This was insipid and bland, even by Dreamworks standards.
>>88010142
i liked Hair up, decent Cinderella parody and the aestethic was nice.
reference to old troll dolls was a nice touch too.
>>88010142
Little slappy?
Make daddy happy?
Why are pop songs so big in these movies?
>>88010194
it's dreamworks bread and butter, duh.
>>88010142
what did you expect from a movie based on an obscure dead toy line?
Silly Anon, this is Dreamworks! They don't give a rats ass about making good movies! This is just a 90 minute commercial for the toys, the food tie-ins, the clothes, and the disposable band aids!
So go buy your fill, and get ready for Trolls Adventures, coming to Netflix 2018!
>>88010290
occasionaly they hit the jackpot, dont be mean.
>>88010232
Yes but why?
Lingering legacy of Shrek?
Something is very wrong with Dreamworks.
>>88010329
True, but only by sheer luck.
They make franchises. Not films.
>>88010142
Guess it'll get an Oscar nod in January?
>>88010451
Yes, but only because the Academy doesn't give a shit about animation, and just focuses on whatever Disney and Dreamworks releases so they can be done with it.
>>88010290
The shitty movies always get good shows though.
>>88010142
agreed
It's so pretty looking though.
Has Dreamworks considered the reason they make so little money with movies is because they spend too much on making the movies?
>>88010142
I liked it!
It wasn't awful, the story was just cliche, but it was still really enjoyable. I'd say it's the best of Dreamworks "bad" films.
/co/ really is full of fickle faggots and tumblr cunts. You fickle edgelords need to occasionally feel superior once in a while.
There's a more than decent enough Dreamworks film since HTTYD and people are so full of shit can't even accept it. Although I have to admit the heroin MC carried the movie, none of the one dimensional supporting characters.
>>88014755
Her and Branch had a good dynamic. I'm a sucker for complete opposites finding love.
I liked it, myself. Thought it was fun an gorgeous. They took a nothing story and had fun with it.
The film was just really visually appealing. Probably one of Dreamworks best in that department.
>>88010187
I liked the movie except for this guy.
>>88010331
>>88010232
>>88010194
>butthurt about pop songs
>mfw every song was skillfully re-imagined and composed and were sung with original voice covers
>TLDR actors sang instead of recycling old pop music over the animation
>anons still ungrateful any effort was made and complain illogically
Why are you so mad? For the sake of being a complaining bitch? I sure love /co/mblr
>>88016725
I did enjoy how they managed to make Sound of Silence peppy.
>>88016822
Its what sealed my decision to watch Trolls in the first place
>>88016725
/co/ hates pop songs, because it's not Brendan Small fake melodeath
Honestly I can understand the annoyance with this kind of shit, but this movie did it really well....I can admit that and I still only think the movie was "decent" tier, I was expecting the music aspect to be something that would drag it down but it was actually not done badly at all
>>88017258
I mean, if anything, this film can be famous for having Zooey Deschanel sing 2 songs, one of them involving a rap.
>Zootopia gets more recognition than Trolls
You fags truly do suck Disney cock and swallow any drek that drips out
I did enjoy True Colors. Maybe its because Justin Timberlake has a damn good voice.
And Clint Eastwood coming right the fuck out of nowhere had me smiling like an idiot.
I actually liked Poppy and Branch and their dynamic. Everything else was either meh or straight up irritating, though.
>>88017712
zootopia IS a better movie, but you're comparing apples and oranges here.
>>88016725
found the dw intern
>>88010142
Is it at least better than Stone Protectors?
Trolls was way better than Shark Tales and Bee Movie. I'd say its on the same level as Antz.