Which Dilbert episode is the most persuasive?

>it's the Science Bitch argument from Always Sunny

>>87570775
Why does his tie always have a boner?

>>87571369
Because you wouldn't remember his character design otherwise
your brain's been persuaded

File: image.png (67KB, 206x186px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 206x186px

>>87571489

>>87570775
The one where he disproves evolution.

The one with Stone Cold

>>87570775
Finding out that the dude behind Dilbert is an MRA was weird.

File: 153961-strip-zoom.gif (105KB, 1000x311px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 1000x311px

>>87571855
Really shouldn't be the evidence is all over his work

>>87571913
>Really shouldn't be the evidence is all over his work

*Really shouldn't be, the evidence is all over his work.

File: vsdx1e.gif (33KB, 560x174px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 560x174px

>>87571913

>>87571855
>writing about established techniques to influence people and how trump uses them makes you an MRA
???

File: Screen-Shot-2015-11-23-at-6.04.23-PM.png (264KB, 791x240px) Image search: [Google]

264KB, 791x240px

>>87571931

>>87571940
Confirmed for not seeing his online spiels about how hard it is being a male and how women have all the power.

File: 887118e3241ec4ff5c52e05af9fd41c3.gif (82KB, 640x287px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 640x287px

>>87571941

>>87571975
Taking your word at face value, how does that make him an MRA? Is it somehow offensive to say that women aren't as persecuted as some of them claim to be?

>>87571913
>>87571931
>>87571941
>>87571984
Huh, guess these ones never made it to the Sunday funnies.

>>87571998
>how does that make him an MRA?

Confirmed for not knowing what MRA's truly are.

>>87572020
Are you suggesting that anyone who thinks men are disadvantaged in any way is an MRA?

>>87571998
Saying women don't have it that bad is one thing, but saying they have it easier than men and men are more oppressed is just whiny MRA faggotry.

>>87572122
But if he provides an argument to support his assertion, who are you to disregard his opinion with a derogatory label? That makes you no better than the people who wine SJW whenever someone says women face challenges

>>87572001
Apparently you have a shitty funnies section, all of those have been in mine.

Scott Adams only backed Trump after being bullied by the liberal media. He'll go back to being a flip-flopping beta male after the election.

>>87572458
He's backed all 3 of the main candidates at different points, his endorsement is really more of a joke than anything

>>87572182
>But if he provides an argument to support his assertion

His argument was archaic and flimsy "having to hold doors open for women, having to pay for them, yet they get to decide sex, etc." rhetoric that is patently untrue.

>>87572586
Most of his arguments involve setting up elaborate rhetorical scenarios and then going "lol I troll u!" when people call him on it.

>>87571913
>>87571941

These aren't MRA at all. It's just lovable loser shit

It's like saying Charles Schultz was MRA because Lucy was a raving cunt

>>87572731
Charles Schultz would be MRA he has stated he has a love/hate relationship about women, also look at his early works, the guy really felt like women held all the power in his life

>>87572618
No, dumdum, I'm talking about the articles he wrote on his site before deleting them because he's a beta.

>>87572827
Sure you were.

>>87573372
What kind of weak argument is this? Anon even said what they were referring to here >>87571975

>>87571515
wat

>>87573607
And? >>87572618

File: clues for the clueless.jpg (251KB, 1000x1023px) Image search: [Google]

251KB, 1000x1023px

Apparently Adams addressed manspreading like twenty years before people even came up with that term and started making a fuss over it.