Does DC have a Stan Lee equivalent? Alive or dead.

>>87485498
Jack Kirby

Didio if we're talking about being alive.
Guy gets blamed for everything but it's clear that he actually loves comics

>>87485498
No. They treated a lot of their early creators like shit.

>>87485498
Huh, Anon? It's pretty common fact that Geoff Johns is the Stan Lee of DC Comics.

>>87486213
Johns is the Feige of Marvel Studios and failing at it

>>87485498
No there never really has been a "face" to DC maybe Geoff or didio but they're not on the same level of what Lee is to Marvel.

Then you have Bob Kane who took credit for anything batman related to boost his ego.

>>87485498
Stan Lee is just famous face for normies. DC has competent writers. It's much better I guess.

>>87486245
>and failing at it
Oh yeah because that movie he worked on came out already right?

Moron.

>>87485498

They used to have one, but Satan Lee took his soul like he has done to so many others.

>>87486364
Julius Schwartz would be more apt anyway.

>>87485498
Julie Schwartz

>>87485541
Kirby worked for marvel.

>>87486445
He also worked for DC and created the whole New Gods and Fourth World mythology.

>>87486336
>he doensn't know about GL

>>87485498
Bob Kane.

>>87486497
He was a consultant which means he contributed literally nothing.

>>87486468

I'm fairly positive that means that Jack Kirby is the Jack Kirby of DC, then

File: 029655292196d06f4aed4af57b8bbea1.jpg (14KB, 236x312px)

14KB, 236x312px

>>87485498
Bob Kane and Stan Lee tag-teamed the wives of Bill Finger and Jack Kirby.

The only reason Bob Kane isn't around anymore is because Stan Lee took him down Highlander-style in his quest for immortality.

>>87486497
Neither apparently do you. Johns had zero power over that. Or are you retarded enough to think that cloud Parallux was his idea?

>>87486186
not even close

>>87486424
this