So are they just going to sweep this under the rug?

Good, it was absolute shit compared to the original. Around that time Disney had a habit of releasing straight-to-video sequels that were really, really bad. They just didn't care about the IP at all and only wanted the money from gullible kids.

>>87576019
it was shit and you should be ashamed of even remembering it

>>87576019
The reprisal of Girl Worth Fighting For wasn't bad

File: lion king two too many.jpg (151KB, 400x564px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 400x564px

>>87576019
>>87576191
>>87577956

shit disney thread?

>>87576019
Goddammit, what a waste of returning voice actors. EVERYONE returned, except Eddie Murphy (but fake Murphy was alright) and Pat Morita (who died).

The story was only TV series tier. Why didn't they make a TV series?

>>87578016
Simba's Pride was shit, this was playful at least

>>87578016
i found it quite fun actually

>>87577988
this song was good to: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BMU8TLaX_jw

>>87578613
>this song was good to

*this song was good too.

>>87578016
Fuck you, it knew what it was.

>>87578056
Donny Osmond didn't return

>>87578636
I thought we left shitty grammar correcting back in 2012

>>87576019
So what about Disney sequels that buck the trend and are actually good?

I like the 3 Aladdin films, I'd say 2 is definitely the weakest but it's still solid.

Can''t really think of anything else. I did when younger feel surprised that Jungle Book II was stronger than I expected, but I was too young to trust that opinion without going back and I'm kinda scared to.

>>87585265
Bambi II
Cinderella III

>>87585281
>Bambi II
this

>>87585265
101 Dalmatians 2: Patch's London Adventure is actually pretty good. Surprisingly well written from what I remember.

File: Rescuersduposter.jpg (26KB, 289x438px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 289x438px

>>87585265

Why do people always forget the best Disney sequel ever made?

(Unless Empire Strikes Back technically counts now... or Winter Soldier)

>>87585281
>>87585409
Holy shit i thought i was the only one

>>87585805
>Why do people always forget the best Disney sequel ever made?
The topic of Disney sequels generally only covers straight-to-video stuff, not theatrical releases. Resucers Down Under has the budget quality you'd expect from the Official Disney Canon, the straight-to-video stuff, not so much.

Basically it's a league of its own.

File: Poo squared.jpg (65KB, 500x353px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 500x353px

Twice the...fun?

File: Dear god no.jpg (350KB, 1000x1500px) Image search: [Google]

350KB, 1000x1500px

They managed to take an underrated classic and shit it up so thoroughly it almost soured the memory of the first one.

>>87585805
Pretty much this >>87585891
Disney treated it as a full blown theatrical release, so I never think about it when discussing the other sequels.

File: HwSO.jpg (69KB, 300x460px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 300x460px

Do live action direct to video's count?

>>87585986

Being great as it is, why wasn't it released theatrically?

>>87578735
shit?

File: 1333407595327.png (356KB, 503x413px) Image search: [Google]

356KB, 503x413px

>>87586103
The only thing I remember about this movie is the part where the kids open a "secret" magazine with the shrunk parents watching in shock, only to reveal it's a science magazine


That said the first movie is god tier and the second one, despite the criticism, is pretty fun

>>87585932
These are the best Disney sequels. They also work as a perfect prologue and epilogue for the TV Series, because they were pretty much done by the same people.

King of Thieves is better than Return of Jafar by a good margin, though. More interesting plot, better songs, and got Robin Williams back after he wasn't in the second (not that Castellaneta was bad in 2).

>>87586690
>best Disney sequels
Personally I'd give the Lilo and Stitch sequels that honor.

>>87586430
It was.

>>87585979
>tfw the only way to get this and Hunchback on Blu ray is via a double pack with their terrible sequels.

>>87586987
If you're that passionate about it we have stand alone BD release for both over here in the UK that you can import.

>>87586878
>Personally I'd give the Lilo and Stitch sequels that honor.

>Stitch! The Movie

That was heinous trash. It was another one of those "lead-in to a shitty TV series" sort of "movies". Like Tarzan & Jane.

Krunk's New Groove was pretty bad, too. Atlantis II is the worst of them because it was the lead-in to a TV series that never happened.

>>87578016
The only good thing to come out of this movie was the tunnel song.

>>87587646
Wasn't that within the first five minutes?

>>87585805
As a kid I didn't even realize this was a sequel.

>>87585265
I'd say Adventurers Down Under, but that probably doesn't count because no one remembers the first one.

>>87585830
We're the only ones who watched it

>>87588432
Keep dreamin'.

The only thing I liked from it was this song:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_beum3_P3Q

>>87578086
>my older sister liked both of the DTV Lion King movies
>she's actively following that shit tv show
Fuck, I love the Toy Story series to pieces and even I refuse to be optimistic about 4.

File: harsh.gif (990KB, 270x268px) Image search: [Google]

990KB, 270x268px

>>87587591
no atlantis 2 was even worse. it wasn't an intro for a serie.

it was a serie turned into a movie.
they crammed 3 or 4 episodes together and made it into a movie.

File: 1476155781744.gif (2MB, 400x306px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 400x306px

>>87586987
Speaking of bad home video releases
>buy a two pack DVD of Muppets Take Manhatten and Muppets in Space
>Muppets in Space is in fucking 4:3

>>87578016

Never even know this shit existed. What the fuck was it about? Also Timon and Pumbaa already had their own movie, what the fuck?

>>87587181

Are blu rays region locked? That sounds just retarded enough to be exactly what happened.

>>87591287
I'm sure it's the same movie with a different title in another region. Look at the rating on the box.

File: return-to-neverland-jane-peter-pan-2-33906758-500-293.jpg (18KB, 500x293px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 500x293px

>>87585265
I love Return to Neverland

I watched it a few months ago and had forgotten how it tried to be 'moodier' and 'edgier' than the first movie. Jane spends most the movie depressed and grumpy and doesn't even befriend Peter until like the last twenty minutes

and that soundtrack...

>>87576019
That's a lotta Dreamworks face.

File: fievel-tiger-and-wylie.jpg (204KB, 600x336px) Image search: [Google]

204KB, 600x336px

>>87585805
That was damn amazi-- oh wait, I'm thinking of Fievel Goes West. THAT was amazing.

>>87578016
fucking moron it's literally rosencrantz and guilderstern are dead with animals

>>87591387
Some are. Assume "yes" unless it's advertised as a region-free version.

File: shang.png (122KB, 431x411px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 431x411px

>>87576019

>>87585979
Reminder that Atlantis 2 was three episodes of a canned TV show stitched together and that the show was going to have a Gargoyles crossover where the gang fights Demona in Paris

>>87576019
Name one good reason Disney should ever bring any attention to that movie.

>>87590431
They did that same shit with a Space Jam and Looney Tunes Back in Action two pack

>>87578016
It was entertaining for what it was. And what it was is better represented by the other title "The Lion King 1 1/2". An irreverent take on the original story through the characters of Timon and Pumba. I imagine if you went in expecting "The Lion King 3" you might be a bit disappointed though.

File: shang.gif (1001KB, 250x200px) Image search: [Google]

1001KB, 250x200px

>>87596520

>>87596378
Give em the LAAAAAAAAZY eye!

>>87596546
Which got the 4:3 shaft?

File: 20080515%20Atlantis%20Banner%20copyright%20Ryan%20Cain.preview[1].jpg (141KB, 490x368px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 490x368px

>>87596492
It was also suppose to have it's own ride at Epcot with a meet and greet characters from the movie area.

>>87586103

I actually really liked this movie but "Honey I Blew Up The Kid" was awful.

I think I also liked the tv show but I don't remember any of it.

File: goofy-5.png (164KB, 500x315px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 500x315px

good direct to video sequel

>>87585281

Those were surprisingly good.

I liked The Lion King 2, mostly for some of the music (Didn't really care for "We Are One", and "Upendi" was horrible.) also liked the two death scenes.

>>87596782
I liked "He lives in you" even if it sounded like a religious song.

>>87585265
The emperor's new groove

>>87596729
Wasn't the original Goofy Movie also direct to video?
https://youtu.be/6nqWNZl3Ou4

>>87578613
Lesson Number One was a very good song. Its the only part of Mulan 2 that I remember.

>>87596823
That was a sequel?

>>87596900
to the Emperor's Old Groove

File: mah nigga.gif (2MB, 387x291px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 387x291px

>>87596703
That series was fucking silly nerdy schlock gold, I loved it. It's a shame the actors (or most of them?) never did much else, they did good work.

>>87596858
No, that was theatrical.

>>87597592
You're shitting me?! That was literally my all time favourite Disney movie since before I can even remember, and I could have actually seen it in theaters? That's a devastating blow to my soul

>>87598047
That's how I felt when I heard Iron Giant was re-released IN THEATRES
WITH NEWLY ANIMATED SCENES

and somehow I missed it

>>87596703
>>87597134
The Honey I shrunk the Kid TV show was fun, but I watched for the dual-waifu team of Barbara Alyn Woods and Hilary Tuck. Man, so many rude thoughts entered my young mind whenever that show came on.

>>87592927
>>87592979
I actually thought it was pretty bad for most of the film. Then had an amazing final scene surprisingly.

File: Liloandstitch2dvd.jpg (34KB, 245x349px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 245x349px

Since we're on the topic, this film had a pretty good budget for a strait to DVD mid-quel. It really felt like a natural sequel, instead of a corporate cash in.

>>87596823
That actually had a sequel, called Kronk's new groove. I liked it desu, it was fun

>>87596415
Wait, is it really? Because that's amazing on so many levels.

>>87601280
Yup, all Lion King movies were inspired by Shakespeare plays.

>>87596640
Back in Action

>>87596674
That's at the Submarines at Disneyland. At World, they were going to expand Adventureland for it.

>>87596492
What the shit?

>>87600752
that one was supposed to be theatrical, but it went straight to DVD since Jungle book 2 was shit

>>87578016
ey, this was pretty good

>>87586582
It was a sports magazine, silly. The joke was that Moranis's character wanted his son to be a scientist like him but his son was a huge sports fan.

>>87586103
>Alvin and Chipmunks did a spoof of the first movie.

>Years later, this came out.

File: download.jpg (16KB, 187x270px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 187x270px

>>87585265
I haven't watched it since a while ago. The reason I liked it when I was growing up was probably because I'm a spic.

>>87602815
I have it on VHS, I saw it again recently and I believe the whole thing is Donald doing drugs while reading about central and south America

File: Iop0987.jpg (112KB, 725x468px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 725x468px

To think that we almost had Aristocats 2

File: 1448356130187.jpg (99KB, 300x417px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 300x417px

Fuck you, I liked it.

>>87601304

Shakespeare didn't write Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead

File: open-uri20150422-12561-61bdoq_23c0162f.jpg (39KB, 300x450px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 300x450px

>>87578016
Undisputed winner

>>87576019
What happened in Mulan 2?

>>87605039
My bad, disregard that, then.

>>87605197
HE ATE PEANUT BUTTER, HE CAN'T SING AT THE CARNIVALLLL

>>87605197
DON'T MAKE ME SAY IT

File: 220px-PIIJTANW.jpg (32KB, 220x314px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 220x314px

The original Pocahontas is one of the worst films in the Disney Animated Classics canon (before you get to early 2000s CG shit).

But Pocahontas II manages to be remarkably worse.

>>87606808

historic inaccuracy aside, what went wrong?!

The Jungle Book II was pure shit with only 2 redeeming factors

>John Goodman as Baloo
>Tony Jaye as Shere Khan

Admittedly, Jaye was just leftover casting from Tailspin, but still.

Anyway, Jungle Book II was bad, but it's not the worst Disney-related Jungle Book thing. The Jungle Cubs takes that honor.

>>87576019
I was under the impression that alot disney movies had awful sequels.
Of the top of my head, little mermaid, sleeping beauty, and lion king all did right?

>>87606808
>>87607882

Pocahontas II was bad, but it earns points for having the balls to completely undo the romance between Pocahontas and John Smith from the first film.

She ditches Smith and hooks up with John Rolfe (her historically accurate husband) in the sequel.

That said, the Disney Pocahontas films making ANY attempts to be historically accurate is a misstep. They should've stuck with their "historical fantasy" angle and run with it.

>>87606808
>suddenly has a new boyfriend
what the fuck man

>>87606808
Why do people here shit so much on Pocahontas? It wasn't even that bad, I liked it.

>>87576019
this why disney don't do sequels

>>87608127
>They should've stuck with their "historical fantasy" angle and run with it.

Yeah. The reason Disney's Hercule TV series was so much fun is that it didn't try to right the mythological inaccuracies of the film. Instead they just went all in on playing fast and loose with Greek myths and did some stuff that was EXTRA hilarious if you knew the myths. Like Beleraphon and Pegasus. And I fuckin loved how they explained the Roman Pantheon being knock-offs of the Greek Pantheon.

>>87576019

>Brother Bear 2

It was the worst simply for making everyone ask WHY? No one liked the first Brother Bear enough to possibly want a sequel. Why did they even fuckin bother?

>>87590431
>Sonic Sadly Rides Robotnik's Cock.gif

>>87608213
What's the problem with Brother Bear? It's one of my favorite Disney movies. Sequel was shit though.

>>87608294

Bland and forgettable. Bad movies like Chicken Little are at least memorable in how bad they art. Brother Bear will join the ranks of Bolt in being completely and utterly forgotten.

The Strange Brew reunion via the casting was the only remarkable thing about the film.

>>87608347
>Chicken Little
>better than Brother Bear

You kidding me, right?

>>87608347
Also the transformation scene. Beautiful animation and music.

Lot of the music in the movie was solid. The only real big issue was the idiotic decision to have Phil Collins sing over what was supposed to be the emotional climax of the movie.

>>87608127
I was a little impressed when they tried to be historically accurate in the second movie and although her royal treatment in England could've made for an entertaining fish-out-of-water movie it just fell flat. Then again, sailing into the sunset is a nicer finale than the true one.
>"If you want a happy ending, that depends, of course, on where you stop your story." - Orson Welles

>>87608347
Sad but true, it was very forgettable, but I loved the antagonist

>>87585265
Extreme Goofy movie isn't as good (I think A Goofy Movie is probably one of their more underrated movies, definitely among my favorites), but it's still solid.

>>87608848

If you can look past all the 90s-isms like "Extreme" in the title and sponsorship from the X-Games, it has all the emotional impact of the first Goofy Movie.

Shit, the intro alone is heartbreaking. Goofy sitting in his son's empty bedroom, staring at the teddy bear he left behind and trying not to cry in his loneliness. Jesus.

>>87608922
"Isn't as good" is still pretty fucking good when the bar is set at A Goofy Movie. Lots of great stuff, definitely.

>>87608085
There was a Sleeping Beauty sequel?

but yeah, The Little Mermaid and The Lion King both had decent sequels

>>87609000
>There was a Sleeping Beauty sequel?

Not that I know of.

Unless you count Maleficent as a legit prequel to the animated Sleeping Beauty.

>>87609000
>>87609020
sorry i was thinking of Cinderella

What was so good about Bambi II?

All I remember is that every commercial featured the skunk farting and that was enough for me to skip it.

File: son monkey.gif (57KB, 400x376px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 400x376px

>No Mulan TaS
>no adaptations of classic chinese mythology
>no monkey king

>>87609276

You got a Billy West-voiced Monkey King in Jackie Chan Adventures. Be satisfied.

File: 1343280042756.gif (2MB, 180x205px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 180x205px

>>87598620
I like it ironically

And also because Jane a cute

>>87609276
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yr5ZWYRaAyw

>>87585756
The only legitimate sequel to 101 Dalmatians is Starlight Barking. It appals me that Disney has made three different continuities following the original without ever touching the canon sequel

>>87609046
The third one was about time travel

>>87576019
There was a Mulan 2?

Uh, people? The actual Walt Disney Animated Studios has only ever made a single sequel - The Rescuers Down Under. Every other one of these 'sequels' is done by other, lesser units or subcontracted to other companies. Sure some of them are good, but nothing in this thread aside from >>87585805 should even be considered when talking about main Disney Movies, they're in a completely different league.

>>87590302
>atlantis 2
I didn't even know that existed

>>87610936
>The actual Walt Disney Animated Studios has only ever made a single sequel - The Rescuers Down Under.

Also Fantasia 2000, the 2011 Winnie the Pooh, and if you want to get technical, Three Caballeros is one to Saludos Amigos

>>87611273
Ok yeah, I guess Fantasia 2000 fits, though I don't tend to think of those two as feature films. Didn't know 2011 Winnie the Pooh was a sequel either.
Got me on Three Caballeros, I never remember much about that time period.

>>87609067
Gorgeous looking, best soundtrack since then, includes deleted scenes from the book, totally entertaining unlike the original and also has a definite story arc (deals with some issues you wouldn't even tell the original had, and pretty well), some continuity nods if you like the original, Patrick fucking Stewart as the Great Prince.

One down side I can think of is, it tries hard to be cute at times, but it doesn't really hurt the movie.

Also, apparently, it's a good 2D Disney movie you haven't watched. Enjoy, guess you won't be seeing many of those anymore, unfortunately.

>>87602149
Well that sucks, I would've loved to see this scene in theaters.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-aXaKcPX2o

>>87585265
The Aladdin sequels were made before the cheap DTV trend.

>>87592979
Kind of surprised it was released theatrically to be honest.

File: SadSally.jpg (37KB, 311x448px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 311x448px

>>87605197
My favorite film has been tainted by this fucking abomination