wWhat went wrong?

>>87192850
Marvel is dead. Bury it. Consider this mercy.

>>87192850
>>Controversy, mockingbird, nazi cap and Gwen x black Spiderman.
What does this have to so with Marvel Studios?

>>87192877
It's another /tv/ thread. Just ignore it and sage.

File: 93f[1].jpg (19KB, 269x200px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 269x200px

same thread
same image
atleast other shitposters change the op

File: Marvel LGBT.jpg (7KB, 300x200px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 300x200px

>>87192877
Here you fucking pansy

>Doctor strange is mediocre, with a 6.7/10 rating, Thor 2 had the same

>Comics aren't selling, only 8 comics made it to the top 50 in September

>The shows are shit, the second seasons are worse. AOS is still not canon

>Controversy, mockingbird, nazi cap and Gwen x black Spiderman.

>Guardians of the galaxy 2 looks like shit


Just for you, you special snowflake tumblerina

>Doctor strange is mediocre, with a 6.7/10 rating, Thor 2 had the same
Marvel will never make a bad movie, face it,

>Comics aren't selling, only 8 comics made it to the top 50 in September
Proof?
>The shows are shit, the second seasons are worse. AOS is still not canon
I hate this meme
>Controversy, mockingbird, nazi cap and Gwen x black Spiderman.
Making stuff up?
>Movies are underperforming
Which ones?
>Guardians of the galaxy 2 looks like shit
True.

>>87192850
>Doctor strange is mediocre, with a 6.7/10 rating, Thor 2 had the same
hey now that's the future BEST MCU MOVIE YET you're talking about!

What's this, preemptive butthurt over Doctor Strange being succesful?

>>87193035
>the media could not be played.

What did they mean by this?

>>87192968
>>87193025
>0.25 $ have been added to your account

File: 14356789098767890_.png (138KB, 375x375px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 375x375px

>Movies underperforming

>>87193092
Civil War was predicted to make $1.3 billion


Tough luck

>>87192850
>wWhat went wrong?
The fact that you don't take this garbage back to /tv/ where it belongs.

>>87193035
Works for me, update your browser cheesus chirst

>>87193115
It made 1.1 billion. I think they'll live.

File: Oh shit, oh shit, oh shit! Jetzt ruhig bleiben_ Locker durch die Hose ___(1).jpg (79KB, 600x284px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 600x284px

Not sticking to source material. This is how Thor should be

File: C__Data_Users_DefApps_AppData_INTERNETEXPLORER_Temp_Saved Images_1476984979460.png (859KB, 1030x672px) Image search: [Google]

859KB, 1030x672px

>>87193136
Still underperforming. But sure, they'll live

>>87193146
> This is how Thor should be.
True dat. But not Aquaman

>>87192968
>Marvel will never make a bad movie
What is iron man 3 abd AOU?

>>87192994
A great movie and a good movie.

>>87192850
Precisely nothing!

>>87193220
lol

>>87193115
No, it wasn't.

>>87192850
>>Comics aren't selling, only 8 comics made it to the top 50 in September

September 2016 sales for Marvel including all trades, GNs and floppies were 2,506,125 units @ $14,547,620 ($5.80/unit mean average)

September 2015 sales for Marvel including all trades, GNs and floppies were 2,382,500 units @ $14,809,311 ($6.22/unit mean average)

September 2016 sales for DC including all trades, GNs and floppies were 3,541,175 units @ $16,924,349 ($4.78/unit mean average)

September 2015 sales for DC including all trades, GNs and floppies were 1,645,000 units @ $11,790,333 ($7.16/unit mean average)

If you don't understand what DC has done to itself you really shouldn't be shitposting unaccompanied on the internet.

>>87193871
>>87192850
tl;dr DC used to have a small market share and solid sales comparable to those of Marvel in cost terms - unit costs would go up and down each year but remained relatively stable overall.

Now they appear to have massively reduced unit costs and increased sales, meaning they put out more than twice as many books for a dollar gain of just 41%, assuming those sales are final. DC has just six titles in September 2016's top 20 that were non-returnable - two of them Flash, two of them Superman, two of them Batman. The Batman books in particular haven't increased sales at all since DC's market share increased - they're right where they were in 2011 after New 52, indicating the overall popularity of DC hasn't changed as Batman is, as it's been for the past 5 years, the top of the table.

The likelihood is that DC's experiment in returnable titles is going to come to a sudden end (indeed, September saw double-shipping Action Comics move from returnable to non-returnable, while the artificial price-drop on titles is also due to come to an end, which should at least save DC's bottom line if they can manage to keep Batman's sales up when it returns to $3.99). They've more than doubled printing costs but without any notable gain financially or any wider market penetration beyond the direct market.

In the top 50 for September, Marvel had 10 titles (20%), DC had 39 (78%), but of those the non-returnable issues were just 15 titles (30%), with 9 returnable titles (18%) in DC's lineup being #1s, which always receive higher speculative orders from retailers before dropping off in later months.

The average spec order for DC #1s in September 2016 was about 72k, indicating generally low confidence among retailers.

>>87193146
Back to /tv/ shill.
This faggot has been spamming KINO/NU MALE threads for months

Ignore and report.

>>87193881
>>87192850
The Batman yardstick is interesting too.

In 2016, September saw Batman selling 274,438 units (issues 6+7 combined) at $2.99, for $820,569.62 (of which DC likely saw 66%, as retailers don't pay cover price).

September 2015 saw Batman selling 114,409 on the regular title (at an eye-watering but irregular price of $4.99) for $570,900.91; but it also sold an Annual from the same line at the same anus-destroying price 80,684 times, for an additional $402,613.16, or combined 195,093 issues (71% of the 2016 unit sales) for $973,514.07 (119% of the 2016 dollar value).

In other words, even the market leader for the past five years is now doing 30% more work for 20% fewer dollars, because of DC's Rebirth policy. Sure, at Batman's regular cover price in recent years ($3.99) these losses are less pronounced than for September, but it's still hurting.

Batman itself has only just returned to direct-only from returnable status this September, having been returnable since the Rebirth #1 issue. Sales have been dropping off steadily since then, indicating that even this behemoth of sales cannot encourage growth in the market.

As a consumer this may or may not be something you enjoy, but for DC it's disastrous. They've wiped out the value of their most valuable title, and have nothing to show for it but a returnable books policy which is already coming to an end after just three months because it doesn't work.

Just reboot desu

Using rotten tomatoes as a way to decide if a movie you haven't yet seen is bad or not is peak /co/

>>87192850
Dr strange is at 8.7/10 with a 95% fresh. Fuck off OP.

>>87192922
I love how you removed "Movies are underperforming" because you knew what a piece of dogshit statement that was.

>>87194812
Anon, OP is a faggot, but so are you. It's currently sitting at 6.9.

>>87192968
>Marvel will never make a bad movie

kys

>>87194822
Faggot lmao

http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Why-Disney-Executives-Apparently-Think-Avengers-2-Was-Failure-80867.html

File: autism speaks.jpg (185KB, 1286x1254px) Image search: [Google]

185KB, 1286x1254px

>>87192922
Dial back to the autistic rage a bit. Anon asked a legit question: what does this comic stuff have to do with Marvel Studios?

>>87194868
Why are you posting about Avengers 2 and not Civil War which is, you know, their most recent movie?

>>87194888
He's also declaring Dr. Strange mediocre and a failure despite it not having been released yet and it getting good pre-release buzz:

https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/doctor_strange_2016/

>>87194888
http://www.forbes.com/sites/markhughes/2016/04/27/can-captain-america-civil-war-score-2-billion-and-become-marvels-biggest-blockbuster/#3863aa3844fa


>$2 BILLION

HAHAHAHA

>>87195034
Civil War is the 12th highest grossing movie of all time.

>>87195067
Let him be happy in his dreams.

>>87194946
>1 rotten
who is this foolish hero to stand up against the greatest marvel movie since Civil War

>>87195121
If you read the reviews the vast bulk of praise is for the visuals.

I'm guessing it's going to be a beautifully made film with lots of amazing visuals but mediocre plot and dialogue.

Which basically sums up the Dr. Strange comics to me, but I was never a fan.

>>87194946
>Anonymous
1 rotten?????
But this is supposed to be the "BEST MARVEL MOVIE, SO FAR™"

>>87192968
>>Comics aren't selling, only 8 comics made it to the top 50 in September
>Proof?
>Mouseketeers so retarded they can't even check a fucking website
Just go to fucking Comichron you inbred

>>87195067
that doesnt mean he isnt right, the MCU has been loosing more money each year since Avengers. Even with Spiderman CW failed to beat.

>>87195717
Spiderman, ironman, black panther and captain America failed to make more than ironman 3. Damn

>>87195717
I'm pretty sure most companies would sacrifice children if their movie could make over a billion each year.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that a huge new kind of film like Avengers would make a shit ton of money and then everything else sorta like it would have diminishing returns. But again, 1.1 billion and 12th highest grossing film of all time is nothing you look at with an ounce of negativity attached to it.

Come back to me after Infinity War hits, then we could actually have a debate.

Bump lol

>>87192850
way to go OP what's next you going to start an anti-Nintendo thread on /v/?

>>87195802
really dont need a debate, avengers 2 made less then avengers, gotg is the only other film to come close

>>87197170

Gotg vol 2 will make less than $600 million

>>87193423
see
>>87195034

>>87192850
Marvel has always been shit, skating by on good creators like Kirby, Starlin, Gerber etc. who managed to slip through the editorial cracks and actually create quality comics. Pro tip though, they all eventually got fucked over by Marvel and left to DC.

>>87197246
Yeah the romance tumor they are already hinting at will make the movie shit.

>>87199528
Nobody cares about comics.

>>87197246
Considering this is /co/, GOTG2 making 1 billion confirmed.

>marvel

File: Ax7KV.jpg (346KB, 937x1500px) Image search: [Google]

346KB, 937x1500px

>>87192968
>Marvel will never make a bad movie, face it,

>>87200823
Thor is a better example.

>>87192850
>GOTG 2 looks like shit

Based off of a fucking 1 minute teaser? Seriously?