Anyone else hate this?

Yes, I hate it when Clint Eastwood appears in my cartoons.

>>87698828
>caricature is bad
you have to be 18 to post here

>>87698828
HERE COMES THE CRIMSON CHIN

File: Mattdamonarthur.jpg (70KB, 720x480px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 720x480px

>>87698828
Absolutely.

File: matt-damon-team-america-340x300.jpg (31KB, 340x300px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 340x300px

>>87698933
LMAO
Even Arthur managed to make him look like a retard

File: 1463715328804.jpg (26KB, 219x244px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 219x244px

how can a real person be in a cartoon

>>87698922
This.

File: 4355821.jpg (63KB, 569x720px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 569x720px

>>87698828

>>87699157
People who post this image should kill themselves.

>>87699157
I thought this image was about the holocaust at first

>>87699157
am i the only one that hates this picture?

>>87699157

Am I the only one in this room?

>>87699157
Wow. So le deep! Xd

>>87699157
This picture is the single best autism certificate on 4chan. It shows that the poster cannot understand hyperbole, and is also too retarded to know what a rhetorical question is.

>>87698828
I hate how every South Park character introduced after a certain point is drawn to be realistic while the original characters still look like cut outs

>>87699612
They've gone back and updated some of the shittier ones slightly.

I think Jimbo got a new vest.

>>87699157
Triggered

File: simpsons.jpg (460KB, 3358x1864px) Image search: [Google]

460KB, 3358x1864px

>>87699612
I think SP still looks crude enough
But oh man, the Simpsons

>>87701243
That gray-haired kid near the bottom left looks exactly the same.

>>87699481
I bet you're one of those faggots who uses literally when they mean figuratively.

File: Ant-and-Dec-Beano.jpg (107KB, 500x217px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 500x217px

ye man it always freaks me out

>>87699157
I'm the only one with the exact arrangement of DNA I currently have.

Check mate.

>>87702044
figuratively suck my my literal dick, faggosi.

>>87702844
>no woman's ever taken your DNA deep inside her

why admit that, anon?

>>87702044
Nobody uses literally to mean figuratively.
They use it incorrectly but not in that way.
They use literally to mean not the absence of any figure of speech, but the absence of hyperbole specifically.

>>87698922
I think the issue OP was trying to share, is the tendency for caricatures to look too uncanny because the artist didn't stylize it enough. So they end up looking like plastic bimbo freaks or something.

There's a skill in omitting features to simplify a face but keep it recognizable.

>>87702044

>literally when they mean figuratively.

LITERALLY nobody does this

File: Spinning Bobby.gif (1013KB, 412x284px) Image search: [Google]

1013KB, 412x284px

>implying

>>87702868
>>87702926
https://boards.fireden.net/v/search/text/%22literally%20impossible%22/type/op/
You're literally lying.

>>87699157
You are the only one mad about this right now.

File: literally.png (134KB, 400x600px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 400x600px

>>87702868
>>87702926
https://youtu.be/ljWcpj8N6ws

>>87703068
>he doesn't own a homosexual gayroller
why are you even on 4chan?

>>87703068
>>87703081
Are you kidding me right now? Did you just assume that gayroller's sexual preference?

Bigotry is real in Trump's America!

"gayroller" should have been a steamroller that rolls over gays

File: 99251621.jpg (13KB, 222x227px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 222x227px

>>87699157
>am I the only one who is I
when did cloning advance this much

>>87698828
>real person in cartoon
HEY! ROBBIE ROTTEN!?

>>87702868
But it gets coupled with hyperbole all the time, it's basically yet another way to exaggerate. It's like the internet is full of Jews or Mediterraneans.

>>87703233
Who did you expect? Sportaflop?

>>87703235
>It's like the internet is full of Jews or Mediterraneans
wait what have the mediterraneans done

>>87698922
>>87702872
>characters done in a certain artstyle
>"real" characters done in a completely different style to show that they're "real"

Even worse is when it's a mixture of the show's style and another style. Just looks ugly and out of place.

>>87703260
They exaggerate things.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%27est_la_sardine_qui_a_bouch%C3%A9_le_port_de_Marseille

>>87703447
well fuck
I was expecting something more in line with the six gorillion thing

Caricatures dont match the overall art style

South park once used photographs Mel Gibson Saddam etc

and it was common for older episodes to use photos so it blended in well.

now they draw everyone unless they used photos after the fact.

But Clint Eastwood needs to get out of the cartoons he is neglecting his duties elsewhere

>>87699612

Yeah it's really off putting. They need to bring back the crude back ground townsfolk from the first five seasons.

>>87703667
We're so, so far past that now though.
At a point you just kind of have to accept it's evolved into a different show

>>87698894
10/10

>>87702860
>Falling for the vaginal jew

File: 98.png (400KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

400KB, 600x450px

>>87702970
But Dusty was actually drawn in the same style of the show. OPs issue is when the animators had such a simplistic style or didn't think hard enough so when they created a caricature they had to add a bunch of details that made them stick out from actual characters.

>>87699157
It's called a hyperbole you jackass.

>>87699157
I hope you posted this ironically.

>>87704110
You mean a jewess?