Is it any good?
>>88191542
No. It'sgreat.
>>88191542
If you like shameless pandering and no substance, sure.
If you want actual good comic there are better Rebirth titles.
>>88191542
It's a very uninspired, barebones, by-the-numbers book.
Like all of Rebirth.
>>88191589
>>88191587
this
But if you like Dick then go ahead and read it. It's better than new 52 Nightwing and slightly better than Dixon/Tomasi
>>88191542
Idk how but Nightwing has been solid for years.
N52 start was meh and forgettable until Forever Evil and since after that Grayson and Nightwing have been great.
New writer more likely.
>>88191587
>>88191589
>>88194638
ignore all 3 of these anons. it's been a great run so far, it's nothing groundbreaking, but it's great Dick fun and continues the events of his past series, Grayson.
>>88194845
>ignore those people that said what I said
Kill yourself
>>88194871
He's right though.
>>88191542
>OMG DICK IS SO AMAZING AND BETTER THAN BATMAN also meet Raptor
>OMG DICK IS AMAZING AND EVERYONE LOVES HIM IN THE MULTIVERSE AND HE IS ALWAYS AMAZING
there, you are now up to speed with all that happened
can't wait for the next arc
>OMG DICK IS AMAZING AND SAVES BLUDHAVEN WITH THE POWER OF LOVE AND EVERYONE STARTS LOVING HIM
>>88191542
Idk it just seems like more character-touting, something we've been receiving for the character of Nightwing non-stop since Grayson. Saying more things that don't need to be said anymore. Hopefully the Bludhaven arc will tell a better story, it certainly seems like Seeley is going to put heavy focus on the city itself which sounds great.