What did /co/ think of this?

>>88196255
I liked it back then and saw it like 10 times.
Looking back now it's kinda meh.

It wasn't the worst thing ever.

>>88196255
I saw it once in theaters and had a good time
Never felt like rewatching it

File: 20f0f2b648589aacb4a1d4490ae43bd5.jpg (109KB, 713x932px)

109KB, 713x932px

>>88196255
i watched it on dvd. it was pretty gud as my first exposure to the simpsons

also
>that disney comic cover parodying the movie at the time

This thing could have been epic if Fox hadn't mutilated the thing to appeal to casual moviegoers.

>>88196255
it didn't feel like a movie, it just felt like a too-long episode

it had a couple of good jokes but a lot more that fell flat, the animation itself wasn't particularly good and the story barely made any sense

>>88196497
Funny how the parody looks less soulless than the original.

File: ss+(2016-12-05+at+05.43.43).jpg (162KB, 1915x796px)

162KB, 1915x796px

>>88196255
It was okay.

>>88196760
So, why was this ok but showing Lisa's coin slot would be worse than Hitler.

Not as good as the show in it's prime but when it came out it was better than the show had been for more than five years.

File: 810c48632365d51cc320ec4ebcceb2df.jpg (13KB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 320x240px

>>88196822
They showed that in the first episode

it was alright, but the spiderpig shit was awful, especially in every fucking commercial

>>88196579
What are you talking about? That pic looks less rendered than the original. It looks off.

>>88196255
It's fine

>>88196255
Did not age well.
I'd probably watch it again if there's nothing else to do.

>>88196865
>anatomically incorrect crotch
Dude...

>>88196822
because of you
you in particular

>>88197133
She's wearing a body stocking, but the Korean animators fucked up and forgot to color it in.

>>88196822
Here's a question: has anyone ever animated a pussy? The Simpsons made a huge deal about showing a dick in their movie, but I can't imagine them even showing Maggie's pussy, certainly not Marge or Lisa's. Anime has more wangs than San Francisco bathhouse, but the Japs are openly afraid of pussies. I'm not trying to be shocking or start a debate, I'm just curious if it's ever even happened. Pics aren't necessary.

>>88197437
Japan has some weird, nonsensical censorship laws left over from after WWII.

Christfags hate seeing the nude human body. It makes them lust. And that's awful.

It's this universally accepted belief that nudity and sexuality is "indecent" that has created the problems we're dealing with today, with instances such as conservatives on twitter and Tumblr believing that a woman doing a spider pose is immature and sexist.

File: homah.png (1MB, 1812x1200px)

1MB, 1812x1200px

homar get ipad

>>88197437
Bojack Horseman had like 7 little girl pussies on screen.

It made sense in context.

I dunno, why can't we have nude men too? Probably because a lot of men get really fucking uncomfortable about it.

>>88197604
They'll start jacking off to the female cartoon characters to the point were they shun real females.

The moral guardians are trying to prevent America from turning into a Western Japan that's full of otaku. Those in control of the media are trying to save Western animation by keeping it from going the way of anime, where they have to pander to otaku to make a living.

They're not villains who hate the female body, they're heroes that are trying to preserve the integrity of Western animation.

well not even Lisa's butt its in the show at least Marge its on 25x9

>>88197702
Actually, no. Anime is rather a different stroke of prudish in certain genres.
The insane otaku manchildren dictate what is appropriate for a character.
They have an insane purity standard far worse than what America enforces in that waifufagging dictates how harem characters may or may not act and what kind of characters there can be, personality-wise.

>>88197728
>They have an insane purity standard far worse than what America enforces in that waifufagging dictates how harem characters may or may not act and what kind of characters there can be, personality-wise.
I think that's just pandering.

>>88197646
the fuck kind of question is that? there's plenty of cartoon nudity around.

People just don't want their children jerking off to Saturday Morning cartoons and if you can't understand that I feel very sorry for you.

>>88197728
>The insane otaku manchildren dictate what is appropriate for a character.
>They have an insane purity standard far worse than what America enforces in that waifufagging dictates how harem characters may or may not act and what kind of characters there can be, personality-wise.

You mean when otaku flip their shit when it's even hinted that their waifu may not be pure, but have no problem reading a doujin where said waifu gets split in half by huge demon cock and are destined to spend the rest of eternity drinking demon semen?

That shit never made sense to me.

>>88197750
>People just don't want their children jerking off to Saturday Morning cartoons and if you can't understand that I feel very sorry for you.
Have you seen the movie adaptations of Astrid Lindgren books?
I remember a scene featuring naked men in the snow.

>>88197792
Pippi Longstocking?

Look at yourselves. You're a bunch of unemployed manchildren complaining on an autistic anime-themed website about how there isn't enough nudity in children's cartoons for you to jerk off to, thinking that you're better than all the evil "prudes" out there who've been brainwashed by evil society and religion. You're going on about the most unimportant, irrelevant, autistic bullshit imaginable and acting like it's some deep-rooted evil in modern society. Do you have any idea how retarded this is?

And you have this same thread pretty much every fucking day.

>>88197437
I mean, if you're cool with them appearing in people's hands or on their foreheads, End of Evangelion has vaginas in multiple places, but that's the only one I can think of and its not American cartoons.

>>88197858
>there isn't enough nudity in children's cartoons for you to jerk off to
Nah, there's enough porn for all of us.
I just think nudity shouldn't be a taboo. It's not in Europe.
>And you have this same thread pretty much every fucking day.
Really? I didn't notice.

what i think is weird is it's specifically female stuff
>Bart moons people
ok
>Bart flashes wang in movie
ok

>Lisa moons somebody

Is like showing video of baby seals being clubbed to death in Canada.

>>88197914
But girls are delicate flowers and boys are idiot retards!

Like how many dozens of times was Calvin naked but Susie was shown in a swimsuit like once in C&H's entire run.

oh man. it's 10 years old next year.

damn.

>>88197987
>>88197914
tbf it would be kind of OOC for either Lisa or Susie Derkins to moon people

>>88197914
girls are more easily raped and must be "protected", this is the reason.

Only man butts and little boy penises are ok in cartoons because cartoonists are disgusting perverts.

It was okay. The movie is probably the best Zombie Simpsons is capable of now: not really good, but it has its moments.

The best part was Marge trying to rationalize why she has stuck with Homer, despite his jerkass attitude, and... breaks out of character and admits defeat.

>Marge: Lately. what's keeping us together is my ability to overlook everything you do. And I overlook these things because.... Well. that's the thing. I just don't know how to finish that sentence anymore.

>>88198089
Though they made some really odd decisions, like actually using Schwarzenegger instead of long-established Arnie parody McBain.

Or having Albert Brooks come back, but not as Hank Scorpio, but playing a character who is basically Hank Scorpio.

>>88198121
Julie Kavner's delivery was p. great here, in fact the movie had one of her best performances ever.

>>88198135

>>88196504
Fox fucked the whole thing up to appeal to people who weren't Simpsons fans. Their excuse was that casuals wouldn't know who Rainier Wolfcastle was or Hank Scorpio.

The writers also intended for Milhouse to get his groove on with Lisa, but the Fox suits also nixed that and forced the inane Colin shit on the movie because they thought it was cute and marketable to chicks.

File: CIA.jpg (79KB, 716x768px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 716x768px

>>88198135
Did you say McBane?

File: sneer.jpg (45KB, 599x431px)

45KB, 599x431px

>>88197263
I see belly button tho

>>88198070
Kids used to be seen as just kids back in the day with anime, and so a character under like 7 that was either male or female could be shown frontally nude casually. They used to do it in Gundam series, which had to do with a lot of kids in wartime situations. It was like, well, here they are, they're kids, they get baths. On to the next scene.

Nowadays though, Japan has sexualized little girls to the point that they make young female nudity some added bonus that otaku can unlock if they buy the DVDs or some shit. Meanwhile, there's still no issue with having frontal nudity of young boys (though I wonder how long that will last before they're sexualized to the point of enhanced marketability). It's royally fucked.

I'm actually glad that america never opened up that pandora's box. But it still represents that we're an equally fucked up society but in a different more repressive way.

>>88196822
I thought it was because that was his hand giving the middle finger

>>88198191
>or Hank Scorpio.

So they didn't think people would know a popular character from when the Simpsons was an ubiquitous cultural phenomenon, but they thought a completely new character nobody had ever seen or knew about would draw crowds?

>>88197858
You're making a bigger deal out of this than anyone else ITT.

>>88198308
Nobody ever accused network executives of non-faggotry.

Unfunny trash

>>88198319
You can get treatment for your pedophilia if you want.

Let's put it this way. You're a little kid mindlessly watching cartoons with your mother and all of sudden, you're suddenly greeted by the sight of a fully nude woman.
How do you think your mum will react to this sporadic exposure of sex to her prepubescent child?

>>88198139
They reportedly made her do like 50 takes on one scene until her throat was sore.

>>88198348
Nah, it had some jokes, but it was just mostly mediocre and disjointed. Like they had a few ideas floating around (Homer gets a pig, Springfield gets polluted) and just tossed them together.

>>88198367
>nude female body is always sexual
nice male gaze, there buddy.

>>88198464
I don't believe that to be true, but many Americans believe that nudity equals sex whether it's male or female.

>>88198351
Thanks for the condescending and spiteful comeback, but I don't have pedophilia.

Why are you so angry?

>>88196880
And then, of course, everyone quoting it.

There's a show with equine girls who don't wear clothes.

>>88198587
I just offered some help. You're the one who came back with insults.

Do you know what "projection" means in an emotional context, anon?

>>88196255

its ok

>>88197437
Jim Sterling had a video about the same issue in games, his reasoning being that while penises have neutral and lewd states (flaccid and erect), vaginas for the most part have only one state and many cultures default to "that's lewd" rather than "that's normal".

Also dicks are funny looking and can lead to funny situations, vaginas not so much. Anything remotely funny you could do with a vagina you could do better with an anus.

>>88198640
Horses don't count as people.

File: 1476540752596.png (6KB, 366x286px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 366x286px

>>88198640
Really now? Care to elaborate?

Awful movie.

>>88196255
It wasn't bad. It was just dissapointing.
Even as a 12 year old I could tell it was somewhat meh

>>88198666
Women do experience an erection of sorts though. When sexually stimulated, the nipples and clit swell and harden.

You don't need naked people everywhere. Nudity purely for fanservice's sake doesn't really have its place in cartoons that are supposed to be for all ages.

>>88196822
came to mention this pedo, but here he is.

>>88198275
Doraemon had a million nude scenes with both boys and girls but they never showed a pussy. Girls had blank crotches like a Ken doll.

>>88198941
>>88196822
It's not polite to samefag to get more (You)s for your own post.

Fucking Americans, man. They produce the most and the most vile porn of any country on the planet, yet they rise up in outrage over artistic nudity.

>>88198649
>I just offered some help.
So, acting like an accusatory jackass after getting called out is your idea of helping?

>You're the one who came back with insults.
All I literally said was "You're making a bigger deal out of this than anyone else ITT." How was that even the slightest bit insulting?

>Do you know what "projection" means in an emotional context, anon?
Yes, I know what it means; but you clearly don't. You're the one who started ranting. You're ironically getting more worked up over "the most unimportant, irrelevant, autistic bullshit imaginable" than anyone else.

>>88199036
>They produce the most and the most vile porn of any country on the planet
Nah, that's Germany.

Standards and Practices.

Archer jokes about fucking all the time and has sex scenes with guy ass and visible thrusting, but bare tits are for some reason still a taboo on every channel.

>>88198399
Having jokes doesn't mean they are funny.

File: wrmj9Pa.jpg (152KB, 1280x718px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 1280x718px

>>88199110
Gravity Falls had a good one.

Sorry that they don't put your fetish in cartoons, faggots.

>>88196822
>>88197437
they didn't show it because Yeardley Smith is a feminist bitch. she won't let them show Lisa naked or being beaten up and abused and she also requires the writers to show Lisa as perfect and correct in every episode.

>>88198829
but it's hardly visible (at least the clitoral hardening) from the same range as a penile erection

>>88199187
>nipples are a fetish
Crawl back into your crypt, Jerry Falwell.

File: pcktp.jpg (35KB, 512x384px)

35KB, 512x384px

The children, oh god will some please think of the children.

You can't have any nudity on any American TV show.

I don't know of any shows aimed towards children anywhere that have nudity, in a sexual way at least.

Want porn? Check porn on the internet.

A neckbeard wanting nudity in a children cartoon just to jack off is pretty stupid.

>>88196255
I really liked it.

>>88199269
las ratas.

>naked male = HAHAHAHAHA SO FUNNEH
>naked female = FUCKING RAPE RAPE RAPE RAPE RAPE
because retards

>>88196255
Probably the last time a Marge/Homer fight felt believable to me with the videotape she leaves for him

>>88196255
I didn't liked The Simpsons back then because i thought the characters were incredible stupid but even throught i didn't like it i went and watched it. MASSIVE MISTAKE

>>88199222
They've never shown any females from 3-17 naked on the Simpsons and Lisa did get beaten up in Bye Bye Nerdie.

Because when it comes to western animation and comic books, most of the time it's poor. When comics/cartoons do fanservice it tends to be mediocre at best, getting chubs only from desperate nerds. Other times, when the fanservice is decent, animators and character designers tend to shit the bed when it comes to nude anatomy.

Drawn Together was alright with naughty shit until they showed bare breasts.

>>88196255
I remember seeing this and really liking it the first time or two, but looking back at it it's pretty much just an average Simpson episode strung out to fill 2ish hours, definitely not as good as was said, but not as bad as stuff that's come after.

As far as the world's developed countries go, America is the most backwards on the planet. Politically they're trapped in the victorian era, with them still trying to answer questions about welfare and taxation and the economy that Europe solved a century a go. Religiously, they are the middle ages. Militarily they're in WW2, with a god-like reverence for soldiers, glorification for combat, societal brainwashing and desire to wipe out other peoples. They had the Jim Crow laws all the way up to the 60s and still treat their minorities worse than Europe. And culturally they're decades behind us all. Even Japan, a very conservative country which has experienced no civil rights or feminist movement shows more societal enlightenment than America.

America needs to step up basically. It's not good for the world when the country with the most money and power is populated by and run by cavemen.

>>88199110
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wqnNURx3Y6Q

Because you'd just masturbate to it, and they don't want to appeal to you.

>>88199543
Everybody keeps repeating this as if it's a good argument. What are you, the fap police?

>>88197654
Are you talking about the seahorses?

>>88199626
It's not an argument, just an acknowledgement of what the current situation is. If I WAS the fap police, I guarantee I wouldn't be such a hard-ass about it.

>>88199660
I don't think that's precisely the reason. Females, especially under puberty, are surrounded by an aura of vulnerability in the eyes of society...you don't have to actually think about men fapping to cartoons to feel this way. It's because real, non cartoon girls are easy to rape and therefore their nudity is dangerous, not funny.

>what exactly is seeing a naked body going to do to a child that's so horrible?
Their soccer mom's gonna beat the fuck out of them, and then scream at the network execs.

>>88196255
I fell asleep part way thru. Answer your question?

>>88196255

It was all right, but you can tell it contained the last of Groaning's fresh material as every Simpsons episode after this sucked.

>>88196822
Why does it matter? Would seeing a little girls vagina improve the plot?

>>88199222
calm down

>>88196255
As a standalone movie it was okay. As a Simpsons episode, it was trash.

Kids are gonna jack off either way.
Pretending like children are innocent angels is fucking retarded.

>>88197768
What happens in fanfiction can be easily dismissed. It's fantasy within fantasy. What happens in show stays canon, and what the creator/s say are the word of God.

Look how POed people got over the whole Marceline and Bubblegum are lesbians thing. I don't think that's too different from moe otaku compartmentalization.

>>88199294
Simpsons, Family Guy, Heavy Metal, etc has has nudity.

>>88200017
HM is an R-rated movie, they can show tits there.

Family Guy and Simpsons have tons of nudity but 90% of it is just like Homer and Peter's fat ass.

>>88200054
he means they never showed Lisa's love box

>>88200112
You can't show even an adult man's dick on network TV, the FCC sez no.

>>88196255
>>88196504
Still waiting on the deleted scenes.

>>88200156
>FCC
Is this 1981? The FCC doesn't regulate anything nowadays but public television. Networks can show hardcore porn on primetime if they want, but they're afraid of losing advertisers/bad publicity.

The animators probably drew a scene with Lisa naked, but they got a boner and felt ashamed so they got rid of it.

>>88199992
>Look how POed people got over the whole Marceline and Bubblegum are lesbians thing.

i like rebecca but jeez she has a boner for gay stuff since Ed Edd n Eddy

You people are complaining about the lack of nudity as if you actually cared about body freedom and whatnot when in actuality you just want to fap to underage cartoon girls. You could just admit that instead of spouting shit about how prude america is.

the fuck is going on in here?

>>88199992
>what the creator/s say are the word of God.
Death of the Author, friendo.

they showed Rileys butt in IO, didn't they?

>>88200690
As a toddler.

>like they'd ever show 11 year old Riley's butt

There is a whole website dedicated to Simpsons nudity.
Yep female nudity is forbidden but Bart's dick is okay. Which raises some questions.

>>88196255
Better than the show at that point.
You can tell they honestly put everything they still had into it.

>>88200273
But you can be gay and fap to Bart's dick? That's cool right?

>>88196822
idk somehow it doesn't seem very in character for Lisa to skateboard in the nude

File: monkeey.gif (2MB, 320x218px)

2MB, 320x218px

>Go to Germany
>Porn is literally played in gas stations

>Be in Louisiana
>Our constitution still bans "sodomy"

You can technically be jailed for oral sex here.

>>88203489
>be in US
>can fap to Lisa Simpson smut pics all I want

>be in Germany
>loli is banned so I go to jail for that

File: loli map.jpg (373KB, 1300x990px) Image search: [Google]

373KB, 1300x990px

>>88203598
Bad news anon...

>>88198666
Sterling is a twat.

>>88199526
>Europe
>advanced beyond America
>being taken over by Muslims and commies
kek

>>88203598

Germany OK, but what planet?
Can't be this one on earth at least.

>>88196255
I liked it, and if they ended on the movie I'd have said they ended on a good note.

>>88203639
States can't override the 1st Amendment. That was settled in the Civil War.

>>88203489
>Louisiana
504 reporting.

>>88199526
>Politically they're trapped in the victorian era welfare/taxation
While I'd give you that one, a good portion of Europe and the rest of the world are having the same issues, and the ones that don't are just in a resting peaceful period before the system they've put in place will eventually have to be changed.

>Religiously, they are the middle ages.
USA actually has a very high diversity of religion due to immigration and the fact that anything can become a religion if you get enough followers. That being said, the whole Christian/Judaism/Islam trifecta is old because it's just old.

>Military-wise they're in WW2 / 4 reasons
We glorify combat in TV and movies, bro, not IRL. That's riots from niggers (read: black people that heavily follow the stereotype). There's been a lot less brainwashing since Iraq's invasion. US has never wanted to wipe anybody out, they just want the immigrants to come in legally and push the illies out. I will give you the reverence for soldiers, though.

>Jim Crow laws to the 60's
Yeah, it ended in the 60's. Not sure what your point was, because we're long past it. For the record, there's racism all over the world, we just end up televising it and making a big deal about it specifically because it's not okay.

>Culturally they're decades behind us all
Completely subjective topic, as culture itself is defined by how the cumulative society acts and has nothing to do with actual progress, i.e. technology/law/industry; morality and general societal rules are different in each place simply because that's how people there decided to behave. And what does enlightenment in this context even mean?

>run by cavemen
we're being run by trump. He's not a caveman, he's just a moron

>>88199110
IFC has uncensored titties in the middle of the day and it's basic cable.

>>88196255
It was shit, just like Zombie Simpson's in general.

>>88197702
Women do a good enough job of causing men to shun them themselves, no need to blame cartoons.

>>88197858
Amen

>>88196255
>It's almost ten years old.

>>88199085
I'm pretty sure it's Russia

>>88196904
Compositions looks better. Simposons one looks like it wasn't a single picture. It looks like made of separate clipart pieces.

>>88199837
Did seeing barts dick improve it? Sure, him being naked moved the plot forward, but did we need to see prepubescent wang?

>Soccer moms
>States' Rights
>The Second Gulf War
>Prepubescent wang

Yeah so, uh, the film

>>88198666
So you're saying that by the penis being more interesting and able to be looked at less sexually, men are objectively better than women in terms of biology? /co/mblr won't be too happy about that.

So the ArcRoyale faggot that is obssessed with underage girl nuditty took over the thread?

>>88204300
Except if you bothered to read up on the case you would know that laws in place were not wholly unconstitutional. The CPPA was ruled unconstitutional but the PROTECT Act signed by Dubbya repeals the reforms made by the previous ruling, once more criminalizing the depiction of minors that are deemed "obscene" by the Miller standard

File: autism levels.png (121KB, 618x542px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 618x542px

http://lostmediawiki.com/The_Simpsons_Movie_(alternate_versions_and_deleted_scenes)

Why aren't we talking about this?

>>88211381
>Marge is the one who's spoken to by God
So that's why she was the only one freaked out about grampa's senior moment?

>>88197437
There's plenty of hentai.

The audience reaction at my showing to 'To be continued... right now' was so pure I remember it to this day.

>>88196497
Yeah, what the fuck is Lisa doing? Aren't they supposed to be fleeing?

>>88211584
looking for something to complain about

>>88196880
He's not Spider-Pig anymore, he's Harry Plopper.

>>88197437
Jessica Rabbit in one shot for a brief frame IIRC she's not wearing panties.

>>88197858
thank you!

>>88211432
yup

I still have one of those shitty watches they sold at Burger King ages ago. It used to have Homer say "Hmm, buuurger" when you hit a button, but it's just low pitched gargling that gets worse the more times it's pressed

>>88216227
vacaroo for us, anon

>>88196255
They stole jokes from the show
Wich is unintentionally funny since they made that joke in the itchy and scratchy movie episode back when tge show was good

>>88218284
I had to go find the damn thing, let me get to it

It was the only good Simpsons episode in years.

File: buuuuurger.png (93KB, 201x202px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 201x202px

>>88219571
http://vocaroo.com/i/s0iBg3K7g8vf

File: 1366769327836.png (363KB, 584x383px) Image search: [Google]

363KB, 584x383px

>>88196255
Needlessly melodramatic. Hollywood fumbles another movie by trying to get a full gambit of emotion instead of doing what Simpsons did best.

>>88197858
keep projecting virgin

>>88219731
I should've warned to lower your audio, a bit late for that now

It was okay, not as good as old simpsons, but it was better than most episodes from around that time.

The Simpsons Movie introduced me to the show, so it has a special place in my heart, even if it is pretty flawed

File: 1300044776986.jpg (17KB, 250x250px)

17KB, 250x250px

>>88204529
>an insightful, well thought out response
were do you think we are?

>>88199222
She's a bitch for not wanting to pander to pedos like you?
So sorry you were deprived of 8 year old cartoon pussy.