying was actually a rather significant departure from when he just jumped really high. Batman hating guns and killing doesn't jive with his first issues. Barbara Gordon and her dad being a slightly darker shade of Lego figure? This is what is getting panties in a twist? It's not even like the Lego continuity matters a damn to the comics anyway. This is something you have to really go out of your way to get asspained over.
>>
File: sad cassandra.jpg (35KB, 277x466px) Image search: [Google]
sad cassandra.jpg
35KB, 277x466px
>>88222460

Seriously this is the big thing. They want to use their ICONIC BG but they also want to use the minority card while AGGRESSIVELY ignore the actual minority Batgirl they have.

The same problem this always creates is that it's not actual minority representation when you leave the actual minority out the dry.
>>
File: 1461731707430.jpg (31KB, 500x421px) Image search: [Google]
1461731707430.jpg
31KB, 500x421px
>>88222743
Not just vampires, he also hates necks. This is the real reason Wonder Woman loved him.
>>
>>88222715
>Why give up on some of the most lucrative deals of literally any century?
>The revenue from movie sales alone is enough to buy an island
They can have their movie sales without raceswapping characters and pushing away traditional fans.
Generation artificial outrage and calling everyone who disagrees racist didn't help Fiegbusters.

>So why bring it up?
>You being right about how desperate they are to get new people doesn't mean you're right about whether or not it's working
Why shouldn't I? If you don't bring it up, they won't listen.
And if it was working, they still wouldn't be so desperate to get new people.
They also wouldn't be artificially inflating their sales numbers to make them look more successful then they actually are, which is proof this shit just hurts them.
>>
>>88213583
Anything to wash the taste of Bruce Timm's Killing Joke Barbara out of my mouth.
>>
>>88213530
Speaking of The Lego Batman Movie.

Anyone looking forward to it?
>>
>>88221475
>You can write and draw whatever you want, and then slap an existing name on it, and it's good writing. Right?
No, why would the way a character looks have more to do with the writing than anything?
Having a goofy slapstick character doesn't automatically mean the writing is goofy.

>He can be a Superman, but he's not the same OG Kal-El Superman
Nobody is saying that this is the same OG barbara gordon
She's afro-latina and her name is barbara gordon, it's a different universe

> I said it doesn't in general play as much of a role.
But you didn't disagree that the scar isn't as iconic as superman's insignia
Which would mean that the role it plays is larger than you're letting on

>It's a visual medium. Try changing the color scheme of Goku's outfit or Asterix' hair color. It breaks the iconicity of the characters.
It being a visual medium doesn't mean that everything has to be the exact same to be iconic. It being iconic means that it can differ wildly, but as long as it's recognizable, it's still that thing.
The american flag is iconic, and you can still recognize that someone is using the american flag, even if it's on a bikini where one boob is blue with stars and the other one is striped
If you changed the colors of the American flag, it would still look like the American flag.
Asterix's hair color isn't iconic, you can still recognize a black and white asterix drawing.

Goku's outfit isn't iconic

>What makes Barbara Gordon iconic? Her backstory, her making the costume out of scratch, her wearing purple, and her being white with red hair.
So close
If a black girl can wear a batgirl costume and people recognize her as wearing a batgirl costume, then how is her being white iconic?

> I shit on the companies who mess with established characters to pretend they care about these people.
And if the people they are pretending to care about are okay with the way they are being represented, why should it matter to you?
>>
File: bat of murder.jpg (125KB, 620x831px) Image search: [Google]
bat of murder.jpg
125KB, 620x831px
>>88222815
>hates necks
>>
>>88222963
>They can have their movie sales without raceswapping characters and pushing away traditional fans.
Or they can have even greater sales by drawing in new fans and keeping the traditional fans who don't really give a shit about race
Because honestly, the "traditional fans" don't make up that big of a percentage of the audience, particularly

>Generation artificial outrage and calling everyone who disagrees racist didn't help Fiegbusters.
And race-swapping didn't really hurt CW's flash

>Why shouldn't I? If you don't bring it up, they won't listen.
You aren't telling anyone who matters any more than you do, so why bring it up in this argument?

>And if it was working, they still wouldn't be so desperate to get new people.
>They also wouldn't be artificially inflating their sales numbers to make them look more successful then they actually are, which is proof this shit just hurts them.
It's proof that the industry is dying
If raceswapping characters didn't help, and raceswapping characters has been done multiple times before, then why else would they do it?
>>
>>88221036
Count again.
Caitlin, Babs, Ivy, Starfire, Kate.
MJ, Firestar, Jean, Mystique, Medusa
It's 5 each.

And that's not including Natasha Romanov, Mera, Maxima, Lana Lang, Artemis, M'gann, Carrie, Giganta, Cheetah, Vicky Vale, Elsa Bloodstone, Julie Power, Wolfsbane, or any of the billion Jean Grey clones and time travel babies.
Or any of the guys.
Gingers aren't going extinct in comic books man. Stop trying to pretend they are.
>>
>>88222743
Superman flying was an evolution of the character, like him leveling up in powers. Same with the writers solidifying Batman's hate for guns. It's an evolution, a progress.
>>
>>88223611
Superman flying was because it's easier to animate.
Laziness is great for creativity.
>>
>>88223611
Well you might call this progressive, I suppose. Not the kind of progress you want. Not all changes have to be beneficial. Sometimes they're benign. This is fairly benign with people running around screaming that the sky is falling.
>>
>>88223048
>No, why would the way a character looks have more to do with the writing than anything?

If the way a character looks doesn't matter than there's no reason to make them look different. No one is going to skip the movie because Babs isn't black.

If you want to use a minority Batgirl there is one and she could really use the push.
>>
>>88222758
>>88222460
EXACTLY THIS.

As I said, if the reason they do raceswaps is because they "care about representation" – why didn't they use Cass Cain? Or do they just not care about Asians?
>>
>>88223637
Wasn't it the Superman radio program that did it first? The very first episodes did mention him jumping but quickly they gave that up for de facto flight, mostly because it's ridiculously awkward to talk about all the things he's jumping over.
>>
File: black bat 1.jpg (98KB, 500x600px) Image search: [Google]
black bat 1.jpg
98KB, 500x600px
>>88223697

You know when you factor in how viable the Chinese market has become NOT including Cass is kind of silly.
>>
>>88223669
>No one is going to skip the movie because Babs isn't black.
People might want to go see the movie because she is black

>>88223697
That's still doesn't mean that raceswapping is bad, that's just proving people don't care enough to do it more
>>
>>88223735
The source I saw said it was the Fleischer cartoons that introduced it to save on having to animate.
>>
>>88223637
>Laziness is great for creativity.
Is it?
I mean, I can think of some pretty decent ideas that were glossed over because it was too much work
>>
>>88223223
>Or they can have even greater sales by drawing in new fans and keeping the traditional fans who don't really give a shit about race
>Because honestly, the "traditional fans" don't make up that big of a percentage of the audience, particularly
Except that's obviously not happening, they're driving off long term fans and these "new fans" aren't staying.

>And race-swapping didn't really hurt CW's flash
Sure it did, it pushed away alot of Wally fans and you can't say they don't matter.

>You aren't telling anyone who matters any more than you do, so why bring it up in this argument?
The same reason you're running around replying to every post that you disagree with and telling people their view doesn't matter because you're okay with this.

>If raceswapping characters didn't help, and raceswapping characters has been done multiple times before, then why else would they do it?
If raceswapping characters doesn't help, and it's been done multiple times, then why are they still doing it?

Because the comic numbers show it doesn't help, otherwise they wouldn't be artificially inflating numbers. If it did work, the industry would be in an upswing and all the lost fans would be replaced with new fans.
But obviously that isn't helping. So why are they doing it outside of artificial outrage?
>>
>>88223781
>People might want to go see the movie because she is black

No they won't. Tumblr will make their usual noise but literally no one else gives a fuck.
>>
>>88223781
>People might want to go see the movie because she is black
People are going to skip the movie because Babs is black. You're not gaining anything.
>>
>>88223697
>why didn't they use Cass Cain?
I like to think in an alternate universe, say, /co/ Prime, they're bitching about why Cass is the police commissioner and if they wanted diversity they could have just used Barbara Gordon and made her asian or even black.
>>
>>88223048
>No, why would the way a character looks have more to do with the writing than anything?
You didn't answer my question. But in any case, if the character's looks don't matter, then why change them?

>She's afro-latina and her name is barbara gordon, it's a different universe
I'm okay with afro-latina. But why did she have to be Barbara Gordon? Batgirl is literally a legacy title. They could've easily created an Afro-Latina character to take the mantle.
And! Bonus point! If she did well in the movie, they could introduce her to comics, and have one more popular minority character.
So, not only is my way better for character consistency, it's better for representation too.

>If you changed the colors of the American flag, it would still look like the American flag.
Cool. What would you say if Trump changed it to, idk, orange and yellow?

>Asterix's hair color isn't iconic
>Goku's outfit isn't iconic
How can one be so ignorant

>If a black girl can wear a batgirl costume and people recognize her as wearing a batgirl costume
Because "Batgirl" is a legacy title, you dipshit. There has been an Asian wearing the Batgirl costume. If a black girl wears a Batgirl costume, she's Batgirl. There's literally no reason for her to be Barbara Gordon.

>And if the people they are pretending to care about are okay with the way they are being represented, why should it matter to you?
Because I'm also a comic fan, and I don't like when my fave characters are messed up for bullshit corporate reasons. Or are you saying that only black people can have an opinion on what they do with Barbara Gordon now?
>>
File: f this.jpg (1MB, 2102x2400px)
f this.jpg
1MB, 2102x2400px
>>88223930
>Cass is the police commissioner

That sounds hilarious

>She doesn't have to read the book to be able to throw it at you.
>>
>>88223983
>Batgirl is literally a legacy title.
DC/WB doesn't seem to want it to be. Getting them to acknowledge the other Batgirls is like pulling teeth.
>>
>>88223794
From what I recall Superman wasn't so much flying but in first adventure of the series he could at least hover. He carry mooks up in the air with him and hover, threatening to make them "bounce" if they wouldn't talk. Later this would evolve to the classic dropping people, swooping down and catching them, and then threatening to repeat unless they gave in.
>>
>>88223254
Black characters in comics are also not going extinct. I could make an equally long list of them, if I could be arsed. It's a stalemate.
>>
File: French & Italian Flag v4.jpg (23KB, 639x428px) Image search: [Google]
French & Italian Flag v4.jpg
23KB, 639x428px
>>88223048
>The american flag is iconic, and you can still recognize that someone is using the american flag,


The French flag is Iconic but if you change the colors it becomes Italian
>>
>>88223637
Sure, but it led to an evolution of the character. Raceswapping is neither better for production, nor an evolution of a character.

>>88223652
It's not progress at all. There's literally zero "progress" in turning a random white character black, when there are already several minority characters in the DC roster which they didn't even use.
>>
>>88224161
>The French flag is Iconic but if you change the colors it becomes Italian
Fuck Italia
>>
>>88224055
>From what I recall Superman wasn't so much flying but in first adventure of the series he could at least hover.
I'll see if I can find the little retrospective thing but it does have him jumping in a few of the Fleicher toons
>>
>>88224080
Exactly. This is a non issue.
Go ahead and list them though. I'm curious how many black women there are in capes without going to like, less than D list
>>
File: Monica_Rambeau_(Earth-721).jpg (30KB, 382x505px) Image search: [Google]
Monica_Rambeau_(Earth-721).jpg
30KB, 382x505px
>>88224385

If a character is a D list then you should strive to increase their fame rather than writing them off completely so you can "Make Headlines" by inventing a thing we've had for years

We've have both a black woman and a lesbian Captain Marvel
>>
File: shaq-lego-movie.png.jpg (90KB, 1275x704px) Image search: [Google]
shaq-lego-movie.png.jpg
90KB, 1275x704px
>>88224270
Of course it's progress! They turned TWO characters from white to sort of black. See this isn't the color tone Lego uses for black, it's a new tannish version they've started using. Pic related is Lego black.

So since you've decided to be asspained over this, now you have to figure out the very specific calculus of rage required. She might be half-black, half-latina, in which case you can still be 100% angry, but she might be half-white in which case only 50% rage for them changing only 50% of her character from the comic standard. These are very important issues, obviously, and need to be settled before you can begin your change.org petition against Lego to fix their shit.
>>
>>88223781
>People might want to go see the movie because she is black
God, give Batwing a bigger role if you think it woud attract black demographics. By that I mean, start by including Batwing at all.

Also, >>88223750 has a good point. There are more Chinese people than black Americans. And they LOVE when there's at least one Asian character. So... it seems they don't care about attracting non-white audiences, after all.

>That's still doesn't mean that raceswapping is bad, that's just proving people don't care enough to do it more
No, it proves that the company is dishonest.
It doesn't do the raceswaps to make minorities better represented. Or else they'd use an already existing minority Batgirl who even has a small fandom.
>>
>>88223930
That's stupid.

I haven't yet seen anyone who'd be okay with raceswapping existing characters instead of using established ones.

If they used Cass, the part of /co/ that is /pol/ would still be pandering because "oh no, a minority in a lead role!", but the rest would be okay with it. /co/ freaking loves Cass.
>>
A few years back, I used to not like race change.
But all this butthurt is so pleasant to watch. Now I love when they do that.
>>
>>88224492
This. Plenty of characters who deserve a boost. Give them a book and write them well.
>>
>>88214542
Well, not necessarily self-identified. Because there are a ton of North Africans and Persians who will tell you that they're white and a bunch of Northern Europeans who will respond, "lol no." Race is a cancer but it won't go away until the people who benefit from it the most stop using it as a crutch (whatever those circumstances are).
>>
>>88222073
>Get out of my safe space!
>>
>>88224622
Didn't seem to be much fuss over Perry White being played by Laurence Fishburne. Not as much as over Heimdall being played by Idris Elba.

Even within this thread you can find evidence of people who don't give a shit if a Lego movie changes Barbara's race.
>>
>>88224385
You also used D-listers, so don't get too cocky. I mean, Julie Power? Elsa Bloodstone? Maxima?

Off the top of my head: Storm, Monica Rambeau, Misty Stone, Black Power Girl, Vixen, Steel's daughter, Amanda Waller, Moon Girl, Bumblebee. I'm sure there are more.

>>88224492
Agreed.
>>
>>88214755
Too bad Hollywood doesn't give a shit about Asians in their crusade for forced diversity.
>>
>>88224497
>lol ur a raycest
Tumblr-level arguments don't cut it here, bub

>See this isn't the color tone Lego uses for black, it's a new tannish version they've started using. Pic related is Lego black.
Now that's actually at least kind of a good argument. God knows, Lego users need more color variations of heads, hands, etc. But it still could of been a new character, anyway.
>>
>>88224965
Yeah they don't care about the Chinese market at all.
>>
>>88224907
I like nextwave and power pack so they stuck in my mind. Elsa was also on Thunderbolts recently. I agree with Maxima being D list though.
And Natasha Irons is Steel's niece, not his daughter.
>>
>>88224743
You missed my point completely.

I was saying no one prefers raceswaps over established/original characters. You just keep playing your broken record of "but some anons are okay with it but some anons are okay with it". Which was completely irrelevant to my post.
>>
>>88224628
If you think we'll start happily cheering on stupid corporate decisions to spite you, you're mistaken.
>>
>>88224978
Anon, we've been over this. It IS a new character. This is Lego Batman Barbara. She's not the comic Barbara. She's an entirely new person. Why this keeps grinding your gears in a movie where Batman acts like this I have no clue because arguably the changes to Batman's personality is a far more significant deviation from the comics than Barbara being a slightly darker shade of plastic toy.

>lol ur a raycest
>Tumblr-level arguments don't cut it here, bub
That's called projection, bub. We're aware of that too.
>>
>>88224337
Ah, doesn't matter who did it first. Don't trouble yourself digging through any collections unless you really want to. It was a natural enough change for the character and one that I think makes sense in either media, cartoon or radio.
>>
>>88224965
>Too bad Hollywood doesn't give a shit about Asians in their crusade for forced diversity.
This.

We have so few badass male Asian protagonists it hurts. Asians can't be badass, I guess. Few female Asians, as well – though they get a pass if they're a sexy exotic babe, or Asia-themed *coughkatanacough*.

But let's not dwell on that too much, we have more whites to raceswap into blacks.
>>
>>88225128
It's not projection anymore when you literally stated that I'd supposedly dislike this 50% less if she were 50% white. Sure, it's a "joke", but it's a Tumblr-level "joke" about me being a Trump-thumping raycest. At least be honest, will ya?

>She's an entirely new person.
Then why. Does she have. To be called. Barbara. Gordon.
>>
>>88225226
Aren't there some in Rouge One? That anons were complaining about anyway Hollywood is weird, they're willing to add or take away Asian characters based off of how China might react.
>>
>>88225019
>And Natasha Irons is Steel's niece, not his daughter.
Oops, yeah, she is. Another anon's comment in this thread confused me.
>>
>>88215257
eh cyborg needs to be black too. the whole tunguska thing. it works nicely for him.

batgirl is a police commissioner's daughter, I don't think it works so well
now if they started making Robin a little browner, being that he's a gypsy, that could work.
>>
>>88225328
Are there? Cool. I honestly haven't yet watched any trailers.
>>
>>88225346
Or they could, you know, start making Wonder Woman a little darker, seeing how she's supposed to be Mediterranean. But no, Lego WW is still pasty white while Babsgirl is brown.
>>
>>88225299
It's a "joke" that doesn't rely on you being racist, only really upset over the skin color change. Whether due to racism or because you feel the character has been horrifically misunderstood or whatever else.

>Then why. Does she have. To be called. Barbara. Gordon.
Anon, this is like having Earth-6 as an alternate Earth where Barbara Gordon is black(ish). That's as bad as this is and you're blowing it ridiculously out of proportion.
>>
>>88225417
Well there's this guy
>>
>>88225492
And this one
>>
>>88225492

fucking donnie yen HYPE

also the Raid guys were in Force Awakens for like a second.
>>
>>88225328
>That anons were complaining about anyway
That's /pol/ most likely.
No reason there can't be Asian-looking people in Star Wars. And they didn't make, like, Luke Skywalker Asian or anything stupid like that.
>>
>>88225206
Here's a writeup that talks about it:
http://www.cbr.com/comic-legends-when-did-superman-first-fly/

Apparently the comics were first but the artist fucked up. The radio had him more or less flying by virtue of not always talking about his jumping or showing him jumping (for instance by his third episode he's catching up with a moving train without having any mention of other jumps to change his direction or gain speed). The cartoon, as I understand it, is the first to spell out that it was exactly flight.
>>
>>88225557
>This guy I like makes me HYPE FOR THIS SHITTY MOVIE
Have some fucking standards, man.
>>
>>88225488
That would be kinda stupid too. But most Elseworlds are supposed to be specifically worlds where a lot of things are different. So it would at least be understandable from a narrative standpoint. Like zeppelins in alternate universes – a minor visual detail to denote that it's a reality differing from the "default" one.
>>
>>88225346
>eh cyborg needs to be black too. the whole tunguska thing. it works nicely for him.

I have no clue what you're talking about. Isn't tungsuka in russia?

>>88225018
>>88224539
China doesn't demand racial representation. You could sell white lead action movies all damm day to them. Putting in asians has a risk because of regional politics. Eg. Suicide Squad, Dr Strange, Kung fu Panda.

They actually DO like representation but randomly changing steve rogers to asian would be seen as idiotic, and they're not going to throw a fit just because there's no asians on the Avengers.
>>
>>88225492
>>88225537
Cool stuff. Not been very hype for Rogue One to be honest, but I think I'll check the trailers.
>>
>>88225714
Yeah, but they also don't like black people. Seriously, they edit out black actors from movie posters to make them sell better.
>>
>>88225793
>>88225714
Yeah they love white actors but not black ones for some reason
>>
File: after-earth-poster.jpg (124KB, 1088x299px) Image search: [Google]
after-earth-poster.jpg
124KB, 1088x299px
>>88225793
>they edit out black actors from movie posters to make them sell better.
Wasn't that bs tho?
>>
File: shecouldactuallydoit.jpg (94KB, 974x412px) Image search: [Google]
shecouldactuallydoit.jpg
94KB, 974x412px
>>88223930

I for am open to her mystery-solving tactics.
>>
>>88214257
Nigga, that hair ain't flowing. That shit's backing up out of the toilet.
>>
>>88213530
If they did ANYTHING the other way around, BLM would go berserk. White people must always feel constant shame and submit to all insults and criticism because some of our great, great, great, great grandfathers probably owned a slave or two.

Fuck you, grandpa Clayton. You should have gotten off of your lazy ass and picked your own damn cotton. Didn't you think, for a second, about how this would affect me?
>>
>>88213530
>inb4 ungrateful minorities piss and moan that this is just to appease them because if they REALLY wanted to be progressive they'd make characters colored in the actual movie universes and not just the silly Lego spin-offs.
>>
>>88225972
Will Smith is nu-black. He transcends racial divisions. He's the last great movie star.
>>
>>88225299
Idk. Why does the narsasistic asshole
in this movie have to be called Batman? That's just as different than this Batgirl. (who actually isn't even black)

It's its own adaptation. Characters are different. Conflicts are different. IIRC, this batman doesn't seem to give too much of a shit about The Joker. If personalities can change for an independent Lego movie, why does the only thing that bothers you guys have to be the skin of a few characters.
>>
>>88228546
I'm sorry, are you implying Batman isn't a narcissistic asshole?
The guy that has to put Bat- in front of everything he owns?
>>
File: Bitchescan'thangwiththestreets.jpg (274KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]
Bitchescan'thangwiththestreets.jpg
274KB, 640x360px
>>88213530
all's i'm saying is maybe if Barbara was black to begin with, she might've known the rules of the street and not opened up that door so quick and got shot like a punk asss
>>
>>88218788
how the fuck is selina black in year one-- it's set in the same universe as Dark Knight Returns. year one just has dick sucking lips and short hair.
>>
File: gordon.jpg (47KB, 625x756px) Image search: [Google]
gordon.jpg
47KB, 625x756px
>>88222743
i actually don't mind the look. lego gordon looks tanned and badass.
>>
>>88215921
it would have been racist for a white family to adopt a ghetto black crack baby
>>
>>88220605
>war on Christmas

Well, now we know you're drinking the Kool-Aid rather than using your goddamn mind
>>
>>88217285
do dindus actually buy comics
>>
>>88219570
black irish means they had fucking black hair not that they were spear chuckers
>>
>>88230576
I got news for you. The people bitching about the lack of diversity the loudest are *also* white. Guilty tripping white, but white.
>>
>>88214721
Because Gotham is filled with crime.
>>
Well, nice to see that 4chan is responding sensibly to movie adaptations as usual.

Seriously, you guys. Even if you don't like the idea of Black Gordons, this is one movie out of the literal dozens of Batman movies you still have available. It's not like you're, oh I don't know, getting Black Barbara Gordon constantly from every single possible news source for the next four years.
>>
>>88213530
She's going to be Bruce's love interest, right? Not that I'm complaining. If it's true they gotta make it right.
>>
>>88230534
They should of made them all black then, is the point
>>
>>88230658
>You can't criticize a bullshit corporate mess up in one movie because all other media didn't mess up that exact same way
That's not how it works

>>88228546
>Why does the narsasistic asshole
>in this movie have to be called Batman?
Because a parody is different than a raceswap. Are you intentionally being retarded?
>>
>constant SJW crusade for diversity and representation
>meanwhile not a single native american to be found anywhere
The best they got was people who were annoyed that Johnny Depp played Tonto, and even that was pretty mild.
>>
>>88213530
It's almost as if something that solely created by black creators isn't widely embraced by basement dwellers or normies alike
>>
>>88213729
>>88214721
Yet they still used a white Green Lantern for some reason
>>
>>88231852
>constant SJW crusade for diversity and representation

it's lego. pople wont give a damn.
>>
>>88225226
>katana
and then they just had her mowing lawns anyway
>>
>>88222758
>>88223697
Why would they go through all the trouble of introducing Cass?

People know Barbara Gordon. She's been in multiple cartoons, some dtv movies, a live action series, and a hollywood film. Cassandra Cain is a footnote in the history of the Batman.
>>
>>88225625
How do you know it's shitty if it's not even out yet?
>>
>>88217285
Some of the characters on this list haven't shown up in a comic in like, a decade. I mean, Empress? Seriously?
>>
>>88213880
>Make new characters
"Oh awesome, the new Lego Batman movie with all new original characters! I guess it's a bit of a shame no Robin, Alfred, Joker, Gordon, Catwoman, or well anyone except Lucius Fox. That's the price of diversity I guess"
>>
>>88234880
It's probably an old picture. Notice how there's nuCarol, but no Kamala
>>
>>88231852
They don't care about Native Americans, they don't care about Asians, they don't care about Polynesians.

They don't really care about black people either, it's more like a surefire way for them to virtue signal that they're not racist.

Bottom line is, they don't care about actual diversity or representation. It's white people virtue signaling to other white people.
>>
>>88218788
You know.... if it was OK for Harvey Dent to be black in the 89 movie, and it was OK for Catwoman to be black in the 66 TV show, why can't Batgirl be black in the LEGO Spin-off?
>>
>>88234518
Then make her not a footnote!

Carol Danvers was a footnote in Marvel's history, as was Luke Cage. But they pushed and pushed and pushed, and now one is getting a movie while the other has a popular TV show.

It's not impossible. And companies know it's not impossible. The only people who think it's impossible it's shills like you who love to defend every single bullshit corporate action those hacks do.
>>
>>88232889
This.

White Green Lantern (when you have like 3 minority ones who are well known), a white Flash, and a pasty white Wonder Woman too. No Renee Montoya, no Cass Cain, no Batwing even, and I don't think I see Ra's Al Ghul. Even Robin is white instead of half-Middle Eastern Damian.

But surely the only way to add "diversity" and "representation" was to raceswap Babs Gordon. Surely.
>>
>>88232865
Boondocks is great.
>>
File: IMG_1506.jpg (192KB, 761x563px)
IMG_1506.jpg
192KB, 761x563px
>>88213583
>>88213530
>complaining about the Gordons being black in a LEGO MOVIE
>>
>>88234910
Make new minority characters who take the mantles of Robin and Batgirl, since those are both legacy titles. Use established minority characters like Cass Cain, Batwing, Renee Montoya, Ra's Al Ghul, Katana, and one or both Green Lanterns. Boom, problem solved.
>>
>>88238172
Still wondering about this, people.
>>
>>88238172
The 66 TV show did everything "wrong" on purpose. It had a Joker with facepaint over a moustache, for fuck's sake. So no one batted an eye when Catwoman suddenly swapped races in the middle of the run. Stranger things happened in that show.

Burton's Harvey Dent wasn't even Two-Face. He was essentially just a secondary character who only shared the same name with a comic character.
>>
>>88222995
Damn right, this is an improvement if I've ever seen one
>>
>>88238443
>The 66 showdid everything wrong on purpose

But a fucking LEGO MOVIE SPINOFF needs to be a 100% accurate representation of the source material?

Admit it, the only difference between the two is one you grew up with and the other is new.
>>
>>88239936
No, because again, the 66 show's idea was "Batman is stupid, let's make it even sillier, who cares about Batman anyway lol, let's just have fun".
Lego's idea is more like "Batman is cool, let's make it more cartoony, fans love these cool characters so let's celebrate them in a new form"
>>
>>88240066
Let's back up a second.

Tell me again why Billy Dee Williams being Harvey Dent, with Burton intending to eventually make him Two Face, is acceptable, but Rosario Dawson Batgirl is not.
>>
>getting triggered over fucking legos

Do you people need a safespace or something
>>
File: 1380035335658.jpg (62KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
1380035335658.jpg
62KB, 1920x1080px
>>88225226
I liked how they handled her in Beware the Batman. The only "Asianess" of her comes from the sword and the fact that she infiltrated the League of Assassins once. She doesn't get a lame story involving senseis and samurai or shit like that.
>>
>>88238292
>No Renee Montoya

She's in the poster with a shitload of characters.
>>
>>88240221
Well for one, Batman 89 was a movie, and Burton supposedly cast the specific actors who fit his vision exactly. I can assume that's also the reason they chose Rosario Dawson to voice Batgirl. But there's no reason to change the design of the animated character, since her looks are independent from the actor.

An additional reason is that even if you consider "representation", Burton's movie was 99% white, and very few minority characters existed in Batbooks at the time to choose from. Both aren't the case now. Plus the movie featured very few major characters, so there wasn't really any room for peppering the cast with more minority characters – which isn't the case with the Lego movie and its ton of characters.
>>
>>88240513
I agree.

Then again, this was kind of Beware the Batman's whole idea: to pick somewhat obscure characters, and reinvent them pretty much "in name only". Sometimes it worked for the better, sometimes just meh.
>>
>>88217126
We need more hispanics. Japanese kingpin would be cool.

But blacks are the largest minoroty in usa, still Hispanics are expected to out do them in numbers even if trump puts up the wall or deports
>>
>>88238292
Blacks are the second largest movie goers in Usa. Most hispanics don't like the movies due to liberal agendas in it.

Only 4 characters are race swapped. Not a big deal compared to other movies.
>>
>>88240868
Hispanics already outdo blacks in numbers (at least, pre-Trump): they're at ~16% iirc, blacks are at 12%
>>
>>88240544
Hm, I probably missed her somehow
>>
File: ironrice.png (6KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]
ironrice.png
6KB, 250x250px
>>88234518

You know else was a foot note?

IRON MAN! The only reason the other batgirls don't get used is because Babs is Iconic but the only reason babs is iconic is because she's the only one they use.
>>
>>88213729
Could've had the half chinese Batgirl show up.
>>
File: 4HgSpk3[1].jpg (230KB, 598x792px)
4HgSpk3[1].jpg
230KB, 598x792px
>>88234518
>Cassandra Cain is a footnote


we live in a world where almost any person you see on the street knows who Goot is.
>>
I thought she's supposed to be hispanic. Black lego minigs are darker.
>>
>>88241433

seriously if Rocket Racoon can move merch then DC has no excuse for not trying to get the other batgirls more attention
>>
>>88241568
Well, they tried to do it with Katana... But oh well, DC being DC as usual.
>>
>>88215138
>The sexiest Robin
>Voiced by the ugliest dejawed monster glob of cum in existence

Dropped.
>>
>>88242193
Don't worry, I bet he'll also play him in a future Nightwing movie :^)
>>
>>88242359
You're making me cry, anon.

On the other hand, I think I can finally forgive Gordon-Levitt's insufferably idiotic "Robin" easter egg.
>>
>>88238374
Right, and no moviegoers would be sad to have a movie full of those side characters instead of Gordon or Alfred
>>
>>88244516
Why instead?
>>
>>88219322

You realize that you're ridiculous, right?
>>
>>88216148

Sorry, proof needed.
>>
>>88216810
>Because corporate suits told them to up their minority quota.

Sorry, proof needed.
>>
>>88234518
>Why would they go through all the trouble of introducing Cass?
What trouble? Have her show up, tap dance on a few thugs faces, maybe get into some Harpo Marx gags with Alfred, Babs or Bruce.
>>
>>88213686
James Gordon tells her that she's too small to be a cop, which is why she decided to become Batgirl.
>>
>>88213880
>Make new characters instead of changing the race of existing ones?

Maybe change the race of existing characters instead of making new ones?
>>
>>88234518
>>88234518
But this isnt babs, this is a black chick that shares the same name
>>
>>88215458
>The easily triggered crowd who protest at the drop of a hat is the opinion that matters.

No, your opinion doesn't matter, Anon.
>>
>>88247001
Such a creative decision.
>>
>>88247026
Why does this random black chick need to have the exact same name as a pre-established popular character?
>>
>>88247001
>Maybe change the race of existing characters instead of making new ones?
For what purpose?

Every change has a reason. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. What's the problem with a white Barbara Gordon?

If the problem is that there aren't many non-white characters – create them, and integrate them with the existing ones. Like Marvel and DC have already done multiple times, showing that it's not impossible.

Is there any other possible reason for a race change? Besides you wanting to blindly defend any stupid decision made by corporate dumbfucks, I mean?
>>
>>88246909
>>88246958
You know who are the worst guys, anon?
>>
>>88216612
>>Croc lives matter

WORD.
>>
>>88219893

Good thing this isn't that character.
>>
>>88247435
It is the character Barbara Gordon who is a white redheaded daughter of Commissioner Gordon and is one of the people who wore the mantle of Batgirl
>>
>>88225488
>this is like having Earth-6 as an alternate Earth where Barbara Gordon is black

Which of the 52 is Lego-Verse?
>>
>>88225062

You know that the reason all the characters are white in comics is due to racism, right? There weren't any decent non-racist caricature blacks, Asians, Hispanic, etc, characters because of racist attitudes. Blacks got to see minstrel-show rejects like Captain Marvel's "Steamboat", and Asians Yellow Peril stereotypes, even up to the 70s, in some instances.
>>
>>88227875

Wow. You are so triggered. Just think, America's getting browner, and you'll fall into the minority. I'm laughing at you, you beta bitch.
>>
>>88240550
>there's no reason to change the design of the animated character

Sure there is, to wipe away the stinking taint of racism.
>>
>>88247326

You.
>>
>>88247165

No one likes new characters.
>>
>>88247885
But the Yellow Claw was about an ABC fighting Not-Fu-Manchu-Because-We-Don't-Have-the-Rights-Yet.
>>
>>88247292
>For what purpose?

Not everyone is white, Anon.

>If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

What makes you think it isn't broke?

>What's the problem with a white Barbara Gordon?

What's the problem with a brown Barbara Gordon?
>>
>>88224539
>God, give Batwing a bigger role if you think it woud attract black demographics
Either way, this is how people want to be represented
And it's not like you're asking for different representation
Just less representation

>No, it proves that the company is dishonest.
Which is fine, but that's still not an argument against raceswapping

You're providing alternatives to race swapping, not reasons as to why it shouldn't happen

>>88224161
That's because the italian flag is just as iconic
iconism exists because people recognize things as things, meaning that if you can slightly change it and still have it represent the same thing, it's an iconic

>>88223983
>You didn't answer my question
Yes I did
The answer is "No" and then I justified it by positing the question about characters and writing

>But why did she have to be Barbara Gordon?
She didn't have to be Barbara Gordon, but she is

>Bonus point! If she did well in the movie, they could introduce her to comics, and have one more popular minority character
It's likely that if there are any resulting lego media, barbara gordon would also be black in the subsequent lego universes
It's literally the same result as your alternative

>So, not only is my way better for character consistency, it's better for representation too.
This is you in a previous post:
>I'm not exactly thin, and I couldn't care less for "representation".
You don't know what's best for representation

>What would you say if Trump changed it to, idk, orange and yellow?
As long as there are 50 stars and 13 stripes, it's an american flag
You could open up paint and change all the colors around and as long as those symbols stayed on the flag, you could recognize it as the American flag

>How can one be so ignorant
They aren't iconic
If you changed the colors, you wouldn't realize what it was
Which is the difference between something that is iconic and isn't
See my point about the American Flag

cont
>>
File: Ebony_White_01.jpg (14KB, 200x281px) Image search: [Google]
Ebony_White_01.jpg
14KB, 200x281px
>>88247885
Are you dense? Are you retarded or something?

Of course there was a lot of racism back in the Golden/Silver age. Do you think we don't know the likes of Ebony White or Chop Chop?

But you're very weirdly selective. You "forgot" to mention how these caricatures died out in the Bronze Age. How the first non-racist minority characters appeared during the Silver Age. How the Dark Age saw the advent of lots and lots of minority characters both as new characters and legacy ones, some created by minority authors.

Ironic how you end at "up to the 70s", when anons in this thread have been suggesting that DC should rather create new or legacy characters – a thing they've been doing since at least the 90s! Which was 20 years ago.

I don't know if you're an oldfag who still remembers the Oil Crisis, or just ignorant. But comics have had 20-30 years of steady development under their belt. Sure it's not perfect, there's still a lot to improve. We're not talking about "keeping comics all-white" or whatever /pol/ bullshit you're implying. We're talking about how to better include minority characters that would have the chance to be their own characters instead of palette swaps of whitey. Being supportive of minorities and social change doesn't mean blindly approving any bullshit that companies do.
>>
>>88214908
Alfred has to be classy and ebonics would ruin that
>>
>>88247524
It's a LEGO, dude. A talking Lego.
>>
>>88248182
People who read Ms.Marvel beg to differ.
>>
>>88248246

an afro doesn't fit into her costume
>>
>>88248246
>Not everyone is white, Anon.
A better solution to that problem is to create a new character.

>What makes you think it isn't broke?
What's broke with Babs Gordon?

>What's the problem with a brown Barbara Gordon?
That's not Barbara Gordon. That's a new character that for some reason uses an established character's name instead of creating an original identity.
>>
>>88223983
>Because I'm also a comic fan, and I don't like when my fave characters are messed up for bullshit corporate reasons
I'm also a comic fan, and I don't really care when my fave characters are messed up for bullshit corporate reasons
Let me remind you that "I don't like something" isn't an argument as to why something shouldn't exist

>Or are you saying that only black people can have an opinion on what they do with Barbara Gordon now?
I'm saying that because you 1. don't care about representation and 2. don't speak for all black people, you shouldn't have a say in what the best way to represent them is

>>88223848
>No they won't. Tumblr will make their usual noise but literally no one else gives a fuck.
I know I would.
I also know that there are a lot of people started watching the JLA cartoon because John Stewart was the main lantern.
I also know that there are a lot of people who didn't want the Green Lantern animated series simply because it wasn't the same Green Lantern they had grown up with.
But we both know that regardless of who they grew up with, both shows were more than decent, and changing the characters has nothing to do with the quality of a series
Nor would raceswapping

>>88223819
Old fans are leaving, new fans are staying, and comic companies still feel the need to introduce minority characters and raceswap different characters?
Despite the fact that it isn't working?
Let me preface my next point by saying, this is all under the assumption that what you are saying is true. Regardless of what I believe, this next part is purely a reaction to what you've said.

If raceswapping characters is driving old fans away and new fans aren't staying, then that means the industry actually cares about diversity and that raceswapping is the easiest way to introduce it. Maybe they aren't raceswapping all races, but it's only a matter of time before they do.

Also > >>88223669
>>88223697
>>
>>88248347
>Either way, this is how people want to be represented
[citation needed]
I'm sure minority people love Kamala Khan, Miles Morales or other original minority characters. You're being dishonest.

>And it's not like you're asking for different representation
>Just less representation
Stop putting words into my mouth. I literally never said that.

>iconism exists because people recognize things as things, meaning that if you can slightly change it and still have it represent the same thing, it's an iconic
If you change the middle stripe of the French flag from white to black, it won't be as iconic.
>>
>>88248538
>What's broke with Babs Gordon?

Not her back!
>>
>>88248347
>She didn't have to be Barbara Gordon
Exactly. But you didn't answer why you think she had to be Barbara Gordon and not e.g. Brandy Grant.

>It's literally the same result as your alternative
No, because comic Babs will still be white. If we do it my way, there's a chance for both Babs and a new black Batgirl to coexist in comics, meaning there'll be one more minority character around which (if they write her well) is always good.

>You don't know what's best for representation
I said I don't personally care if I'm represented myself or not. I don't see how it means I don't know how it can be done.

>You could open up paint and change all the colors around and as long as those symbols stayed on the flag, you could recognize it as the American flag
>If you changed the colors, you wouldn't realize what it was
It's not a puzzle game. I could probably recognize Superman if he were a naked purple blob with a red cape. Doesn't mean they should make him that.
>>
>>88248470
So comics and cartoons are okay to discuss, but Legos are where you, Mr.Mature Adult, draw the line?
>>
>>88248538
>A better solution to that problem is to create a new character.

Nobody likes new characters. Most new characters fall into complete obscurity, even if they manage to get a cult following. I'm like, the only person I know of who likes Original Star-Lord. Can't stand the modern re-hash.That's not Peter Quill.
>>
>>88248421
>Are you dense? Are you retarded or something?

Disregarded automatically.
>>
>>88248601
>[citation needed]
The citation is that no large swaths of black people are sending in complaints

>I'm sure minority people love Kamala Khan, Miles Morales or other original minority characters
The existence of one doesn't disprove the other
People can like both

>Stop putting words into my mouth. I literally never said that.
You don't want the representation for minority groups to be race swapping and you're not asking for more representation, just different representation
That's less representation because instead of both (which exist), you just want one

>If you change the middle stripe of the French flag from white to black, it won't be as iconic.
1. Then that means the french flag isn't iconic or that the colors are the only thing that makes it iconic
2. The batgirl costume isn't any less iconic if you decide to change the purples to blues or the blacks to whites
You can still recognize Spider-man's costume, even if he has a symbiote attached, even if it's 100 years in the future and the colors are reversed and he has a cape, etc etc
The things that make Spider-man's costume iconic is 1. the spider insignia, 2. the eye shapes on the mask
I'm too lazy to do it, but if I had made a screenshot of this episode of Spectacular Spider-man at 21:38, people would still be able to tell it's related to spiderman because of the things that make spider-man iconic
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xs18el_the-spectacular-spider-man-survival-of-the-fittest-episode-1_shortfilms
>>
>>88248543
>I'm also a comic fan, and I don't really care when my fave characters are messed up for bullshit corporate reasons
Who gives a fuck

>Let me remind you that "I don't like something" isn't an argument as to why something shouldn't exist
I never used that as my argument. Again, stop strawmanning and misrepresenting my points, k?

>don't speak for all black people
No one speaks for all black people.

>you shouldn't have a say in what the best way to represent them is
Who's gonna stop me?

>I also know that there are a lot of people started watching the JLA cartoon because John Stewart was the main lantern.
Oh so you don't want them to create new characters... but you liked when they did exactly that? Huh, interesting.
>>
>>88248899
No argument as expected, I see.
>>
>>88248883
>Nobody likes new characters.
That's just not true.

People love new characters if they're a) connected to a pre-existing popular character or name b) written decently
>>
>>88248772
>But you didn't answer why you think she had to be Barbara Gordon
I don't think she has to be anything
She just is
This isn't about whether or not I think something should exist nor is that my argument

>because comic Babs will still be white
Nobody wants to change comic babs to black.
They are two separate universes and can stay that way.
This isn't a batman movie, it's a lego batman movie, so there can be a lego batman comic that follows the lego batman movie and you'll still have your white babs and people will still have their black lego babs

>I don't see how it means I don't know how it can be done
And I said you don't speak for the black people, so your opinion on how they should be represented is meaningless
Just because something can be done, doesn't mean it should be done
Which was literally your next point

>Doesn't mean they should make him that.
But if the narrative of the story fit that, and the story was good, then it would make sense for them to do that
>>
>>88248805

Wow, way to miss the point, Anon.
>>
All this thread proves that "representation" is just another buzzword that future creators are best left to ignore. You want to add whatever race you want in your story? Well here's a problem. If you DON'T mention it, the SJWs will come after you. If you DO mention it, the pollacks will come after you. It's a "You can't win" scenario, and any attempt to try will just lread to bad publicity that makes YOU look like the bad guy no matter what.
>>
>>88248966
>Who gives a fuck
Exactly my point
Why would a comic fan's own personal experience mean anything
So why would>>88223983 say "Because I'm also a comic fan" as a part of his argument

>I never used that as my argument.
I never said you did, I was just reminding you in case you forgot

>No one speaks for all black people.
True

>Who's gonna stop me?
Nobody is going to stop you because nobody is going to care
You have no power to change anything, all you're doing is complaining about something online
So nobody can stop you from doing absolutely nothing
Nobody can stop you from only voicing your opinions

>Oh so you don't want them to create new characters... but you liked when they did exactly that? Huh, interesting.
I didn't say that
I said that it really doesn't matter whether or not they create new characters or they change the race of old characters
The result is the same
>>
>>88249054

Most new characters disappear, only to be brought back years later, get ruined, and then killed.

>>88248471

Okay, that's...one...character.
>>
>>88248538
>That's a new character that for some reason uses an established character's name instead of creating an original identity.

The character doesn't do anything, Anon.
>>
>>88248917
>The citation is that no large swaths of black people are sending in complaints
About what? About not enough black characters, I assume. Not about "not enough raceswapping" specifically

>The existence of one doesn't disprove the other
>People can like both
I don't give a shit. People liked Liefeld.

>That's less representation because instead of both (which exist), you just want one
Are you literally stupid? I want the same amount of minority rep to exist, just by different means. Wtf

>1. Then that means the french flag isn't iconic
But it is. It's one of the most iconic flags.

>or that the colors are the only thing that makes it iconic
So?

>2. The batgirl costume isn't any less iconic if you decide to change the purples to blues or the blacks to whites
The difference is, a superhero can technically redesign their costume a bit, just like a person in real life can change their style. Such costume changes in superhero comics usually signify a change in the character – a different story arc, a change in personality or methods. If you were a true cape fan you'd know it.
>>
>>88249146
I'd much rather piss the pollacks off
>>
>>88249106
>She just is
It's not a natural phenomenon or act of God. It's a decision by someone hired by DC. We're discussing that decision. Clear enough?

>Nobody wants to change comic babs to black.
Did you not understand my post?
My whole point is, if you introduce a new character, that means that character can then join Babs in the comics and coexist with her there. Meaning, we get more minority charas in comics.

>And I said you don't speak for the black people, so your opinion on how they should be represented is meaningless
Nope, because I'm talking about representation in general. Stop trying to shut me up because you lack arguments.

>But if the narrative of the story fit that
How does the narrative necessitate a raceswap?
>>
>>88249352

Why specifically them? You don't seriously think THEY're a bigger threat than SJWs? Theyr'e just as bad as they are, no more, no less. The only reason you think /pol/ is worse is because you're in 4chan, and SJWs are on Tumblr/Twitter/etc. You'd be singing a different tune if they were more openly posting here like in Tumblr, whereas here, they have to be more subtle.
>>
>>88249146
>pollacks
Go back to tumblr.
I'm in favor of creating new or legacy minority characters. I just don't like raceswapping and other arbitrary changes to existing characters. But of course, I'm a bad evil "pollack" now, sure
>>
>>88249320
>Not about "not enough raceswapping" specifically
So obviously raceswapping is okay representation

>People liked Liefeld
And I didn't like Friends, Gilmore Girls, or the Jersey Shore
That doesn't mean things shouldn't exist just because I don't like them

>I want the same amount of minority rep to exist
I never said you didn't. I just said that you only want one kind of representation to exist, which means less representation.
Not that you don't want the representation to exist, just that the representation that does exist is what it is and taking away raceswapping is just less representation.
Yes, it's completely possible to introduce new minority characters. That just isn't what happened in this scenario.

>It's one of the most iconic flags.
Which is fine and I agree with, I was just presenting an ultimatum
>So?
So that means just because something is iconic doesn't mean that everything about it is iconic. The things that make it iconic cannot be changed and the things that don't make it iconic can be changed.
Barbara Gordon isn't iconic because she's white. Nothing about her being white has to do with her being Batgirl, being a character in the story, or being popular.
Meaning that you can easily change those things and still have it be Barbara Gordon
Unlike the french flag, whose iconism relies on it's colors and in some cases the order of it's colors

>The difference is, a superhero can technically redesign their costume a bit, just like a person in real life can change their style.
The line you quoted isn't in disagreement or refutation with your points.
You're right in that sometimes when a costume changes, something else changes along with it
And that doesn't mean that the character stops being that character
But all of those points don't actually prove that raceswapping is bad or hurtful
>>
>>88249184
>You have no power to change anything, all you're doing is complaining about something online
So is everyone.

>The result is the same
No. Creating new characters means one more original character exists. Raceswapping means messing up an existing one, and not creating an original minority identity.
>>
>>88249253
The same thing happens to old characters as well, unless they either have a fan following (which a new character can also get), or a fanboy in editorial.
>>
>>88249438
>It's not a natural phenomenon or act of God
To a comic book character, it would be

>We're discussing that decision
Right, but the reason behind that decision has nothing to do with how we feel about it.

>My whole point is, if you introduce a new character, that means that character can then join Babs in the comics and coexist with her there
And if we change babs' race AS WELL AS introducing new minority characters, then we have even more minority characters.
You're not arguing against raceswapping

>Nope, because I'm talking about representation in general
How one group is okay with being represented is different from another.
You can't talk about this stuff in general because it's different for every group.
And if you don't belong to a group, and if you do not represent a group, then it really doesn't matter what you think about how a group should be represented.
And my argument is: People are okay with a raceswap being how they are represented
I'm using the fact that it happened and the people that are being represented by this raceswap do not have a problem with being represented in this way

>How does the narrative necessitate a raceswap?
Not all changes are necessary. But just because something isn't necessary doesn't mean it shouldn't exist.
>>
>>88249621
>So is everyone.
Which is fine

>No.
Yes.
Introducing a new minority character that gets focus is essentially the same thing as writing a new story with a previously used character being different enough to where people can say "you messed that character up".
The fact that a character exists is meaningless if that character doesn't get any "screen-time" or focus in the story, because it wouldn't really be representation unless that happened.
>>
>>88249661
New characters usually aren't given enough time to get a fan following.
>>
>>88249585
>So obviously raceswapping is okay representation
I don't get your logic.

>That doesn't mean things shouldn't exist just because I don't like them
That means we're able to criticize those things. And sometimes, those things can improve (not always of course). Liefeld was free to publish whatever x-treme shit he wanted. I'm free to criticize it and tell why it's shit.

>Not that you don't want the representation to exist, just that the representation that does exist is what it is and taking away raceswapping is just less representation.
Are you really stupid? I don't suggest taking away raceswapping and doing nothing instead. I suggest taking away raceswapping and creating new or legacy characters instead. Which means, roughly the same amount of rep. Think about it for a minute.

>Meaning that you can easily change those things and still have it be Barbara Gordon
No.
Barbara Gordon is a fictional person. A person is a unique individual. With their looks, background, race. Can you imagine an "Asian Barack Obama"? You can probably imagine someone similar, with similar political views, mannerisms etc. But it'd be someone similar, not Barack Obama.

Barbara Gordon as an individual happens to be white. Don't try to switch her with a very close simile who happens to be black. Instead create a different individual who is black, and has a different story and personality. It'd be much more interesting, too.
>>
>>88249515
>Why specifically them?

Not that Anon, but...because they're pasty subhuman Morlocks. Their lives mean nothing unless they're angry about something, and it amuses the rest of us to watch them froth. It's a symbiotic relationship.
>>
>>88249715
>To a comic book character, it would be
We're not comic characters. We're discussing it. Stop evading the topic.

>Right, but the reason behind that decision has nothing to do with how we feel about it.
Doesn't mean we can't criticize it.

>And if we change babs' race AS WELL AS introducing new minority characters, then we have even more minority characters.
I thought the problem is that there are not enough minority characters, and introducing 1 would solve the problem. Now you've moved the goalposts to where 1 isn't enough and we need 2.
You understand you're not arguing for raceswapping either? If we move the goalposts to where we need 2 characters instead of 1, okay, let's introduce 2 minority characters then. It's still bettern than raceswapping, for the reasons I've already stated.

>People are okay with a raceswap being how they are represented
I don't give a fuck.
Maybe they're okay with Superman raping Batgirl in the ear and beheading her, and that's their favorite way of being represented somehow. Idgaf.

>it happened and the people that are being represented by this raceswap do not have a problem
I do have a problem though, with the character being messed up when they didn't have to be.

>But just because something isn't necessary doesn't mean it shouldn't exist.
It means that if there are arguments against it, then maybe it shouldn't exist at all. And no, in this case, "some people like it" is not an argument that would defend it.
>>
>>88249779
>Introducing a new minority character that gets focus is essentially the same thing as writing a new story with a previously used character being different enough to where people can say "you messed that character up".
That doesn't make any sense. An existing character is an existing character, a new character is a new character.
>>
>>88249888
>I don't get your logic.
If the people who are being represented are not complaining about how they are being represented, then they are fine with how they are being represented
meaning if people are okay with their minority representation being a raceswapped character, then it's a decent way to represent those people

>That means we're able to criticize those things
And again, it still doesn't mean that our opinions about those things matter towards whether or not they should exist
You can not like the raceswap, but whether or not it's good representation isn't really up to you

>Which means, roughly the same amount of rep.
You obviously didn't get what I was saying.
But that doesn't really matter because here's something else to think about:
Why not raceswap characters AND introduce new original minority characters if the goal is to have a lot more representation at once?

>Barbara Gordon is a fictional person
Which means her existence is whatever the author of her existence wants it to be
Which means that Barbara Gordon could be taller than Bruce Wayne, Blonde, or even black if the person creating the media wanted it to be
And even if you maintain that it's not Barbara Gordon, isn't that even better?
You get to keep your white Barbara Gordon and another Barbara Gordon can exist.
How is that not the same as creating a new character if people regard the character as separate?

>Barbara Gordon as an individual happens to be white
And in the lego movie, she happens to be black

>Don't try to switch her with a very close simile who happens to be black
There is no trying to switch anything, Barbara Gordon is black in the new Lego movie sequel
But if you see this Barbara Gordon as a not Barbara Gordon simile who is distinct from the actual Barbara Gordon, that's fine too
>>
>>88249888
>Barbara Gordon as an individual happens to be white.

Not Lego Universe Barbara Gordon. She brown.
>>
>>88250158
Then she has no reason to be called Barbara Gordon.
>>
>>88250096
>We're not comic characters. We're discussing it. Stop evading the topic.
That was just a joke
How am I evading the topic if I digress for a bit and then get back on topic?

>Doesn't mean we can't criticize it.
And that doesn't mean your criticisms have any regard on whether it should or shouldn't exist

>I thought the problem is that there are not enough minority characters, and introducing 1 would solve the problem
Please quote me by copying and pasting what I said instead of putting words into my mouth

>Now you've moved the goalposts
Even if I had moved the goal posts and made that the main concern, raceswapping would already be a solution to the problem. The only problem there is is that you don't personally like raceswapping.

>I don't give a fuck.
If you don't care, why are you arguing for one or the other?

>I do have a problem though, with the character being messed up when they didn't have to be.
The characters aren't getting messed up though
the role that the character plays in the story wouldn't change whether she was black or white, so how is that messing up the character?

>It means that if there are arguments against it
But there are also arguments for that thing

>then maybe it shouldn't exist at all
That is the argument we are having right now
You hold the opinion that it shouldn't exist
I hold the opinion that it's fine if it does
>>
>>88250126
>An existing character is an existing character, a new character is a new character.
But when it comes to representation, the thing we are actually discussing, it doesn't matter whether or not the character is original
The fact that there is a new, different character who happens to be black isn't any more or less representation than and old character who is now black
That is what I mean by it is essentially the same.
>>
>>88250344
But that's her name
>>
>>88250133
>then it's a decent way to represent those people
No, because there might be other reasons for/against it than the opinion of some random assholes who happen to belong to the same minority group.

>And again, it still doesn't mean that our opinions about those things matter towards whether or not they should exist
They don't have any direct influence because we're not DC editorial members.

>whether or not it's good representation isn't really up to you
I don't care if it's "good representation", I think it's bad treatment of the character's legacy.

>Why not raceswap characters AND introduce new original minority characters if the goal is to have a lot more representation at once?
Because raceswapping is a bad choice for reasons already explained. If there's a rep problem that means we need 2 minority characters, then it's best to introduce 2 new ones. If there's a rep problem that means we need 5 minority characters, then it's best to introduce 5 new ones. That's it.

>Which means that Barbara Gordon could be taller than Bruce Wayne, Blonde, or even black if the person creating the media wanted it to be
That's called "in name only", and it's honestly a rather bad way to go about managing iconic characters.

>How is that not the same as creating a new character if people regard the character as separate?
Because a different character means a different personality, story, and yes, name. A simple palette swap is different, but not original enough to be a good creative choice.

>And in the lego movie, she happens to be black
It's not "her" then. How can one person switch races?

>if you see this Barbara Gordon as a not Barbara Gordon simile who is distinct from the actual Barbara Gordon, that's fine too
So she's essentially a new character, but instead of exploring her original identity, has to wear Barbara Gordon's name, for strictly corporate marketing reasons? That's not something that should be defended
>>
>>88250436
>Please quote me by copying and pasting what I said instead of putting words into my mouth
It's an anon imageboard, I can't be sure which posts are yours. But in any case, we are talking about an instance where 1 character (Babs Gordon) is raceswapped to introduce 1 minority character. I provided a different solution for that: not do raceswapping, and instead introduce 1 new minority character.
Now you moved the goalposts and said what if we both make 1 new character, and raceswap 1 more, which makes 2. My solution is still the same: introduce 2 new characters then.

>The only problem there is is that you don't personally like raceswapping.
Digressing, moving the goalposts, and then pretending you forgot anything you read in my posts isn't a valid way of debating.

>why are you arguing for one or the other?
Because my reasons have nothing to do with what some other assholes on the internet think.

>the role that the character plays in the story wouldn't change whether she was black or white, so how is that messing up the character?
She's not an object, she doesn't merely play some utilitarian role. She's an individual, with multiple aspects to her character.

>But there are also arguments for that thing
Which are? "Why not" and "some people don't mind it" aren't arguments for it, btw.
>>
>>88250513
That name was given to her by DC. I'm saying that there's no reason for a different person to have the same identity as another existing person.
>>
>>88250645
>because there might be other reasons for/against
And if those reasons mattered to the people who were being represented, then there would be a problem
But there isn't a problem, because whatever reasons there are don't lie in how they should be represented

>They don't have any direct influence because we're not DC editorial members.
Which is fine

>I don't care if it's "good representation"
So why are you arguing about representation

>If there's a rep problem that means we need 2 minority characters, then it's best to introduce 2 new ones
But as far as representation goes, 2 black characters are 2 black characters, regardless of whether they are old or new
Whether or not it's best isn't up to someone who doesn't care about "good representation"

>"in name only", and it's honestly a rather bad way
And you're allowed to have your opinion
But that doesn't mean your opinions are facts

>Because a different character means a different personality, story, and yes, name
Obviously not in this case

>It's not "her" then
If it's not "her", then you shouldn't have a problem with it

>So she's essentially a new character, but instead of exploring her original identity, has to wear Barbara Gordon's name, for strictly corporate marketing reasons?
Her identity is no more original than the reboots over the years of barbara gordon.
If she's barbara gordon strictly for corporate marketing reasons, that doesn't mean she's somehow not Barbara Gordon
>>
>>88250480
Okay, fine, ignore any points I made if it helps you sleep at night. I'm too lazy to reiterate them again for your ADHD ass
>>
>>88250916
>That name was given to her by DC
Yes, that is literally how comic book characters created by DC work

> I'm saying that there's no reason for a different person to have the same identity as another existing person
The reason is because it's easy
If you want to criticize it's quality, then wait for the movie to come out
>>
>>88250891
>She's not an object, she doesn't merely play some utilitarian role. She's an individual, with multiple aspects to her character.

Holy crap, Anon.
>>
>>88250966
I'd would pay attention to your points if you made any valid ones
Your argument is summarized by your own personal opinion, that you don't like it
That's it

Whether or not a character is new is not any more or less representation
>>
>>88250916
>there's no reason for a different person to have the same identity as another existing person.

Obviously wrong.
>>
>>88250944
>And if those reasons mattered to the people who were being represented, then there would be a problem
Who the fuck cares if they matter to them or not? Are they god kings of comics or what?

>But there isn't a problem, because whatever reasons there are don't lie in how they should be represented
That literally makes zero sense. Creative decisions can have problems that aren't representation-related, you know that right? And these problems can be discussed and criticized, you know that, right?

>But as far as representation goes, 2 black characters are 2 black characters, regardless of whether they are old or new
Yes.
Only one way doesn't mess up an established character's legacy, and also creates a full-fledged original minority character rather than a variation.

>But that doesn't mean your opinions are facts
Welcome to art criticism 101, motherfucker. Enjoy your stay.

>Obviously not in this case
No, it's still valid, in this case or all the others. DC just decided to disregard it for what ever reason.

>If it's not "her", then you shouldn't have a problem with it
My problem is that this different character has to assume a preexisting identity instead of having an original one of her own.

>Her identity is no more original than the reboots over the years of barbara gordon.
You seem to not understand what a "reboot" means.
>>
>>88251026
If you want to keep ignoring my points, you don't have to make new posts about it. I get it, you don't want to acknowledge them. Whateve works for you.
>>
>>88250978
>The reason is because it's easy
That doesn't mean it's a good decision and we shouldn't criticize it.
>If you want to criticize it's quality, then wait for the movie to come out
I'm not criticizing the quality of her dialogue or characterization. That would obviously have to wait until the movie comes out.

>>88251034
Explain why then
>>
I draw stuff, and I wouldn't want someone on the internet to force me to swap their race or appearance. That's how I created them
>>
>>88251232
>That doesn't mean it's a good decision and we shouldn't criticize it
nor does it mean it's a bad decision and that we should
>>
>>88251518
>nor does it mean it's a bad decision
Of course not. It's bad for other reasons.
>>
>>88251181
>If you want to keep ignoring my points
Like I said, if you had any valid ones, I would address them
>>
>>88251656
Yeah, I got it, I got it. Whatever floats your boat, buddy. Why are you still here?
>>
>>88251136
>Are they god kings of comics or what?
No, but the creators of the comics and comic related media are more than okay with raceswapping

>Creative decisions can have problems that aren't representation-related
Sure, but if the problems you were concerned about didn't have to do with race and representation, why would making her white fix your problem?

> And these problems can be discussed and criticized
If the problem itself wasn't about diversity, or rather diversity, in >>88213880 and why reply to chain of replies about diversity?

>Only one way doesn't mess up an established character's legacy
If there was another movie in which either white barbara gordon appeared or a character that filled the role of her appeared, the legacy hasn't been "messed up"

>also creates a full-fledged original minority character
That's fine, but raceswapping accomplishes the same task

>Welcome to art criticism 101
So don't regard your opinions as facts
Such as in your next point

>No, it's still valid, in this case or all the others
If your point is that it's just your opinion, it doesn't actually matter because whatever DC says is canon is canon, and your opinion isn't evidence to anything
Your opinion has nothing to do with the facts
And the fact is, Barbara Gordon is black in the Lego Universe

>My problem is that this different character has to assume a preexisting identity
Right, your problem
The raceswapping doesn't have a problem, you have a problem with the raceswap

>You seem to not understand what a "reboot" means.
Hope Larson's Batgirl is a wildly different batgirl than the incarnations that have appeared before, in terms of personality, but that's still Barbara Gordon
This black Barbara Gordon is still Barbara Gordon
The Barbara Gordon that in Batman Beyond was old with gray hair and was solidly against the newest Batman, but that was Barbara Gordon

Every time an old character appears in a new work, it's still that character
This time is no different
>>
>>88251709
>Why are you still here?
If you're too lazy to reiterate your points, then why aren't you too lazy to just leave?
>>
>>88251613
Those aren't reasons, those are just opinions though.
>>
>>88252156
>No, but the creators of the comics and comic related media are more than okay with raceswapping
Doesn't mean it's good

>why would making her white fix your problem?
Are you dyslexic or reading-impaired?

>in >>88213880
That's not even my post

>If there was another movie in which either white barbara gordon appeared or a character that filled the role of her appeared, the legacy hasn't been "messed up"
In that movie, it wouldn't be.

>That's fine, but raceswapping accomplishes the same task
No. Raceswapping doesn't create an original minority character.

>So don't regard your opinions as facts
There are no "facts" when talking about creative stuff (besides, like, who created which character etc).

>whatever DC says is canon is canon
Doesn't mean their decision can't be criticized

>your opinion isn't evidence to anything
Wtf. What the actual fuck. Opinion? Evidence? How can an opinion be evidence? Wtf???

>And the fact is, Barbara Gordon is black in the Lego Universe
Um, duh. And that fact represents a certain decision by DC. A decision that is criticized in this thread. No one is claiming it's not a fact and some sort of fake news. Of course DC made her black. We're criticizing the creative integrity of such a decision.

>The raceswapping doesn't have a problem, you have a problem with the raceswap
The raceswapping doesn't not have a problem, it's just you who is vehemently defending it. See, it works both way.

>The Barbara Gordon that in Batman Beyond was old with gray hair
Holy shit. Do you know that when people grow old, their hair can go grey and their personality may change somewhat? Holy. Shit.
>>
>>88252225
That's how art crtiticism works, kiddo. When a critic argues that a work is bad, it's never based on some sort of scientifically provable objective fact. It's not math.
>>
>>88252450
>Doesn't mean it's good
Doesn't mean it's bad

>Are you dyslexic or reading-impaired?
If she was white, you wouldn't have a problem with her
But she's not white

>That's not even my post
You're still replying to someone who is in an argument about diversity and representation

>In that movie, it wouldn't be.
So if the legacy as a whole isn't messed up, then raceswapping the character is fine

>Raceswapping doesn't create an original minority character.
But the reason barbara got raceswapped wasn't so that there could be an original minority character

>There are no "facts" when talking about creative stuff
>We're criticizing the creative integrity of such a decision
Pick one.
Either you have legitimate arguments as to the existence of integrity in this film or it's just your opinion that this film has no integrity

>Doesn't mean their decision can't be criticized
Doesn't mean that it should be either

>How can an opinion be evidence?
It can't
You don't actually have an argument because you don't have any evidence

>The raceswapping doesn't not have a problem
If it had a problem that wasn't just you having a specific negative opinion about it, then why weren't we discussing that?

>Do you know that when people grow old...
My point was that nobody criticized the fact that they had Barbara appear in this instead of a new original character that had an original backstory that they could have explored
>>
>>88252522
>it's never based on some sort of scientifically provable objective fact
But there's usually a context that helps provide reasons for people to agree with his opinion
You're just saying it's bad and the reason it's bad is because you don't like it
Thread posts: 536
Thread images: 59


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoin at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Posts and uploaded images are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that website. If you need information about a Poster - contact 4chan. This project is not affiliated in any way with 4chan.