Does /co/ think he will make a good Grinch

Yes.

He already did

>>87645671
Damn skippy he will, considering that he was LITERALLY named by Doctor Seuss

>>87645671
Yes, he's a very good voice actor.

The character design could be a little better. It'd be nice if his eyes were colored properly.

>>87645671
why is this gigantic queer suddenly in everything now?

>>87645671
Idk Jim Carey set a pretty high bar.

>>87646405
He has been for a while now.

You should be more fond of him, he once referred to black people as "coloreds" in an interview.

>>87646442
Colored is the PC term for blacks/niggers
Am I missing something here

>>87646429
Oh, I'm sure Jim is just tickled that Bendydick doesn't have to worry about the make-up.

He has a good voice and I'm sure I will forget its even Cumberbund. Unlike the Jim Carrey movie where no matter how decent the movie actually was it just feels like Jim Carrey in makeup with a potbelly.

>>87645671
I don't see the voice working. Karloff is just too perfect.

>>87646593
>it just feels like Jim Carrey in makeup with a potbelly.

I fail to see the problem with that, Carrey was pretty fucking funny back then.

>>87646538
No, see, it's a slur now, because it was PC back when they didn't have any rights. Tumblr threw a fit over it.

>implying the movie won't completely be about Cindy Lou

>>87646617
Karloff was perfect in the cartoon, Carrey was perfect in the movie. They can write a third Grinch suited to Cumberdale.

>>87646760
It won't. They learned from The Lorax that the Seuss villain is what makes the bux.

>>87646760
>>87646779
Besides, the Carrey film used Cindy Lou as the audience surrogate, and they're probably going to stray as far from that as they can. It wasn't a disaster like The Cat in the Hat, but purists don't like it.

What we have to worry about is Max having a Minion voice and personality.

>>87646779
>thinking the lorax movie was good.

>>87645671
IS THAT BEN "CUM IN HER HATCH" CUMBERBACH

>>87646827
It wasn't good by any stretch, but for a time in 2012, a huge portion of people developed a crippling sexual obsession with the Once-ler, and they want that cash flow again.

>>87646540
Heh

File: Dr-Seuss-How-The-Grinch-Stole-Christmas-Gallery-6.jpg (158KB, 1200x795px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 1200x795px

>>87645671
CINDY LOU WHO, I'VE COME TO BARGAIN

I think he would do a good grinch. But I don't want a new grinch. Old grinch is timeless.

>>87645671

He should.

better than Karloff or Hans Conreid...debatable.

>>87645671
i want to hear him say the lines
and i want to watch the motion capture footage, if its half as mesmerizing as what he did for smaug then it will be worth it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHuXSZv6Tqs

>>87645671
He'd probably be fine, but that design could use some improvement

It feels too safe and marketable

>>87645671
for a 30 minute special? Yes.
For a whole 1 hour movie? No.

>>87645671
The better question is. Will he make a better Grirch?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uz_W6BOgEXg

YOU'RE A BAD ONE, CUMBERBATCH
YOU ACTING MAKES ME REEL
YOU HAVE THE VOCAL TALENT OF A RETCHING OLD PIG SQUEAL
CUMBERBATCH
YOUR FACE IS ONE THAT I WOULD WANT TO QUICKLY CONCEAL

Well now I do, after seeing Dr. Strange.

Your brain is full of Spain, you've got Spain in your brain, Mr. Grir

>>87651323
>Animated movies
>1 hour long
This isn't the fifties anymore, gramps.

Anything to give him a chance to do more comedy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bbsYIN3oVBg

>>87651251
>Cumberbatch on all fours flopping around in a onesie while snarling and making weird faces
Oh god this is the most hilarious thing I've seen in weeks

File: 50 shades of kek.jpg (35KB, 293x298px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 293x298px

>>87645977